SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900T

51,015 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i9-14900T?

A: The CPU features 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What is the significance of the GPU's 18 GB VRAM capacity?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER comes with 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-13850HX?

A: The Core i9-14900T has an average benchmark score of 51015, which is 0.5% higher than the Core i7-13850HX's score of 50761.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pair has a combined percentile of 54 among all desktop and laptop configurations in the database.

Q: What does the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate about its performance tier?

A: The GPU scores 2690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what does it imply for cooling?

A: The TDP is 35 watts, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, implying modest thermal requirements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The Core i9-14900T sits in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 51015. Meanwhile, the RTX 5070 SUPER occupies only the 18th percentile among GPUs, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690. This 72-percentile gap indicates that the CPU is vastly more capable than the GPU in raw compute terms.

In CPU-bound workloads, the processor will dominate the performance picture. The Core i9-14900T scores 30803 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it in the top decile of all processors. For tasks like data compression, it achieves a Passmark score of 436066, and for encryption workloads it hits 27062. These are strong absolute numbers that indicate the CPU has ample headroom in heavily threaded productivity applications.

The GPU, however, will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios. With a Steel Nomad score of 2690, the RTX 5070 SUPER ranks alongside the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower) and the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% slower). This suggests that in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the graphics card will constrain overall system performance well before the CPU reaches its limits.

The combined percentile of 54 reflects this lopsided pairing. The system overall sits near the middle of the database, dragged down by the GPU's low standing while being lifted by the CPU's high percentile. For balanced workloads that use both components equally, such as gaming with physics simulation, the GPU will be the bottleneck. For pure compute tasks that leverage the CPU heavily, the processor will perform at near its full potential.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900T delivers strong multi-threaded performance across Cinebench versions. It scores 3104 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 12937 in R20 multi-core, and 30803 in R23 multi-core. Single-core scores are equally consistent: 438 in R15, 1826 in R20, and 4348 in R23. These numbers place the CPU in the 90th percentile overall, with an average benchmark score of 51015.

Passmark results reinforce the CPU's capabilities. The multi-thread score is 36239, while single-thread performance is 4016. Integer math scores 138149, floating-point math scores 92699, and extended instructions hit 23660. Data compression (436066) and encryption (27062) scores are particularly notable for productivity-focused workloads. The CPU's nearest rivals show how close the competition is: the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 (0.5% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 (0.6% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448 (1.1% lower). Only the Intel Core Ultra 9 285T edges ahead at 51310, a 0.6% difference.

The GPU's benchmark presence is minimal, with only one recorded test: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2690. This score places it in the 18th percentile, a notably low position. Its nearest rivals are all older or lower-tier cards: the Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower), GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% slower), Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% slower), and GT 440 (2645, 1.7% slower). The closeness of these margins underscores how far the RTX 5070 SUPER sits from contemporary high-end GPUs.

When viewed together, the system presents a clear picture: a top-decile CPU paired with a bottom-quintile GPU. The combined percentile of 54 means the pairing lands squarely in the middle tier of all tracked configurations, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's weak showing relative to the CPU's strength.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics performance. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the Core i9-14900T's 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 places it in the top 10% of all CPUs, making it suitable for prolonged multi-threaded tasks.

Software developers and data analysts will find the CPU compelling. The Passmark data encryption score of 27062 and data compression score of 436066 indicate strong throughput for build pipelines, database operations, and cryptographic workloads. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache support working with large codebases and datasets.

Students and small business users who run virtual machines, compile code, or process spreadsheets will see excellent CPU performance. The 35-watt TDP means the system can operate in compact enclosures with modest cooling, which suits office environments. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 offers flexibility in system configuration.

Gamers targeting high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play will find the GPU adequate but not exceptional. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 18 GB of VRAM is generous for texture-heavy titles, but its 18th-percentile ranking suggests it will struggle with demanding modern games at high settings. Users who play esports titles or older games with low graphical demands will see acceptable performance.

The pairing makes less sense for users whose primary activity is gaming or GPU-accelerated machine learning. Those workloads would benefit more from a balanced CPU-GPU pairing. However, for users who need maximum CPU throughput and only occasional GPU acceleration, this build offers a sensible allocation of resources.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory enabled.

The base clock of 1.10 GHz is exceptionally low, which explains the 35-watt TDP. The boost clock of 5.50 GHz is remarkably high, creating a wide dynamic range that allows the processor to idle efficiently and burst to high performance when needed. This makes the chip well-suited for power-constrained environments that still require occasional peak performance.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool supports the CPU's strong single-threaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4348 and Passmark single-thread score of 4016.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51015 places it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rivals show how tight the competition is at this level. The Core i7-13850HX is 0.5% slower, the Ryzen 9 5900XT is 0.6% slower, and the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is 1.1% slower. Only the Core Ultra 9 285T beats it, by a 0.6% margin. This places the i9-14900T at the top of a very competitive cluster of processors.

The Passmark physics score of 2245 and prime number finding score of 164 are relatively modest, suggesting that while the CPU excels at parallel integer and floating-point workloads, it is less optimized for highly sequential or branch-heavy tasks. The random string sorting score of 49484 indicates solid performance for data organization tasks. The launch MSRP for this CPU is $549, reflecting its top-tier positioning in Intel's 14th-generation lineup.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5070 SUPER's 18th-percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 indicate it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings in demanding titles. Esports games and older titles are more viable targets, but users seeking 144Hz or 240Hz experiences should temper expectations. The CPU's strong single-core score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 will help in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will cap overall frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and streaming overlays. The Passmark data compression score of 436066 supports efficient video encoding workflows. The GPU's modest performance means streamers should plan for lower in-game settings to maintain a stable stream.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30803 positions the CPU for strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The 18 GB of VRAM on the GPU assists with GPU-accelerated effects, but the GPU's low percentile ranking suggests that complex effects stacks will not perform at high-end levels. The dual-channel memory support for DDR5 helps maintain high throughput for large media files.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent, given the multi-threaded benchmark scores. The Passmark floating-point math score of 92699 indicates strong performance for geometry calculations. GPU-based rendering with CUDA or OptiX will be limited by the GPU's 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is modest by contemporary standards.

Software Development: Build times will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, especially for parallel compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 138149 supports heavy code parsing and transformation workloads. The ECC memory support is valuable for long-running build servers or database systems where data integrity is critical.

Student and Office Work: The 35-watt TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for shared workspaces. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback for basic display output. The CPU's 90th-percentile ranking ensures responsiveness in spreadsheet, document, and web-based workflows. The dual DDR4/DDR5 support allows cost-effective memory configurations for budget-conscious academic users.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900T uses the LGA 1700 socket, which is shared with Intel's 12th and 13th generation processors. This means users can potentially upgrade to other LGA 1700 CPUs without changing the motherboard, though the BIOS must support the specific processor. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern SSDs and expansion cards.

Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. Users who built with DDR4 can retain their existing memory, while those seeking higher bandwidth can opt for DDR5. The ECC memory support is uncommon for consumer platforms and adds reliability for workstation use cases.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and requires a 275-watt TDP, drawing power from a single 16-pin connector. The CPU's 35-watt TDP is minimal, so the overall system power draw will be dominated by the GPU. A power supply must accommodate the GPU's 275-watt requirement plus the rest of the system's needs, though the CPU's modest draw leaves substantial headroom for the GPU and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom to drive higher-end graphics cards. The CPU's 90th-percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck a faster GPU in most scenarios. Users could also consider adding a second GPU for compute workloads, though the single PCIe 5.0 x16 slot limits this option unless the motherboard offers additional slots.

The platform's memory bandwidth is limited to dual-channel, which may constrain certain memory-intensive workloads. Users who require higher memory throughput should consider platforms with quad-channel support, though this is not an option on LGA 1700. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache mitigates some memory latency concerns for the CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing Intel's Core i9-14900T with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a 50-series card in the 18th percentile. The combined percentile is 54, placing this system in the middle tier of all tracked configurations.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 51015 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 tell a story of extreme imbalance. The processor is a top-tier performer for productivity and compute workloads, while the graphics card is a low-tier option for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. This pairing prioritizes CPU throughput at the expense of graphics performance.

The system is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a supplementary GPU. Users who primarily run CPU-bound applications will find the performance compelling, while those who expect balanced gaming or GPU compute will be disappointed. The 35-watt CPU TDP combined with the 275-watt GPU TDP creates a system that is power-efficient on the CPU side but power-hungry on the GPU side.

The build class is desktop, with the CPU using the LGA 1700 socket and the GPU using a dual-slot design with a 16-pin power connector. The GPU's dimensions are 245 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, which fits in most mid-tower cases. The display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b connections.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip, designated GB205, contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². The GPU features 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units.

Memory configuration includes 18 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. This is a generous amount of VRAM for the GPU's performance class, which can handle large textures and high-resolution assets without exceeding memory capacity.

The clock speeds are a base of 2325 MHz and a boost of 2512 MHz. The GPU's compute capabilities include 32.15 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). It features 50 ray tracing cores and 200 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs. The pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 places the GPU in the 18th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all significantly older or lower-tier products: the Quadro K1100M scores 2664 (1% faster), the GT 1030 scores 2662 (1.1% faster), the Arc Pro B50 scores 2660 (1.1% faster), and the GT 440 scores 2645 (1.7% faster). The margins between these scores are small, indicating that the RTX 5070 SUPER's performance is closely matched to these much older cards.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 18 GB of VRAM is a strong asset, allowing large scenes and textures to fit in memory. However, the low compute throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 limits the speed at which those scenes can be processed. The ray tracing cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for path tracing and AI-based denoising, but the overall GPU performance tier constrains the complexity of real-time rendering workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Consequently, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not observed results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690, placing it in the 18th percentile, indicates that gaming performance will be modest in modern titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, users can expect playable frame rates in less demanding games, but the GPU's low percentile ranking suggests that AAA releases with high graphical fidelity will likely require reduced settings to maintain smooth performance.

At 1440p, the GPU's 18 GB of VRAM is sufficient for texture-heavy games, but the compute throughput of 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 may become the limiting factor. The 672.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures, but the GPU's overall performance tier suggests that 1440p ultra settings will be challenging for recent titles.

At 4K, the GPU will struggle significantly. The 18th-percentile ranking places it near the GT 1030 and GT 440, which are entry-level cards from previous generations. Users attempting 4K gaming should expect low frame rates even at medium settings. The CPU's strong single-core performance will help maintain minimum frame rates, but the GPU is the clear bottleneck.

Esports titles such as competitive shooters and MOBAs, which are less demanding on GPU resources, may run at acceptable frame rates. The CPU's high single-core score of 4348 in Cinebench R23 will help maintain high CPU-side frame pacing. However, users seeking high-refresh 144Hz or 240Hz experiences should anticipate that the GPU will limit maximum frame rates in most scenarios.

The absence of measured FPS data means these estimates carry uncertainty. The benchmark scores provide a general indication of the GPU's performance class, but real-world gaming results can vary based on driver optimization, game engine efficiency, and system configuration. Users should treat these figures as rough guidance rather than precise predictions.