SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

82%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

15,910 Benchmark Score

Top 18% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Core Ultra 5 134U and Arc A350M combination presents an interesting balance sheet, with both components sitting at the 70th percentile within their respective categories. The CPU's average benchmark score of 15910 places it in a tight cluster with several AMD EPYC server processors, showing a deltaPct of just 0.2% against the AMD Ryzen 5 40 and 0.5% against the AMD EPYC 9354P. This indicates that the processor's multi-threaded throughput is competitive with enterprise-class silicon, despite its mobile-oriented 9W TDP envelope.

The GPU, scoring an average of 24647 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, finds itself within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT and 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. This positioning suggests that the graphics solution is not the limiting factor for most productivity workloads, but the 25W TDP and 4GB VRAM capacity create constraints that the CPU does not face. The data indicates that the CPU can sustain its performance profile across a wider range of tasks than the GPU, particularly when memory capacity demands exceed the 4GB frame buffer.

The bottleneck analysis reveals a workload-dependent picture. For single-threaded tasks, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1576 puts it in the 70th percentile, which aligns with its overall positioning. However, the GPU's pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s suggest that frame generation is constrained more by fill-rate limits than by shader throughput. The 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p gaming but will struggle at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the primary bottleneck.

The Passmark data compression score of 124771 and encryption score of 8077 indicate that the CPU handles data-intensive workloads efficiently, while the floating-point math score of 32425 shows solid numeric processing capability. The integer math score of 51306 further reinforces that the CPU is well-balanced for mixed workloads. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, delivered over a 64-bit bus, represents the most significant system-level constraint — this narrow interface will throttle performance in bandwidth-sensitive applications more than the raw compute capabilities would suggest.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5572 and a single-core score of 1576, positioning it at the 70th percentile among all CPUs. The multi-core to single-core ratio of approximately 3.5:1 reflects the 12-core, 14-thread configuration, which uses a hybrid architecture to balance efficiency and performance. The Cinebench R20 results show 4725 multi-core and 666 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 894 and 221 respectively — these generational improvements across test versions indicate consistent scaling.

In Passmark testing, the CPU achieves a multithread score of 12464 and a single-thread score of 3063. The physics score of 883 appears low relative to the overall average, which may indicate that the test does not fully utilize the hybrid core arrangement. The data encryption score of 8077 and extended instructions score of 7002 demonstrate capable cryptographic and SIMD performance, while the random string sorting score of 13702 shows strong memory subsystem efficiency for its class.

The GPU's Geekbench scores of 24546 in OpenCL and 24747 in Vulkan yield an average of 24647, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs. This puts it within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 590 and 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile, suggesting comparable raw compute performance to those desktop and professional mobile solutions. The deltaPct of 0.8% against the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is notable, as that GPU typically operates at significantly higher power levels.

The combined percentile of 70 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that both components sit at the same performance tier, creating a harmonious system with no single component dramatically outperforming the other. The CPU's average benchmark score of 15910 and the GPU's average of 24647 both represent the 70th percentile in their respective markets, meaning users can expect consistent performance across CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads without one component creating a disproportionate bottleneck.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core Ultra 5 134U uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — this means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The Meteor Lake architecture is built on Intel's 7nm process and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with the specific memory configuration dependent on the motherboard implementation. The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes, which is sufficient for the Arc A350M's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, allowing full bandwidth utilization without lane sharing.

The CPU's 9W TDP and the GPU's 25W TDP combine for a modest total power draw, which suggests that the system's thermal and power delivery infrastructure has substantial headroom. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating that the power supply requirements are dictated by the laptop chassis design rather than a discrete PSU recommendation. This low power envelope makes the platform suitable for thin-and-light designs where thermal constraints are paramount.

Memory support is listed as DDR5, with the dual-channel bus providing adequate bandwidth for the 12-core CPU. The 4GB GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU, with its 64-bit bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth, is the most likely candidate for future bottlenecking as workloads become more memory-intensive. The CPU's 12MB shared L3 cache and 2MB per-core L2 cache help mitigate some memory latency concerns, but the GPU's narrow memory interface remains a structural limitation.

For users considering an upgrade path, the platform's soldered nature means that any future improvement requires a complete system replacement rather than component swapping. The PCIe Gen 4 support and dual-channel DDR5 capability represent current-generation standards, but the 4GB GPU frame buffer will likely become the first limitation for modern games and creative applications. The CPU's 70th percentile performance should remain serviceable for several years, but the GPU's end-of-life production status suggests that driver optimization and performance improvements are unlikely to continue.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's Geekbench scores and its positioning relative to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, the Arc A350M is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with medium to high settings in most titles. The 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest that the GPU can handle modern game engines at 1080p, though the 4GB VRAM capacity will require texture quality reductions in newer titles with large asset libraries. The 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy post-processing effects.

The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1576 and Passmark single-thread score of 3063, is adequate for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 12-core, 14-thread configuration provides sufficient multi-threaded headroom for background tasks and game streaming simultaneously. The Passmark physics score of 883 may indicate some limitations in physics-heavy game scenarios, but the overall CPU performance profile suggests it will not be the primary bottleneck at 1080p.

At 1440p, the GPU's fill-rate limitations become more pronounced. The 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate and 105.6 GTexel/s texture rate are insufficient for maintaining high frame rates at this resolution with demanding graphical settings. Users should expect to reduce resolution scaling or lower quality presets to achieve playable performance. The 4GB VRAM capacity will also cause issues at 1440p in games that exceed this frame buffer, leading to texture popping or reduced draw distances.

Ray tracing performance is supported through the 6 dedicated RT cores, but the modest compute resources suggest that ray-traced effects will carry a significant performance penalty. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing and variable rate shading, but users should anticipate frame rate drops when enabling these features. The Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide broad API compatibility for modern game engines.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The 70th percentile GPU positioning and the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicate that this system can achieve 60+ FPS in esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings. However, the 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 4GB VRAM capacity will limit performance in AAA titles, where users should expect frame rates in the 30-50 range at medium settings. The CPU's single-thread score of 1576 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient for high-refresh gaming in less demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 14 threads provide adequate headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming workloads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 12464 and data compression score of 124771 indicate that the CPU can handle real-time encoding without severely impacting gaming performance. The 9W TDP is remarkably efficient for sustained streaming sessions, though the GPU's 4GB VRAM may limit game settings while streaming at higher resolutions.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5572 and Passmark floating-point math score of 32425 suggest capable performance for 1080p video editing timelines. The GPU's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance provides hardware acceleration for effects that leverage half-precision math. However, the 4GB VRAM will limit working with high-resolution footage or complex multi-layer compositions.

3D Rendering: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 4725, is competitive for CPU-based rendering tasks. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 performance can accelerate GPU-based renderers, though the 4GB VRAM will constrain scene complexity and texture resolution. The 70th percentile CPU positioning suggests render times will be acceptable for hobbyist or small studio work.

Software Development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 51306 and extended instructions score of 7002 indicate strong performance for compilation tasks and code execution. The 14 threads provide good parallelism for build systems, while the 12MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data. The platform's DDR5 memory support ensures adequate bandwidth for development tools.

Student and Office Work: The 9W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP together create an efficient platform for battery-conscious productivity. The Passmark single-thread score of 3063 ensures responsive application loading and smooth multitasking. The CPU's 70th percentile ranking means it outperforms the majority of processors in typical office workloads, while the low power draw extends battery life for all-day usage.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: Both the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U and Intel Arc A350M sit at the 70th percentile within their respective categories, giving the pair a combined percentile of 70.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 15910 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 40, 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 75F3, and 0.5% higher than the AMD EPYC 9354P.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Arc A350M features 4GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth with memory clocks of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and is it upgradeable?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — the CPU is not upgradeable without replacing the entire motherboard.

Q: What is the total power draw of both components?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 9W and the GPU has a TDP of 25W, combining for a total of approximately 34W under typical load.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A350M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU remains in active production.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need balanced CPU and GPU performance without the power draw of high-end gaming systems. The 70th percentile CPU performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5572, makes this suitable for content creators who work with 1080p video and moderate 3D rendering workloads. The 12-core, 14-thread CPU configuration provides the multi-tasking headroom that developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will appreciate.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings represent a primary audience, given the GPU's positioning between the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630. The 4GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth support most esports titles and older AAA games at playable frame rates. Students and office workers will benefit from the 9W CPU TDP, which enables long battery life without sacrificing the Passmark single-thread score of 3063 that ensures responsive everyday use.

Small business workstations handling data processing tasks will find the Passmark data compression score of 124771 and encryption score of 8077 valuable for database operations and secure file handling. The CPU's 70th percentile ranking against server-class EPYC processors suggests that it can handle professional workloads despite its mobile form factor. The end-of-life GPU status may be a concern for long-term support, but the CPU's active production status ensures continued platform availability.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 134U mobile processor with the Intel Arc A350M discrete GPU. Both components are manufactured by Intel, creating a unified ecosystem with shared architecture philosophies — the CPU uses the Meteor Lake architecture on Intel's 7nm process, while the GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture on TSMC's 6nm process. The buildClass is explicitly laptop, indicating that this is a mobile solution designed for portable computing rather than desktop replacement.

The combined percentile of 70 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of performance, with both components delivering above-average results within their respective markets. The CPU's average benchmark score of 15910 and the GPU's average of 24647 both represent the 70th percentile, creating a balanced platform where neither component dramatically exceeds the other's capabilities. This equilibrium makes the system predictable — users can expect consistent performance across a wide range of applications without unexpected bottlenecks.

The CPU's 12 cores, 14 threads, and 4.40 GHz boost clock provide substantial processing power for a 9W TDP, while the GPU's 768 shading units and 6 RT cores offer capable graphics performance within a 25W envelope. The combined power draw of approximately 34W makes this an efficient pairing suitable for thin-and-light laptop designs. The platform supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 4, ensuring compatibility with current-generation components.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 134U is a 12-core, 14-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 1, based on the Meteor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 700 MHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, with a remarkably low 9W TDP that enables fanless or near-silent operation in thin chassis. The processor is built on Intel's 7nm process and uses the Intel BGA 2551 socket, confirming its soldered, non-upgradeable nature.

The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides the CPU with 70th percentile performance among all processors, as indicated by the average benchmark score of 15910. The nearest rival comparisons show it within 0.5% of several AMD EPYC server processors, which is remarkable given the massive TDP difference between mobile and server platforms.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 5572 and single-core score of 1576, while the Passmark multi-thread score of 12464 and single-thread score of 3063 reinforce the balanced performance profile. The data encryption score of 8077 and compression score of 124771 indicate strong capabilities for security and data management tasks. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with capacity dependent on motherboard implementation, and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.

The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 64EU graphics provide a fallback display output and basic acceleration when the discrete GPU is unavailable. The processor's release date of December 2023 and active production status ensure ongoing availability and support. The launch MSRP is $332.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile discrete GPU from the Alchemist generation, built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6nm process. The chip, designated DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1150 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 4GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is the GPU's primary limitation, as the narrow bus constrains data throughput in bandwidth-intensive workloads. The 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

The 6 dedicated RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, supported by DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 24647 across Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan tests, places it within 0.5% of the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which pairs well with the CPU's 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

The GPU has a TDP of 25W and is classified as an IGP-slot-width device, meaning it is designed for integrated placement within a laptop motherboard. Its production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022, indicating that this is a mature product at the end of its lifecycle. Display outputs are dependent on the portable device implementation.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 134U + Intel Arc A350M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 134U

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds