SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

29,093 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core Ultra 5 135H + Intel Arc A370M: A Balanced Mobile Duo

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and performance percentiles, not from direct gameplay testing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and Intel Arc A370M form a laptop-class pairing that targets a specific niche: users who need strong CPU throughput for productivity without sacrificing a discrete GPU for moderate gaming and creative workloads. The combined percentile of 78 places this build above the majority of systems in the database, though the GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 64-bit bus will define its limitations more than raw compute power.

Gaming Performance

Without measured FPS rows, the gaming analysis must rely on the Arc A370M's benchmark scores and its position relative to known rivals. The GPU achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673, with a percentile ranking of 74 against all GPUs. This places it in the mid-range tier of mobile graphics, roughly equivalent to desktop discrete GPUs from several generations ago. The nearest rival data shows the Arc A370M within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800M in average benchmark score, which is notable given the RX 6800M is a high-end laptop GPU; the deltaPct of 1.0 indicates the Arc is actually slightly ahead in these synthetic tests, though real-world gaming may differ due to driver maturity and memory bandwidth constraints.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU will likely achieve playable frame rates in esports titles (Counter-Strike, Valorant, League of Legends) where the CPU's strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1700, PassMark single-thread score of 3521) will carry the experience. For AAA titles, the 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors; expect medium-to-high settings rather than ultra. The 64-bit memory bus is particularly restrictive for modern games that frequently exceed 4 GB VRAM usage at high textures. The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) suggest hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, but the pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s indicate that RT effects will need to be dialed down for smooth performance.

At 1440p, the Arc A370M will struggle with ultra settings across most genres; the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is adequate for 1080p gaming but insufficient for sustained high-resolution frame rates. The estimated FPS scaling from benchmark scores suggests roughly 30-40% lower performance at 1440p compared to 1080p, which would push many titles below the 60 FPS threshold. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking, combined with its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6), positions it as a capable 1080p card that should not be expected to drive high-refresh 1440p monitors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 18 threads and 4.60 GHz boost clock can feed frames well above 144 FPS in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU caps overall output. At 1080p, the Arc A370M can plausibly hit 144 FPS in lightweight esports titles, but AAA games will typically land between 40-70 FPS on medium settings. The GPU's 74th percentile and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 output define this ceiling; high-refresh monitors are best reserved for competitive titles.

Streaming: The Core Ultra 5 135H's 14 cores and 18 threads (with a PassMark multithread score of 22422) provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 96EU graphics can assist with Quick Sync-style encoding, while the discrete GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 suggests efficient API usage. Streamers targeting 1080p60 output will find this pairing workable, provided the game settings are tuned to leave CPU resources for encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11875.5 indicates solid rendering performance for 1080p and 1440p timelines. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM limits preview quality for high-bitrate or multi-layer projects, but the OpenCL score of 29676 suggests acceptable GPU-accelerated effects. Export times will be CPU-bound, and the 28 W TDP means sustained loads may cause thermal throttling in thin chassis.

3D rendering: Blender and similar applications will favor the CPU's 14 cores; the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7834 places it ahead of most mobile processors from a few years ago. The GPU's 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores can accelerate viewport rendering, but the 4 GB memory will cap scene complexity. For final-frame rendering, the CPU is the primary workhorse, with the GPU providing supplementary acceleration.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 251651 and integer math score of 73509 indicate strong performance for compilation, code analysis, and virtualization workloads. The 18 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large project indexing. This is a capable developer machine, especially for web, backend, or game development where compile times matter.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3521 ensures snappy response in productivity suites, while the GPU's 74th percentile is overkill for document work but useful for presentations with graphics. The 28 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a discrete-GPU laptop, though the Arc A370M may draw power even during light tasks if not properly managed.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process node. The core configuration mixes performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3, which supports the high PassMark multithread score of 22422 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11875.5.

The CPU's 81st percentile ranking against all CPUs places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (deltaPct -0.1) and Intel Core i5-13500HX (deltaPct -0.6) in average benchmark score, meaning the Ultra 5 135H delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1700 and PassMark single-thread score of 3521 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is critical for legacy applications and lightly-threaded games.

The 28 W TDP is notable; this is a low-power chip designed for thin-and-light laptops, yet it outperforms many 45 W processors from previous generations. The dual-channel memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the 18 threads, though the lack of ECC memory support (eccMemory: false) may deter workstation users. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 96EU graphics provide a fallback for basic display output and can handle light gaming when the discrete GPU is disabled to save power. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 8 lanes (CPU only) is forward-looking, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so the extra bandwidth is reserved for future NVMe storage.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets laptop buyers who need a versatile machine for mixed workloads: students running engineering software, developers compiling code, and casual gamers who play at 1080p. The CPU's 81st percentile ensures that no productivity task will feel sluggish, while the GPU's 74th percentile handles moderate gaming and GPU-accelerated creation. Content creators working with 1080p video or small 3D scenes will find the combination adequate, but professionals requiring 4K timelines or large simulations should look at higher-tier GPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1.0) and AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6); the former is a high-end mobile part, but the Arc A370M's lower memory bandwidth (112.0 GB/s vs. the RX 470's 192 GB/s) will manifest in texture-heavy games. Small business users running office suites, accounting software, or light database work will be served well, as the CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 15026 indicates adequate security processing. The laptop class (buildClass: "laptop") means this is a complete system purchase, not a DIY build; the target buyer is someone who values portability without sacrificing CPU performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform; there is no upgrade path for the processor itself. The GPU is similarly integrated, so buyers are committing to this configuration for the laptop's lifespan. The platform supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and the memory support is listed as "Depends on motherboard," suggesting that laptop manufacturers may offer various capacities and speeds.

The PCIe Gen 5 support (8 lanes, CPU only) is a future-proofing feature for NVMe storage, but the GPU operates at PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the Arc A370M's bandwidth needs (112.0 GB/s). The CPU's 28 W TDP and GPU's 35 W TDP combine for a 63 W total thermal envelope, which is modest for a laptop with discrete graphics. The suggestedPsu field is null, indicating that no specific PSU requirement exists; laptop power adapters will be sized by the manufacturer based on the full system draw. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more DDR5 memory (if the laptop has accessible SODIMM slots) or a larger NVMe SSD, since the GPU and CPU are permanently soldered.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 8 ray tracing cores and no dedicated tensor cores (the tensorCores field is null). The base clock is 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, yielding a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s.

Memory is the key limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus provides 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is less than half of what many competing GPUs offer. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) are respectable for the class, but the memory subsystem will throttle performance in bandwidth-sensitive workloads like high-resolution textures or compute tasks with large datasets. The 74th percentile ranking and Geekbench scores (OpenCL 29676, Vulkan 28673) confirm that the GPU is competitive with mid-range desktop cards from earlier generations, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for modern game assets.

Ray tracing hardware is present (8 RT cores), and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) enables hardware-accelerated RT and variable rate shading. However, the low pixel rate relative to RT-heavy titles suggests that ray tracing will only be viable at 1080p with low settings and DLSS-like upscaling (though Intel's XeSS is not explicitly listed in the API support). The GPU's production status is end-of-life, and its release date of 2022-03-29 means it is now a mature product with stable drivers, but also one that will not receive major performance optimizations going forward.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 29093, with a percentile of 81. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (avgScore 29123, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (avgScore 28940, deltaPct 0.5), and Intel Core i5-13500HX (avgScore 29270, deltaPct -0.6). This means the Ultra 5 135H is statistically tied with the desktop Ryzen 7 5800X, a remarkable result for a 28 W mobile chip. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11875.5 and PassMark multithread score of 22422 place it in the upper quartile of all CPUs, with the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1718 and R20 multicore score of 7834 confirming scaling across workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 29175, with a percentile of 74. It is essentially tied with the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1) and AMD FirePro W8000 (deltaPct -0.1), and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6) and AMD Radeon RX 6800M (deltaPct 1.0). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 are within 3.5% of each other, indicating balanced performance across compute and graphics APIs. The combined percentile of 78 for the CPU+GPU pairing reflects a system that is above average overall, but with the CPU clearly being the stronger component relative to its peers.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has 14 cores and 18 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A370M has 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, offering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth; exact memory support depends on the motherboard.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X?

A: The Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, while the Ryzen 7 5800X scores 29123, a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the AMD chip is marginally faster by 0.1%.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Arc A370M has a production status of "End-of-life" and was released on 2022-03-29.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 78, indicating it outperforms 78% of all systems in the database.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-heavy balance. The CPU's 81st percentile versus the GPU's 74th percentile shows that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck for AAA titles, particularly at resolutions above 1080p, due to the 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth. The estimated FPS scaling from benchmark scores suggests that the CPU can maintain high frame rates in esports, but the GPU will limit ultra settings to 1080p with occasional dips below 60 FPS.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the workhorse; the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 output is sufficient for acceleration but not for compute-heavy tasks like large-scale rendering or machine learning inference. The PassMark data compression score of 251651 and integer math score of 73509 indicate the CPU handles workloads that are memory-latency sensitive, while the GPU's Vulkan score of 28673 suggests it excels in draw-call-heavy scenarios. The bottleneck shifts depending on the task: gaming is GPU-limited, multi-threaded rendering is CPU-limited, and mixed workloads may see both components at their respective limits without a clear constraint.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (Meteor Lake architecture, 28 W TDP) with the Intel Arc A370M (Xe-HPG architecture, 35 W TDP). The combined percentile of 78 places this system in the upper quarter of all configurations in the database, with the CPU ranking at the 81st percentile and the GPU at the 74th percentile. The CPU's performance rivals the desktop AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, while the GPU competes with the AMD Radeon RX 470 and RX 6800M, making this a well-balanced mid-range laptop for 1080p gaming and productivity. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are the primary constraints, while the CPU's 18 threads and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a strong foundation for multi-tasking. This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU throughput for work and accept moderate GPU performance for gaming, rather than those seeking a gaming-first laptop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 135H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 135H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds