SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
86%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score
Top 14% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and Intel Arc A380 pairing represents a significant mismatch in compute capability, combining a high-end desktop processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card. The CPU is a Raptor Lake Refresh part on the LGA 1700 platform, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. This processor operates at a 65 W TDP, which is notably efficient for its performance class. The Arc A380, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and Alchemist generation, is a 6 GB GDDR6 graphics card with a 96-bit memory bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth. It is a dual-slot card with a 75 W TDP and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14901E delivers strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25753 points in multi-core and 3635 points in single-core tests. These figures place it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of desktop processors currently available. The multi-core score suggests that the 8 cores and 16 threads are well-utilized in heavily parallel workloads, while the single-core score reflects the high 5.60 GHz boost clock, which is critical for latency-sensitive applications. The processor also scores 10816 in Cinebench R20 multi-core and 1526 in single-core, further confirming its balanced capability across different rendering workloads.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload performance. The multithread score of 30298 and single-thread score of 4354 are both solid, with the latter indicating strong responsiveness in everyday tasks. Data compression performance is particularly robust, with a score of 288777, suggesting that the CPU handles archiving and file management tasks efficiently. Integer math performance is also high at 112736, which benefits applications like spreadsheets and database operations. Floating-point math scores 81089, useful for scientific and engineering simulations. The extended instructions score of 17249 indicates good support for modern SIMD operations, which can accelerate media encoding and processing. However, the find prime numbers score of 189 is relatively low, which is a specific test that may not reflect typical real-world workloads.

The cache hierarchy contributes to this performance, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in multi-threaded applications. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, allowing builders to choose between cost-effective older memory or higher-bandwidth newer modules. ECC memory support is included, which is an important feature for workstation and server applications where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for modern storage devices and expansion cards. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, which is useful for troubleshooting or systems without a discrete GPU, though the Arc A380 in this build makes that secondary.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance relationship between the Core i9-14901E and Arc A380 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card is at the 44th percentile among all GPUs. This means the GPU is the primary bottleneck in nearly all graphics-intensive workloads, as the CPU has significant headroom to feed frames faster than the Arc A380 can render them. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 37911, while the GPU averages 8558, a difference of roughly 4.4 times, indicating that the CPU is capable of processing far more data than the GPU can output. In gaming scenarios, this imbalance means that frame rates will be limited by the GPU’s rendering capacity, and the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor, even at lower resolutions where CPU demands are higher.

The nearest rivals for the CPU illustrate its position. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has an average score of 37904, essentially identical to the 14901E, while the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37943, just 0.1% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 are also within a fraction of a percent. This shows that the 14901E is competitively positioned against modern mid-range and high-end processors. For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M, which scores 8595 (0.4% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 (1.2% lower). These comparisons place the Arc A380 in the same performance tier as older mobile and entry-level desktop cards, confirming its limited throughput relative to the CPU.

For workload balance, the CPU will dominate in tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the GPU plays a minimal role. Conversely, in gaming or GPU-accelerated compute, the Arc A380 will cap performance. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 is low compared to the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 30298, indicating that any workload leveraging GPU compute will be severely constrained. This pairing is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks and only need basic graphics acceleration, but it is not balanced for high-end gaming or professional GPU workloads.

Usage Scenarios

  • High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or above. The Arc A380’s estimated frame rates are too low to drive a 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitor in modern titles, as the GPU’s 44th percentile performance will bottleneck even the strong CPU. The CPU can handle the frame generation, but the GPU cannot keep up.
  • Streaming: The CPU is well-suited for streaming due to its high multi-threaded performance, scoring 25753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. It can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without significant frame drops, provided the game is not GPU-bound. However, the Arc A380’s limited performance means that streaming demanding games will require lowering settings to maintain playable frame rates.
  • Video editing: Video editing benefits from the CPU’s strong multi-core scores, such as the 10816 in Cinebench R20 and the 288777 in data compression, which helps with timeline scrubbing and export times. The GPU’s low compute score of 2762 means that effects and transitions relying on GPU acceleration will be slow, but basic editing and rendering tasks will be CPU-driven and perform well.
  • 3D rendering: The 14901E excels in 3D rendering, with Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2595 and R23 multi-core of 25753 indicating fast CPU-based rendering. Applications like Blender’s CPU renderer will leverage all 16 threads effectively. The Arc A380’s 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance is minimal for GPU rendering, so users should rely on CPU rendering for best results.
  • Software development: Compilation tasks will benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 112736 and multithread score of 30298, which speed up code building and testing. The GPU is largely irrelevant for development, except for UI rendering, where the Arc A380 is sufficient. The 65 W TDP also means the system runs cool and quiet during long compile sessions.
  • Student and office work: For everyday productivity, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4354 ensures snappy response in office suites, web browsing, and coding. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display tasks if the discrete GPU is not needed, but the Arc A380 provides additional display outputs. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with multitasking between many applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Arc A380’s PassMark G3D score of 6252 and its 44th percentile ranking among GPUs indicate entry-level gaming performance. In modern AAA titles at 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU is expected to deliver frame rates in the low 30s to mid-40s, depending on the game’s optimization. For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are less demanding, the Arc A380 may achieve 60 FPS or slightly higher at 1080p with reduced settings, though the CPU’s high single-core performance will ensure minimal frame pacing issues.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 6 GB memory capacity and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will become a further limitation, with frame rates expected to drop below 30 FPS in most AAA titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 is low, suggesting that DirectX 12 titles will struggle. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 36736 is more promising for Vulkan-based games, but still indicates that the GPU is not designed for high-fidelity gaming. The DirectX 9 score of 73 in PassMark is notably higher than DirectX 11 (38) and DirectX 12 (35), implying that older games may run relatively better. For a practical gaming experience, users should target 720p or 1080p with low to medium settings, and even then, frame rates will be moderate. The CPU is never the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU is the limiting factor across all resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need substantial CPU processing power for productivity, with only occasional or light gaming needs. The target audience includes content creators who work with video editing or 3D rendering on the CPU, as the 14901E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 will significantly reduce render times. Software developers will benefit from the fast compilation speeds indicated by the integer math score, and the 65 W TDP makes it suitable for always-on workstations. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the CPU’s multi-threading for simulations, while the GPU handles basic visualization tasks.

Small business workstations that run database, accounting, or office software will find the CPU’s high single-thread performance and ECC memory support valuable for data integrity. The Arc A380 provides multi-monitor support with its 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs, which is useful for productivity. However, this is not a gaming PC for enthusiasts; users seeking high-refresh gaming should look for a more powerful GPU. The 86th percentile CPU ranking means that the processor will remain relevant for years, while the GPU is already end-of-life, so the build is forward-looking only on the CPU side.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports a range of 12th, 13th, and 14th generation processors. The CPU’s 65 W TDP leaves significant thermal and power headroom within the socket, allowing for a future upgrade to a higher-core-count processor if needed, though the 8-core design is already strong. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so users can choose their memory based on budget. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is future-proof for next-generation storage and GPUs, though the Arc A380 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The suggested PSU for the Arc A380 is 250 W, which is modest, but the entire system’s power draw will be low due to the 65 W CPU and 75 W GPU. This means that a typical 500 W or 550 W power supply is more than adequate, leaving headroom for additional drives or peripherals. The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU, as the Arc A380 is the clear bottleneck. Replacing it with a higher-tier graphics card would unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential, as the 14901E can easily drive mid-range and high-end GPUs without bottlenecking. The CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that any modern GPU will have sufficient bandwidth. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the dual-channel support is already standard.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-14901E achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904, showing a 0% difference, meaning the two are statistically tied. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is 0.1% higher at 37943, while the Intel Core 5 211E is 0.2% lower at 37829. This tight grouping indicates that the 14901E is competitively positioned against modern high-end processors. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 is particularly strong, and its single-core score of 3635 is among the best, which is reflected in the high single-thread PassMark score of 4354. These scores suggest that the CPU excels in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The Intel Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, scores 8595, which is 0.4% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 scores 8458 (1.2% lower). The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 6252 is its strongest result, but the DirectX 11 score of 38 and DirectX 12 score of 35 are very low, indicating poor modern API performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 is also low, confirming entry-level capabilities. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 38224 and Vulkan score of 36736 show that compute workloads are possible but limited. The combined percentile for this pairing is 65, which reflects the CPU’s high performance dragging up the average, but the GPU pulls it down from what the CPU alone could achieve.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the Intel Arc A380. The CPU is a high-end, 8-core, 16-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, and it delivers top-tier performance in the 86th percentile. The GPU is an entry-level, end-of-life card from Intel’s Arc 3 line, based on the Xe-HPG architecture, performing in the 44th percentile. The combined percentile of 65 indicates that the overall system is above average, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU. The build is best described as a workstation-oriented system with basic graphics capability, rather than a balanced gaming or content creation machine. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 75 W TDP make it an efficient system, and the 250 W suggested PSU means it can run on a modest power supply. This pairing is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks and need only basic display output or light GPU acceleration.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-14901E?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the Arc A380 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Arc A380 scores 8558 on average, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595) and 1.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458). It is also 1.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 880M (8436).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Q: What memory types does the Core i9-14901E support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it also supports ECC memory for improved data integrity.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W. The suggested power supply for the Arc A380 is 250 W, which is modest for the entire system.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock is 1937 MHz, effective at 15.5 Gbps.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X’s score of 37943. This difference is negligible, indicating near-identical performance.