SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc A350

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14901E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh generation. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². This CPU provides 8 physical cores and 16 threads, which is a conventional core count for a modern high-end desktop part. The base clock is set at 2.80 GHz, while the boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz, offering a substantial frequency range for both sustained and burst workloads. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache, which helps with data locality in multi-threaded applications.

Benchmark results show a strong all-around performer. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 25,753 in multi-core and 3,635 in single-core. The single-core figure is particularly notable, as it places the i9-14901E in the upper echelon of desktop processors for lightly threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software. The multi-core score indicates robust rendering and compilation capability, though the 8-core/16-thread configuration means it will not match higher-core-count parts in heavily parallel workloads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 10,816 multi-core and 1,526 single-core reinforce this pattern, showing consistent scaling across benchmark versions.

PassMark results add depth. The multi-thread score is 30,298, and the single-thread score is 4,354. The integer math score of 112,736 and floating-point math score of 81,089 suggest strong number-crunching ability, which translates well to scientific computing, financial modeling, and engineering simulations. Data compression scores 288,777, indicating fast file archiving and database operations. Data encryption at 18,571 points shows capable AES and cryptographic workloads, though not class-leading. Extended instructions score 17,249, and random string sorting at 39,138 points indicates good memory access patterns for sorting algorithms. The physics score of 3,041 and prime number finding at 189 are lower, reflecting the CPU's limits in certain specialized integer-heavy tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,911, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (+0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (+0.3% delta). This means the i9-14901E is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate benchmark performance, though individual workloads may favor one over the other. For real workloads, the data indicates that the i9-14901E is a versatile processor that handles single-threaded tasks with excellent responsiveness and multi-threaded tasks with solid, if not spectacular, throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the mainstream socket for 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Core processors. This socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology based on availability and performance needs. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a significant feature for workstation and small business environments where data integrity is critical. The integrated graphics are Intel UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output and hardware video decoding without a discrete GPU.

For PCIe, the CPU provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which means a single high-end graphics card or NVMe SSD can run at full PCIe 5.0 bandwidth. This is future-proof for storage and GPU connectivity. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is limited, but the high boost clock of 5.60 GHz already provides substantial performance out of the box. The production status is active, and the release date is June 30, 2024.

The CPU's TDP is 65 watts, which is remarkably low for an 8-core high-frequency part. This low TDP means that most standard air coolers and compact liquid coolers will handle it easily. The GPU, an Intel Arc A350, has a TDP of 25 watts and a suggested PSU of 200 watts. Combining the CPU and GPU, the total system power draw is modest, so a typical 300-400 watt power supply would provide ample headroom, though the suggested PSU figure for the GPU alone is 200 watts. This makes the platform suitable for small form factor builds or low-noise office PCs.

A sensible next upgrade path from this pairing would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU's 16 PCIe 5.0 lanes can feed a much more powerful graphics card, and the 65W TDP leaves thermal and power budget for a higher-tier GPU. However, the Intel Arc A350 is a low-power card, so users seeking higher gaming performance would benefit from a GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or a fast NVMe SSD would complement the CPU's capabilities. The platform itself is mature, so users are unlikely to upgrade the CPU without changing the motherboard and memory to a newer socket.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. There is no measuredFpsUltraByGame data, and the dataIsMeasured field is set to false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions in this section are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The CPU's strong single-core performance (4,354 in PassMark single-thread, 3,635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) suggests that it can feed a GPU effectively in most games, especially at lower resolutions where CPU-bound scenarios are more common. The 86th percentile CPU score indicates it is well above average for gaming workloads. However, the GPU is the limiting factor here. The Intel Arc A350 has only 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a low-end graphics card by any measure, with 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 24 ROPs.

For 1080p gaming at high or ultra settings, the Arc A350 would likely struggle to maintain 60 FPS in modern AAA titles. The 4 GB VRAM is a hard constraint, as many current games require more than 4 GB at high texture quality, leading to stuttering or reduced detail. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are less demanding, the CPU's high single-core performance could push frame rates to playable levels, perhaps 60-100 FPS at medium settings, but the GPU's low fill rate (48.00 GPixel/s) and texture rate (96.00 GTexel/s) will cap performance. At 1440p or 4K, the Arc A350 would be severely underpowered, and frame rates would drop below 30 FPS in most games.

Given the CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 50th percentile, the estimated gaming experience is that of a system capable of 720p or low-setting 1080p gaming for modern titles, and medium-setting 1080p for older or less demanding games. Frame rates would vary widely depending on the title, but users should expect single-digit to low-30s FPS in graphically intensive games at high settings. The data suggests that this pairing is not intended for high-refresh gaming but rather for productivity with occasional light gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i9-14901E and the Intel Arc A350 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This 36-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture loading and frame rendering, while the CPU sits idle waiting for the GPU to complete frames. The estimated FPS scaling would show that increasing resolution from 1080p to 1440p would have a more dramatic impact on frame rates than upgrading the CPU, because the GPU is already saturated.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as software compilation, data compression (288,777 PassMark), and video encoding, the CPU is the clear performer, and the GPU has no role. The GPU's 50th percentile means it is average among all GPUs, but in productivity tasks that do not use the GPU, it is irrelevant. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this imbalance: the system as a whole is above average, but the GPU drags down the overall gaming potential.

For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 16 threads can handle encoding (e.g., x264), but the GPU's limited resources will still bottleneck the game itself. The CPU's 65W TDP and the GPU's 25W TDP mean power draw is not a concern, but performance is. The data indicates that for any GPU-accelerated workload—whether gaming, 3D rendering, or machine learning inference—the Arc A350 is the limiting factor. Upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance improvement for the system.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37,911, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (+0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (+0.3% delta). This means the i9-14901E is effectively tied with these four competitors, with performance differences of less than half a percent. In practical terms, a user would not notice any difference between these CPUs in day-to-day tasks.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25,753 and single-core score of 3,635 are strong, but the single-core score is particularly impressive, indicating excellent IPC and frequency behavior. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,354 confirms this. The multi-thread score of 30,298 is solid but not exceptional for a modern 8-core part, reflecting the 65W TDP limit that constrains sustained all-core boost.

The Intel Arc A350 has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. It is at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it is exactly average in the database's ranking. Its nearest rivals list is empty, so there are no direct comparison points. The GPU's hardware specifications—4 GB GDDR6, 64-bit bus, 124.0 GB/s bandwidth, 3.072 TFLOPS FP32—indicate a low-end part, but the 50th percentile suggests that many GPUs are even weaker, likely older integrated graphics or entry-level discrete cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, which is above the median but below the high-performance tier. The combined picture is that of a workstation-oriented CPU paired with a modest GPU, suitable for productivity tasks where the GPU is secondary. The CPU's 86th percentile dominates the system's overall ranking, while the GPU's 50th percentile holds it back from being a gaming or rendering powerhouse.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc A350 pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. The CPU's 86th percentile and high single-core scores (4,354 PassMark, 3,635 Cinebench R23) make it ideal for software developers who compile code, run unit tests, and use IDEs. The 16 threads and 36 MB L3 cache handle large codebases efficiently, and the ECC memory support is a plus for reliability in development environments.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editing in Premiere Pro or After Effects, will benefit from the i9-14901E's multi-core strength (25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core). However, the Arc A350's 4 GB VRAM and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 will limit GPU-accelerated effects and 3D rendering in Blender or Maya. For 2D graphic design and photo editing, the CPU is more than sufficient, and the GPU can handle basic acceleration.

Students and small business workstations are a strong fit. The 65W TDP CPU and 25W GPU mean low power consumption and quiet operation, making it suitable for office environments. The CPU's data compression (288,777) and encryption (18,571) scores indicate fast file operations and secure data handling for small business databases. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails, adding resilience.

Gamers at 720p or low-setting 1080p will find this system playable for esports and older titles, but not for modern AAA games. The GPU's 50th percentile and 4 GB VRAM are the limiting factors. Users who want high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming should look elsewhere, as this pairing is not designed for that purpose.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 50th percentile and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below 144 Hz in most titles. The CPU's 4,354 single-thread score can drive high FPS in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will bottleneck at 1080p.

Streaming: Streaming is feasible using CPU-based encoding, as the 16 threads and 30,298 PassMark multi-thread score can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets. However, the GPU's limited resources mean the game itself will run at low settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video editing: The CPU's 25,753 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provides solid performance for timeline editing and export in software like Premiere Pro. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate some effects, but 4 GB VRAM may limit complex projects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles with CPU) will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, but GPU rendering will be slow due to the Arc A350's low compute throughput and 64-bit memory bus.

Software development: This is the strongest scenario. The CPU's 86th percentile, high single-core score (4,354), and 112,736 integer math score make compilation fast. ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The 65W TDP CPU and 25W GPU result in a low-power, quiet system ideal for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU's 288,777 data compression score speeds up file archiving, and the integrated graphics serve as a backup.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing the Intel Core i9-14901E with the Intel Arc A350. The CPU is a high-end 14th Gen Raptor Lake refresh part, while the GPU is an entry-level Alchemist (Arc 3) discrete card. The combined percentile is 68, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU's 86th percentile is the dominant factor, while the GPU's 50th percentile pulls the overall ranking down.

This pairing is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation that happens to have a discrete GPU for basic acceleration. The 65W CPU TDP and 25W GPU TDP make it power-efficient, and the 200W suggested PSU for the GPU indicates a very modest power supply requirement. The build class is desktop, so it is intended for a stationary workstation or office PC, not a laptop.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc A350 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,911.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 25 watts, and the suggested PSU is 200 watts.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures for this pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination; all frame rate discussions are estimates.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A350 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The die size is 157 mm², and the chip contains 7,200 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units. It features 6 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed. The base and boost clocks are both 2000 MHz, which is a modest clock for a low-power part. The memory clock is 1937 MHz, with an effective data rate of 15.5 Gbps.

The memory subsystem is the GPU's primary weakness: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is low by modern standards, limiting texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, both of which are entry-level figures. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1), indicating that the GPU can handle some compute tasks but is not a high-throughput accelerator.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is feature-complete for modern APIs, including ray tracing. However, with only 6 RT cores and 3.072 TFLOPS, ray tracing performance would be very low, likely unsuitable for playable frame rates in RT-enabled games. The GPU has no display outputs, which is unusual—it is designed for compute or as a secondary accelerator, not as a primary display adapter. The production status is end-of-life, with a predecessor of Xe Graphics and a successor of Battlemage.

For rendering, the GPU's benchmark scores are absent (average benchmark score of 0), but its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is average among all GPUs. In 3D rendering software like Blender or Maya, the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 would handle simple scenes but struggle with complex geometry and textures due to 4 GB VRAM. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will also bottleneck large texture sets. For machine learning inference, the lack of tensor cores means it relies on general-purpose shaders, which is inefficient. Overall, the Arc A350 is best suited for light 2D acceleration, video decode, and compute offload, not for demanding rendering tasks. The 200W suggested PSU and 25W TDP make it easy to integrate into low-power systems, but its performance is firmly entry-level.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc A350

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

Intel Arc A350

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds