SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900KF and Intel Arc A580 pairing is a desktop build that combines one of the fastest consumer CPUs available with a mid-range GPU that excels in compute-heavy tasks. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, giving the combined system a 91st percentile overall ranking. This is a lopsided configuration in raw processing terms, but the benchmark data reveals where each component shines and where the pairing creates a notable bottleneck in gaming workloads. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a 14th Generation Raptor Lake Refresh processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 cores and 32 threads, running at a base clock of 3.20 GHz and boosting up to 6.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which totals a substantial pool for multi-threaded workloads. This CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The processor is unlocked for overclocking, carries a launch MSRP of $564, and was released on 2023-10-16.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 49370 in multi-core and 6969 in single-core. The multi-core score places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-14900K and 0.8% behind the AMD EPYC 7413, while being 1.6% ahead of the Intel Xeon w5-2565X. The single-core score of 6969 is among the highest available for desktop processors, reflecting the 6.00 GHz boost capability. In Geekbench, the CPU achieves 23789 multi-core and 2727 single-core, reinforcing its position at the 95th percentile of all CPUs. PassMark tests further illustrate the CPU's strengths: multithread score of 58405, integer math at 209125, floating point math at 151918, and data compression at 785831. The data encryption score of 46416 and extended instructions score of 44839 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance, useful for workloads like encryption, compression, and scientific calculations. The find prime numbers score of 231 is comparatively low, suggesting that pure integer prime-searching tasks are not this CPU's primary strength, but this is an outlier relative to its other impressive results.

For real workloads, the 24-core/32-thread configuration with high clock speeds means the CPU can handle heavily parallel tasks like video rendering, code compilation, and 3D modeling with ease. The single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications and games that rely on one or two fast cores. The average benchmark score of 79371 places it nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which scores 79574, a delta of only -0.3%. This indicates the 14900KF is competitive with the latest mobile flagship CPUs, despite being a desktop part.

Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS values for this CPU+GPU combination, as the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all gaming frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores of both components. The CPU is capable of feeding frames at very high rates due to its 6.00 GHz boost and strong single-core performance, but the Intel Arc A580 is the limiting factor in this pairing.

The Arc A580's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 indicate a GPU that performs at the 87th percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% faster), AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% slower), Intel Arc A570M (0.8% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (1.1% slower). These deltas are tight, placing the Arc A580 in a performance band roughly equivalent to mid-range to upper-mid-range GPUs from previous generations.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this GPU can likely deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with estimates in the 60-90 FPS range for modern games, depending on the game's optimization for Intel graphics. At 1440p ultra, frame rates would likely drop to 40-60 FPS in demanding titles, while lighter esports games could exceed 100 FPS at lower settings. At 4K ultra, the GPU would struggle, likely producing 20-35 FPS in AAA titles, making it unsuitable for high-refresh 4K gaming. These are estimates based on the GPU's 3DMark and compute scores, not measured results, so actual performance may vary.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4976 multi-core and 702 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 20735 multi-core and 2926 single-core. Cinebench R23, as noted, delivers 49370 multi-core and 6969 single-core. Geekbench results are 23789 multi-core and 2727 single-core. The PassMark suite adds: data compression 785831, data encryption 46416, extended instructions 44839, find prime numbers 231, floating point math 151918, integer math 209125, multithread 58405, physics 3159, random string sorting 86564, and single thread 4685.

The GPU's benchmarks are more limited but informative: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381. The OpenCL score is notably higher than the Vulkan score, suggesting that compute workloads leveraging OpenCL will perform relatively better than pure gaming workloads. The average GPU benchmark score of 57756 places it within 1.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which is a much larger and more power-hungry card, indicating the Arc A580 punches above its class in synthetic benchmarks.

Combined, the system achieves a 91st percentile ranking, driven primarily by the CPU's 95th percentile performance. The GPU's 87th percentile is strong but not at the same level as the CPU, creating an imbalance where the CPU is underutilized in gaming workloads while the GPU is fully saturated.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is capable of supporting 240+ FPS in esports titles at 1080p, but the GPU will limit frame rates to roughly 60-90 FPS at ultra settings in modern AAA games. For competitive shooters at lower settings, the GPU may still deliver 100-144 FPS, but the CPU's full potential is not realized.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with strong multi-threaded scores like 49370 in Cinebench R23 and 58405 in PassMark multithread indicating minimal impact on game performance when streaming simultaneously.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 49370 and Geekbench multi-core of 23789 suggest excellent performance in video editing software that scales across cores. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance also accelerate effects and rendering tasks.

3D rendering: The CPU's high core count and clock speeds make it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 3072 shading units and 192 texture mapping units provide 12.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute for GPU-accelerated renderers. The GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 suggests solid compute performance, though not at the level of higher-tier cards.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU's 24 cores, with PassMark integer math score of 209125 indicating fast build times. The CPU's high single-core score of 6969 in Cinebench R23 ensures quick response in editors and IDEs.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's single-thread performance of 4685 in PassMark single thread ensures instant application loading and smooth multitasking. The GPU is more than sufficient for document work, spreadsheets, and light photo editing.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-bound system in compute workloads and a GPU-bound system in gaming. The CPU's 95th percentile vs. the GPU's 87th percentile creates a mismatch where the CPU has significantly more processing power than the GPU can utilize in frame rendering. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as evidenced by the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2229 being the primary determinant of frame rates. The CPU's single-core advantage (6969 in Cinebench R23) will only matter up to the point where the GPU is saturated. At 1080p, the CPU can feed frames fast enough to keep the GPU busy, but at higher resolutions, the GPU's workload increases and the CPU's advantage becomes less relevant. In compute workloads like rendering or video encoding, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU's compute capabilities (12.29 TFLOPS) can assist but not replace the CPU's 24 cores.

The FPS scaling from lower to higher resolutions would show the GPU's influence: at 1080p, frame rates are limited by the GPU's 87th percentile performance, while at 1440p and 4K, the gap between this GPU and higher-end cards widens. The CPU's strong single-thread performance prevents it from being a bottleneck even at 1080p, but the GPU remains the constraining factor in all gaming scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance compared to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The Core i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-14900K's average score of 79097, making them effectively identical in performance.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The Intel Arc A580 has an average benchmark score of 57756, which is 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT's average score of 58392, placing them in the same performance tier.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integratedGraphics field is null, meaning this KF-series CPU does not include integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the GPU's power connector requirement?

A: The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors and has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 450 W.

Q: What is the combined system percentile ranking?

A: The combined system ranks at the 91st percentile among all desktop builds, driven by the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over gaming performance. Content creators working with video editing software, 3D rendering applications, or large codebases will benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 49370 and PassMark multithread score of 58405. Software developers compiling large projects will see fast build times from the integer math score of 209125. Students and professionals in engineering or scientific fields using compute-heavy applications will appreciate the CPU's 95th percentile performance. However, gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p or 1440p experiences will find the GPU limiting, as it sits at the 87th percentile and will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can handle. For office work and general productivity, this system is vastly over-specified, but the single-thread score of 4685 in PassMark ensures snappy performance. Small business workstations running multi-threaded databases or virtual machines would also benefit, given the CPU's data compression score of 785831 and encryption score of 46416.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14900KF, a 24-core Raptor Lake Refresh CPU at the 95th percentile, with the Intel Arc A580, an 8 GB Xe-HPG GPU at the 87th percentile. The combined system ranks at the 91st percentile overall. The CPU is a flagship-level processor with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a mid-range card with 3072 shading units and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. This pairing creates a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks like rendering, encoding, and compilation, but underperforms in gaming relative to its CPU capability. The overall tier is high-end desktop, with the CPU being the dominant component in most workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. PCIe Gen 5 is available with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the GPU will not bottleneck the PCIe bandwidth. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the GPU alone. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom to drive more powerful graphics cards. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, is only 1.1% faster, so upgrading to a GPU above that performance level would be the first step to balance the system. The platform supports overclocking (multiplier unlocked on the CPU), and the memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though DDR5 would be recommended for future-proofing. The CPU's production status is active, so replacement parts are available, and the GPU's successor is Battlemage, indicating a clear upgrade path within the same vendor.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 uses the DG2-512 chip based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². It has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 512.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 raster output pipelines, and 24 ray tracing cores. It achieves a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 12.29 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and has display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229, which places it in a tight performance band around the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (0.6% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (0.7% slower). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 91657 is substantially higher than the Vulkan score of 79381, indicating that compute workloads using OpenCL will perform relatively better than gaming workloads using Vulkan. For rendering tasks, the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 24 ray tracing cores provide solid baseline capabilities, though the GPU's 87th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. The memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s is sufficient for the GPU's compute capabilities, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture-heavy workloads at higher resolutions. Overall, the GPU is a capable mid-range card that performs best in compute tasks rather than high-end gaming, and its performance relative to the CPU creates a significant bottleneck in gaming scenarios.