SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770

68,809 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF and Intel Arc A770 form a desktop build that targets a specific niche: high-end processing power with a modern, feature-rich graphics card. The CPU is a flagship 24-core part from Intel’s 14th Gen lineup, while the GPU is Intel’s top-tier Alchemist offering. This pairing yields a combined percentile of 93, placing it in the top tier of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations. However, the data shows a significant imbalance in raw compute capability between the two components, which dictates the system's strengths and limitations.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-14900KF is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node. It is a 24-core, 32-thread part, which means it relies on a hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores to deliver its threading capabilities. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a maximum boost clock of 6.00 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its benchmark scores.

In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 49,370 points in the multi-core test and 6,969 in single-core. The multi-core figure is a dominant result, indicating exceptional performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and other tasks that scale with core count. The single-core score of 6,969 is equally strong, ensuring snappy responsiveness and high performance in lightly-threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 results (20,735 multi-core, 2,926 single-core) and R15 results (4,976 multi-core, 702 single-core) follow the same pattern, confirming consistent scaling across versions. In Geekbench, the CPU posts a multi-core score of 23,789 and a single-core score of 2,727, which are indicative of strong general-purpose compute capabilities.

The Passmark suite provides further granularity. The multithread score is 58,405, with integer math at 209,125 and floating-point math at 151,918. Data encryption scores 46,416 and compression scores 785,831, showing that the i9-14900KF handles cryptography and archival tasks with ease. Extended instructions (SIMD) score 44,839, and random string sorting hits 86,564. The CPU’s overall average benchmark score is 79,371, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (average score 79,574, 0.3% faster), the Intel Core i9-14900K (average score 79,097, 0.3% slower), the AMD EPYC 7413 (average score 80,041, 0.8% faster), and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X (average score 80,671, 1.6% faster). This places the 14900KF in a tight cluster at the very top of consumer CPU performance, with deltas under 2% against workstation and flagship mobile parts. For real workloads, this means the CPU is effectively a performance ceiling for most desktop software, excelling in both single-threaded response and multi-threaded throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-14900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and is part of the Raptor Lake generation. The platform supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory based on budget and performance targets. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are reserved for the primary graphics card or NVMe storage, ensuring high bandwidth for modern components. The processor has a TDP of 125 W, which is a baseline power draw figure; actual power consumption under boost loads will be higher, but the data does not specify a maximum turbo power value.

For this specific pairing, the GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 550 W. This suggests that the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU, along with the rest of the system, is expected to stay within that headroom. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be focusing on the GPU, as the CPU is already near the top of its class. Since the i9-14900KF supports both DDR4 and DDR5, a builder could upgrade memory speed or capacity without changing the motherboard, though they would need a board that supports their chosen memory type. The unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking the CPU to extract more performance, provided the cooling solution is sufficient. The platform is effectively a dead-end in terms of CPU upgrades, as the i9-14900KF is among the fastest LGA 1700 parts, so the primary avenue for future performance gains is the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark results for this exact combination are estimated, as no measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i9-14900KF combined with the Intel Arc A770 in the FACT PACK. All FPS discussions are therefore projections based on the individual component scores, not observed frame rates.

The CPU’s performance is stellar, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79,371. This is significantly ahead of the GPU’s standing. The GPU, the Intel Arc A770, has an average benchmark score of 68,809, placing it in the 90th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 90HX (average score 69,000, 0.3% faster), the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (average score 68,562, 0.4% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 (average score 69,870, 1.5% faster), and the NVIDIA Quadro P6000 (average score 69,986, 1.7% faster). This indicates the A770 is a solidly performing GPU, but it is not in the same league as the CPU in terms of relative standing among its peers.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Arc A770 scores 2,969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 109,175 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 94,284 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores show the GPU is capable of handling modern DirectX 12 workloads and compute tasks. The combined percentile for the CPU+GPU pair is 93, which is high, but this is largely driven by the CPU’s exceptional performance. The combined picture is one of a system where the CPU is the star, and the GPU is a competent but secondary component. For gaming, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor; the GPU will determine frame rates in most scenarios. For productivity, the CPU will dominate rendering and compilation times, while the GPU assists in acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a CPU-bound system with a significant performance gap between the processor and graphics card. The i9-14900KF sits in the 95th percentile of CPUs, while the Arc A770 sits in the 90th percentile of GPUs. While both are above average, the delta in their relative standings suggests that the CPU is the stronger component. In workloads that rely heavily on the processor, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will be less of a bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 and Passmark multithread score of 58,405 support this, showing massive headroom for parallel processing.

Conversely, in gaming, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. The Arc A770’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,969 is a moderate result, indicating it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-core performance is so high that it will not hold back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, meaning the GPU will be the primary determinant of FPS. The lack of measured FPS data for this pairing precludes a precise bottleneck analysis, but the percentile disparity implies that the CPU is overqualified for the GPU. This is not necessarily a negative; it provides a clear upgrade path. A user could replace the GPU with a more powerful model in the future without needing to upgrade the CPU, as the i9-14900KF has ample headroom to support faster graphics cards.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This CPU+GPU pairing is suitable for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU’s 6.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-core score of 6,969 in Cinebench R23 ensure high frame rates in esports titles, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory for modern game assets. However, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and achieving high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K will be challenging in graphically intensive games.

Streaming: The i9-14900KF is excellent for streaming due to its 24 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 58,405 indicates that the CPU can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU can assist with encoding via its media engine, but the CPU alone has enough headroom to manage the load.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49,370 will accelerate video rendering and export times dramatically. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for timeline scrubbing and effects previews, and its OpenCL score of 109,175 helps with GPU-accelerated effects. The combination is well-suited for 4K video editing, though the GPU may slow down final renders compared to a higher-end card.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the dominant force here. The i9-14900KF’s multi-core performance (49,370 in Cinebench R23) is ideal for CPU-based renderers like V-Ray or Blender Cycles. The GPU can contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering, but its FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is modest, so it will not be the primary render driver. This build excels in CPU rendering tasks.

Software Development: The CPU’s high core count and fast single-core speed make it perfect for compilation. The Passmark integer math score of 209,125 and data compression score of 785,831 indicate rapid code compilation and file I/O processing. The GPU is less relevant here, but its support for modern APIs like Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 Ultimate ensures compatibility with development tools that leverage GPU compute.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for standard office tasks, but it handles them with ease. The CPU’s single-core performance (2,727 in Geekbench) ensures snappy application launches, and the 36 MB L3 cache helps with multitasking. The GPU’s dual-slot design and 16 GB VRAM are unnecessary for word processing or spreadsheets, but the system will never struggle with these light workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. It targets content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists who use CPU-based rendering engines, as the i9-14900KF’s 24 cores provide exceptional throughput in these tasks. It is also suitable for developers who compile large codebases, where the CPU’s multithread score of 58,405 and integer math performance of 209,125 will drastically reduce build times. Gamers at 1080p will find this system capable, but they will leave CPU performance on the table, as the Arc A770 will be the limiting factor. Students and small business workstations that run heavy simulation or data analysis software will benefit from the CPU, but the GPU is more than sufficient for standard productivity. The build is not ideal for 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, where the A770’s performance is comparatively weaker. It is a workstation-first build with gaming as a secondary capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-14900KF and Intel Arc A770 is 93, placing it in the top tier of all benchmarked desktop combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79,371, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K’s score of 79,097.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Intel Arc A770 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900KF has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU for the system is 550 W, which accounts for the GPU’s 225 W TDP and the CPU’s 125 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A770 is in the 90th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 68,809.

Q: Are there measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combo?

A: No, the data set does not contain measured FPS rows for this exact combination; performance estimates are based on individual benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-14900KF and Intel Arc A770. The CPU is a flagship 24-core processor, and the GPU is a 16 GB graphics card from Intel’s Arc Alchemist generation. The system’s combined percentile of 93 indicates it is a high-performing machine, but the CPU’s 95th percentile standing versus the GPU’s 90th percentile shows a CPU-heavy bias. This is a top-tier processor paired with a mid-to-high-tier graphics card, making it a powerful workstation that can also game at moderate settings.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A770 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-512 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. The chip contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². It has a base clock of 2100 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), with 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. The GPU features 4,096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 render output units. It has 32 ray tracing (RT) cores, but the data does not list a tensor core count. The pixel rate is 307.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 614.4 GTexel/s. It delivers 19.66 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 39.32 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio). The card has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector, and is dual-slot in width. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and outputs video through 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark tests, the A770 scores 2,969 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is a moderate result indicating solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 109,175 shows strong compute capability for tasks like video encoding and image processing, while the Vulkan score of 94,284 confirms good cross-platform API performance. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 68,809, placing it in the 90th percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 90HX, scores 69,000 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 scores 69,870 (1.5% higher). This indicates the A770 is competitive with older workstation and mining cards, but it is not a top-tier gaming GPU. The 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature, providing headroom for high-resolution textures and large datasets, which benefits content creation but does not directly translate to higher frame rates in gaming. The RT cores are present, but the overall FP32 throughput of 19.66 TFLOPS suggests ray tracing performance will be modest, requiring lower resolutions or upscaling to maintain playable frame rates. For rendering, the GPU can accelerate workloads, but it will not match the CPU’s dominance in CPU-based render tasks.