SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14901E

37,911 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14901E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form an unusual desktop pairing. The CPU is a high-end 14th Gen desktop processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmark scores, while the GPU, based on its Steel Nomad score, sits at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, a surprisingly low position. The data shows this is a combination where processing power dramatically outweighs graphics throughput, creating a specific performance profile that benefits certain workloads far more than others.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility means a builder can choose between older, more widely available DDR4 modules or newer DDR5 kits, depending on motherboard selection. The platform also includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for workstation and server-adjacent tasks where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the processor itself, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe storage or a discrete GPU, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is available for basic display output in the absence of a dedicated card.

The CPU’s TDP is rated at 65 watts, which is modest for an 8-core, 16-thread part. This low thermal design power suggests that a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads, and it also implies that the power delivery requirements on the motherboard are not extreme. However, the GPU in this pairing is a different matter. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 watts and requires a single 16-pin power connector. While the FACT PACK does not list a suggested PSU wattage, the combined 340-watt TDP of the CPU and GPU, along with other system components, indicates that a quality power supply with ample headroom on the 16-pin rail is necessary for stable operation under full load. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 245 mm in length, so case compatibility is generally straightforward, but the power connector specification should be verified against the chosen PSU’s cables.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on the graphics side, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The Intel Core i9-14901E’s average benchmark score of 37911 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it can drive much faster GPUs without becoming the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. Since the current GPU is the limiting factor, upgrading to a more powerful graphics card—one with a higher average benchmark score and better percentile ranking—would yield the most significant performance gains for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. Conversely, the CPU platform itself is mature, with no further processor upgrades likely to provide a major jump given the existing high percentile standing, so the next logical step is a GPU replacement rather than a platform change.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s socket and what memory types does it support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901E uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for error-sensitive computing tasks.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37911, which is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X at 37943 (-0.1% delta). It is slightly ahead of the Intel Core 5 211E by 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 by 0.3%.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score and how does it rank?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12). This places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 2664, a 1% difference.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain any measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. All FPS discussions must be treated as estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-14901E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER build is 52, indicating it sits near the midpoint of all possible system configurations.

Q: What are the CPU’s single-threaded and multi-threaded Cinebench scores?

A: The CPU scores 3635 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 25753 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Additionally, it scores 1526 in Cinebench R20 single-core and 10816 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a stark imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The Intel Core i9-14901E achieves an average benchmark score of 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. In contrast, the RTX 5070 SUPER’s average benchmark score is 2690, which lands it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the CPU is capable of far more work than the GPU can feed or process in graphics-bound tasks. In gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the RTX 5070 SUPER will be the limiting factor, as its low percentile ranking suggests it will struggle to keep up with modern titles at high settings.

The CPU’s performance in specific workloads reinforces this bottleneck. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 30298, and its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 25753, both strong figures that indicate excellent handling of parallel processing. Meanwhile, the GPU’s only benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, which is low enough to be comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% delta). This means that for any workload that depends on the GPU—such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or high-resolution gaming—the system’s overall output will be constrained by the graphics card’s performance, not the CPU.

The FPS scaling data is absent, so precise frame rate expectations are unavailable. However, the percentile gap suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios (e.g., low-resolution gaming, physics calculations, or data compression), the system will perform admirably. In GPU-bound scenarios (e.g., 4K gaming, ray tracing, or large video exports), the system will fall far short of what the CPU alone suggests. The Passmark physics score of 3041 and floating-point math score of 81089 indicate strong computational throughput, but these are CPU-side metrics that cannot compensate for the GPU’s low 3D benchmark results.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is someone whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who treats the GPU as a secondary or auxiliary component. Gamers at lower resolutions, such as 1080p, may find that the CPU’s high single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3635) can drive moderate frame rates in less demanding titles, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking will limit visual fidelity and frame rates in more demanding games. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based tasks—such as software compilation, data analysis, or encoding—will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753.

Software developers and students in computer science fields would see value in the CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 18571 and extended instructions score of 17249, which indicate strong performance in encryption and SIMD-heavy workloads. Small business workstations handling database operations or spreadsheet calculations would benefit from the Passmark integer math score of 112736 and random string sorting score of 39138. However, any user expecting to run modern 3D applications, video editing with GPU acceleration, or high-fidelity gaming will be disappointed by the GPU’s low benchmark standing. The build is essentially a high-end CPU paired with a low-end GPU, making it suitable for specialized compute tasks rather than balanced general-purpose use.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14901E is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, allowing for significant single-threaded performance when needed. The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports high-speed data access for frequently used instructions.

Benchmark results show a capable processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and its single-core score of 3635 is strong for tasks that rely on low-latency, high-clock operations. The Passmark single-thread score of 4354 corroborates this, indicating robust per-core performance. In multi-threaded workloads, the Passmark multi-thread score of 30298 and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2595 demonstrate that the CPU handles parallel tasks efficiently. The data compression score of 288777 suggests excellent throughput for file archiving and compression tools, while the floating-point math score of 81089 is beneficial for scientific and engineering applications.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within a narrow band. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904) and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X (37943) are effectively identical in average score, with deltas of 0% and -0.1%, respectively. The Intel Core 5 211E (37829) and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804) are slightly behind at 0.2% and 0.3% deltas. This indicates that the i9-14901E is competitive with current mainstream and mobile high-end parts, though it does not hold a decisive lead. The 65-watt TDP is notably low for this level of performance, making it an efficient choice for sustained all-core workloads without requiring exotic cooling.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB205 chip fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die contains 31,100 million transistors across a 263 mm² area, giving a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The GPU has 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It also includes 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, which are designed to accelerate ray-traced lighting and AI-based features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem is substantial in capacity but not in bandwidth. The 18 GB of GDDR7 memory is generous for high-resolution textures and large datasets, but the 192-bit bus width results in a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is rated at 32.15 TFLOPS, which is the same as the FP16 performance (32.15 TFLOPS, 1:1), suggesting no dedicated half-precision boost.

Despite these specifications, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 is remarkably low, placing the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% delta), and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% delta). These are entry-level or legacy products, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER’s benchmark performance does not match its modern architecture or memory capacity. This suggests that either the benchmark is not representative of the GPU’s real-world capabilities, or the GPU is severely underperforming in this specific test. The data shows a disconnect between the raw specifications and the measured benchmark result, which warrants caution when predicting gaming or rendering performance.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37911, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a strong result, backed by specific scores like Cinebench R23 multi-core at 25753 and single-core at 3635. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, meaning it is at parity with the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 112736 and floating-point math score of 81089 further underline its computational strength.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2690, which is the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a dramatic departure from the CPU’s position. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M, is only 1% behind, and the GeForce GT 1030 is 1.1% behind. The GPU’s score is so low that it suggests the RTX 5070 SUPER would be outperformed by virtually any modern mid-range or high-end GPU. The combined percentile for the build is 52, which is near the middle of all systems, reflecting the offsetting effects of a high-CPU and low-GPU pairing.

For real workloads, this means that CPU-bound tasks will see excellent performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10816 and the Passmark data encryption score of 18571 indicate that the system excels at processing, encryption, and general computation. Conversely, GPU-bound tasks will see poor performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 is a direct measure of the GPU’s ability to handle modern DX12 workloads, and its low percentile suggests that gaming at high settings or rendering complex 3D scenes will be severely limited.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system that pairs the Intel Core i9-14901E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-tier desktop processor from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is from the GeForce 50-series. The combined percentile of 52 indicates that this system is average when compared to all other builds, but this average hides a wide gap between the two components. The CPU is in the 86th percentile, while the GPU is in the 18th percentile.

The overall tier of this build is therefore defined by its CPU. It is a powerful workstation-oriented processor that can handle demanding multi-threaded tasks with ease. The GPU, however, is a weak link that will drag down any graphics-intensive application. The build is not balanced, but it is coherent as a CPU-first system where the GPU is an afterthought. Users who prioritize computational performance over graphics will find the CPU to be the star, while those who expect a high-end gaming experience will be disappointed by the GPU’s benchmark results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, which sits in the 18th percentile, suggests that gaming performance will be poor for a modern GPU. The nearest rivals, such as the GeForce GT 1030, are entry-level cards, so frame rates in modern titles would likely be low, even at 1080p with reduced settings.

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s strong single-threaded score of 3635 in Cinebench R23 would help in CPU-bound scenarios, such as esports titles at low resolutions. However, the GPU would still be the limiting factor as resolution and graphical details increase. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s and its low benchmark score would likely result in frame rates well below what a gamer would expect from a 50-series card. The 18 GB of VRAM is plentiful, but the raw processing power appears insufficient based on the Steel Nomad score. Without measured FPS data, these are qualitative estimates, but the GPU’s percentile position strongly indicates that this is not a gaming-focused build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU can keep up with high polling rates due to its 5.60 GHz boost clock and strong single-threaded performance, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking will cap frame rates in most games. Expect this system to be unsuitable for competitive high-refresh play in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25753, can handle encoding workloads while gaming. However, the GPU’s low performance will limit the game’s frame rate, making the stream quality secondary to the poor in-game experience.

Video editing: CPU-based rendering and effects are strong, as shown by the Passmark multi-thread score of 30298. However, GPU-accelerated effects and exports will be slow due to the GPU’s low benchmark score. The 18 GB of VRAM helps with large timelines, but the processing power is lacking.

3D rendering: The CPU will excel at physics and scene preparation, but the GPU’s 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance is undermined by its low 3DMark score. Rendering with GPU acceleration will be significantly slower than with a higher-percentile GPU.

Software development: This is a strong scenario. The CPU’s high integer math score of 112736 and data encryption score of 18571 indicate fast compilation and secure data handling. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the system performs well here.

Student and office work: The CPU’s high single-threaded score of 4354 in Passmark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, while the multi-threaded performance handles multitasking. The GPU’s low score is not a hindrance for spreadsheets, documents, or web browsing, making this a capable if overbuilt office machine.