SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900K

79,097 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900K and Intel Arc A310E pairing is a study in extremes. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, paired with a graphics card that sits exactly in the 50th percentile. This is not a balanced combination by any conventional measure, but the benchmark results reveal a specific, if narrow, utility. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop part built on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture, running on a 10 nm process node. Its base clock is 3.20 GHz, and it can boost up to 6.00 GHz, a significant range that allows it to handle both high-frequency single-threaded tasks and massive parallel workloads. The architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, represents the 14th generation of Intel’s Core series, and the chip is currently marked as Active in production. With a die size of 257 mm² and a 125 W TDP, it is a substantial piece of silicon, but its performance envelope is what truly sets it apart.

The cache hierarchy of the i9-14900K is generous, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool. This large cache is critical for workloads that repeatedly access the same data, such as database operations or certain scientific simulations. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility for builders, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-class stability. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for the fastest storage devices or expansion cards. An integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit is also present, which can serve as a fallback display output or for quick sync video encoding tasks, though its capabilities are far overshadowed by the discrete GPU in this build. The CPU is multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is possible for those willing to push beyond the stock 6.00 GHz boost clock.

CPU Analysis

The benchmark scores for the Intel Core i9-14900K paint a clear picture of a processor that excels at both single-thread and multi-thread tasks. In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves a multi-core score of 39399.5 and a single-core score of 2262.5. The multi-core result is particularly telling; it suggests that the 24 cores and 32 threads are effectively utilized, allowing the chip to crush heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding. The single-core score, while lower in absolute terms, is equally impressive when compared to other processors, indicating strong per-core performance that benefits everyday tasks and gaming. The Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 21697 and a single-core score of 2655. These numbers suggest a balanced architecture that does not sacrifice responsiveness for raw core count.

Looking at the Passmark results, the data reveals more specific strengths. The multithread score of 58674 is enormous, but the single-thread score of 4697 is also strong, showing that the chip does not lag in lightly threaded scenarios. The integer math score of 210622 and floating point math score of 152975 are both very high, indicating robust computational throughput for general-purpose computing and scientific calculations. More specialized tests show where the CPU shines: data compression scores 792694, and data encryption scores 46813. These are strong results for tasks like file archiving or secure communications. The extended instructions score of 45154 and random string sorting score of 86971 suggest the chip handles complex instruction sets and data sorting tasks efficiently. The find prime numbers score of 231 is lower, but this is a specific test that often favors different architectures. The physics score of 3140 is moderate, which may be a factor in some simulation workloads. Overall, the benchmark results indicate a processor that is a top-tier performer, sitting 0.3% behind the Intel Core i9-14900KF, its closest rival, and 1.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of this pairing is defined by the massive gap between the CPU and GPU. The i9-14900K holds a 95th percentile position among all CPUs, as mentioned, which means it outperforms nearly all other processors on the market. Its average benchmark score is 79097, placing it in the company of the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, which scores 79574. The delta percentages are small, just -0.3% and -0.6% respectively, showing that the 14900K is essentially at the top of the heap for consumer processors. In contrast, the Intel Arc A310E GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, which is the median. This means the GPU is exactly average, neither a standout performer nor a complete slouch. The combined percentile for the build is 73, reflecting the fact that the CPU is pulling the overall performance upward, but the GPU is holding it back from the very top tiers.

The lack of measured FPS data for this specific combination means the benchmark scores must be used to estimate the gaming and rendering experience. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20793 and single-core score of 2935 are strong indicators of its ability to feed a GPU with data, but the GPU’s specifications suggest it will be the limiting factor in most graphical workloads. The Arc A310E has a 4 GB memory pool and a 64-bit memory bus, which are modest figures. Its FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, which is far below what gaming GPUs typically offer. The combined picture is one where the CPU is capable of handling the most demanding computational tasks, but the GPU is only suitable for light graphical work or as a display output. Users expecting high-end gaming performance from this pairing will be disappointed by the data.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU, and the benchmark results make it clear which component will limit which workload. In CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the i9-14900K will have no trouble delivering top-tier performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 is nearly double what many mid-range processors achieve, and its Passmark multithread score of 58674 is similarly dominant. For these workloads, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU will be the sole driver of performance. However, in any workload that relies on the GPU, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A310E will be the bottleneck. Its 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark scores indicate it is not a high-performance part. The FPS scaling in games will be poor, with the GPU unable to keep up with the CPU’s ability to process game logic and physics.

The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in any scenario; it is the GPU. The i9-14900K’s single-core performance is strong enough to handle the most demanding game engines, but the GPU’s limited shading units, 768, and its low pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s will cap frame rates. The CPU’s TDP of 125 W also suggests it can sustain high clock speeds without throttling, assuming adequate cooling, which is another factor that favors CPU performance. The GPU’s TDP of 75 W is low, meaning it will not generate much heat, but this also reflects its limited computational capacity. In summary, the data implies a system where the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU, leading to a severe bottleneck in graphical applications. For users who primarily use the system for CPU-bound tasks, this is a non-issue, but for gamers, it is a critical flaw.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, and the FACT PACK confirms that no measured FPS data exists. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and the specifications of the GPU. The Arc A310E is a modest GPU with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory and a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. Its 768 shading units and 16 ROPs are low by modern standards, and its 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a fraction of what a dedicated gaming card offers. Based on these specifications, the estimated FPS in games at 1080p with ultra settings would be low. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the GPU might manage playable frame rates, but for AAA games, the performance would be poor, likely in the lower end of the single digits or low twenties. At 1440p or 4K, the performance would be even worse, with the 4 GB memory buffer likely causing texture streaming issues.

The CPU’s performance in gaming is not the concern. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2262.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2655 indicate that it can process game logic and physics at high speeds. However, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The data shows the GPU is at the 50th percentile, meaning half of all GPUs are faster. This is not a configuration for high-refresh gaming. Even at 1080p, the estimated FPS would be well below the 60 FPS mark for most modern titles, and at higher resolutions, the experience would be unplayable. Users should treat this as a workstation or productivity build rather than a gaming machine, as the data strongly suggests the GPU is not a gaming-focused component.

Who Should Build It

This build is squarely aimed at users who need massive CPU compute power and only light graphical output. The i9-14900K is a top-tier processor, and its 95th percentile ranking means it is among the best for CPU-bound tasks. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development would benefit greatly from the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle complex renders or compile large codebases. Software developers, in particular, would see significant improvements in build times and parallel test execution, thanks to the CPU’s high integer and floating point scores. Students in computer science or engineering fields would also benefit, as they can run virtual machines or simulations without performance issues.

Small business workstations that run database servers or heavy spreadsheet calculations would also be a good fit. The Passmark data compression score of 792694 and encryption score of 46813 suggest the CPU is capable of handling data-heavy tasks efficiently. However, the GPU is a limiting factor for any graphical work. Users who need to do CAD work or GPU-accelerated rendering would need to invest in a better GPU. For gamers, this build is not recommended, as the GPU will severely bottleneck performance. The data indicates that this is a CPU-first build, and the GPU is merely a placeholder for display output or light 2D work. The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU performance above all else and is willing to sacrifice gaming or graphical performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900K uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus means users can choose between the two, but the data does not specify which is better for this CPU. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs or future expansion cards. The TDP of 125 W is manageable, and the data recommends a 250 W PSU for the GPU, but the CPU itself would require a suitable power supply for the whole system. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W, which is low, but the CPU’s power draw would need to be factored in, and a higher wattage PSU would be sensible for stability.

The upgrade path for this build is clear: the GPU is the primary bottleneck, and upgrading it would yield the most significant performance gains. A user could replace the Arc A310E with a more powerful GPU, and the CPU would be able to handle nearly any graphics card on the market without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU’s high single-core performance and multi-core performance ensure it will not hold back a future GPU upgrade. The platform itself is at the end of its life, as the Socket 1700 is not expected to support future Intel generations, but the 14900K is powerful enough to remain relevant for years. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-end GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The memory and storage can also be upgraded, but the data suggests the CPU is the strongest component in this build.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a low-profile, single-slot GPU built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-128 chip. It is manufactured on a 6 nm process node at TSMC, with a transistor count of 7,200 million on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has a base and boost clock of 2000 MHz, which is respectable, but its memory configuration is limited. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. This is a small amount of memory, and it will be a limiting factor in modern games and 3D applications. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, which are low numbers, and its pixel rate is 32.00 GPixel/s, with a texture rate of 64.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS, which is a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores, which is a feature, but the overall performance is too low for meaningful ray tracing in games. The lack of tensor cores in the data suggests that AI acceleration is not a focus for this GPU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this GPU’s bandwidth needs. It has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs for display connectivity. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which are modern APIs. The TDP is 75 W, and it requires no power connectors, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, which is low. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of 2024-03-31, and its predecessor is Xe Graphics, with the successor being Battlemage. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking reflects its mid-pack performance, and the lack of benchmark scores means it is not a high-performance part. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB memory and 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance would be insufficient for complex scenes.

Build Overview

This build combines the Intel Core i9-14900K, a flagship desktop CPU, with the Intel Arc A310E, an entry-level desktop GPU. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 73, indicating that the overall performance is above average, but not top-tier. The CPU is the star of the show, with a 95th percentile ranking, while the GPU is average at the 50th percentile. This pairing is a desktop-class system, but it is not a balanced gaming rig. It is a CPU-heavy configuration that would excel in productivity, content creation, and software development. The GPU’s low performance and memory capacity make it unsuitable for demanding graphical workloads. The build is a niche product for users who prioritize CPU compute power and are unconcerned with gaming or heavy GPU acceleration. The data suggests a system that is overkill for office tasks but underpowered for gaming, making it a specialist tool for a specific type of user.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-14900K’s CPU percentile rank?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K is in the 95th percentile against all CPUs, meaning it is faster than nearly all other processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF?

A: The i9-14900K is 0.3% behind the i9-14900KF in average benchmark score, with the KF scoring 79371 and the K scoring 79097.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900K supports ECC memory, which is a feature for workstation stability.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K has a maximum boost clock of 6.00 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Intel Arc A310E has an FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so gaming performance must be estimated from benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is not suitable. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank and low FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS would estimate frame rates well below 60 FPS at 1080p in most modern titles, making it a poor choice for gamers seeking smooth gameplay. Streaming also suffers, as the GPU cannot handle the graphical load of games, though the CPU’s strong multi-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5, could handle encoding via software, but the gaming experience would still be poor.

Video editing is a strong suit for this build, as the i9-14900K’s 24 cores and 32 threads excel at rendering timelines and exporting videos. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 58674 and high data compression score of 792694 support this, though the GPU’s 4 GB memory will limit effects previews. 3D rendering is also excellent for the CPU, with its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20793 indicating fast render times in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS would not accelerate GPU-based renderers effectively.

Software development benefits greatly from this build. The CPU’s high integer math score of 210622 and random string sorting score of 86971 suggest fast code compilation and data processing, making it a top-tier choice for developers. Student and office work is over-provisioned with this build, as the CPU’s 95th percentile ranking is far more power than needed for spreadsheets or web browsing, but it would handle any student workload without breaking a sweat. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output, but the system is overkill for these tasks, making it a future-proof investment for more demanding academic software.