SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A750

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A750

20,582 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF paired with the Intel Arc A750 is a desktop combination that represents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a top-tier 24-core processor sitting at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range contender at the 66th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a significant imbalance where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card in raw computational power. The data indicates a system built primarily for CPU-intensive productivity, with gaming performance constrained by the GPU's capabilities. Since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using Intel's 10 nm process node. The die measures 257 mm², and the chip features 24 cores with 32 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to handle heavy multi-threaded workloads. The base clock runs at 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 6.00 GHz, and the CPU has a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This structure supports the CPU's 95th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 79371.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the CPU scores 49370, which is roughly 40% higher than the single-core score of 6969, showing strong scaling across its 32 threads. The Cinebench R20 results follow a similar pattern: 20735 multi-core versus 2926 single-core. The Cinebench R15 numbers are 4976 multi-core and 702 single-core. These scores place the i9-14900KF in a virtual tie with the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which has an average score of 79574 (a delta of -0.3%), and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900K at 79097 (a delta of 0.3%). Against the AMD EPYC 7413, the i9-14900KF trails by 0.8%, and it is 1.6% behind the Intel Xeon w5-2565X. The margins are tight, meaning the i9-14900KF trades blows with workstation-class silicon.

Geekbench results show 23789 multi-core and 2727 single-core, reinforcing the strong multi-threaded performance. PassMark tests break down the workload characteristics: integer math scores 209125, floating-point math scores 151918, and extended instructions score 44839. Data encryption hits 46416, while data compression reaches 785831. Random string sorting scores 86564, and find prime numbers scores 231. The multi-thread score is 58405, with a physics score of 3159 and a single-thread score of 4685. For real workloads, this CPU excels in rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks where the 32 threads can be fully utilized. The 6.00 GHz boost clock also gives it a strong edge in lightly-threaded tasks, as evidenced by the high single-core scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance is exceptional, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2727 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6969. These numbers suggest the i9-14900KF will not bottleneck any game at any resolution, as its raw single-thread capability ranks near the top of all CPUs. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. The Arc A750 sits at the 66th percentile, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 indicates it can handle modern titles, but not at the highest settings.

At 1080p, the Arc A750 should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the CPU ensuring consistent frame pacing. The GPU's 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p gaming, but high-refresh-rate monitors above 144 Hz will be challenging in demanding titles. At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in graphically intensive games, and the CPU's advantage becomes irrelevant as the GPU hits its limits. At 4K, the Arc A750 will be severely constrained, likely requiring reduced settings to achieve playable performance. The PassMark DirectX scores are telling: DirectX 9 scores 181, DirectX 10 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 72, and DirectX 12 scores 70. These scores are relatively low, suggesting that the GPU's driver overhead may impact older API performance, though DirectX 12 is the primary focus for modern titles.

Given the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 66th percentile, the estimated gaming experience is CPU-bound at low resolutions and GPU-bound at higher resolutions. For esports titles that favor CPU performance, this system would excel at 1080p, but for AAA games with heavy GPU demands, the frame rates will be modest.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a system at the 81st percentile overall, with the CPU carrying the vast majority of the performance weight. The CPU's average benchmark score is 79371, placing it at the 95th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 20582, placing it at the 66th percentile. This 29-percentile gap between components is substantial and indicates that the GPU is the clear bottleneck in most workloads.

The CPU's nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at 79574 (-0.3%), the Intel Core i9-14900K at 79097 (+0.3%), the AMD EPYC 7413 at 80041 (-0.8%), and the Intel Xeon w5-2565X at 80671 (-1.6%). The i9-14900KF sits comfortably in this group, meaning it is competitive with both mobile HX-series parts and server-grade EPYC and Xeon processors. The GPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Arc B570 at 20556 (+0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile at 20534 (+0.2%), the AMD Radeon R9 M390X at 20662 (-0.4%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M at 20480 (+0.5%). The Arc A750 is essentially tied with these parts, showing that it performs at the level of a mobile RTX 3070 or a desktop B570.

The Geekbench OpenCL score for the GPU is 98554, and the Vulkan score is 85631, indicating strong compute performance for a mid-range GPU. The PassMark G3D score is 12534, with GPU compute at 5368. These scores suggest the GPU is capable of some compute tasks, but the CPU's PassMark integer and floating-point scores dwarf the GPU's compute output, confirming that the CPU is the dominant compute resource in this system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance is stark. The CPU at the 95th percentile versus the GPU at the 66th percentile means the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every workload that involves graphics. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering, video encoding, or data processing, the i9-14900KF will deliver outstanding performance, and the GPU will have minimal impact. In gaming, the GPU will cap frame rates, and the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to catch up. The FPS scaling is evident from the benchmark scores: because the GPU's average score is roughly a quarter of the CPU's (20582 versus 79371), the GPU is the bottleneck in any graphics-heavy scenario.

For productivity workloads that use both components, such as 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the Arc A750's FP32 performance of 17.20 TFLOPS can assist, but it is far weaker than the CPU's multi-threaded throughput. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 58405 is more than ten times the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 5368, highlighting the CPU's dominance. This means any workload that can leverage the CPU's 32 threads will vastly outperform the GPU's compute capabilities. The system is well-balanced for CPU-centric tasks but poorly balanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A750 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-512 chip, using TSMC's 6 nm process node. The die contains 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, with a transistor density of 53.4 million per mm². The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 2050 MHz, boosting to 2400 MHz. The GPU features 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. It has 28 ray tracing cores, and the pixel rate is 268.8 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 537.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 17.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 34.41 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W. The card uses a dual-slot design with 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors, and it has a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2612 places it at the 66th percentile, which is firmly mid-range. The nearest rivals are the Intel Arc B570 (20556, +0.1%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.2%), AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.4%), and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.5%). The Arc A750 is essentially equal to these parts, meaning it offers performance similar to a laptop RTX 3070. For rendering, the 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware support for RT workloads, but the modest 17.20 TFLOPS of FP32 means ray tracing will be slow in demanding scenes. The 512 GB/s of memory bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p textures, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity could be limiting for high-resolution textures or large scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900KF compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K's score of 79097. The two processors are effectively identical in performance, with the KF variant lacking integrated graphics.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 81st percentile overall, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 66th percentile.

Q: Does the Arc A750 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 28 ray tracing cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A750?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile?

A: The Arc A750 has an average benchmark score of 20582, while the RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, a delta of 0.2%. The Arc A750 is marginally faster.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU boosts to 6.00 GHz, while the GPU boosts to 2400 MHz.

Q: Is the CPU's cache sufficient for high-performance computing?

A: The CPU has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which supports its strong multi-threaded benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering that uses CPU-based renderers will benefit from the i9-14900KF's 24 cores and 32 threads, with the Arc A750 providing a baseline for display output and light GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the CPU's multi-threaded performance, as indicated by the PassMark integer math score of 209125 and data compression score of 785831. Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the CPU's throughput for simulations and data processing, though they should not expect high-end gaming performance.

Small business workstations that run database queries or spreadsheet-heavy workloads will be well-served by the CPU's capabilities. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the Arc A750 adequate, but those seeking high refresh rates or 1440p/4K gaming should look elsewhere. The system is not ideal for GPU-accelerated machine learning, as the GPU's compute score of 5368 is far below the CPU's multi-thread score of 58405. For users who need a workstation-class CPU with a basic GPU to drive displays, this pairing is sensible, but for balanced performance, the GPU should be upgraded.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-14900KF, a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, with the Intel Arc A750, an 8 GB GDDR6 graphics card. The CPU is a high-end part at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is mid-range at the 66th percentile. The overall tier is the 81st percentile, which reflects the CPU's dominance in the combined score. The CPU's average benchmark score is 79371, and the GPU's is 20582. This is a lopsided pairing where the CPU is overkill for the GPU, making it suitable for CPU-centric workloads like rendering, compilation, and data analysis, but less suitable for gaming or GPU compute. The GPU is end-of-life with a successor called Battlemage, while the CPU is active and unlocked for overclocking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is ample for the Arc A750's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU has a TDP of 225 W, and the suggested PSU is 550 W, which provides headroom for the CPU's 125 W TDP. The combined power draw is manageable, but users should ensure their PSU has the required 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin connectors for the GPU.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The Arc A750 at the 66th percentile is the bottleneck, and replacing it with a higher-tier GPU would balance the system. The CPU has headroom to support a much faster GPU, as its 95th percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck any current graphics card. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so a future GPU using that interface would be compatible. The CPU's memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though users on DDR4 may want to consider a platform upgrade to leverage DDR5 speeds. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is possible with adequate cooling, but the stock 6.00 GHz boost clock is already high. The GPU is end-of-life, so users should plan for a replacement, and the successor Battlemage is the natural direction. For a more balanced system, upgrading to a GPU at the 80th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's performance class.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A750

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KF

Intel Arc A750

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds