SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KS + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KS

81,127 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900KS + Intel Arc A750: A Study in Asymmetry

The pairing of Intel's flagship 24-core desktop processor with its mid-range Alchemist graphics card creates one of the most lopsided configurations in the benchmark database. The Core i9-14900KS sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the Arc A750 lands at the 66th percentile among GPUs — a gap of 30 percentile points that defines every workload discussion that follows. This combination is a desktop build where the processor outperforms the graphics card by a wider margin than any nearest-rival comparison suggests, making it a platform that rewards CPU-bound tasks far more than GPU-bound ones.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build holds an 81st percentile ranking among all desktop configurations in the database, reflecting the strong CPU contribution tempered by the mid-range GPU.

Q: How does the Core i9-14900KS compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-14900KS posts an average benchmark score of 81,127, placing it essentially tied with the Intel Xeon w5-3535X (81,115, 0% delta) and AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (81,103, 0% delta), while leading the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (80,762) and Intel Xeon 638 (80,723) by 0.5% each.

Q: What is the Arc A750's standing relative to other GPUs?

A: With an average benchmark score of 20,582, the Arc A750 is nearly identical to the Intel Arc B570 (20,556, 0.1% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534, 0.2% ahead), while trailing the AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20,662, 0.4% behind) by a negligible margin.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS features 24 cores and 32 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel, using a 257 mm² die.

Q: How much memory does the Arc A750 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this a measured or estimated gaming performance dataset?

A: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for each component?

A: The Core i9-14900KS carried a launch MSRP of $689, while the Arc A750 launched at $289 — these figures are stated once here for reference and do not reflect current market conditions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of where the bottleneck sits in this configuration. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking against all CPUs, combined with an average benchmark score of 81,127, places it in the top tier of desktop processors. The GPU's 66th percentile and 20,582 average score place it firmly in the mid-range. When the combined percentile lands at 81, the mathematical implication is that the GPU drags the system down from the CPU's near-elite standing.

The PassMark physics score of 3,381 for the CPU, alongside a single-thread score of 4,815, indicates that processor-bound scenarios will rarely struggle. Meanwhile, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and DirectX 12 score of 70 suggest that graphics-heavy workloads will hit the Arc A750's ceiling long before the i9-14900KS breaks a sweat. In CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (803,368 PassMark score) or integer math (212,644), the processor operates at its near-elite level. In GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or high-resolution gaming, the Arc A750 becomes the limiting factor.

The FP32 throughput of 17.20 TFLOPS on the GPU, while respectable for its class, is dwarfed by the CPU's multicore capabilities in Cinebench R23 (50,995). For any workload that can leverage both processors, the GPU will saturate first. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU is adequate for its 8 GB frame buffer, but the 36 MB of shared L3 cache on the CPU highlights the disparity in data-handling capacity between the two components.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2050 MHz with a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs at 2000 MHz with a 256-bit bus width, yielding 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that supports 1080p and 1440p gaming at reasonable settings.

The shading unit count of 3,584, paired with 224 texture mapping units and 112 raster output pipelines, gives the card a pixel rate of 268.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to the PassMark G3D score of 12,534, which places the card at the 66th percentile — competitive with the Arc B570 and RTX 3070 Mobile, but below the Radeon R9 M390X by 0.4%. The 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workloads, though the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests RT effects will carry a noticeable cost.

The FP16 throughput of 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicates that compute workloads leveraging half-precision can run at double the FP32 rate. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554 and Vulkan score of 85,631 show the card performing better in compute-oriented APIs than in DirectX, where PassMark scores range from 65 (DirectX 10) to 72 (DirectX 11) to 70 (DirectX 12). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612 reinforces the DirectX 12 performance picture.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users whose workloads are predominantly CPU-bound but who still need a functional GPU for display output and occasional graphics acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases would benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark multithread score of 60,012 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 50,995 indicating exceptional parallel processing capability. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 7,199) also suits developers running single-threaded build tools.

Students in computer science or engineering fields would find the CPU's data compression (803,368) and floating-point math (153,975) PassMark scores valuable for simulation and analysis work, while the GPU handles typical classroom graphics needs. Small business workstations running database queries or financial modeling would leverage the CPU's extended instructions score of 45,524 and encryption score of 47,717, with the GPU providing adequate visualization.

Gamers at 1080p who prioritize high frame rates in CPU-bound titles would see the i9-14900KS shine, though the Arc A750 will cap performance in GPU-heavy games. Content creators editing video would benefit from the CPU's multicore might during rendering, with the GPU assisting in effects and previews. The key caveat is that anyone primarily gaming at 1440p or 4K would find the GPU insufficient relative to the CPU's capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-14900KS delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 50,995 and single-core score of 7,199, placing it at the 96th percentile among all CPUs. The Geekbench multicore score of 23,931 and single-core score of 2,692 reinforce this elite standing. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves 60,012 in multithread, 4,815 in single-thread, 212,644 in integer math, and 153,975 in floating-point math. These scores place it effectively tied with the Xeon w5-3535X and Ryzen 9 8940HX, with only 0.5% separating it from the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and Xeon 638.

The Arc A750 produces a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, Geekbench OpenCL score of 98,554, and Vulkan score of 85,631. The PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and GPU compute score of 5,368 place it at the 66th percentile, with the nearest rival being the Arc B570 at just 0.1% ahead. The combined percentile of 81 reflects the CPU's dominance in the overall average benchmark score of 81,127, which is nearly four times the GPU's 20,582.

The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 803,368 is particularly striking, as is the random string sorting score of 89,789 — both indicating substantial throughput for data-intensive operations. The extended instructions score of 45,524 and encryption score of 47,717 show strong performance in specialized workloads. The find prime numbers score of 244 is comparatively modest, suggesting that certain integer-heavy algorithms do not scale as well with this architecture.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The Arc A750's PassMark G3D score of 12,534 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,612, combined with its 66th percentile ranking, suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings is the realistic target.

In CPU-bound titles, the i9-14900KS's single-thread score of 4,815 in PassMark and 7,199 in Cinebench R23 would allow the processor to feed frames at a high rate, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles at 1080p. However, the GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth would become the limiting factor in graphically demanding games, with estimated frame rates dropping to the 60-90 FPS range at 1080p ultra settings.

At 1440p, the Arc A750's 8 GB frame buffer and 256-bit memory bus would struggle with modern titles at ultra settings, with estimated frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for AAA games. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 70 suggests that DX12 titles may see better optimization than DX11 titles (72) or DX10 (65), though the DirectX 9 score of 181 indicates strong legacy performance. Ray tracing workloads, supported by the 28 RT cores, would see significant frame rate penalties given the 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-14900KS uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for current and near-future GPUs. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback display output.

The Arc A750 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, with power delivered through a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connector configuration. The GPU's TDP of 225 W, combined with the CPU's 150 W TDP, means a 550 W power supply provides reasonable headroom for this configuration, though additional components would require careful power budgeting.

The platform's support for DDR5 memory is a notable upgrade path, as is the PCIe Gen 5 interface for future storage devices. The CPU's ECC memory support adds another option for workstation builds. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-performing GPU, given that the CPU's 96th percentile ranking leaves substantial headroom for graphics improvements. The Arc A750's successor, Battlemage, is listed as its successor in the database, indicating a potential direct upgrade path within Intel's lineup.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class configuration pairing the Intel Core i9-14900KS, a 24-core, 32-thread Rapton Lake processor on the Socket 1700 platform, with the Intel Arc A750, a mid-range Xe-HPG graphics card based on the DG2-512 chip. The combined percentile of 81 places this system in the upper tier of desktop configurations, though the asymmetry between the CPU's 96th percentile and GPU's 66th percentile is the defining characteristic.

The CPU, with its 10 nm process node and 257 mm² die, represents Intel's flagship Core 14th Gen desktop offering. The GPU, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors, represents Intel's Alchemist generation and is now marked as end-of-life. This pairing is best understood as a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU, where the processor's capabilities far exceed what the graphics card can utilize in most workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename within the Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. It operates at a base clock of 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 6.20 GHz, the latter among the highest in the database. The 150 W TDP and unlocked multiplier indicate overclocking headroom for enthusiasts.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support extends to both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel interface, with ECC memory support included. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 CPU lanes provides modern connectivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers basic display capability without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 96th percentile, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 50,995 and single-core of 7,199. The Geekbench scores of 23,931 (multicore) and 2,692 (single-core) corroborate the Cinebench results. PassMark multithread score of 60,012 and single-thread of 4,815 confirm the processor's dual strengths in parallel and single-threaded workloads. The data compression score of 803,368 is exceptional, indicating that the CPU excels at tasks involving large data sets and compression algorithms.

The nearest rival comparisons show the i9-14900KS essentially tied with the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, with a 0.5% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and Intel Xeon 638. This places the processor at the top of the consumer desktop hierarchy, with workstation-class Xeon parts as its closest competitors.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,815 in PassMark and 7,199 in Cinebench R23 can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the Arc A750's 66th percentile ranking will limit overall performance. Estimated 1080p frame rates in esports titles could reach 144+ FPS, while AAA games at 1080p ultra would likely fall to 60-90 FPS.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample capacity for simultaneous gaming and encoding, with the PassMark multithread score of 60,012 indicating strong parallel processing. The GPU's 8 GB memory and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle encoding offload, though the CPU alone could manage streaming workloads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 50,995 and PassMark floating-point math score of 153,975 support fast render times in CPU-based editors. The GPU's OpenCL score of 98,554 assists with effects and GPU-accelerated previews, though the 8 GB frame buffer limits complex compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24 cores excel in CPU-based renderers, with the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 21,417 and R15 multicore score of 5,140 indicating strong performance. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS FP32 and 34.41 TFLOPS FP16 provide GPU-accelerated rendering capability, though the 66th percentile ranking limits its competitiveness.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 803,368 and integer math score of 212,644 indicate strong performance in compilation and data processing tasks. The single-thread score of 4,815 supports fast IDE responsiveness, while the 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without the discrete GPU, and the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache supports rapid data access for productivity applications. The PassMark encryption score of 47,717 indicates secure data handling, while the random string sorting score of 89,789 supports database and spreadsheet operations.