SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900HX

56,004 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support, which is notable for a mobile part. PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the machine's discrete GPU handles graphics-intensive tasks.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 91st percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 56004. In Cinebench R23, it scores 30055 points in multi-core and 2181.5 points in single-core. The single-core score is particularly strong, indicating high per-thread performance that benefits latency-sensitive workloads. The multi-core score reflects the massive thread count, and the ratio between multi-core and single-core results (roughly 13.8x) shows excellent scaling across the 24 cores.

Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 17511 and a single-core score of 2330. PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 539965, floating-point math hits 112273, and integer math reaches 157375. The multithread PassMark score of 43778 confirms sustained throughput under heavy load. Extended instructions score 31247, which matters for AVX-512-like workloads that benefit from wide vector units. Physics simulation in PassMark scores 2638, a moderate result that suggests the CPU handles physics calculations competently but not exceptionally.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Core 7 253PQE sits 0.2% ahead in average score at 55919, making it essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 390 is 0.5% behind at 56273, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 is also 0.5% behind at 56306. The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX trails by 1% at 56555. These narrow deltas indicate that the i9-14900HX is in a tightly contested performance band, where the difference between first and fourth place is only about 1%. For real workloads, this means the CPU is not a clear leader but rather one of several high-end options with comparable throughput.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU, not the CPU, will dominate gaming performance at high refresh rates. The Arc A350M's 70th percentile ranking among GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647, means it trails the CPU's 91st percentile. In CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, the i9-14900HX's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2181.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2330 ensure frame pacing is not CPU-limited. However, the GPU becomes the bottleneck in most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. PassMark data compression at 539965 and floating-point math at 112273 indicate the CPU can handle x264 encoding while the game runs on the GPU. The multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 30055 suggests that even with encoding overhead, there is enough compute capacity to maintain game frame rates, though the GPU's 4 GB VRAM may limit game settings during streaming.

Video editing: Multi-core performance shines here. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 15616 and PassMark multithread score of 43778 translate to fast timeline rendering and export times. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the CPU's ability to maintain high throughput across all cores supports heavy multi-track editing. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and transitions, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4574 and R23 multicore of 30055 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the Arc A350M's 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 and 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 provide entry-level acceleration. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking means it handles moderate rendering tasks but will struggle with complex scenes. The CPU's 91st percentile ensures it will not be the limiting factor in most render pipelines.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from both single-thread and multi-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4175 speeds up incremental builds, while the multi-core score of 43778 accelerates full rebuilds. The 32 threads handle parallel compilation gracefully, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes. The data encryption score of 32619 indicates solid performance for secure build pipelines.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The single-core Geekbench score of 2330 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the multi-core power is unused in most office workloads. The GPU handles 2D acceleration and video playback effortlessly. For students running simulations or data analysis, the CPU's PassMark integer math of 157375 provides ample compute for statistical packages.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core 7 253PQE?

A: The i9-14900HX has an average benchmark score of 56004, which is 0.2% lower than the Core 7 253PQE's 55919. This is a negligible difference, making the two CPUs effectively equal in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Arc A350M sits in the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24647. This places it in the mid-range tier, comparable to desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 590, which scores 24744 (0.4% higher).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900HX supports ECC memory. This is a feature typically found in workstation or server platforms, and its presence in a mobile CPU indicates suitability for reliability-focused workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, which reflects the imbalance between the high-performing CPU (91st percentile) and the mid-range GPU (70th percentile). The pairing is overall above average but constrained by the GPU.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have and why does it matter?

A: The CPU has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing memory latency and improving performance in workloads with moderate data footprints, such as gaming and compilation.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium settings but can become a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenarios like high-resolution textures or ray tracing.

Q: Is the CPU production status active?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900HX has an "Active" production status, meaning it is currently in production. The GPU is marked "End-of-life," which may affect long-term driver support.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU scores in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 70th percentile. This 21-percentile gap indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this compromise.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data analysis, and multi-threaded rendering, the i9-14900HX's 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional performance. The PassMark multithread score of 43778 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 30055 ensure that the CPU will not bottleneck these tasks. The GPU plays a minor role, and its lower performance has minimal impact.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, the Arc A350M becomes the constraint. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking, with an average score of 24647, places it well below the CPU's capabilities. The 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit texture detail and resolution. The GPU's closest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% lower), indicating it performs in the range of older desktop mid-range cards.

For FPS estimation, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2181.5) suggests it can drive high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU's compute throughput (3.379 TFLOPS FP32) will cap actual FPS in GPU-limited scenarios. The GPU's pixel rate of 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 105.6 GTexel/s provide theoretical limits for rasterization throughput.

The memory subsystem shows similar imbalance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 with a wide bus, while the GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are narrow. This means the GPU will struggle with high-resolution textures and memory-heavy effects, even if the CPU can feed data quickly.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900HX delivers strong benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4574 in multi-core and 310.5 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 15616 multi-core and 2204 single-core. Cinebench R23 improves to 30055 multi-core and 2181.5 single-core. Geekbench reports 17511 multi-core and 2330 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 43778 and single-thread score of 4175, with specialized results of 539965 for data compression, 32619 for data encryption, 31247 for extended instructions, 193 for prime number finding, 112273 for floating-point math, and 157375 for integer math. The average benchmark score is 56004, placing the CPU in the 91st percentile.

The Intel Arc A350M GPU has a more limited benchmark profile. Geekbench OpenCL scores 24546, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 24747. The average benchmark score is 24647, placing the GPU in the 70th percentile. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% lower).

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a significant margin. The CPU's 91st percentile versus the GPU's 70th percentile creates a 21-point gap. The combined percentile of 81 indicates an overall above-average system, but the GPU drags down the total. For CPU-heavy workloads, this system performs near the top tier. For GPU-heavy workloads, it performs in the mid-range. Users should expect the GPU to be the first component to reach its limits.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need maximum CPU performance in a laptop form factor but can accept mid-range GPU capability. The Intel Core i9-14900HX's 91st percentile ranking makes it suitable for professionals who run CPU-intensive applications: software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and analysts processing large datasets. The ECC memory support adds appeal for data integrity-sensitive workloads.

Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the Arc A350M adequate, given its 70th percentile ranking and performance comparable to the RX 590 and GTX 1630. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit high-resolution or high-detail gaming. Esports titles and older games will run well, but modern AAA games will require reduced settings. The CPU's single-core performance ensures minimal frame pacing issues in CPU-bound scenarios.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering or encoding will benefit most. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30055 and PassMark multithread of 43778 accelerate video exports and 3D rendering. The GPU can handle light effects and compositing, but heavy GPU rendering will be slow. The data compression score of 539965 aids in archive management and file transfers.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer science fields will appreciate the CPU's compute power for assignments involving compilation, numerical analysis, or machine learning preprocessing. The GPU's 6 RT cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate provide entry-level ray tracing and AI acceleration, though the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 limits advanced workloads.

Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or virtualization will find the 24 cores and 32 threads valuable. The PassMark integer math of 157375 and floating-point math of 112273 indicate strong number-crunching ability. The GPU is sufficient for office applications and basic graphics tasks.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; users cannot swap it for a different processor. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU has a 55 W TDP, which is modest for a 24-core part, suggesting the laptop's cooling solution is designed for sustained loads.

The GPU is also soldered, as it is an integrated mobile part with a 25 W TDP and "IGP" slot width. The Arc A350M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides adequate bandwidth for its 4 GB VRAM. The GPU's production status is "End-of-life," so future driver updates may be limited, though the DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 API support ensures compatibility with modern titles.

Memory upgrades are the most practical path. The dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and upgrading to higher-capacity or faster modules can improve performance, particularly for the GPU, which shares system resources. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory pressure, but additional RAM benefits multitasking and large datasets.

Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes provide high bandwidth for NVMe SSDs. The CPU's support for Gen 5 means future storage devices can reach higher speeds, though current Gen 4 devices will also work. The absence of a suggested PSU figure in the data means power supply requirements are unknown, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 25 W GPU TDP indicate a relatively modest total power draw for a high-performance laptop.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be increasing RAM to the maximum supported capacity and adding a fast NVMe drive. The CPU and GPU are both soldered, so they cannot be replaced. Users who need more GPU performance would need to purchase a different laptop, as the Arc A350M is the limiting factor.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900HX with the Intel Arc A350M in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the "laptop" build class. The combined percentile of 81 places this system above average among all configurations, but the gap between the CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 70th percentile defines its character. This is a CPU-centric build where the processor is the star and the GPU plays a supporting role.

The overall tier is high-end for CPU performance and mid-range for GPU performance. Users get a flagship mobile processor capable of handling the most demanding compute tasks, paired with a GPU that is adequate for mainstream gaming and light creative work. The system excels in productivity, development, and CPU-based rendering, while gaming performance at high settings will be limited by the GPU.

The build is best described as a mobile workstation with gaming capability. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with ECC memory support, make it suitable for professional workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p gaming and light GPU acceleration. This is not a balanced gaming laptop, but it is a powerful portable compute platform.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process. The chip, codenamed DG2-128, contains 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.9M per mm². The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 24 raster output units, and 6 ray tracing cores. It does not list dedicated tensor cores, but supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Clock speeds are 1150 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory sits on a 64-bit bus, providing 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's compute capabilities are 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU has a 25 W TDP and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 24546 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 24747, with an average of 24647. This places the GPU in the 70th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24744, 0.4% higher), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24763, 0.5% higher), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24442, 0.8% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24277, 1.5% lower). The performance is comparable to desktop mid-range cards from several generations ago.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 6 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing acceleration, but the 3.379 TFLOPS FP32 and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth limit scene complexity. The 4 GB VRAM is a constraint for high-resolution textures and large scenes. The GPU is capable of 1080p gaming at medium settings and light GPU-accelerated rendering, but will struggle with heavy workloads. The production status is "End-of-life," which may limit long-term driver support despite the modern API support. The GPU is best suited for users who need basic graphics acceleration alongside a powerful CPU, rather than those seeking high-end gaming or rendering performance.