SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and Intel Arc B770 form a desktop pairing that sits at a distinct performance crossroads. The CPU is a high-frequency 8-core/16-thread part based on the Raptor Lake architecture, while the GPU is a next-generation Battlemage discrete graphics card with 16 GB of VRAM. The combination achieves a 68th percentile ranking against all other CPU+GPU pairings in the database, indicating a solidly above-average system. However, a critical caveat applies to all performance discussions here: the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Therefore, all frame rate analysis is necessarily estimated from the individual component benchmark scores and architectural characteristics, not from direct gameplay data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The die measures 368 mm², which is substantial for a graphics processor. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). This configuration feeds a 256-bit memory bus paired with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, yielding a total bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. That memory capacity and bandwidth figure is a defining characteristic: 16 GB is ample for high-resolution textures and complex scenes, while 512 GB/s ensures the data can be fed to the compute units without starvation.

Compute resources are generous. The GPU packs 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s and the pixel rate reaches 307.2 GPixel/s. Raw FP32 throughput is rated at 19.66 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance doubling to 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1). For ray tracing, there are 32 dedicated RT cores. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

The GPU scores a 50th percentile position against all GPUs in the database, which places it exactly at the median — a perfectly average performer when viewed against the entire field. However, its average benchmark score is zero, and there are no nearest rivals listed, which means the percentile is based on its specification class rather than measured results. In practical rendering terms, the 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and the 512 GB/s bandwidth suggest a card capable of handling 1440p and entry-level 4K workloads, but without measured scores, it is difficult to assert a definitive tier. The RT core count of 32 indicates dedicated hardware for ray-traced effects, but the performance impact relative to rasterization is not quantified in the data.

The key takeaway is that the GPU is specification-rich, with modern architecture and high bandwidth, but its 50th percentile standing implies it does not break new ground. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature, preventing capacity-related stutters in texture-heavy scenarios. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooler design suggest it requires substantial power and chassis airflow, but the exact thermal behavior is not documented.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for modern game assets, but the 50th percentile GPU standing suggests 1080p high-refresh (e.g., 144 Hz) is achievable in most titles, while 1440p high-refresh will require settings adjustments. The CPU's strong single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 ensures the processor will not bottleneck frame generation in most scenarios, but the lack of measured FPS data prevents a definitive resolution-specific verdict.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and high boost clock of 5.60 GHz provide a capable foundation for software encoding, while the GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate includes relevant modern features. The Passmark multithread score of 30298 indicates the CPU can handle encoding alongside gaming, though dedicated hardware encoders on the GPU are not detailed in the pack.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 and Passmark integer math score of 112736 point to strong processing power for timeline operations and effect rendering. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering, while the 512 GB/s bandwidth handles high-resolution video data flow. The combination should handle 4K editing workflows comfortably, though export times will depend on software optimization.

3D rendering: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads at 5.60 GHz boost provide solid single-frame render performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10816. The GPU's 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 compute supports GPU-accelerated renderers, and the 16 GB VRAM is critical for complex scenes. The 68th combined percentile suggests a system capable of professional workloads, but not top-tier render farm performance.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark data compression score of 288777 and data encryption score of 18571 indicate fast build and compile times, particularly for single-threaded tasks where the 3635 R23 single-core score excels. The 16 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently, while the GPU's compute capability can accelerate certain development tasks like shader compilation or machine learning inference.

Student and office work: The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the overall desktop class build make this a power-conscious system for daily tasks. The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 4354 ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet responsiveness, while the GPU's 50th percentile standing is overkill for basic office tasks but leaves headroom for future demands. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. This creates a significant imbalance: the processor is far stronger relative to its peer group than the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's 86th percentile standing means it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them in most scenarios. The 5.60 GHz boost clock and high single-core performance (3635 in R23) are particularly relevant here — the CPU is unlikely to hold back the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's median performance will cap frame rates.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or office productivity, the GPU is largely irrelevant, and the CPU's 86th percentile position shines. The Passmark multithread score of 30298 and the 8-core/16-thread configuration provide strong parallel throughput. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the CPU's performance advantage becomes moot, and the GPU's 50th percentile becomes the ceiling. The 32 RT cores may help with ray-traced effects, but the lack of measured FPS data means the scaling is purely speculative.

The combined percentile of 68 sits between the CPU's 86 and the GPU's 50, reflecting a system where the weaker component drags the overall ranking down. For balanced performance, the data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive scenarios, while the CPU is the clear strength. Users pairing this CPU with a stronger GPU would likely see better overall system balance, but the current pairing still delivers a 68th percentile combined ranking. The lack of measured FPS data means there is no direct evidence of how these components scale together, only the implication from the individual percentiles.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Arc B770 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This means the GPU is backward-compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slot, though it will run at Gen 4 speeds as per its own specification. ECC memory is supported, which is a professional-grade feature that may appeal to workstation users.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 225 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the GPU alone is 550 W. The combined power draw is significant, but the CPU's low TDP means the system does not demand an extreme power supply. The GPU requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector, so the PSU must have those available. A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the GPU first, as the CPU's 86th percentile position leaves headroom for a stronger graphics card without a processor bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures future GPUs that use Gen 5 will not be bandwidth-limited.

The socket 1700 platform is at the end of its lifecycle for new CPU releases, meaning a CPU upgrade would likely require a motherboard change. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, but the platform's age suggests a full platform upgrade is the more sensible long-term move if CPU performance is the goal. For now, the 8-core/16-thread CPU with a 5.60 GHz boost is sufficient for most workloads, so the GPU is the logical first upgrade target. The 550 W suggested PSU provides headroom for a more power-hungry GPU, as long as the additional power connectors are present.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The TDP is 65 W, which is notably low for an i9-class part.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and data-intensive workloads, as it reduces memory latency. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output capability, though the discrete Arc B770 will handle graphics duties.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in single-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635 is exceptionally high, driven by the 5.60 GHz boost clock. The Passmark single-thread score of 4354 confirms this strength. For multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 is strong for an 8-core part, while the Passmark multithread score of 30298 indicates good parallel scaling. The Passmark data compression score of 288777 and integer math score of 112736 are particularly high, suggesting the CPU handles file archiving and general computation with ease. The floating-point math score of 81089 is lower relative to the integer score, which is typical for this architecture.

The 86th percentile against all CPUs places this processor well above average. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at -0.1%, the Intel Core 5 211E at 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 0.3%. These deltas are negligible — all within a fraction of a percent — meaning the i9-14901E is essentially tied with these competitors in average benchmark score. The 8-core/16-thread configuration is the limiting factor versus higher-core-count rivals, but the high clocks compensate.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU+GPU combination have measured FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual benchmark scores and architectural specifications.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a total bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. Memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance relative to rivals?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3635. Its Passmark single-thread score is 4354. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which has a deltaPct of 0, meaning the scores are effectively identical.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 68, meaning this pairing performs better than 68% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Intel Arc B770 is 550 W. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W and requires one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The CPU has a much lower TDP of 65 W.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. ECC memory is also supported, which is useful for professional workstations.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Intel Arc B770 has 32 dedicated RT cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, which include ray tracing features, but no measured ray tracing performance data is available.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU demonstrates strong benchmark results across multiple suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2595 in multicore and 366 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results are 10816 multicore and 1526 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 25753 multicore and 3635 single-core. Passmark results include multithread at 30298, single-thread at 4354, data compression at 288777, data encryption at 18571, extended instructions at 17249, find prime numbers at 189, floating-point math at 81089, integer math at 112736, physics at 3041, and random string sorting at 39138. The average benchmark score is 37911.

The CPU's percentile against all CPUs is 86. The nearest rivals and their deltas are: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 0%, AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at -0.1%, Intel Core 5 211E at 0.2%, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 at 0.3%. These differences are minimal, indicating the CPU performs on par with these competitors in aggregate.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, with an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile against all GPUs is 50, placing it at the median. There are no nearest rivals listed for the GPU. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pairing is 68.

The combined picture is one of a strong CPU paired with a median GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile is a clear strength, while the GPU's 50th percentile is average. The 68th combined percentile reflects the GPU dragging the overall score down. In CPU-bound tasks, this system will perform in the top 14% of all CPUs. In GPU-bound tasks, it will perform at the median. The lack of measured FPS data means the actual gaming experience is estimated from these scores, and the 68th percentile suggests a system that is above average overall but not exceptional in graphics-heavy workloads.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing consists of the Intel Core i9-14901E, a high-clock 8-core/16-thread desktop processor, and the Intel Arc B770, a discrete GPU with 16 GB of VRAM. The CPU is a genuine i9 part with a 65 W TDP, which is unusual for the i9 designation — most i9 parts have higher power envelopes. The GPU is a Battlemage-generation card with modern features like 32 RT cores and PCIe 4.0 support.

The overall tier of this system is moderate. The combined percentile of 68 places it in the upper third of all system pairings in the database. However, the discrepancy between the CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile means the system is stronger in CPU-bound tasks than GPU-bound ones. This is a balanced-but-GPU-limited system: the processor has headroom for a more powerful graphics card, but as configured, the GPU is the weak point.

The CPU and GPU are both from Intel, which may offer driver and feature integration benefits, though this is not explicitly documented. The desktop class means the system is intended for stationary use with a dedicated power supply, and the GPU's dual-slot cooler and 225 W TDP require adequate case space and airflow. The 16 GB of VRAM is a future-proofing asset, but the 50th percentile GPU performance suggests it is not a top-tier card for enthusiasts seeking maximum frame rates.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for software developers, data analysts, and power users who run multi-threaded applications like compilers, data compression tools (Passmark data compression score of 288777), and encryption workloads (Passmark data encryption score of 18571). The high single-core score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 benefits applications that rely on fast single-threaded execution, such as legacy software or spreadsheet macros.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the CPU's strength beneficial, as the 5.60 GHz boost clock ensures high frame pacing in CPU-bound titles. However, the GPU's 50th percentile means 1440p and 4K gaming will be limited to medium-to-high settings, not ultra. The 16 GB VRAM is a strong asset for texture-heavy mods or future game releases, but the raw compute of 19.66 TFLOPS is mid-range.

Content creators working with video editing will benefit from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 112736 and multithread score of 30298, which speed up encoding and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is useful for GPU-accelerated effects, but the 50th percentile performance means render times will be average. 3D artists using GPU renderers will find the 19.66 TFLOPS and 512 GB/s bandwidth adequate for medium-complexity scenes, but not for high-end production work.

Students and office workers will find this system overkill for typical tasks, but the 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption reasonable. The ECC memory support is a niche feature that appeals to workstation users who require data integrity, such as financial analysts or researchers. Small business workstations that run database queries or virtualization will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed. Overall, this is a system for users who need a strong CPU and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU, making it a sensible choice for professional workloads rather than high-end gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds