SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

27,507 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and Intel Arc A530M combination represents a mobile platform that lands in the 82nd percentile overall, placing it above the majority of laptop configurations. The CPU is the clear leader in this pairing, with its 79th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits slightly higher at the 85th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a pairing where the data suggests a balanced approach to mobile performance, but with distinct characteristics for compute-heavy versus graphics-heavy tasks. The benchmark results indicate a system capable of serious productivity work and solid 1080p gaming, though there are no measured FPS figures for this exact configuration; all performance framing in this analysis is estimated from the aggregate CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor built on Intel's Meteor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W, marking it as a power-efficient mobile part. The cache hierarchy consists of 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with bandwidth rated at 89.6 GB/s, and the platform supports PCIe Gen 5. The integrated graphics are Arc Xe-LPG with 96 execution units, providing a fallback for light graphics work when the discrete GPU is not engaged.

Benchmark scores for the CPU show strong multi-threaded performance relative to its power envelope. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 12804.5 points in multi-core and 1647.5 in single-core. The single-core score of 1647.5 is competitive for everyday responsiveness, while the multi-core result indicates the 14 cores are scaling well under sustained load. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 7161 multi-core and 1010 single-core, and in the older R15 test, it achieves 2021.5 multi-core and 241 single-core. These results suggest the CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads such as video encoding or 3D rendering, though the 28 W TDP will limit sustained performance compared to higher-power desktop parts.

PassMark results flesh out the picture further. The multi-thread score of 21100 and single-thread score of 3399 show a processor that is well-rounded. Integer math scores of 69986 and floating-point math of 51670 indicate strong number-crunching ability for scientific or financial applications. Data compression scores of 236209 and encryption scores of 14251 highlight capability in file archiving and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 13749 suggests good SIMD performance for vectorized code. Physics simulation scores of 1439 and prime number finding at 88 are more modest, but these are typically single-threaded or latency-sensitive tasks where the 3.60 GHz base clock helps.

The nearest rivals show this CPU sits in a tight competitive band. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 has an average score of 27535, which is 0.1% higher than the Ultra 5 125H's average of 27507. The Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X both score 27578, representing a 0.3% lead. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, which is 0.5% behind. This means the Ultra 5 125H is statistically tied with these desktop-class processors from a generation prior, making it a significant performer for a mobile chip. The data shows the 125H delivers desktop-equivalent multi-threaded performance in a 28 W package, which is notable for laptops where thermal headroom is scarce.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread configuration?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has 14 cores and 18 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores for a mix of high-speed and power-saving operation.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score of 27507 is within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800, Intel Core i5-12600K, and AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, showing near-identical aggregate performance to those desktop parts.

Q: What memory technology does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and memory capacity depends on the motherboard implementation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A530M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A530M includes 12 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, indicating full hardware ray tracing capability.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 82, placing this configuration in the top fifth of all laptop builds in the database.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this specific combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing; all gaming performance assessments are estimated from the individual component benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is a mobile graphics processor based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation for Arc 5 Mobile. It is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die. The chip is designated DG2-256. Clock speeds are set at a 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The compute layout includes 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. There are 12 RT cores for ray tracing, and the pixel rate is 62.40 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 3.994 TFLOPS for FP32 and 7.987 TFLOPS for FP16, the latter at a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 65 W and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark results show the A530M performing well in compute tasks. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 49735, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 43492. These numbers indicate strong general-purpose compute and graphics API performance. The average benchmark score of 46614 places it at the 85th percentile among all GPUs, which is a solid result for a mobile part. The nearest rivals confirm its positioning: the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46601 with a delta of 0%, meaning they are effectively identical in performance. The AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46702, a 0.2% lead for the AMD part. On the NVIDIA side, the RTX A2000 scores 46043, which is 1.2% behind, and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972, 1.4% behind. This places the A530M in the same performance tier as these established mobile and workstation GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest the GPU can handle 1080p gaming and moderate 3D rendering tasks. The presence of 12 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate means hardware-accelerated ray tracing is available, though the overall compute throughput will limit ray-traced effects to lower settings or resolutions. The FP16 performance of 7.987 TFLOPS indicates that workloads leveraging half-precision can see a boost, which is relevant for AI inference and certain compute tasks. The 65 W TDP is reasonable for a discrete mobile GPU, allowing for sustained clocks in a laptop chassis without excessive thermal strain.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in overall percentile, with the GPU at 85 and the CPU at 79. This near parity suggests neither component will consistently bottleneck the other in general workloads. However, the nature of the workloads determines which component is the limiting factor. In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or spreadsheet analysis, the Ultra 5 125H will be the primary driver, and its performance relative to rivals like the Ryzen 7 5800 (0.1% difference) indicates it will not hold back the system. In GPU-intensive tasks like gaming or 3D rendering, the Arc A530M's performance, which is on par with the RX 5600M, will dictate the frame rate.

The lack of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis must be inferred from the component scores. The CPU's single-thread score of 3399 in PassMark indicates strong per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming frame pacing. The GPU's 85th percentile suggests it can push high frame rates at 1080p in most titles. The balance in this pairing is favorable: the CPU's 18 threads can feed the GPU's 1536 shading units without starving them in most scenarios. For workloads that are heavily parallel, such as multi-threaded rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 12804.5 will allow it to keep pace with the GPU's compute output.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the scores, would show that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes more critical, and the Ultra 5 125H's 1647.5 Cinebench R23 single-core score is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks. At higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases, and the A530M's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factor. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth of the CPU is separate and will not affect GPU-bound scenarios. Overall, the data indicates a well-balanced mobile platform where neither component is a glaring weak point.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2021.5 multi-core and 241 single-core. In R20, it scores 7161 multi-core and 1010 single-core. In R23, it scores 12804.5 multi-core and 1647.5 single-core. These scores show a processor that scales well with thread count, with the multi-core scores roughly 8-13 times higher than single-core, reflecting the 14-core/18-thread configuration. PassMark results reinforce this: multi-thread score of 21100 and single-thread of 3399. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27507, placing it at the 79th percentile. This is a strong result for a mobile processor, putting it in the same league as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Intel Core i5-12600K.

The GPU's benchmark performance is anchored by its Geekbench scores. The OpenCL score of 49735 and Vulkan score of 43492 yield an average of 46614, which is the 85th percentile. This is a high ranking, placing the A530M above the majority of GPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, matches it exactly, while the RX 6550M is 0.2% faster and the RTX A2000 is 1.2% slower. These deltas are minimal, indicating the A530M is a well-positioned mid-range mobile GPU.

The combined picture shows a system with a combined percentile of 82. The CPU at 79 and GPU at 85 are both above average, with the GPU being the slightly stronger component. For real workloads, this means the system will handle graphics-intensive tasks slightly better than compute-heavy tasks, but both are capable. The pair rank by FPS is null, as there is no measured data. The estimated gaming performance, based on the GPU's 85th percentile, would place this laptop in a position to run modern titles at 1080p with high settings, while the CPU's 79th percentile ensures that frame rates will not be limited by processor overhead in most games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which is a ball-grid array package, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. This is a mobile platform, and as such, there is no traditional CPU upgrade path; the processor is not removable. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory, with the specific capacity depending on the motherboard. The memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5, which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and other peripherals.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A530M is also a mobile component, and its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8. There is no upgrade path for the GPU in a laptop. The TDP figures are 28 W for the CPU and 65 W for the GPU, and there is no suggested PSU listed, as this is a laptop configuration. The display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the output options vary by laptop model. The production status for both components is Active, indicating they are current products.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported amount, as the dual-channel DDR5 configuration benefits from higher capacity for multitasking and larger datasets. Adding a high-speed PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD would also be a logical step, as the platform supports this interface. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG 96EU graphics provide a backup for the discrete GPU, but they are not a replacement for the A530M's performance. Since both components are soldered, the laptop is the primary upgrade path; a user looking for more performance would need to consider a new system. The platform's strengths are its balance and efficiency, and an upgrade would be a lateral move within the same performance tier unless a significantly higher-tier mobile GPU and CPU are chosen.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 85th percentile and the CPU's 79th percentile suggest this system can drive high-refresh 1080p gaming. The Arc A530M's 3.994 TFLOPS and 8 GB of VRAM are sufficient for competitive titles at high frame rates, though the lack of measured FPS means this is an estimate. The CPU's single-thread score of 3399 in PassMark ensures the processor can keep up with the GPU's output.

Streaming: The CPU's 18 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12804.5 indicates the processor can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets without significant frame drops. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate also enables hardware encoding offload, freeing the CPU for other tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance, as shown by the PassMark multi-thread score of 21100, will handle timeline scrubbing and export rendering effectively. The GPU's compute performance, with an OpenCL score of 49735, can accelerate effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 4K editing with moderate effects.

3D rendering: The combination of the CPU's 12804.5 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 3.994 TFLOPS makes this a capable entry-level rendering system. CPU-based renderers will leverage the 18 threads, while GPU-accelerated renderers will use the A530M's shading units. The system will handle small to medium scenes, but complex scenes will require patience.

Software development: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1647.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy compilation for smaller projects and responsive IDE performance. Multi-threaded builds will benefit from the 18 threads. The data encryption score of 14251 in PassMark indicates good performance for security and hashing tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 28 W TDP makes it power-efficient for battery life. The single-thread performance is more than adequate for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet tasks. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics can handle external display output, preserving the discrete GPU for when it is needed. The 79th percentile CPU ranking means this is a high-performing office machine.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H processor and the Intel Arc A530M graphics card. The CPU is a 14-core, 18-thread Meteor Lake part with a 28 W TDP, and the GPU is a 65 W Alchemist-based mobile part with 8 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of 82 places this configuration in the upper tier of laptop systems in the database, indicating strong overall performance.

The CPU's 79th percentile and the GPU's 85th percentile both point to a system that is above average in its respective component classes. The CPU's average benchmark score of 27507 ties it with desktop processors like the Ryzen 7 5800, while the GPU's average score of 46614 matches the Radeon RX 5600M. This is a mid-range to upper-mid-range mobile platform that excels in balanced workloads. It is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, but it is a significant step above entry-level laptops, offering desktop-class compute in a portable form factor. The system is designed for users who need a single device for both productivity and gaming without compromising severely on either.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is aimed at users who need a versatile laptop for both work and play. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the GPU's 85th percentile performance sufficient for high settings in most titles, and the CPU's 79th percentile ensures smooth frame pacing. Content creators, including video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's 18 threads and the GPU's compute capabilities for rendering and effects. Software developers will appreciate the strong single-thread and multi-thread performance for compilation and testing.

Students and office workers will find the system more than capable for everyday tasks, with the 28 W CPU TDP contributing to longer battery life. Small business workstations can leverage the system's data encryption and compression scores for secure file handling and archiving. The integrated Arc Xe-LPG graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks, extending the system's flexibility. This is not a system for those seeking maximum performance at any cost; it is for users who want a capable, efficient, and balanced laptop that can handle a wide range of tasks without a dedicated desktop setup. The 82nd combined percentile confirms that this build will satisfy the majority of users looking for a single, do-it-all mobile machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core Ultra 5 125H

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds