SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and Intel Arc A310 form a desktop pairing that sits at a combined 63rd percentile against all systems. The CPU is a high-end 8-core Raptor Lake part, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level Arc 3 component. This creates a deeply unbalanced configuration where the processor massively outclasses the graphics card in raw compute. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A310 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores, though it lacks any listed tensor cores in the FACT PACK. The silicon packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 45.9 million per square millimeter.

Memory configuration is deliberately modest: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, producing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1937 MHz, which translates to 15.5 Gbps effective. Both the base and boost clocks are identical at 1750 MHz, indicating the card operates at a fixed frequency without dynamic boosting headroom. Pixel rate reaches 28.00 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 56.00 GTexel/s. Compute throughput is rated at 2.688 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.376 TFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio.

Benchmark results place the A310 at the 40th percentile among all GPUs. Its PassMark G3D score of 5433 and average benchmark score of 7550 put it in direct competition with the AMD Radeon R7 250 (7557, deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (7580, deltaPct -0.4). The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 scores 7472, which is 1% lower than the A310's average. This positions the A310 as a very low-end discrete GPU, barely above integrated graphics territory in some workloads.

For rendering, the situation is constrained. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is the primary limiting factor for modern 3D workloads, as large textures and complex scenes will exceed this allocation quickly. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for light 1080p workloads but becomes a bottleneck for high-resolution textures. The ray tracing cores exist but are only 6 in number, and with an FP32 throughput of just 2.688 TFLOPS, ray-traced scenes will render slowly. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 compliance mean the API feature set is modern, but the raw hardware limits practical rendering performance. The A310's PassMark GPU compute score of 2157 indicates modest compute acceleration for tasks like video encoding or basic physics, but it is far from a compute workhorse.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not viable with the A310. The GPU's 40th percentile standing and PassMark G3D score of 5433 indicate it can handle light esports titles at low settings, but high-refresh 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming at any modern resolution is beyond its capability. The CPU could drive high frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance well below that threshold.

Streaming: The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30298 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 provide ample headroom for software x264 encoding while gaming. However, the A310's graphics performance is so limited that streaming modern games becomes impractical because the GPU cannot maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles to begin with.

Video editing: The i9-14901E's strong multicore performance (Cinebench R20 multicore 10816, PassMark integer math 112736) handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding effectively. The A310's 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for basic 1080p editing in software like DaVinci Resolve, but 4K timelines or heavy color grading with noise reduction will strain the GPU. The Arc A310's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate means modern GPU-accelerated effects can run, but at reduced quality settings.

3D rendering: The CPU dominates here. Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2595 and R23 multicore score of 25753 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance for scenes that rely on ray tracing via CPU. The A310's 6 RT cores and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are too weak for GPU-accelerated rendering to be productive. The 4 GB VRAM will also cause out-of-memory errors on moderately complex scenes. This pairing favors CPU renderers like Blender Cycles with CPU sampling.

Software development: The i9-14901E excels at compilation and code analysis tasks. PassMark data compression score of 288777 and extended instructions score of 17249 indicate rapid build times and strong performance in cryptography or hashing workloads. The A310 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration for UI rendering, but has no impact on developer productivity beyond that.

Student and office work: This is a viable configuration for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4354 ensures snappy application responsiveness. The A310's low 30 W TDP and single-slot design mean the system runs quiet and cool. However, this is enormous CPU overkill for such workloads, and the GPU's 40th percentile position is more than sufficient for 2D desktop tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with Raptor Lake architecture. This supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is enabled. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor itself. The A310 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which means it can run at full bandwidth on this platform, though the GPU's performance is not bandwidth-limited in any meaningful way.

Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility to reuse older DDR4 kits or invest in new DDR5. The dual-channel bus is standard for this class. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The TDP is 65 W for the CPU and 30 W for the GPU. The suggested PSU for the system is 200 W, which is remarkably low for a desktop with a Core i9 processor. This indicates the total system power draw stays modest, and most existing power supplies will have ample headroom. The GPU requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot.

A sensible next upgrade path would prioritize replacing the A310 with a more capable GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom, so pairing it with a mid-range or high-end graphics card would unlock its full gaming potential. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the A310 means a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 would work without platform changes. The 200 W suggested PSU would need to be upgraded if a more powerful GPU is installed, as most discrete graphics cards with higher performance draw significantly more than 30 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system is severely GPU-bottlenecked in graphics workloads. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911. The GPU is at the 40th percentile with an average score of 7550. The delta between these two components is stark: the CPU outperforms its nearest rivals by staying within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37943), and Intel Core 5 211E (37829), while the GPU trades blows with low-end cards from 2013-2018 era.

In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data compression, and physics simulation, the i9-14901E will run at near-full utilization while the A310 sits mostly idle. The PassMark physics score of 3041 and multithread score of 30298 indicate the CPU handles complex calculations effortlessly. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings or 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the A310 becomes the limiting factor, holding back the entire system.

The FPS scaling in gaming would show a flat line regardless of CPU performance because the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. The A310's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 illustrate how weak it is in modern API workloads. Even with the CPU's massive single-thread advantage, the GPU caps performance at a low level. Conversely, productivity tasks that are CPU-only see no penalty from the weak GPU, so the balance is workload-dependent.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rates below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The A310's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and 40th percentile position suggest it performs around the level of a GTX 1650 (which scores 7472, 1% higher than the A310's average). However, the A310's 4 GB VRAM is below the 6 GB typically found on modern entry-level cards, which will cause texture quality reductions in newer games.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this GPU can only handle older titles or esports games with frame rates in the 30-60 FPS range. Modern AAA games will either run at low settings to achieve 30 FPS or be unplayable. At 1440p, the A310 is not viable for any recent title at ultra settings, as the 4 GB VRAM and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain the memory demands. The CPU's performance is irrelevant here because the GPU is the constraining factor.

For competitive games like CS2 or Valorant, the A310 might achieve 60-90 FPS at low settings, but the 1750 MHz clock and 768 shading units limit the pixel throughput. The 28.00 GPixel/s pixel rate and 56.00 GTexel/s texture rate are the hard boundaries for fill-rate-bound scenes. The DirectX 9 score of 69 is the highest among the PassMark DirectX tests, confirming the GPU is better suited to legacy APIs than modern ones.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits specific, niche users. Desktop builders who need extreme CPU compute for software development, scientific computing, or CPU-based rendering but have minimal graphics requirements could benefit. The i9-14901E's 86th percentile CPU standing delivers top-tier processing power for compilation, data analysis, and virtualization workloads.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound pipelines, such as audio production or CPU-based video encoding, will find the 65 W TDP and 8 cores/16 threads more than adequate. The PassMark floating point math score of 81089 and integer math score of 112736 indicate strong mathematical throughput. However, these users should consider that the A310 offers little GPU acceleration, so any GPU-dependent creative software will underperform.

Gamers should not build this system. The GPU's 40th percentile position and 4 GB VRAM make modern gaming at acceptable quality impossible. Students doing general coursework and office work would be better served by a cheaper CPU, as the i9-14901E is massively overprovisioned for such tasks. Small business workstations running database servers or application servers, where the GPU is inconsequential, would find this pairing acceptable since the CPU dominates the workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14901E delivers exceptional CPU benchmark results. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2595 multicore and 366 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 10816 multicore and 1526 single-core. The R23 test produces 25753 multicore and 3635 single-core. PassMark tests are equally strong: multithread score of 30298, single-thread score of 4354, and average benchmark score of 37911. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs.

The GPU results are far more modest. Geekbench OpenCL scores 30607 and Vulkan scores 28964. PassMark tests show DirectX 9 at 69, DirectX 10 at 31, DirectX 11 at 33, and DirectX 12 at 29. The G2D score of 625 and G3D score of 5433 place the A310 at the 40th percentile against all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 7550.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU contributes roughly 83% of the average benchmark score (37911 out of approximately 45461 total) and the GPU contributes the remainder. The combined 63rd percentile reflects the CPU's high standing pulling up the GPU's low score. In practice, the system's performance is entirely dependent on whether the workload is CPU-bound or GPU-bound, with a dramatic performance cliff between the two.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-14901E's position among all CPUs?

A: It sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in direct competition with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904) and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37943).

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A310 have, and why does it matter?

A: The A310 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. This limited capacity and bandwidth make it unsuitable for modern high-resolution gaming or GPU-based 3D rendering.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: CPU-based rendering works well, with the i9-14901E scoring 25753 in Cinebench R23 multicore. However, the A310's 6 ray tracing cores and 2.688 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are too weak for productive GPU-accelerated rendering.

Q: What is the power consumption of this pairing?

A: The CPU TDP is 65 W and the GPU TDP is 30 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 200 W. The GPU requires no external power connectors, making this a low-power desktop configuration.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, along with both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the release date of each component?

A: The CPU was released on 2024-06-30, while the GPU was released on 2022-10-11 and is now end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor.

Q: How does the A310 compare to the GTX 1650?

A: The A310 has an average benchmark score of 7550, which is 1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650's score of 7472. However, the A310 has only 4 GB VRAM compared to the GTX 1650's typical 4 GB or 6 GB configurations.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. The base clock is 2.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The TDP is 65 W, which is notably low for a Core i9-class chip. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC capability enabled. It provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display solution. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported. The production status is active, with a release date of 2024-06-30.

Benchmark performance is excellent across the board. Cinebench R23 multicore of 25753 and single-core of 3635 indicate strong both multithreaded and single-threaded performance. PassMark multithread score of 30298 and single-thread score of 4354 confirm this. The data compression score of 288777 and floating point math score of 81089 show exceptional throughput for number-crunching tasks. The encryption score of 18571 and extended instructions score of 17249 indicate robust security and SIMD performance.

The 86th percentile standing against all CPUs places it among the top tier of processors. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, showing this is a tightly competitive field. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 matches it exactly (deltaPct 0), while the Ryzen 7 9700X trails by 0.1% and the Intel Core 5 211E leads by 0.2%. This means the i9-14901E's performance is essentially identical to these alternatives, and the choice between them comes down to platform features rather than raw speed.

For real workloads, the 8 cores and 16 threads handle compilation, video encoding, and scientific simulations efficiently. The 5.60 GHz boost clock provides excellent latency-sensitive performance for gaming and interactive applications, though the GPU pairing in this build negates that advantage for gaming. The 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, and the CPU can maintain high boost clocks without thermal throttling in most desktop cases.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a top-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU, creating a fundamentally unbalanced system. The Intel Core i9-14901E represents the high end of the Core 14th Gen lineup with its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 5.60 GHz boost clock, achieving an 86th percentile CPU score. The Intel Arc A310 is a low-power discrete GPU with 4 GB VRAM, 768 shading units, and a 30 W TDP, sitting at the 40th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined percentile for the system is 63, which reflects the CPU's strength pulling up the GPU's weakness. This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the build class field. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with Raptor Lake architecture, supporting modern features like PCIe Gen 5 and DDR5 memory.

The intended use case is clear: this is a CPU-centric workstation for users who need massive processing power but have minimal graphics demands. Software developers, data analysts, and CPU-based renderers will benefit from the i9-14901E's exceptional multicore and single-thread performance. However, gamers and GPU-accelerated creators will find the A310 severely lacking. The system's overall tier is mid-range due to the combined percentile, but the CPU alone would place it in the high-end tier. This dichotomy defines the build's character: a powerful brain attached to a very weak visual cortex.