SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900HX paired with the Intel Arc A370M is a profoundly unbalanced laptop configuration, coupling one of the most powerful mobile processors available with a modest entry-level discrete GPU. The benchmark data shows a processor that sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU rests in the 74th percentile. This pairing creates a system where the CPU is the undisputed star, capable of handling the most demanding productivity and rendering workloads, but the GPU severely limits the experience in graphically intensive tasks like gaming and 3D rendering. The data indicates a clear division of labor: the i9-14900HX is a mobile workstation-class processor, and the Arc A370M is a capable multimedia and esports GPU, but the combination is not a high-performance gaming machine. The following analysis is based strictly on the provided benchmark scores, with all FPS figures presented as estimates since no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration is a poor fit. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile ranking and modest specifications place it in the field of 1080p esports and older titles, not modern AAA games at high refresh rates. While the CPU's exceptional single-core performance (4175 in Passmark) can feed frames quickly, the GPU will be the limiting factor, making high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming unrealistic. Users targeting high-refresh gaming would need a more powerful GPU to pair with this CPU.

Streaming and content creation are a mixed bag. The i9-14900HX excels in encoding and multitasking, as evidenced by its strong Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 and Passmark multithread score of 43778. This allows for seamless game capture and encoding while maintaining high frame delivery. However, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth could become a bottleneck when handling complex scenes or high-resolution textures in the stream. The CPU can handle the encoding workload, but the GPU may struggle with the rendering side of the task.

Video editing is a scenario where the CPU does the heavy lifting. The i9-14900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Geekbench multicore score of 17511, provide ample processing power for timeline scrubbing, effects, and export. The Arc A370M's hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding via its Xe-HPG architecture can assist with preview and render tasks, but its 4 GB VRAM may limit the use of large, complex timelines with heavy GPU-accelerated effects. The system will handle 1080p and some 1440p editing well, but 4K editing will be more dependent on the CPU's power.

3D rendering is a core strength of this CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 indicates that the i9-14900HX can render complex scenes in CPU-based render engines with high efficiency. The Arc A370M, however, is not a rendering powerhouse. Its FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is minimal for GPU-based renderers like Octane or Redshift, and the 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for large scenes. The data suggests this is a capable CPU rendering station, but not a GPU rendering one.

Software development is a great use case for the CPU. The i9-14900HX's high single-core score of 4175 in Passmark ensures fast compilation of single-threaded code, while the 24 cores and 32 threads accelerate parallel build tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 539965 also indicates strong performance in archiving and data handling, which is common in development workflows. The Arc A370M is sufficient for driving multiple displays and basic UI rendering, making this a productive development machine.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware. The CPU's massive multicore power is unnecessary for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, and the Arc A370M is more than enough for these tasks. The data shows that the system would handle these workloads with ease, but the high power draw and performance of the CPU are wasted in such scenarios. This is a case of extreme over-provisioning for basic tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is a mobile one, built on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which indicates the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. The i9-14900HX supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for compatible storage and GPU expansion, though the laptop form factor limits expansion options. The Arc A370M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The TDP figures highlight the power disparity: the CPU is rated at 55 W, while the GPU is rated at 35 W. This is a relatively low-power GPU compared to the high-end CPU. The suggested PSU field is null, but the combined TDP of 90 W suggests a reasonably sized power adapter in a laptop. The CPU's 55 W TDP is a base figure; with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, it will likely draw much more power under full load, necessitating a robust cooling solution and a capable power supply.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is not about the CPU, as it is already top-tier. The primary bottleneck is the GPU, and in a laptop, the GPU is also typically soldered and not upgradeable. Therefore, the only viable upgrades are increasing system memory to the maximum supported amount or replacing the storage with a faster PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive to leverage the CPU's 16 lanes. The data suggests that the platform is a dead-end for significant performance upgrades, as both the CPU and GPU are integrated.

The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 is a notable feature, but the actual type used depends on the specific laptop design. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class of processor. For users looking to maximize performance, faster DDR5 memory would be the better choice to feed the CPU's high core count, though the exact speed is not specified in the data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark performance is exceptional. It scores 30055 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2181.5 in single-core, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its Geekbench scores are equally strong: 17511 multicore and 2330 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multithread score of 43778 and a single-thread score of 4175, with an average benchmark score of 56004. This CPU is a top-tier performer for mobile computing.

The GPU's benchmark performance is modest. It scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 29175. This places it in the range of desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 470, which has a near-identical average score of 28996 (0.6% difference). The data shows that while the CPU is near the top of its class, the GPU is only in the upper-midrange.

The combined picture is one of stark contrast. The CPU's 91st percentile ranking shows a processor that outperforms 91% of all CPUs, while the GPU's 74th percentile ranking shows it outperforms 74% of all GPUs. The combined percentile for the build is 83, but this is heavily weighted by the CPU. The nearest rivals for the CPU include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 390, which is 0.5% faster, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX, which is 1% faster, showing the i9-14900HX is in elite company. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, which is nearly identical in performance.

The Cinebench R20 scores further reinforce the CPU's power: 15616 multicore and 2204 single-core. The Passmark integer math score of 157375 and floating-point math score of 112273 indicate strong computational throughput for a wide range of tasks. The data compression score of 539965 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance for file archiving and data management.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system is heavily CPU-bound in most workloads. The i9-14900HX is capable of far more processing power than the Arc A370M can keep up with in graphics-intensive tasks. In gaming, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU can easily calculate game logic and physics, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will limit texture quality and resolution. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking and 1% delta from the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (which is counterintuitively a faster card in reality, but in this data set has a lower score) show it is not designed for high-end gaming.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the main driver, and the GPU plays a supporting role. For tasks like video editing, the CPU's high core count and fast single-core speed will handle most of the heavy lifting, while the GPU accelerates effects and encoding. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor for large 4K projects, but the CPU can power through most tasks. The bottleneck in this scenario is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth.

The data shows that the CPU's performance is so dominant that it will rarely be the limiting factor. The Passmark physics score of 2638 is low relative to the CPU's other scores, but this is a specific test. In real-world scenarios, the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads will provide massive parallelism. The GPU, with its 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs, is a small chip by comparison and will be the constraint in any workload that relies on pixel throughput or shader complexity.

The FPS scaling is not measured, but the data suggests that CPU-bound games at low resolutions will see high frame rates, while GPU-bound games at high resolutions will see low frame rates. The CPU's single-core performance of 4175 in Passmark is excellent for gaming, but the GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is roughly one-tenth of a high-end desktop GPU, limiting the system to esports titles at 1080p. The imbalance is clear: this is a workstation CPU paired with a multimedia GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX refresh. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is among the highest for mobile processors. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores confirm its high-end positioning. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 is a strong result for a mobile chip, and the single-core score of 2181.5 is competitive with desktop parts. The Geekbench multicore score of 17511 and single-core score of 2330 further validate its performance. The Passmark single-thread score of 4175 is excellent, indicating strong per-core performance that is critical for many applications.

The 24 cores are divided into performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of the Raptor Lake architecture, though the exact split is not specified. The 32 threads allow for significant parallelism in multi-threaded applications. The data compression score of 539965 and the integer math score of 157375 show the CPU excels at data-intensive tasks. The floating-point math score of 112273 is also robust, making it suitable for scientific and engineering workloads.

The CPU's 55 W TDP is a base figure, but the boost clock of 5.80 GHz suggests that under load, it will consume significantly more power. This requires a robust cooling solution in a laptop. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with ECC support, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and points to its workstation pedigree. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, but it is not intended for gaming, serving only as a basic display output.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this build is a professional who needs extreme CPU power but only modest GPU capabilities. This system is ideal for software developers who need fast compilation times and the ability to run multiple virtual machines, as the 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample resources. The Passmark data encryption score of 32619 and extended instructions score of 31247 also suggest strong performance for cryptography and specialized code.

Content creators who work with CPU-based rendering engines, such as those in Blender or Cinema 4D, will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055. The CPU can handle complex scenes and high-resolution renders without issue. However, creators who rely heavily on GPU acceleration in Adobe After Effects or DaVinci Resolve will find the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM limiting, making this a poor choice for those workflows.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU's performance useful for simulations and large datasets, but they may not need the GPU's power. The system is overkill for general student use, but it is a capable workstation for specific technical programs. Small business workstations that run complex financial models or data analysis software will benefit from the CPU's high throughput, as indicated by the Passmark multithread score of 43778.

Gamers are not the target audience. The Arc A370M is an entry-level GPU, and this build is not suitable for modern AAA gaming. The data shows the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU is only in the 74th percentile. Builders looking for a gaming machine should pair this CPU with a much more powerful GPU, but in a laptop, that is not an option. This is a productivity-first machine.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, meaning the following numbers are qualitative expectations. The Arc A370M, with its 74th percentile ranking and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, is not capable of high-refresh gaming at 1080p in modern titles. It is more suited to esports games like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, where the CPU's high single-core score of 4175 can drive high frame rates.

For esports titles at 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the system could deliver playable frame rates, likely in the 60-100 FPS range. The GPU's 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs are sufficient for these lighter loads. However, the 4 GB VRAM may become a limitation in some esports titles with high texture settings, but for most competitive games, it is acceptable.

For AAA games at 1080p, the system will struggle. Estimates suggest that at high settings, frame rates would be in the 30-50 FPS range for titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield. At ultra settings, the 4 GB VRAM would likely be exceeded, causing stuttering and texture popping. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant bottleneck for modern game textures.

At 1440p or 4K, the system is not viable for gaming. The GPU's FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS is too low to render complex scenes at those resolutions. The data suggests that users should stick to 1080p with reduced settings for any modern game. The CPU will never be the limiting factor in gaming; it is the GPU that holds the system back.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance bottleneck in this configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A370M GPU is the definitive bottleneck. While the CPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, the GPU ranks in the 74th percentile, and its 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus limit its ability to handle modern gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU is powerful enough, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth may be insufficient for complex 4K timelines with heavy effects. It is more suited to 1080p editing.

Q: Is the CPU upgradable?

A: No. The Intel Core i9-14900HX is soldered to the motherboard on the Intel BGA 1964 socket. The platform is a mobile one, and the CPU is not designed for user replacement.

Q: How does the Arc A370M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A370M has an average benchmark score of 29175, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH at 29197 (0.1% difference) and the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28996 (0.6% difference). It performs in the same class as those older desktop GPUs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 83, which reflects the strong CPU performance but is tempered by the GPU's lower ranking.

Q: What type of memory does this CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer processors.

Q: Is this a good system for software development?

A: Yes, the CPU's high single-core score of 4175 and high multicore score of 43778 in Passmark make it excellent for compilation and parallel builds. The Passmark data compression score of 539965 also aids in data handling.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) and uses the DG2-128 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process node. It has 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU features a base clock of 1550 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

The GPU contains 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It has 8 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is a modest number. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is rated at 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance at 8.397 TFLOPS. The GPU has a TDP of 35 W and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Vulkan, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs. These scores are comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 470, which has a similar average score. For rendering, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a severe limitation, as modern scenes can easily exceed this capacity. The FP32 performance is also low for GPU rendering, making the CPU the primary rendering engine in this system.

The GPU's 8 ray tracing cores are present, but their performance is limited by the overall low compute power of the chip. The 2050 MHz boost clock helps, but the 64-bit memory bus is a significant constraint on memory bandwidth. The 112.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient for high-resolution textures and complex shaders in modern games. The data shows that this GPU is best suited for light multimedia tasks and esports gaming, not for high-end gaming or professional rendering workloads.