SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF paired with the Intel Arc B570 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count flagship processor with a mid-range graphics card. The data indicates this is a CPU-dominant pairing, with the processor consistently outperforming the GPU in relative standing. This analysis examines the platform, benchmark results, and workload suitability based exclusively on the provided specifications and scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which houses the Raptor Lake-R architecture processor. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing flexibility in memory selection based on motherboard choice and budget constraints. The memory support for both standards is a notable feature, allowing builders to leverage existing DDR4 modules or opt for newer DDR5 kits. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature typically associated with workstation and server environments, which broadens the potential use cases for this platform.

The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage devices and expansion cards. The GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is a capable connection for the Arc B570, though the bandwidth is halved compared to a full x16 slot. This configuration is sufficient for the GPU’s performance class, and the data does not indicate a significant limitation from the interface.

Power delivery requirements are defined by the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 150 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the system is 450 W, which is the baseline recommendation for this combination. The data suggests that a power supply at this level provides sufficient headroom for the two primary components, though additional devices would require careful planning. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, a standard configuration that is compatible with most power supplies on the market.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, as the processor’s benchmark scores indicate it has substantial headroom for higher-tier graphics cards. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests it is not the bottleneck in most workloads, making a GPU swap the most logical path for improved gaming or rendering performance. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU ensures that future storage devices will not be constrained by the platform, extending the system’s longevity.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are exceptional, placing it in the 95th percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score is 79371, which is nearly identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, at 79574, a difference of only -0.3%. The Intel Core i9-14900K is just behind at 79097, a delta of 0.3%, indicating that the KF variant performs essentially on par with its integrated-graphics counterpart. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, which is 0.8% higher, while the Intel Xeon w5-2565X scores 80671, 1.6% higher. These differences are marginal, placing the i9-14900KF firmly in the top tier of processors.

In multi-core workloads, the CPU demonstrates its strength. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 49370, while the single-core score is 6969. The Geekbench multicore score is 23789, with a single-core score of 2727. The Passmark multithread score is 58405, and the single-thread score is 4685. These figures indicate a processor that excels in both heavily threaded tasks and lightly threaded applications, making it versatile across different software types.

The GPU presents a more moderate picture. The Intel Arc B570 sits in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534, a delta of 0.1%, and the Intel Arc A750 at 20582, a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X trails at 20662, which is -0.5% relative to the B570. These results show the GPU performs in the mid-range tier, comparable to mobile versions of higher-end desktop cards.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU’s 95th percentile performance vastly outstrips the GPU’s 65th percentile standing. The combined percentile for the build is 80, reflecting a system that is stronger in processor-bound tasks than in graphics-intensive scenarios. The benchmark data consistently shows the CPU leading the GPU by a wide margin, shaping the overall character of this configuration.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking suggests it can handle competitive titles at moderate settings, but the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 6969 in Cinebench R23 and 4685 in Passmark single-thread ensures that frame pacing will be consistent. The limiting factor will be the GPU, as the processor can easily feed frames to a more powerful graphics card.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49370 indicates robust encoding and transcoding capabilities, allowing for simultaneous gameplay and streaming without a significant performance hit. The GPU’s hardware encoding support, implied by its architecture, would assist in offloading this work, though the CPU alone is more than capable.

Video editing is a strong suit for this processor. The Passmark floating-point math score of 151918 and the data compression score of 785831 show that the CPU can handle complex media processing tasks efficiently. The GPU’s 10 GB of VRAM provides adequate memory for timeline previews and effects, though rendering will rely heavily on the CPU’s multi-core performance.

3D rendering workloads will be primarily CPU-bound. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20735 and the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4976 indicate that the processor can tackle demanding render tasks, while the GPU’s compute score of 7281 in Passmark suggests it can assist with GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications, but it will not be the primary driver.

Software development tasks, such as compilation, benefit from the CPU’s high multi-threaded throughput. The Geekbench multicore score of 23789 and the Passmark integer math score of 209125 demonstrate fast compilation times and responsive build processes. The GPU’s 65th percentile is sufficient for standard development environments and basic graphical output.

For student and office work, this configuration is overkill. The CPU’s single-core performance is excellent for productivity applications, but the power and cost associated with this platform are unnecessary for basic tasks. The system would excel in any academic workload, including scientific computing, given the CPU’s floating-point performance, but it is not an efficient choice for simple document editing or web browsing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is set to false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14195 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 provide a baseline for its gaming capability. At 1080p, the Arc B570 should deliver playable frame rates in most titles at high settings, given its position near the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750. At 1440p, performance will drop, and users may need to adjust settings to maintain smooth frame rates. At 4K, the GPU will struggle with demanding titles, and the 10 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor.

The CPU’s high single-core performance ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The Passmark single-thread score of 4685 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6969 indicate that the processor can handle the game logic and physics calculations without issue. The estimated frame rates will be dictated by the GPU’s rendering capabilities, which are mid-range by current standards. These figures are estimates and should be treated as approximations until measured data is available for this pairing.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming performance. Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable, especially in esports titles where the CPU’s strong single-core performance can drive high frame rates, but the GPU will limit performance in graphically demanding games. Gamers at 1440p or higher will find the GPU to be the primary constraint.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The Cinebench R23 score of 49370 and Passmark multithread score of 58405 indicate that the processor can handle long render times and complex edits. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p video work, though 4K projects may require more memory.

Software developers will find this system well-suited for compilation and testing. The high integer math score of 209125 in Passmark and the robust multi-threaded performance ensure fast build times. The platform’s ECC memory support adds a layer of stability for long-running processes.

Students in engineering or scientific fields will benefit from the CPU’s floating-point performance, as indicated by the Passmark floating-point math score of 151918. The system can handle simulations and data analysis, though the GPU’s compute capabilities are limited compared to dedicated workstation cards.

Small business workstations that run heavy computational software, such as financial modeling or data processing, will see strong performance from the CPU. The Passmark data encryption score of 46416 and data compression score of 785831 highlight its capability in these areas. The build is less suited for graphics-intensive design work, where the GPU may be a limiting factor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, codenamed Battlemage, and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU features 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, with a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². It has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, operating at 19 Gbps effective. This configuration is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, though the 10 GB capacity may be a limitation in future titles that require more VRAM.

The GPU’s clocks are set at a base and boost of 2500 MHz. The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1). These figures place the GPU in the mid-range tier, as confirmed by its 65th percentile ranking.

The GPU has 18 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware support for real-time ray tracing. The lack of specified tensor cores suggests that AI-accelerated features may be limited or rely on the general compute units. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83514 and Vulkan score of 96844 indicate solid compute performance for a mid-range card.

The benchmark scores show that the GPU is comparable to the RTX 3070 Mobile and Arc A750. The Passmark G3D score of 14195 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 reflect its capabilities in modern graphics workloads. The GPU’s rendering performance is adequate for mainstream gaming but will not compete with high-end cards in the same price bracket.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking is far above the GPU’s 65th percentile, indicating that the processor is not the limiting factor in most workloads. In gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, as the CPU can easily supply frames faster than the GPU can render them.

The FPS scaling, while not directly measured, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s performance in DirectX 11 (Passmark score of 118) and DirectX 12 (Passmark score of 72) suggests that it will be the constraint in graphically intensive scenarios. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that it will not cause frame drops or stuttering.

In productivity workloads, the CPU dominates. The multi-core scores are exceptional, and the GPU’s compute performance is secondary. For tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary engine, while the GPU provides assistance where supported. The bottleneck shifts based on the workload: CPU-bound tasks will run at full speed, while GPU-bound tasks will be limited by the Arc B570’s mid-range performance.

The combined percentile of 80 reflects this imbalance, showing a system that is stronger overall than the GPU alone would suggest. Users looking to maximize gaming performance would need to upgrade the GPU, while those focused on productivity will find the CPU to be a formidable asset. The balance is skewed toward the processor, which is a key consideration for potential buyers.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor’s position among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF is in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 79371. It performs within 1.6% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus and the AMD EPYC 7413.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest competitors?

A: The Intel Arc B570 is in the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. It is nearly identical in performance to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, and the Intel Arc A750, which scores 20582.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 80, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations. This reflects the CPU’s high performance offset by the GPU’s mid-range standing.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation environments.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU for this configuration is 450 W, based on the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 150 W TDP. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 2375 MHz, with an effective speed of 19 Gbps.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 14th Generation Core processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The processor has 24 cores and 32 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power and throughput.

The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, the latter being a notable figure for single-threaded performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports high-speed data access for demanding workloads.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional, placing it in the 95th percentile. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49370 and single-core score of 6969 demonstrate its dominance in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 23789 and single-core score of 2727 reinforce this position.

The Passmark tests show a well-rounded processor. The multithread score is 58405, with a single-thread score of 4685. The integer math score is 209125, and the floating-point math score is 151918. The data encryption score is 46416, and the data compression score is 785831. These figures indicate a processor capable of handling a wide range of computational tasks with ease.

The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, providing high bandwidth for storage and expansion. It is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, which is a feature for enthusiasts seeking additional performance. The launch MSRP is $564, reflecting its position as a flagship desktop processor.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i9-14900KF with the Intel Arc B570, creating a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. The processor’s 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs makes it one of the most powerful available, while the GPU’s 65th percentile places it in the mid-range tier.

The overall tier of the build is reflected in its combined percentile of 80, indicating a system that is above average in performance. The CPU is the clear star, with its 24 cores, 32 threads, and 6.00 GHz boost clock delivering exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU, with 10 GB of VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, provides competent graphics performance for mainstream gaming and compute tasks.

This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize processor-intensive workloads, such as video editing, 3D rendering, software development, and scientific computing. For gaming, the system is capable at 1080p, but the GPU will limit performance at higher resolutions. The build represents a logical choice for those who need a powerful CPU and are willing to pair it with a mid-range GPU, with the option to upgrade the graphics card later without changing the platform.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc B570

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KF

Intel Arc B570

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds