SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the Intel Arc A380 is a study in extreme asymmetry. The data places this combination at the 70th percentile overall, a figure that belies the vast chasm between the two components’ individual standings. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all processors, a top-tier performer, while the GPU languishes in the 44th percentile, squarely in the entry-level segment. This build is a desktop configuration where the processing brain vastly outpaces the visual output capabilities, creating a system whose character is defined entirely by this imbalance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a maximum boost clock of 6.00 GHz. This high boost clock is reflected in the benchmark data, particularly in single-threaded workloads. The CPU achieves a Geekbench single-core score of 2655 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, indicating exceptional responsiveness in tasks that rely on a single thread, such as everyday application usage and many games.

The multi-threaded performance is equally formidable, driven by the combination of 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 21697 place it firmly in the high-end desktop tier. The data shows it is a mere 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-14900KF in average benchmark score, a negligible difference, and 1.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7413. This level of performance is suited for heavy parallel workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58674 further corroborates this, showing immense throughput for demanding professional applications.

The architecture also includes a substantial cache hierarchy, with 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, alongside 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps feed the 24 cores efficiently, reducing latency and improving performance in data-intensive tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 792694 and integer math score of 210622 are indicative of a processor that can handle complex computational and archival tasks with ease. This is a CPU designed for maximum compute, and its benchmark scores confirm it delivers on that promise without compromise.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The foundation of this build is the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The Core i9-14900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory technology. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth storage devices. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, which is a base figure; the data suggests a capable cooling solution is necessary to sustain the 6.00 GHz boost clocks under load.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W and a suggested PSU rating of 250 W. This is an extremely low power requirement for a discrete graphics card. In a system with a 125 W TDP CPU, the overall PSU headroom is substantial; even a modest power supply would comfortably run this configuration, leaving ample room for future upgrades. The GPU itself is listed as end-of-life, however, meaning its upgrade path is not within its own product line.

The most sensible next upgrade for this platform would be the graphics card. The CPU is at the top of its class, so any bottleneck in gaming will come from the GPU. Replacing the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU would unlock the full potential of the Core i9-14900K in gaming workloads. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future high-end GPU will not be bandwidth-limited. The platform is mature and powerful, with the CPU being the long-term component and the GPU being the clear point of weakness.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a profound bottleneck that defines this system. The CPU's average benchmark score is 79097, placing it in the 95th percentile, while the GPU's average score is 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile. This is not a balanced pairing; the CPU is capable of far more work than the GPU can process in graphics-related tasks. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor in nearly all scenarios, preventing the CPU from ever being exercised to its full potential.

This bottleneck is most acute in resolution-dependent workloads. At lower resolutions, the CPU has to work harder to feed frames to the GPU, but with the Arc A380, the GPU will hit its rendering limit well before the CPU becomes a constraint. The data suggests the GPU is the primary performance limiter for any graphics-intensive application. For non-graphics tasks, such as video encoding or 3D rendering that use the CPU, the system will perform exceptionally, as it is entirely CPU-bound. The PassMark physics score of 3140 and floating-point math score of 152975 show the CPU is a powerhouse for these compute-heavy workloads. The system is therefore a high-performance workstation that happens to have a weak graphics component, rather than a balanced gaming machine.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is for users whose primary workload is CPU-intensive and who require only basic graphics output. The target user is a professional or student working in software development, data analysis, or 3D rendering where the CPU is the main engine. The Core i9-14900K's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 demonstrates its capability to shorten render times and compile code faster than most other desktop processors. Anyone who spends their day in these applications would see a direct benefit from this CPU's performance.

For gamers, this build is not suitable for high-fidelity or high-refresh-rate gaming, as the GPU is a significant bottleneck. However, for a small business workstation or an office PC that needs to handle heavy spreadsheet calculations, virtualization, or database management, the CPU is overqualified and will provide a smooth, responsive experience. The PassMark data encryption score of 46813 and random string sorting score of 86971 indicate strong performance in security and data management tasks. This is a niche build for those who prioritize CPU compute over all else and are aware that the graphics card is merely a display adapter for the desktop environment, not for serious gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh Gaming: This scenario is severely limited by the GPU. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 indicates entry-level rasterization performance that will struggle to achieve high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles. The CPU is more than capable, but the graphics card will be the primary constraint.

Streaming: While the CPU has ample headroom to encode a stream using x264, the gaming portion of the stream will suffer from the GPU's low performance. The Intel Arc A380 does have dedicated hardware for encoding, but its overall rendering performance will limit the quality and frame rate of the gameplay being streamed.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Core i9-14900K's multi-core performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20793, will handle video encoding and effects processing with ease. The GPU can assist with some effects, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse, making this a productive system for editors.

3D Rendering: The 3D rendering performance is exceptional for CPU-based renderers. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 6103 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 58674 show that the CPU can handle complex scenes and high polygon counts. The GPU is less relevant here, but its 6 GB of memory can handle modest viewport workloads.

Software Development: The CPU is ideal for compilation and testing. The high single-thread score of 4697 in PassMark ensures fast build times for smaller projects, while the 32 threads can parallelize large-scale builds, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score. This is a developer's dream processor.

Student and Office Work: This is massive overkill for standard productivity tasks. The CPU will be idle most of the time, but it guarantees zero lag in any office application, spreadsheet, or web browsing scenario. The low-power GPU is efficient for desktop rendering, making this a very responsive, if expensive, office machine.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows in the data for this specific CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data clearly shows the bottleneck: the CPU is in the 95th percentile, while the GPU is in the 44th percentile. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 6252 is the primary indicator of its gaming capability.

Given the Arc A380's performance class, which is near the AMD Radeon 880M and NVIDIA GeForce MX330, frame rates in modern games are expected to be low, even at 1080p. The GPU is best suited for esports titles or older games. For demanding AAA games, the user would likely need to significantly lower settings and resolution to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock will not be a factor, as the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all gaming scenarios. The performance ceiling of this system in gaming is defined by the entry-level graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of extreme divergence. The Core i9-14900K achieves an average benchmark score of 79097, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Core i9-14900KF, is only 0.3% faster, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 1.7% slower. This confirms the CPU is at the apex of consumer desktop performance.

In contrast, the Intel Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5170M, is 0.4% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 is 1.2% slower. This places the GPU in the entry-level segment, far below the high-end performance of the CPU. The combined percentile for the system is 70, a number that averages the two extremes but does not reflect the user experience in any single workload. In CPU-bound tasks, the system performs like a top-tier workstation; in GPU-bound tasks, it performs like a budget laptop.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship, top-tier processor with an entry-level, end-of-life graphics card. The processor is an Intel Core i9-14900K, a 24-core, 32-thread behemoth. The graphics card is an Intel Arc A380, a 6 GB GDDR6 card based on the Xe-HPG architecture. The system's overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 70, is mid-range, but this is misleading.

The reality is a dual-personality system. For productivity, rendering, and development, it is a top-tier machine. For gaming, it is a low-end system. The pairing is logical only if the user's primary need is CPU compute and the GPU is an afterthought for basic display output. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $589, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 149 USD, but the performance gap between them is far larger than the price gap suggests.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K faster than the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: The data shows the i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is 0.3% higher than the i9-14900K's score of 79097. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A380's performance relative to other GPUs?

A: The Arc A380 has an average benchmark score of 8558, placing it in the 44th percentile. It is 1.2% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 and 1.4% faster than the AMD Radeon 880M.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, as indicated in the memory support specification.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile rank?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier performer.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested PSU wattage?

A: The Intel Arc A380 has a TDP of 75 W, and the suggested PSU rating is 250 W.

Q: Will this system be good for 3D rendering?

A: Yes, for CPU-based rendering. The Core i9-14900K's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 indicates it is exceptionally strong for rendering workloads.

Q: What is the primary bottleneck in this system for gaming?

A: The Intel Arc A380 is the primary bottleneck. Its 44th percentile performance rank is significantly lower than the CPU's 95th percentile rank, and it will limit frame rates in all gaming scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds