SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

15,910 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A370M is a mobile graphics processor built on the Xe-HPG architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. This is an entry-level Alchemist-generation part, classified as Arc 3 Mobile, and it is now marked as end-of-life in production status. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It carries 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s. That memory configuration is modest by modern standards, and bandwidth will be a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenes and higher resolutions.

The rendering hardware includes 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS for FP32 and 8.397 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Ray tracing is supported through 8 dedicated RT cores, though the absolute count is low; tensor cores are not specified in the data. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which means it is feature-complete for modern game APIs, including hardware ray tracing and mesh shaders. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, reflecting its laptop integration.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and a Vulkan score of 28673. The average benchmark score is 29175, placing this GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals by average score are the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1.0% behind). Notably, the RX 6800M is a high-end part, yet the A370M scores within 1% of it in these synthetic benchmarks — though that does not translate to real-world parity, as memory bandwidth and driver optimization differ substantially. For rendering workloads, the OpenCL score suggests the GPU can handle compute tasks at a level comparable to those desktop and mobile rivals, but the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth will cap its ability to work with large textures or complex scenes. The FP16 throughput being exactly double FP32 indicates the hardware is optimized for shader-heavy workloads that can use half precision, but without tensor cores, AI-accelerated rendering features are absent.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with competitive settings, the A370M's 74th percentile GPU standing and 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput should deliver playable frame rates in esports titles. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will struggle with texture-heavy AAA games at high presets, so high-refresh (144 Hz or above) gaming is realistic only in lighter titles or with reduced settings. The 1% delta to the RX 6800M in average score is misleading for gaming, as that rival has far more memory bandwidth.

Streaming: The Arc A370M supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, and its 8 RT cores can offload some encoding-adjacent tasks. The CPU pairing with the Core Ultra 5 134U (14 threads) provides enough multi-threaded headroom for software encoding, as shown by a PassMark multithread score of 12464. The 70th percentile CPU standing means simultaneous gaming and streaming will be feasible at moderate settings, though the GPU's modest VRAM may limit game quality while encoding.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5572 and single-core score of 1576 indicate competent timeline scrubbing and effect application in 1080p editing. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29676 provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading. For 4K timelines, the 4 GB VRAM will be a bottleneck, and the 112 GB/s bandwidth will slow preview rendering of high-bitrate footage.

3D rendering: In CPU-bound renders, the Core Ultra 5 134U's 12 cores / 14 threads deliver a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 4725, which is workable for small scenes. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS supports real-time viewport rendering, and its Vulkan score of 28673 indicates good compute performance for GPU-accelerated renderers. However, the 4 GB memory limit makes large scene rendering impractical.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 124771 and integer math score of 51306 reflect solid compilation and data processing capabilities. The 12 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core help with code locality. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, though its DirectX 12 Ultimate support is useful for graphics programmers testing shader code.

Student and office work: The 9 W TDP CPU and 35 W GPU are energy-efficient, suitable for all-day battery use. The CPU's single-thread PassMark score of 3063 handles office applications responsively. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is far more than needed for document rendering or spreadsheet acceleration, making this pairing overqualified for basic productivity but underqualified for demanding creative work.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 72nd combined percentile, meaning it outperforms roughly 72% of all recorded system configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 40?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U has an average benchmark score of 15910, while the AMD Ryzen 5 40 scores 15882, a delta of 0.2% in favor of the Intel part. This is a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware ray tracing features.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and core count?

A: The Core Ultra 5 134U has 12 cores and 14 threads, with a base clock of 700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 470?

A: The Arc A370M's average benchmark score is 29175, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 470's 28996. The two are effectively equivalent in synthetic scores.

Q: What is the CPU's thermal design power?

A: The Core Ultra 5 134U has a TDP of 9 watts, making it a very low-power mobile processor.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms: the CPU is at the 70th percentile among all CPUs, the GPU at the 74th percentile among all GPUs, and the combined system at the 72nd percentile. This near-parity means neither component dramatically outstrips the other in general performance. However, workload-specific bottlenecks emerge from the specifications. The GPU's 112 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will throttle performance in memory-intensive tasks, such as high-resolution gaming or large dataset compute, regardless of the CPU's readiness. The CPU's 9 W TDP limits sustained multi-core performance, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 5572 — strong for a 9 W part, but far below what desktop CPUs achieve. In gaming, the GPU will typically be the limiting factor at 1080p ultra settings, because the CPU's 14 threads and 4.40 GHz boost can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them in most titles. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios like data compression (PassMark score of 124771) or prime number finding (score of 56), the CPU becomes the bottleneck while the GPU idles. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS suggests the GPU can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings, but the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1576) is sufficient to avoid holding back the GPU in most games. For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's multi-threaded score of 12464 in PassMark multithread indicates enough headroom to encode video while the GPU renders frames, though the GPU's modest VRAM may force lower texture settings to keep total memory usage within 4 GB.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, based on the Meteor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a TDP of just 9 watts. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5, dependent on the motherboard, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is not supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU, and it includes integrated graphics in the form of Arc Xe-LPG with 64 execution units. The socket is Intel BGA 2551, indicating a soldered mobile part, and it was released on December 13, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $332. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 894 and single-core score of 221; Cinebench R20 multicore of 4725 and single-core of 666; and Cinebench R23 multicore of 5572 and single-core of 1576. PassMark scores include data compression at 124771, data encryption at 8077, extended instructions at 7002, find prime numbers at 56, floating point math at 32425, integer math at 51306, multithread at 12464, physics at 883, random string sorting at 13702, and single-thread at 3063. The average benchmark score is 15910, placing the CPU at the 70th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 5 40 (15882, 0.2% behind), the AMD EPYC 9334 (15940, 0.2% ahead), the AMD EPYC 75F3 (15859, 0.3% behind), and the AMD EPYC 9354P (15826, 0.5% behind). The fact that this 9 W mobile chip trades blows with server-class EPYC processors in average score is remarkable, though those EPYC parts have far higher core counts and memory bandwidth, so the average score masks workload-specific differences. For real workloads, the 14 threads provide solid multi-tasking, while the 4.40 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded performance. The low TDP means sustained all-core loads will throttle to lower clocks, which is reflected in the Cinebench multicore scores being modest relative to the thread count. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics add a secondary GPU option for low-power tasks, though the discrete A370M will handle demanding graphics.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need a balanced mobile system for mainstream productivity and light-to-moderate creative work. Gamers playing at 1080p with medium settings will find the A370M's 74th percentile GPU performance adequate for esports and older AAA titles, but the 4 GB VRAM excludes high-texture 1440p gaming. Content creators working with 1080p video editing will benefit from the CPU's 14 threads (Cinebench R23 multicore 5572) and the GPU's OpenCL acceleration (29676), though 4K work is constrained by VRAM. Software developers compiling code will appreciate the integer math score of 51306 and data compression score of 124771, which indicate strong throughput for build tasks. Students and office workers get a low-power (9 W CPU, 35 W GPU) system that handles document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work with ease, as shown by the single-thread PassMark score of 3063. Small business workstations can leverage the 70th percentile CPU performance for database queries and financial modeling, while the GPU provides hardware acceleration for presentations and data visualization. The 72nd combined percentile indicates this is a mid-to-upper tier laptop, suitable for users who want a single machine for work and play without extreme performance demands.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U achieves an average benchmark score of 15910, placing it at the 70th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 40 with an average score of 15882, a delta of 0.2% — essentially identical performance. The AMD EPYC 9334 and EPYC 75F3 score 15940 and 15859, respectively, with deltas of -0.2% and 0.3%, meaning the Intel part sits comfortably in a cluster of comparable processors. The CPU's best results are in data compression (124771) and integer math (51306), while its weakest is prime number finding (56), reflecting the low TDP's impact on sustained compute. The Intel Arc A370M GPU has an average benchmark score of 29175, at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% ahead), followed by the AMD FirePro W8000 at 29211 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M at 28874 (1.0% behind). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 show the GPU performs consistently across compute APIs. Combined, the system sits at the 72nd percentile, which is slightly higher than either component's individual percentile, suggesting the pairing works well together without one part dragging the other down. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from these benchmark scores.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A370M discrete GPU. The CPU is a Meteor Lake part from the Core Ultra Series 1, released in December 2023, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 3 Mobile part released in March 2022 and now end-of-life. The combined percentile of 72 indicates this system outperforms 72% of recorded configurations, positioning it as a solid mid-range mobile platform. The CPU's 70th percentile and GPU's 74th percentile are closely aligned, meaning neither component is a glaring weak point. The CPU's 12 cores and 14 threads, with a 4.40 GHz boost clock and 9 W TDP, make it an efficiency-focused processor that still delivers competitive multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 5572). The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory and 112 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors for high-end gaming, but its 1024 shading units and 8 RT cores provide modern feature support. This pairing is best described as a balanced mobile workstation for users who need CPU and GPU acceleration in a power-efficient package. The 9 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP together draw minimal power, making this suitable for thin-and-light laptops that prioritize battery life over raw performance.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is a soldered mobile interface, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard or entire laptop. Memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with capacity dependent on the motherboard — this is the primary upgradable component on the CPU side. The GPU is also soldered (slot width: IGP, meaning integrated into the system), so no GPU upgrades are possible. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the A370M's bandwidth needs. The GPU's TDP is 35 W, and no suggested PSU is listed, which is typical for a laptop where power delivery is fixed by the design. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the motherboard, as the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 support can improve integrated graphics performance and overall responsiveness. For storage, the PCIe Gen 4 lanes allow for fast NVMe SSDs, though the lane count is limited to 8 for the CPU. Given the soldered nature of both processors, the practical upgrade path is limited to memory and storage; users seeking more GPU performance would need a new laptop with a higher-tier Arc GPU or a rival discrete GPU. The GPU's end-of-life status means no future driver optimizations are likely for the A370M, though its DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure it remains compatible with current software.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U combined with the Intel Arc A370M, so all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical results. The GPU's average benchmark score of 29175 at the 74th percentile suggests it can handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in most titles. The 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is comparable to desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 470, which is 0.6% behind in average score, so users can expect similar frame rates to that card. At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will likely deliver 30-50 FPS in modern AAA games, dropping below 30 FPS in the most demanding titles due to the 4 GB VRAM and 112 GB/s bandwidth. At 1080p medium settings, frame rates should rise to 50-80 FPS in most games, with esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends potentially reaching 100+ FPS. At 1440p, the GPU is not recommended, as the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity will severely limit performance, likely resulting in 20-40 FPS even at low settings. The CPU's single-core score of 1576 in Cinebench R23 and 3063 in PassMark single-thread indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, as even at 1080p medium, the GPU is the limiting factor. The 8 RT cores enable ray tracing at reduced resolutions, but the low shading unit count means ray-traced effects will significantly cut frame rates. The Vulkan score of 28673 suggests good performance in Vulkan-based titles, which can offer better multi-threaded scaling than DirectX 11. Overall, this pairing is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the expectation that frame rates will vary widely depending on the game's optimization and memory usage.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + Intel Arc A370M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds