SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KS

81,127 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KS and Intel Arc A770 pairing is a desktop configuration that places in the 93rd combined percentile among all builds, indicating a high-tier system. The CPU, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a 6.20 GHz boost clock, and the GPU, a 16 GB GDDR6 Alchemist part with 32 ray tracing cores, together form a capable workstation and gaming platform. It is important to note that the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is the flagship of the Core 14th Gen desktop lineup, built on the Raptor Lake architecture at a 10 nm process node. It provides 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.20 GHz, which is the highest boost clock in the FACT PACK for any CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 places it far above typical desktop processors, while the single-core score of 7199 demonstrates excellent per-thread performance. Geekbench scores of 23931 multi-core and 2692 single-core reinforce this picture. PassMark tests reveal specific strengths: integer math scores 212644, floating point math scores 153975, and extended instructions score 45524. Data compression scores 803368, while data encryption scores 47717. The multithread score of 60012 and single-thread score of 4815 both confirm high performance across varied workloads.

In terms of real workload interpretation, these numbers indicate that the i9-14900KS excels at heavily parallel tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations, where all 24 cores can be utilized. The 6.20 GHz boost clock also gives it a significant edge in latency-sensitive applications like gaming or single-threaded software compilation. The CPU holds a percentile rank of 96 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 96% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (avg score 81115, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (avg score 81103, delta 0%), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (avg score 80762, delta 0.5%), and Intel Xeon 638 (avg score 80723, delta 0.5%). The i9-14900KS essentially matches the Xeon w5-3535X and Ryzen 9 8940HX, while leading the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and Xeon 638 by 0.5% in average benchmark score. This parity with server-class Xeons suggests the desktop i9 can handle professional workloads without compromise.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, codenamed Alchemist, using a 6 nm process from TSMC. The DG2-512 chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The shader configuration includes 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, alongside 32 ray tracing cores. This hardware supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Benchmark scores for the GPU include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109175, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 94284. These scores place the Arc A770 in the 90th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it outperforms 90% of graphics cards in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (avg score 69000, delta -0.3%), AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (avg score 68562, delta 0.4%), AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (avg score 69870, delta -1.5%), and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (avg score 69986, delta -1.7%). The Arc A770’s average benchmark score of 68809 is essentially on par with the CMP 90HX, slightly above the Instinct MI25, and modestly below the Pro WX 8200 and Quadro P6000.

The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB capacity are substantial for modern rendering workloads. The pixel rate of 307.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 614.4 GTexel/s indicate high fill rates, while FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1) support compute-heavy tasks. The 32 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the absence of tensor core data in the FACT PACK means deep learning acceleration is not quantified. For rendering, the Arc A770’s Vulkan and OpenCL scores suggest strong compute capability for GPU-accelerated renderers, while the 16 GB VRAM allows large scene handling without memory swapping.

Gaming Performance

As stated, no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains an empty measuredFpsUltraByGame object, so all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The i9-14900KS’s single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 7199, Geekbench single-core 2692) is among the best in the database, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2969 and Vulkan score of 94284 provide a baseline for GPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p ultra settings, the CPU’s 6.20 GHz boost clock and 36 MB L3 cache should prevent bottlenecks in most titles, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-texture games, though the 19.66 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests mid-range rasterization capability. At 1440p ultra, the GPU becomes the more limiting factor, but the 90th percentile GPU score indicates it can still handle modern titles at playable frame rates. For 4K ultra, the data suggests that the Arc A770 would struggle to maintain high FPS in demanding AAA games, as its compute throughput is below high-end rivals like the Quadro P6000 (which scores 1.7% higher on average). Esports titles and lighter games should run smoothly at high refresh rates, given the CPU’s exceptional single-thread performance and the GPU’s reasonable fill rates. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game optimization and driver maturity.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The i9-14900KS ranks in the 96th percentile among CPUs, while the Arc A770 ranks in the 90th percentile among GPUs. This 6-percentage-point gap suggests the GPU is the weaker link in most workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations (PassMark physics score 3381) or data compression (803368), the i9-14900KS will not be the limiting factor. However, in GPU-bound scenarios like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A770’s performance ceiling will cap overall system output.

The combined percentile of 93 reflects this slight mismatch. For multi-threaded compute tasks, the CPU’s 50995 Cinebench R23 multi-core score vastly exceeds what the GPU can process in parallel, meaning the GPU will often sit idle waiting for CPU data. Conversely, in pure rasterization workloads, the CPU’s single-core dominance (7199 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can feed the GPU without stalling. The 512.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth aligns well with the CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 support, reducing data transfer bottlenecks. The practical takeaway is that this pairing is CPU-heavy; users upgrading the GPU later would see larger gains than upgrading the CPU, as the i9-14900KS already outperforms nearly all CPUs on the market.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i9-14900KS’s 7199 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 6.20 GHz boost clock are ideal for maintaining 144+ FPS in competitive titles, though the Arc A770’s mid-range compute performance (19.66 TFLOPS) may limit frame rates in graphically intense games. Expect smooth performance in esports and moderate settings in AAA titles.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. PassMark data encryption (47717) and extended instructions (45524) support efficient video encoding, while the CPU’s 96th percentile rank ensures minimal impact on game performance during broadcasts.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 50995 and Geekbench multi-core of 23931 indicate fast timeline scrubbing and export times. The Arc A770’s 16 GB VRAM and OpenCL score of 109175 accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading. This is a strong setup for 4K editing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s multi-threaded performance dominates render workloads, with PassMark floating point math (153975) and integer math (212644) showing rapid calculation throughput. The GPU’s 32 ray tracing cores support hardware RT, but its 90th percentile GPU score means it is not a top-tier renderer.

Software development: The i9-14900KS’s 36 MB L3 cache and high single-thread speed (2692 Geekbench single-core) reduce compile times. PassMark random string sorting (89789) indicates efficient data manipulation for build tools. The GPU is secondary here, making this an excellent developer workstation.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU’s 4815 PassMark single-thread score ensures instant responsiveness. The 16 GB GPU memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth handle spreadsheets and presentations effortlessly, though the 150 W CPU TDP and 225 W GPU TDP mean higher power draw than necessary.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS has a boost clock of 6.20 GHz, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A770 have?

A: The Arc A770 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 93, placing it above 93% of all builds in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The i9-14900KS supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The Arc A770 has 32 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-14900KS (avg score 81127) matches the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (avg score 81115, delta 0%) and leads the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 by 0.5% in average benchmark score.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s exact benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 5140, single-core 725; Cinebench R20 multi-core 21417, single-core 3023; Cinebench R23 multi-core 50995, single-core 7199; Geekbench multi-core 23931, single-core 2692; PassMark multithread 60012, single-thread 4815. Additional PassMark sub-scores include data compression 803368, data encryption 47717, extended instructions 45524, find prime numbers 244, floating point math 153975, integer math 212644, physics 3381, and random string sorting 89789. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 81127, with a percentile rank of 96 among all CPUs.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 2969, Geekbench OpenCL 109175, and Geekbench Vulkan 94284. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 68809, with a percentile rank of 90 among all GPUs. The combined picture shows a CPU that is near the top of its class, matching server-grade Xeons, paired with a GPU that is solidly above average but not elite. The 93rd combined percentile reflects a system that excels in CPU-heavy tasks like rendering and compilation, while the GPU handles mainstream gaming and compute workloads adequately. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (96 vs 90) indicates the GPU is the performance bottleneck for graphics-intensive applications.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900KS, a desktop-class CPU from the Core 14th Gen series, with the Intel Arc A770, a desktop GPU from the Alchemist generation. The build class is desktop, confirming it is a stationary system rather than a laptop. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank among all CPUs places it in the top 4% of processors, while the GPU’s 90th percentile rank places it in the top 10% of graphics cards. The combined percentile of 93 indicates an overall high-tier system, though not the absolute highest due to the GPU’s slightly lower standing. The CPU is an overclockable part (multiplier unlocked) with a 150 W TDP, while the GPU has a 225 W TDP and is marked as end-of-life production status. This pairing is best described as a high-end CPU married to a mid-to-high-end GPU, creating a system that is exceptionally strong for CPU-bound tasks but only moderately strong for GPU-bound workloads.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolution with high refresh rate monitors will benefit from the i9-14900KS’s 7199 Cinebench R23 single-core score, though the Arc A770’s 90th percentile GPU rank means they should temper expectations for 4K ultra settings. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will see massive gains in rendering times from the CPU’s 50995 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports large textures. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 36 MB L3 cache and 4815 PassMark single-thread score. Students and office workers would find this configuration excessive for their needs, as the CPU and GPU power draw (150 W and 225 W TDP) and component cost are far beyond typical productivity requirements. Small business workstations handling heavy data processing or engineering simulations would benefit from the CPU’s data compression score of 803368 and floating point math score of 153975, though the GPU’s compute capabilities are secondary in such roles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 150 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 225 W; the suggested power supply for the GPU is 550 W, which should cover the entire system with reasonable headroom. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking to push beyond the 6.20 GHz boost clock. The GPU requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, fitting a dual-slot design.

For future upgrades, the most logical step is replacing the Arc A770 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU’s 96th percentile rank leaves little room for CPU improvement, and its Socket 1700 platform is a mature end-of-life socket, meaning future CPU upgrades would require a motherboard change. The 550 W suggested PSU provides enough headroom for a slightly more power-hungry GPU, but any major upgrade would likely necessitate a new power supply. The 16 GB GPU memory is already substantial, so the next upgrade should focus on raw compute performance rather than capacity. The PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes ensure compatibility with future high-bandwidth storage or expansion cards, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 interface will not bottleneck most workloads. Overall, this platform has limited CPU upgrade potential, making GPU replacement the most impactful path forward.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + Intel Arc A770

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KS

Intel Arc A770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds