SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900KF

79,371 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A380: A Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship 14th-generation desktop processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-R part running at a 3.20 GHz base clock and a 6.00 GHz boost clock, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The GPU is a DG2-128 chip on TSMC's 6 nm process, featuring 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. The combined 70th percentile ranking across all builds indicates this is a mid-tier system overall, but the performance disparity between the two components is substantial, which shapes every workload outcome discussed below.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900KF is a desktop-class processor from the Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture (codename Raptor Lake-R). It packs 24 physical cores and 32 threads, a configuration that excels in heavily threaded workloads. The base clock of 3.20 GHz and boost clock of 6.00 GHz are both notable; the boost figure is among the highest in the FACT PACK's data, indicating strong single-thread responsiveness. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². Cache is organized as 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, a very strong position. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49370 demonstrates exceptional parallel processing capability; the single-core score of 6969 is equally impressive, showing that the high boost clock translates into real-world single-threaded performance. Geekbench scores of 23789 multicore and 2727 single-core corroborate this, as does a Passmark multithread score of 58405. For integer math, the Passmark score is 209125, while floating-point math reaches 151918, indicating robust ALU and FPU performance. Data compression scores are particularly high at 785831, and encryption throughput is 46416, both suggesting strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 79371, which is nearly identical to its closest rivals. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus by only 0.3% (79574 vs 79371), and it is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900K (79097). Against the AMD EPYC 7413, it is 0.8% behind (80041), and it lags the Intel Xeon w5-2565X by 1.6% (80671). These deltas are all within a narrow band, meaning the i9-14900KF is essentially performance-equivalent to its nearest competitors in aggregate benchmarks. This positions it as a top-tier desktop processor for both productivity and content creation.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A380 is a desktop GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist (Arc 3) generation. It uses the DG2-128 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units, along with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The base clock is 2000 MHz, boosting to 2050 MHz, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). Memory configuration is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s.

The GPU's compute capabilities are modest: FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The card is dual-slot, draws 75 W TDP, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 250 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and outputs 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, all of which are current-generation standards.

Benchmark results place this GPU in the 44th percentile among all GPUs, which is below average. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 808, a low figure indicating limited modern gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL score is 38224, and Vulkan is 36736, both moderate for compute. Passmark G3D score is 6252, with G2D at 610. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 37, 38, and 35 respectively, all very low, while DirectX 9 scores 73. GPU compute via Passmark is 2762. The average benchmark score is 8558, placing it just above the AMD FirePro W5170M (8595, delta -0.4%), and slightly ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, delta 1.1%) and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, delta 1.2%). It is 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon 880M (8436). These rivals are all older or entry-level parts, confirming the A380 is a low-end GPU by current standards.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also supports ECC memory, a feature that is valuable for workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for storage and future expansion cards. The CPU multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking if the user has a capable motherboard and cooling solution. The launch MSRP for the CPU was $564.

The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is a potential bottleneck consideration for the platform, as the CPU natively supports PCIe Gen 5. However, for the A380's bandwidth needs (186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth), the x8 link is sufficient. The suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU is low, but the CPU's 125 W TDP is substantial; a system PSU must account for both, plus other components. The GPU is dual-slot and 222 mm long, requiring a case with adequate clearance.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU first, as the CPU has significant headroom and is the stronger component by far. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means it will not be a limiting factor in most workloads for years to come. The motherboard and memory (DDR4 or DDR5) should be retained, as the CPU's memory controller supports both. For a user seeking better gaming or rendering performance, upgrading to a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would be the logical step, given the CPU's ability to feed it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is extreme. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression, or heavily threaded rendering tasks, the CPU will dominate, and the GPU's role is minimal. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A380 will be the limiting factor, capping frame rates and compute throughput well below what the CPU could support.

For gaming, benchmark results indicate the GPU's low DirectX 12 score (35) will constrain performance even at 1080p. The CPU's high single-core score (6969 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame pacing and physics calculations are handled easily, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will saturate quickly with modern game textures. For productivity, the CPU's multicore might (49370 in Cinebench R23) means tasks like video encoding or 3D scene rendering will be fast, but any GPU-accelerated effects (e.g., Blender Cycles with GPU compute) will be slow.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance: the system is well above average overall, but this is almost entirely due to the CPU. In a balanced system, both components would be closer in percentile. The data suggests that this pairing is appropriate for compute-heavy, GPU-light workloads, but it is severely mismatched for graphics-intensive tasks. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 6252 is comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs, while the CPU's Passmark multithread score of 58405 is among the best available.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's exact benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multicore 4976 and single-core 702; Cinebench R20 multicore 20735 and single-core 2926; Cinebench R23 multicore 49370 and single-core 6969; Geekbench multicore 23789 and single-core 2727. Passmark sub-scores include data compression 785831, data encryption 46416, extended instructions 44839, find prime numbers 231, floating-point math 151918, integer math 209125, multithread 58405, physics 3159, random string sorting 86564, and single-thread 4685. The average benchmark score is 79371, with a 95th percentile ranking.

The GPU's exact scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 808; Geekbench OpenCL 38224 and Vulkan 36736; Passmark DirectX 10 37, DirectX 11 38, DirectX 12 35, DirectX 9 73, G2D 610, G3D 6252, and GPU compute 2762. The average benchmark score is 8558, with a 44th percentile ranking.

The combined picture is clear: the CPU is a top-decile performer, while the GPU is slightly below the median. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.6% of its average score, indicating it is at the top of its class. The GPU's nearest rivals are all older or lower-end parts, and it is within 1.4% of them, meaning it is not significantly better than those older parts. This reinforces the assessment that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this build.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with high refresh-rate monitors, the CPU can deliver high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 35 will prevent the system from reaching high FPS in modern games. The 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture detail and resolution. Expect playable but not competitive frame rates at medium settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding (x264) while gaming, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 49370 indicates strong encoding throughput. The GPU's encoders are less relevant here, but the CPU can handle both gaming and streaming simultaneously without a significant frame rate penalty.

Video editing: In timelines with heavy effects, the CPU will excel at rendering and export tasks, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score ensuring fast final encodes. However, GPU-accelerated effects (e.g., Lumetri, Magic Bullet) will be slow due to the A380's low compute scores (4.198 TFLOPS FP32). For basic cuts and color grading, the system is capable; for complex 4K timelines, the GPU will bottleneck.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers (e.g., Blender Cycles with CPU) will perform exceptionally well, with the Passmark multithread score of 58405 indicating fast ray tracing on the CPU. GPU-based rendering will be slow, as the A380's 8 RT cores are entry-level, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 confirms limited modern rendering performance.

Software development: Compilation and build times will be excellent, with the CPU's integer math score of 209125 and data compression score of 785831 speeding up code compilation and source control operations. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but it can handle basic UI rendering and 2D acceleration.

Student and office work: For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheets, this build is massively overqualified for the CPU side, but the GPU's G2D score of 610 is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration. The system will feel fast for everyday tasks, but the GPU's low performance is not a hindrance in this scenario.

Who Should Build It

This build is intended for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over graphics performance. Gamers at 1080p with esports titles (e.g., CS:GO, Valorant) that are CPU-bound will see high frame rates, but AAA games at high settings will be limited by the GPU. Content creators who rely primarily on CPU rendering (e.g., software-based 3D rendering, video encoding) will benefit greatly from the i9-14900KF's multicore might, though GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. Developers and data analysts will appreciate the CPU's compilation and compression speeds, and the GPU is sufficient for visualization. Students and small business users with compute-heavy tasks (e.g., simulations, large spreadsheet models) will find the CPU brawn beneficial, while the GPU is adequate for standard office applications. For any GPU-centric workload, this build is not recommended without a GPU upgrade.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs a flagship Intel Core i9-14900KF CPU with an entry-level Intel Arc A380 GPU. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, scoring in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a 6 GB GDDR6 Xe-HPG part with 1024 shading units, scoring in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 70, placing this build above average overall. The system is best described as a high-end productivity workstation with a placeholder GPU; it is not a gaming-oriented build. The CPU's launch MSRP was $564, and the GPU's launch MSRP was 149 USD. The production status is Active for the CPU and End-of-life for the GPU, indicating the GPU is at the end of its market life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KF has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900K?

A: The i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K's 79097.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is in the 44th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 6.00 GHz.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 808 and Passmark DirectX 12 score of 35 indicate very low performance in modern titles. Estimated FPS in AAA games would be in the 20-35 range at best, with older or lighter titles reaching 40-50 FPS at medium settings. The CPU's high single-core score (6969 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame times are stable, but the GPU is the limiting factor. At 1440p, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth will be inadequate, with estimated FPS dropping below 20 in most modern games. At 4K, the system is not viable for gaming, as the GPU's pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s is too low for the resolution. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, which are CPU-bound, the CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock could push frame rates to 200+ FPS at 1080p low settings, but the GPU's low fill rate may still cause occasional dips. Overall, this is not a gaming build; the CPU is overkill, and the GPU is a bottleneck at any resolution above 720p.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900KF + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900KF

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds