SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing brings together Intel’s 14th Gen flagship desktop CPU and NVIDIA’s top-tier Ampere GPU, creating a system that targets high-end productivity and demanding creative workloads. The data shows a desktop-class configuration with a combined performance percentile of 94, placing it among the upper echelon of all possible CPU+GPU combos. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile among all graphics cards. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all gaming frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This is a locked multiplier part, meaning overclocking is not supported, but the high boost clock compensates with strong out-of-the-box performance.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 39551 in multi-core and 5583 in single-core. The single-core score is particularly telling for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, while the multi-core figure indicates serious throughput for parallel workloads. Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 20008 and a single-core score of 2570.

The PassMark suite provides additional granularity. The multi-thread score of 46532 and single-thread score of 4506 show balanced performance across both metrics. Floating point math scores 119550, while integer math reaches 177066, suggesting strong number-crunching capabilities for scientific and financial applications. Data compression scores 564207, and data encryption hits 34644, indicating solid performance for archival tasks and secure data handling. Extended instructions score 31084, which matters for workloads leveraging AVX-512 or similar instruction sets. The random string sorting score of 63728 is useful for database and sorting operations, while find prime numbers scores 209, a more niche metric but still relevant for cryptography-related tasks.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 60008, placing it at the 92nd percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with an average score of 60099 (a delta of -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D at 59641 (+0.6%), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T at 60572 (-0.9%). These deltas are remarkably small, indicating that the i9-14900F sits in a performance band where it trades blows with top-tier server and mobile HX chips. The data suggests this CPU is not a clear winner in raw multi-core throughput but rather a highly competitive option that matches or slightly trails its closest competition.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2570, provides the responsiveness needed for high-refresh-rate gaming. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is among the highest available, which translates directly to lower frame times in CPU-bound scenarios. Combined with the GPU’s capabilities, this system should deliver extremely high frame rates at 1440p and 4K, though exact FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 indicates that background streaming workloads will have minimal impact on game performance. The CPU’s 65 W TDP also means it runs relatively cool under sustained load, leaving thermal budget for the GPU.

Video editing: For software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, the multi-core performance is critical. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 suggests the CPU can handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export tasks efficiently. The data compression score of 564207 is relevant for intermediate codecs, and the floating point score of 119550 supports effects and color grading operations.

3D rendering: Rendering engines like Blender or V-Ray rely heavily on multi-core throughput. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3986 and R20 score of 16611 indicate strong scaling across all 24 cores. The CPU’s position at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in this workload class, though the nearest rivals show it is not the absolute top-tier choice.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from both single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 accelerates build times for large projects, while the single-core score of 2570 ensures fast IDE responsiveness. The extended instructions score of 31084 suggests good support for SIMD-optimized code paths.

Student and office work: For typical productivity tasks, the CPU is massively overprovisioned. The single-thread score of 4506 in PassMark ensures snappy spreadsheet, word processing, and web browsing performance. The 65 W TDP also makes this a surprisingly efficient processor for a 24-core part, which is beneficial for sustained office workloads where power draw matters.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with a chip size of 628 mm² and 28,300 million transistors. It features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, translating to 21 Gbps effective. The GPU has 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output processors.

For ray tracing and AI workloads, the GPU includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The base clock is 1560 MHz with a boost clock of 1860 MHz. Pixel rate reaches 208.3 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 625.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 40.00 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). This makes the card exceptionally strong for compute-heavy tasks like machine learning inference and scientific simulation.

The GPU’s benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5741, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633. The average benchmark score is 131938, placing it at the 95th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA L4 with an average score of 131072 (delta of 0.7%), the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation at 135218 (-2.4%), the NVIDIA A10M at 135230 (-2.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (-2.6%). The small deltas suggest the RTX 3090 Ti is competitive with professional workstation cards, though it trails them slightly in raw compute benchmarks.

The 24 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for large datasets in machine learning, 3D scene rendering, and high-resolution texture workloads. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth ensures that memory-bound operations, such as large matrix multiplications or high-resolution video processing, are not bottlenecked by data transfer. The triple-slot design and 450 W TDP indicate this is a power-hungry card that requires adequate cooling and a robust power supply.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the dual-channel architecture means users must choose between DDR4 and DDR5 based on their motherboard. ECC memory is supported, which is a boon for workstation builds where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest SSDs and GPUs.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The RTX 3090 Ti has a TDP of 450 W, and the suggested PSU is 850 W. Combined with the CPU’s 65 W TDP, the total system draw remains manageable, but users should account for other components when sizing a power supply. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must support this connector or include an adapter.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize memory bandwidth by selecting high-speed DDR5 modules, given the CPU’s support for both memory types. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option; instead, users should focus on enabling XMP/EXPO profiles for memory. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning future upgrades would involve moving to a newer graphics card generation, but the current pairing remains highly capable for the vast majority of workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a fairly balanced system, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60008 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, suggesting it is not the limiting factor in this pairing. The GPU’s average score of 131938 is also closely matched by its rivals, meaning neither component significantly outperforms the other in a way that would create a clear bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation or data compression, the CPU’s PassMark physics score of 2899 and data compression score of 564207 will determine performance. The GPU’s role is secondary in these tasks. Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like ray tracing or pixel-heavy rendering, the GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 208.3 GPixel/s pixel rate will dominate, with the CPU providing enough headroom to feed the GPU without stalling.

The FPS scaling in gaming is expected to be GPU-limited at 4K resolution, where the GPU’s pixel rate and memory bandwidth are the primary drivers. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread performance may become more relevant, but the high boost clock of 5.80 GHz mitigates this. The data suggests that neither component will severely bottleneck the other in typical workloads, making this a well-matched pair for high-end use cases.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5741 and Vulkan score of 215633 suggest strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which translates to solid frame rates in modern titles.

At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, should prevent major bottlenecks in most games. The GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is more than sufficient for high refresh rates at this resolution. Estimates suggest frame rates in the range of 144-240 FPS for esports titles, though these are qualitative expectations based on benchmark scores.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth become more relevant, as higher resolutions demand more memory. The pixel rate of 208.3 GPixel/s supports high frame rates in this resolution class. Estimates indicate the system should handle demanding AAA titles at 100-144 FPS on ultra settings.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary driver. The 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs suggests it outperforms 95% of graphics cards, but the most demanding games may still require settings adjustments to hit 60 FPS consistently. The 24 GB VRAM is future-proof for 4K textures, and the 1.01 TB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in high-resolution scenarios. Frame rates here are estimated at 60-100 FPS depending on the title’s optimization.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance spans multiple suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3986 in multi-core and 562 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 39551 multi-core and 5583 single-core. Geekbench results are 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core. PassMark tests show 564207 for data compression, 34644 for data encryption, 31084 for extended instructions, 209 for find prime numbers, 119550 for floating point math, 177066 for integer math, 46532 for multi-thread, 2899 for physics, 63728 for random string sorting, and 4506 for single-thread. The average benchmark score is 60008, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile.

The GPU’s benchmarks include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5741, Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441, and Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633. The average benchmark score is 131938, placing the GPU at the 95th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 94, indicating it performs better than 94% of all possible combinations.

The combined picture shows a system that is slightly GPU-leaning, with the GPU ranking higher than the CPU. The CPU’s nearest rival deltas range from -0.9% to +0.6%, while the GPU’s range from -2.6% to +0.7%. This suggests the GPU has slightly more variance relative to its competition, but both components are solidly in the top tier of their respective categories.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory with a bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 60008, while its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, scores 60099, a delta of -0.2%.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3090 Ti is 850 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900F supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3090 Ti is at the 95th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate figures are estimates.

Who Should Build It

This system targets gamers who prioritize 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 95th percentile ranking and 24 GB VRAM provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and future game releases. The CPU’s 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures smooth frame delivery at high refresh rates, though exact FPS figures are estimates.

Content creators working with 4K video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and the GPU’s 40.00 TFLOPS FP32 performance for effects and rendering. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly useful for large compositing projects. 3D artists and animators will find the combination of 24 CPU cores and the GPU’s 84 RT cores suitable for both viewport interactivity and final frame rendering.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and the PassMark integer math score of 177066. The CPU’s support for ECC memory adds reliability for long-running build processes. Students in engineering or data science fields can leverage the system for simulation and machine learning coursework, given the GPU’s tensor cores and 24 GB memory.

Small business workstations handling data compression, encryption, or financial modeling will find the PassMark scores compelling, particularly the data compression score of 564207 and encryption score of 34644. The system’s 94th combined percentile ensures it can handle the most demanding professional software without compromise.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from Intel’s Core 14th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture. The GPU is NVIDIA’s Ampere-based flagship from the GeForce 30-series, featuring 24 GB of GDDR6X memory and 40.00 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power.

The combined percentile of 94 indicates this pairing outperforms 94% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile. This places the build in the high-end tier of desktop systems, suitable for enthusiasts and professionals who demand top-tier performance in both CPU-bound and GPU-bound workloads. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is notably low for a 24-core part, while the GPU’s 450 W TDP necessitates a robust cooling solution and an 850 W power supply. This is a powerful, well-balanced pairing for users who need maximum compute capability without compromising on gaming performance.