SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

27,507 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H pairs with Intel Arc A570M in a laptop-class build that ranks at the 84th percentile overall, placing it firmly in the upper mid-range tier of mobile platforms. The CPU, a Meteor Lake part, delivers an average benchmark score of 27,507, landing at the 79th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, based on the Xe-HPG Alchemist architecture, achieves an average score of 58,239, sitting at the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The data indicates a highly capable pairing where the GPU is the stronger component, a fact that shapes the analysis of its gaming and compute potential.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, which uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket. This is a mobile, soldered form factor, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; the socket designation points to a permanent installation on the motherboard. The chip is built on Intel's 7 nm process node as part of the Meteor Lake architecture, and its production status is listed as Active, indicating it is a current product. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with the specific capacity dependent on the motherboard or system builder's configuration. Memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, a figure that supports the high data throughput demands of both the CPU's integrated Arc Xe-LPG 96EU graphics and the discrete Arc A570M GPU. ECC memory is not supported.

PCIe connectivity is provided via Gen 5, which offers substantial bandwidth headroom for the fastest available NVMe storage drives and future peripherals. However, the discrete GPU, the Intel Arc A570M, connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is an important distinction: while the CPU is ready for Gen 5, the primary expansion card uses the older, narrower standard, which is common for mobile GPUs to balance bandwidth and power consumption. The CPU's TDP is 28 W, and the GPU's TDP is 75 W, a combined thermal envelope that is typical for a performance-focused laptop. The suggested PSU field is null, which is expected for a laptop-class build where power is delivered by an external adapter rather than a user-selected power supply; the internal power delivery is designed by the laptop manufacturer to handle both components' demands.

Given the BGA socket and mobile class, a sensible next upgrade is not a CPU or GPU swap but rather a system-level purchase. The data suggests that the platform is at its performance limit for this configuration. Users seeking more performance would need to look at a new laptop with a higher-tier CPU and GPU combination, as the 125H and A570M are soldered and not interchangeable. The active production status of both components means that replacement parts for warranty or repair are likely available, but performance upgrades are not part of the roadmap for this specific build.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark results paint a clear picture of a strong multi-threaded performer with respectable single-core capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 12,804.5 points in multi-core and 1,647.5 points in single-core. The multi-core score is significantly higher than the single-core score, a 7.8x ratio that indicates excellent scaling across the 14 cores and 18 threads. This is corroborated by PassMark results: a multithread score of 21,100 and a single-thread score of 3,399. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27,507 places it at the 79th percentile, and its nearest rivals provide context. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 scores 27,535, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially performance-equivalent to that desktop-class CPU. Similarly, the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27,578, a delta of -0.3%, showing the 125H is within a hair of those parts. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27,382, a delta of 0.5%, meaning the Intel part is slightly ahead. This data indicates that the mobile 125H competes at the level of previous-generation desktop mid-range processors.

The GPU's benchmark data is limited to a single Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which places it at the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals show a tight grouping: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085 (+0.3%), the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528 (-0.5%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (-0.7%). The deltas are all under 1%, indicating that the Arc A570M's raw compute performance, as measured by OpenCL, is statistically indistinguishable from these desktop and workstation cards. This is a striking result for a mobile GPU with a 75 W TDP, as it suggests the A570M delivers compute throughput on par with much larger, higher-power desktop parts. The combined picture is a laptop that can handle heavy compute tasks, with the GPU offering a slight edge over the CPU in terms of percentile ranking relative to their respective pools.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the performance leader. The GPU's 88th percentile rank is notably higher than the CPU's 79th percentile rank. This means that in a typical workload, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, especially in tasks that are heavily reliant on single-threaded performance, where the 125H's 1,647.5 Cinebench R23 score is modest compared to its multi-thread might. In contrast, the GPU's high percentile rank suggests it has ample headroom for graphics-intensive tasks. For gaming, this points to a CPU-bound scenario at lower resolutions and graphical settings, where the CPU must feed frames to the GPU. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,399 is adequate, but the GPU's high standing suggests it could push more frames than the CPU can deliver in certain titles.

However, the balance shifts depending on the workload. For multi-threaded CPU tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 21,100 PassMark multithread score and 12,804.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score are strong, and the GPU can assist with acceleration in APIs like DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GPU's FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS provides significant compute power for rendering tasks, but the CPU is not a bottleneck in these scenarios; both components are working in concert. The bottleneck is more nuanced: the CPU is the limiting factor for high-refresh gaming at 1080p, while the GPU is the stronger component for raw throughput. The FPS scaling, which is not measured but estimated, would show that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance caps frame rates, while at 1440p and above, the GPU's workload increases and the system becomes more balanced. The data suggests that for best results, users should target higher resolutions where the GPU's strength is fully utilized, mitigating the CPU's relative weakness.

Who Should Build It

This Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and Intel Arc A570M pairing is targeted at mobile users who need a balance of CPU and GPU power for demanding applications. Gamers at 1440p or those willing to play at high settings at 1080p will find the GPU's 88th percentile rank sufficient for modern titles, though they must accept that the CPU may limit maximum frame rates in esports or low-detail scenarios. Content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded scores and the GPU's compute capabilities, which are on par with desktop cards like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and 18 threads, as well as the high PassMark integer math score of 69,986. Students and small business users needing a workstation-grade laptop for data analysis, scientific computing, or heavy multitasking will find the 28 W CPU and 75 W GPU to be a power-efficient yet capable combination, with the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 236,209 indicating fast file handling and archiving.

The build class is explicitly laptop, so this is not a DIY desktop build. It is a complete system purchase. The target user is someone who wants a single device for both work and play, without the need for an external GPU dock. The 84th combined percentile suggests that this is a top-tier mobile platform, suitable for users who would otherwise consider a desktop with a mid-range CPU and a high-end GPU from a previous generation. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and its 224.0 GB/s bandwidth supports texture-heavy workloads. This is not a budget-oriented platform; it is a performance-oriented one, as indicated by the CPU's launch MSRP of $375, which is a high price point for a mobile processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 88th percentile rank suggests it can drive high frame rates, but the CPU's single-thread score of 1,647.5 in Cinebench R23 will likely be the limiting factor at 1080p. Estimated FPS figures would show that at 1080p, the system may struggle to maintain 144 Hz in CPU-bound titles, but at 1440p, the GPU's workload increases, and the system can deliver smoother performance, with the frame rate being more dependent on the GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS of compute power.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 21,100 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, which can offload the task entirely, but the CPU's strength is a key asset for software encoding scenarios. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports the data transfer needs of simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The combination of a strong multi-threaded CPU and a compute-capable GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,804.5 speeds up timeline rendering and effect application, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 58,239 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and export. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing timelines with multiple layers and effects.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers, the 125H's 18 threads are a significant asset, with the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,161 showing strong performance. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc A570M's FP32 performance of 5.325 TFLOPS is competitive with desktop cards, and its 16 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, albeit with the understanding that its performance is not on the level of top-tier desktop GPUs. The GPU's 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 performance is a boon for workloads that support mixed precision.

Software development: Compilation is a multi-threaded task, and the CPU's 14 cores and 18 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 69,986 and extended instructions score of 13,749 show strong processing capability for code compilation and execution. The 18 MB of shared L3 cache helps reduce latency in large codebases.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks, this platform is overkill. The CPU's single-thread performance of 3,399 in PassMark is more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 96EU graphics provide a backup for the discrete GPU, potentially saving power when the A570M is not needed. The laptop's power efficiency, with a 28 W CPU and 75 W GPU, contributes to longer battery life for on-the-go use.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such. The GPU's 88th percentile rank and its proximity to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in OpenCL benchmarks suggest that it is capable of high-end gaming performance. However, gaming performance is not solely determined by raw compute; driver optimization and thermal constraints play a significant role. The Arc A570M's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is a positive factor for modern games at 1080p and 1440p, and its 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution textures. The GPU's pixel rate of 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s indicate strong fill rates.

In terms of estimated performance, at 1080p ultra settings, the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck in many titles, particularly those that are not heavily multi-threaded. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,647.5 is adequate but not exceptional, so frame rates in CPU-heavy games may fall below what the GPU is capable of delivering. At 1440p ultra settings, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of performance, and the system should deliver playable frame rates in most AAA titles, with the GPU's performance being comparable to desktop cards like the RX 5600 OEM. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM may become a limiting factor for ultra textures, and the frame rate will drop, but it should still be playable in less demanding titles. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is one of a capable 1440p machine that can handle 1080p at high refresh rates, with the caveat that the CPU may hold back performance in specific scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a Meteor Lake architecture chip built on Intel's 7 nm process. It has 14 cores and 18 threads, indicating a hybrid design with a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core configuration. The base clock is 3.60 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 4.50 GHz, which is a healthy turbo range for a 28 W TDP. The L1 cache is 112 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 18 MB shared, a substantial cache hierarchy that helps feed the 18 threads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also includes integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics with 96 execution units, which provides a fallback display output and can handle light gaming or hardware acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle.

Benchmark results show a CPU that is a multi-threaded powerhouse relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,804.5 is impressive for a 28 W part, and its PassMark multithread score of 21,100 places it in the same league as desktop CPUs like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Intel Core i5-12600K. The single-core performance, while not class-leading, is solid, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1,647.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,399. The data compression score of 236,209 in PassMark is particularly high, indicating excellent performance in file archiving and data-heavy workloads. The encryption score of 14,251 and the floating-point math score of 51,670 further demonstrate its versatility. The CPU's 79th percentile rank among all CPUs shows its overall capability, making it a top-tier choice for mobile computing.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system, as indicated by the buildClass field, pairing the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a 14-core, 18-thread Meteor Lake part, and the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc part with 2,048 shading units, 16 ray tracing cores, and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The combined percentile rank is 84th, which places this system in the upper echelon of all laptop configurations. The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile suggest that the GPU is the stronger component, and this is a system designed for graphics-intensive tasks. The GPU's transistor count of 11,500 million on a 269 mm² die, built on TSMC's 6 nm process, highlights its complexity, while the CPU's 7 nm process from Intel is also advanced. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 for storage and peripherals, but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is standard for mobile.

The build's overall tier is high, backed by the 84th percentile ranking. It is not a flagship system, but it is firmly in the performance segment, capable of handling demanding games and professional workloads. The CPU's launch MSRP is $375, which is a premium price for a mobile processor, reflecting its high core count and performance. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed, but its performance parity with desktop cards like the RX 6950 XT in OpenCL suggests a high intrinsic value. This is a system for users who demand performance in a portable form factor, and the data supports its position as a strong contender in the mobile market.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile rank is 84th, placing this laptop build in the upper mid-range to high-end tier. The CPU ranks at the 79th percentile, and the GPU ranks at the 88th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,507. It is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 (27,535, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i5-12600K (27,578, -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (27,578, -0.3%). It is slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G (27,382, +0.5%).

Q: Is the Intel Arc A570M a high-performance GPU?

A: Yes, its average benchmark score of 58,239 places it at the 88th percentile. It is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657) in OpenCL performance.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The specific memory capacity depends on the motherboard or laptop design. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is explicitly a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, and the GPU is also a mobile part with a 75 W TDP.

Q: Are there measured frame rate results for this system?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in this platform?

A: No, the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a ball-grid array soldered directly to the motherboard. It is not a socketed processor and cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard or laptop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds