SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is a desktop combination that lands at the 71st percentile overall, with the CPU sitting at the 92nd percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a build where the processor is the dominant component, delivering top-tier multi-threaded performance while the graphics card provides solid mid-pack 1440p-class capability. The data shows an asymmetric pairing: the i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-R part with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, while the RTX 3070 TiM is an Ampere-generation GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, compilation, or scientific computing, this pairing makes sense; for pure gaming at high resolutions, the GPU becomes the clear limiter.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a Raptor Lake Refresh desktop processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, featuring a die size of 257 mm². It packs 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a high-core-count part aimed at multi-threaded workloads, but the 65 W TDP (listed in the FACT PACK) suggests it is a power-constrained variant compared to unlocked K-series parts. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking headroom is not available from the factory design.

Benchmark results confirm the processor’s strength. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900F scores 39551 points in multi-core and 5583 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it places the chip in the top tier for threaded applications, with a percentileVsAllCpus of 92, meaning it outperforms 92% of all CPUs in the database. The single-core score of 5583 is also strong, indicating that the 5.80 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly-threaded tasks. In Geekbench, the scores are 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core, reinforcing the same pattern: excellent parallel throughput with competitive single-thread performance.

Looking at the nearest rivals, the i9-14900F’s average benchmark score is 60008. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (a laptop-class part) scores 60099, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i9 is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX also scores 60104, again -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641, which is 0.6% behind the i9. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, putting it 0.9% ahead. These deltas are all within 1%, so the i9-14900F sits in a cluster of high-end parts where performance differences are negligible in real-world terms. The practical takeaway: for multi-core workloads, this CPU is within a rounding error of the fastest alternatives in its class.

PassMark results add further detail. The multi-thread score is 46532, with integer math at 177066 and floating-point math at 119550. Data compression scores 564207, while encryption hits 34644. Extended instructions (SIMD-heavy work) score 31084, and random string sorting is 63728. Physics simulation scores 2899, and single-thread performance is 4506. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in parallel computation, compression, and encryption tasks, while the physics score is comparatively modest—likely due to the benchmark’s sensitivity to clock speed rather than core count. For real workloads, this means the i9-14900F is a strong choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, data processing, and software compilation, where core count and cache size matter most. The 36 MB L3 cache is generous and helps with data-heavy applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 60008, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU, however, has no benchmark scores listed in the FACT PACK (its avgBenchmarkScore is 0), and it sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This is a stark contrast: the CPU is elite, the GPU is exactly median. The combined percentile for this pairing is 71, which reflects the CPU pulling the overall score upward while the GPU holds it back.

The Cinebench R20 scores are 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core, while Cinebench R15 shows 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. These older versions confirm the same trend. The Geekbench scores (20008 multi-core, 2570 single-core) are consistent with other results. The PassMark single-thread score is 4506, which is lower than the Cinebench single-core relative positioning—this is likely due to different workload definitions, but the overall picture remains: the i9-14900F is a top-8% CPU.

The GPU’s lack of benchmark data means we cannot provide exact scores, but its 50th percentile ranking suggests it performs at the median level for all GPUs. This is a mid-range position, not a high-end one. The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but delivers only average GPU performance. For users running applications that stress the GPU (gaming, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, machine learning inference), the RTX 3070 TiM will be the bottleneck. For CPU-bound workloads (compilation, scientific simulation, data analysis), the system will feel exceptionally fast.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th, 13th, and 14th Gen Core processors. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. ECC memory is supported, which is a plus for workstation users who need error correction. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. The integrated graphics are listed as N/A, so a discrete GPU is mandatory—this system already has one.

The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 220 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which is a reasonable figure for this combination. The CPU’s low 65 W TDP means a modest power supply can handle the processor, but the GPU’s 220 W requirement plus the rest of the system means the 550 W suggestion is the minimum. For upgrades, the socket 1700 platform is nearing the end of its lifecycle, as newer Intel generations use different sockets. However, within this platform, a user could upgrade to a higher-TDP K-series CPU (if the motherboard supports it) for better sustained multi-core performance, though the locked multiplier on the 14900F limits overclocking. The 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores are already near the top of what socket 1700 offers, so a CPU upgrade would yield marginal gains. The GPU is the more logical upgrade path: moving to a higher-tier card would address the 50th percentile bottleneck. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 slot ensures the platform is ready for future GPUs that might leverage that bandwidth, though current cards use PCIe 4.0.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance but are willing to accept mid-tier GPU capability. The i9-14900F’s 92nd percentile CPU rank makes it ideal for content creators who render video, 3D artists using CPU-based renderers, software developers compiling large codebases, and data scientists running multi-threaded simulations. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 indicate that these workloads will complete significantly faster than on average systems. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU’s compilation speed, though the GPU is not suited for heavy CUDA-based research tasks.

Small business workstations focused on data processing, encryption (PassMark encryption score of 34644), and compression (564207) would see strong returns from this CPU. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running server-like workloads. Gamers, however, should note that the GPU is at the 50th percentile—this is not a high-refresh-rate 4K system. At 1080p or 1440p with lower settings, the CPU’s high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 5583) will help maintain high frame rates, but the GPU will limit maximum FPS in demanding titles. This is a build for productivity first, gaming second.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is an Ampere-architecture GPU based on the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. The die contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² area, with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It features 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, which support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 915 MHz, boosting to 1410 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The memory subsystem is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 16.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 16.60 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). These figures put the RTX 3070 TiM in the mid-range tier, consistent with its 50th percentile ranking. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games at high textures and for GPU compute workloads that require large datasets; 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate but not exceptional. The ray tracing cores and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is half of what high-end cards offer.

The card is triple-slot wide, 270 mm long, 140 mm tall, and 55 mm wide, requiring a 550 W PSU and a single 8-pin power connector. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being GeForce 20 and successor GeForce 40, so this is a last-generation part. For rendering, the 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance means it can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane, but it will be slower than current mid-range cards. The 8 GB VRAM is a hard constraint for large scenes or 4K textures. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can offset the raw performance deficit in gaming by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, which is within 1% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59641, +0.6%), and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572, -0.9%). It is effectively tied with all four.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists eccMemory as true, meaning the i9-14900F supports error-correcting code memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, achieved with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplierUnlocked field is false, so the i9-14900F has a locked multiplier and does not support overclocking. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is the maximum.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than half of all graphics cards in the database.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combinedPercentile is 71, which reflects the CPU’s high 92nd percentile pulling the overall score up, while the GPU’s 50th percentile drags it down.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The i9-14900F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, according to the FACT PACK, which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and NVMe storage.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination (dataIsMeasured is false, and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty). Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking provide the basis for these estimates.

At 1080p resolution, the i9-14900F’s strong single-thread performance will prevent CPU bottlenecks in most games, allowing the RTX 3070 TiM to operate near its full potential. The GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles from the era of its release, likely delivering 60-100 FPS in esports titles and 50-70 FPS in AAA games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and frame rates will drop by roughly 20-30% compared to 1080p, depending on the game. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and mid-range compute will struggle, with estimates of 30-45 FPS on ultra settings in demanding games.

The 8 GB VRAM is a critical constraint for modern games with high-resolution textures; titles exceeding 8 GB will cause stuttering or require reduced texture quality. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can improve frame rates by rendering at a lower internal resolution, effectively compensating for the GPU’s raw performance deficit. The ray tracing cores (46) allow for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but at significant performance cost; enabling ray tracing at 1440p will likely push frame rates below 30 FPS in heavy scenes. Overall, this is a 1080p-to-1440p gaming system, with the CPU ensuring high minimum frame rates but the GPU capping maximum FPS.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass is "desktop") pairing Intel’s Core 14th Gen i9-14900F with NVIDIA’s GeForce 30-series RTX 3070 TiM. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake Refresh part with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an Ampere-architecture card with 8 GB GDDR6 and 16.60 TFLOPS FP32. The combined percentile is 71, placing this system above average overall, but the asymmetry is stark: the CPU is at the 92nd percentile, and the GPU is at the 50th.

This pairing is best described as a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 220 W TDP together suggest a system that is power-efficient for its class, with a 550 W PSU recommendation. The i9-14900F’s launch MSRP is $524, which positions it as a premium processor, while the GPU’s end-of-life status suggests it may be available at a discount. The system is designed for CPU-intensive workloads, not for pushing maximum graphics settings at high resolutions. It occupies a niche where processor performance is the priority, and the GPU is sufficient for mainstream gaming at 1080p or 1440p with adjusted settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this pairing. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile means that in any workload that uses both components, the GPU will reach its limit first. In gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM will cap frame rates, while the i9-14900F will have headroom to spare—likely not exceeding 50-60% utilization in most titles. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 indicates the CPU can feed the GPU with data far faster than the GPU can process it, so the GPU is always the limiting factor.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding (x264/x265), 3D rendering (Blender CPU), or code compilation, the GPU sits idle while the CPU delivers top-tier performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 and integer math score of 177066 confirm that the CPU will excel in these tasks, with no GPU involvement. The bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU in such scenarios, but that is the intended use case for this build. The balance is therefore workload-dependent: for gaming, the GPU limits; for productivity, the CPU is the star. The FPS scaling (estimated) shows that lowering resolution from 1440p to 1080p will increase frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means the ceiling is modest. Upgrading the GPU to a higher-percentile card would rebalance the system for gaming, while the CPU would remain relevant for years due to its 92nd percentile standing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds