SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

24,442 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is a desktop build that presents a distinct split in performance capabilities. The processor is a high-end, power-efficient 8-core part from the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, while the graphics card is a mid-range, end-of-life RDNA 2 solution. Analysis of the benchmark data shows that this combination is heavily CPU-bound in most scenarios, with the GPU acting as the primary constraint for high-resolution gaming and graphics-accelerated workloads. The combined system percentile of 78 indicates strong overall performance, but the architecture of the pairing suggests different bottlenecks depending on the task.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the processing and graphics capabilities of this build. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the 86th percentile of all processors, demonstrating top-tier computational strength. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 24442 places it in the 70th percentile of all GPUs, which is a lower relative standing. The delta between these percentiles indicates that the CPU is the dominant component, capable of feeding the GPU far more data than the graphics card can process in many workloads.

This bottleneck is most evident in the benchmark scores for specific workloads. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 30298 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 are exceptionally high, showing massive parallel processing headroom. However, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16461 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1804 are comparatively modest. In gaming, this means that at lower resolutions where the CPU does most of the work, the system will perform well, but at higher resolutions where the GPU becomes the limiting factor, performance will scale down to the GPU’s capabilities.

The Passmark physics score of 3041 for the CPU shows strong game physics simulation potential, while the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 61 indicates a more limited ability to handle complex graphical effects. The data suggests that for tasks like 3D rendering or video encoding, the CPU will often finish its part of the job and wait on the GPU, whereas for tasks like data compression or encryption, the GPU is irrelevant and the CPU’s high scores (288777 for data compression and 18571 for encryption) fully dictate performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which is the foundation for the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory selection. The processor also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically associated with workstation and server environments, adding to its appeal for professional use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the fastest available storage and expansion cards, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is notably low for a Core i9 part, indicating excellent power efficiency. The GPU, on the other hand, has a 160 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 450 W. This means a power supply in the 450 W range is sufficient for the whole system, leaving headroom for the CPU’s low power draw. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s high percentile rank (86) and robust benchmark scores suggest it has significant headroom to support a faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck itself. The CPU’s 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide a solid foundation for gaming, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is becoming a limiting factor for modern titles at higher settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong across various tests. In Cinebench R23, it scores 25753 points in multicore and 3635 points in single-core. These scores are indicative of a processor that excels in both heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering and lightly threaded tasks like gaming. The Passmark single-thread score of 4354 further confirms its strength in single-core performance. In the nearest rival comparison, the CPU’s average score of 37911 is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37943), and the Intel Core 5 211E (37829), with delta percentages ranging from -0.1 to 0.3.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show a more mixed picture. It achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 72417, indicating solid compute performance. However, its Passmark G3D score of 16461 places it in the 70th percentile. In the nearest rival comparison, the GPU’s average score of 24442 is slightly higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277) by 0.7% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (24236) by 0.8%, but slightly lower than the Intel Arc A350M (24647) by -0.8%. The combined picture is a system with a top-tier processor that is held back by a mid-range graphics card in graphics-intensive tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideally suited for users who require immense CPU processing power for professional or creative workloads but do not need top-tier gaming graphics. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and data analysts who work with large datasets, compile code, or render video. The Passmark data compression score of 288777 and integer math score of 112736 indicate strong performance in file archiving and data processing tasks. The support for ECC memory further aligns it with small business workstations and scientific computing.

For gamers, this system is best suited for those playing at 1080p resolution, where the CPU’s high single-core performance (3635 in Cinebench R23 single-core) can drive high frame rates, and the GPU can keep up. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will become the limiting factor, making the system less ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming at those resolutions. Students and office workers will find the system overwhelmingly powerful for their needs, but the high CPU performance ensures it will remain relevant for years. The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests that this build is not for those looking for the latest graphics features, but rather for those who prioritize CPU compute power above all else.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread performance when needed. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is remarkably low for a processor of this performance class, making it an excellent choice for power-conscious builds or systems with limited cooling. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a large 36 MB shared L3 cache, which helps reduce memory latency and improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark data shows a processor that is not only fast but also versatile. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2595 and R20 multicore score of 10816 show strong scaling across generations of the benchmark. The Passmark floating point math score of 81089 and extended instructions score of 17249 demonstrate its capability in scientific and multimedia applications. The CPU’s performance is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a delta percentage of around 0.1% compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, indicating that this is a highly competitive processor in its class. The core count of 8 and 16 threads is a sweet spot for gaming, as it provides enough threads to handle modern game engines while maintaining high single-core clock speeds.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s high single-core performance (4354 in Passmark single-thread) will allow it to push frame rates high, but the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking will be the limiting factor. The system should perform well in esports titles, but may struggle with demanding AAA games at maximum settings.

For streaming, the CPU’s 16 threads and high multicore score (25753 in Cinebench R23) provide ample headroom to encode video while gaming. The GPU can handle the rendering load, though its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 61 suggests it may not handle the most demanding streaming settings.

For video editing, the CPU excels with its high data compression score (288777) and floating point math score (81089), making quick work of encoding and effects. The GPU’s compute scores (80503 in OpenCL) can accelerate rendering, but the CPU will often be the faster path.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 25753 is a strong indicator of performance, but the GPU’s RDNA 2 architecture with 10.60 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is also capable. However, the 8 GB VRAM may be a limitation for very large scenes.

For software development, the CPU’s high integer math score (112736) and random string sorting score (39138) make it excellent for compiling code and running virtual machines. The 16 threads allow for efficient parallel builds.

For student and office work, this system is overkill, but the low 65 W TDP of the CPU makes it an efficient and quiet workstation for multitasking, spreadsheets, and web browsing.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-core performance and the GPU’s 70th percentile ranking suggest that gaming performance will be solid at 1080p, with the CPU capable of driving high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU will be the bottleneck, and at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM may be insufficient for maximum settings. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 61 is a concern for modern titles that rely heavily on DX12 features, but its DirectX 11 score of 163 is more robust, indicating better performance in older or less API-demanding games. Overall, gamers should expect a system that is capable of 1080p high-refresh gaming, but not a top-tier 4K machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined system percentile is 78, indicating strong overall performance relative to other builds.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14901E supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation and server applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average benchmark score of 37911, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X’s score of 37943.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU’s boost clock is 5.60 GHz, which is the highest frequency it can achieve.

Q: Is the GPU’s production status active?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is based on the Navi 23 chip and the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The GPU features 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though its performance in this area is limited by its class. The memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming but can be a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The GPU’s clock speeds are a base of 1968 MHz, a game clock of 2359 MHz, and a boost clock of 2589 MHz. It delivers a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s, with an FP32 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS. These specifications translate to a benchmark performance that is in the 70th percentile of all GPUs. Its Passmark G3D score of 16461 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 80503 indicate that it is a capable mid-range card for 1080p gaming and light compute tasks. However, its performance is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (0.7% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (0.8% higher), showing that it is not a high-end part. The GPU’s power draw is 160 W with a dual-slot cooler and a single 8-pin power connector, fitting into a wide range of cases.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a high-end, power-efficient Intel Core i9-14901E processor with a mid-range AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT graphics card. The CPU is the star of the show, with an 86th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the top tier of processors. The GPU, with a 70th percentile ranking and an average score of 24442, is a solid but not exceptional performer. The combined percentile of 78 reflects the overall system standing.

The system is clearly designed for CPU-intensive tasks, where the Core i9-14901E’s 8 cores and 16 threads can be fully utilized. It is an excellent choice for content creation, software development, and any workload that benefits from high single-thread and multicore performance. The GPU is an adequate companion for 1080p gaming, but it is not the primary strength of this build. This is a system for users who value raw processing power and are willing to accept mid-range graphics performance in exchange for exceptional CPU compute capability.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14901E

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds