SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

16,129 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pairing is a desktop-class combination that lands in the 76th percentile overall, indicating a high-tier system skewed heavily toward CPU-bound productivity workloads. The processor is the dominant component here, sitting in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is more mid-pack at the 59th percentile. This is not a balanced 50/50 split; the data clearly shows a configuration where the CPU dramatically outclasses the GPU, a fact that shapes every workload expectation from rendering to gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, on a 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The 257 mm² die is produced by Intel and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It has no integrated graphics, so the discrete GPU is mandatory.

Benchmark results paint a picture of a compute monster. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 39551, while the single-core score is 5583. The Cinebench R20 results show 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Geekbench results are similarly strong, with a multi-core score of 20008 and a single-core score of 2570. PassMark tests reinforce the trend: multi-thread score of 46532, single-thread score of 4506, integer math at 177066, floating-point math at 119550, and extended instructions at 31084. Data compression hits 564207, while data encryption reaches 34644. The average benchmark score is 60008, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals confirm its positioning. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60099, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the Intel part is essentially tied with it. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60104, again a -0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641, a +0.6% delta in favor of the Intel CPU. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572, a -0.9% delta. These margins are razor-thin, all within 1%, indicating that the i9-14900F trades blows with top-tier AMD mobile and server parts. For real workloads, this means heavy multi-threaded tasks like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulation will run at the same speed as those rival platforms, despite the i9-14900F being a desktop part. The 32 threads and high boost clock give it elite throughput for any parallel workload, while the 5.80 GHz boost ensures snappy single-threaded response for older or lightly threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The core imbalance is obvious: a 92nd-percentile CPU paired with a 59th-percentile GPU. In CPU-intensive tasks such as data compression, encryption, or physics calculations, the processor will operate without any GPU constraint, delivering its full 60008 average benchmark score. The PassMark physics score of 2899 and find prime numbers score of 209 indicate strong, though not record-breaking, single-thread performance. In these scenarios, the CPU is the clear driver, and the GPU is idle.

The bottleneck flips in graphics-limited workloads. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16129, and its PassMark G3D score is 20349. When rendering frames or performing GPU compute, the RTX 3060 Ti will be the limiting factor. The CPU will have massive headroom, waiting on the GPU to finish its work. This is typical for gaming at high resolutions or for GPU-accelerated rendering tasks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 78927 further show the GPU’s absolute performance ceiling. The data suggests that in any workload where the GPU is the primary compute engine, the system will perform at the level of the GPU’s 59th percentile, leaving the CPU’s 92nd-percentile potential largely untapped. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks, the GPU’s lower percentile is irrelevant, and the system runs at the CPU’s tier. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this averaging of two disparate components.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 39551 is a top-tier result, placing it in the 92nd percentile. The single-core score of 5583 is equally strong. PassMark multi-thread at 46532 and single-thread at 4506 confirm consistency across different test suites. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 is competitive with the nearest rivals, which all score near 60000 on their average benchmarks. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 60008 is the key figure for comparison, and its rivals are all within 0.9% of that number, meaning performance parity with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Ryzen 7 8745HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are more moderate. The PassMark G3D score of 20349 is the primary gaming proxy, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 reflects modern DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench Vulkan scores 47784, while OpenCL scores 78927, showing compute capability. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9060 with a score of 16014 (a +0.7% delta for the RTX 3060 Ti), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16351 (-1.4%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 (-1.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (+1.7%). The deltas are small, indicating the RTX 3060 Ti is firmly in a performance tier with these cards, neither significantly ahead nor behind.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is average for its GPU class. The 92nd-percentile CPU will dominate productivity benchmarks, while the 59th-percentile GPU will limit graphics-heavy applications. The overall 76th percentile is a weighted average, reflecting the CPU’s strength pulling the system upward.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct frame-rate measurements.

Based on the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20349 and its 59th-percentile position, gaming performance will be solid for 1080p and 1440p but not top-tier. The RTX 3060 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most titles at these resolutions. The CPU will not be a limiting factor in any game, given its 92nd-percentile standing; the GPU will be the bottleneck. In CPU-light games, the system will hit the GPU’s maximum frame rate. In CPU-heavy titles, the i9-14900F’s high single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains smooth, but the absolute FPS will still be capped by the GPU. For esports titles at 1080p, the GPU’s 59th percentile suggests high refresh rates are achievable, but not at the level of higher-tier GPUs. For AAA games at 1440p, expect playable frame rates with settings adjusted, given the GPU’s mid-pack ranking. At 4K, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and moderate compute will be stressed, and the 59th percentile indicates the experience will be below that of top-tier cards. These are estimates; actual FPS will vary by title and settings.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional or enthusiast who prioritizes CPU-heavy workloads over gaming. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit the most, as the 24 cores and 32 threads deliver elite multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 show that rendering tasks will complete at speeds rivaling far more expensive workstation CPUs. Developers compiling large codebases will see similar benefits, as the high core count and 5.80 GHz boost clock handle both parallel and sequential compilation tasks efficiently. Students in engineering or data science fields requiring heavy computation will find this CPU capable, though the GPU is sufficient for their needs. Small business workstations running virtualization, database workloads, or financial modeling will leverage the CPU’s 92nd-percentile position effectively.

Gamers, however, are not the ideal audience. The GPU’s 59th percentile means that at 1080p, the system will perform adequately, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will hold back the experience. Gamers who play CPU-intensive simulation or strategy titles might see some benefit, but the GPU will still limit overall frame rates. This build is for users who need a powerful compute platform and want decent graphics capability, not for those chasing maximum gaming frame rates.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is based on the Ampere architecture, using the GA104 chip on an 8 nm process from Samsung. It has 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, with a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU features 4864 shading units, 152 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. It includes 38 ray-tracing cores and 152 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and DLSS. The base clock is 1410 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 253.1 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 16.20 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU has a 200 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested PSU, with a single 12-pin power connector. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show its position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2626 is a modern measure of gaming performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 78927, and Vulkan scores 47784, showing decent compute capability. PassMark G3D scores 20349, with DirectX 11 at 163, DirectX 12 at 78, and DirectX 10 at 132. The PassMark GPU compute score is 10006. The average benchmark score is 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile. The nearest rival data shows it is within 1.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060, Radeon Pro 5600M, Radeon RX 5700 XT, and Radeon R9 370X, meaning it is statistically tied with those cards. For rendering tasks, the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p workloads, but the 59th percentile indicates it will not excel in high-end 4K rendering or heavy GPU compute tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though only dual-channel. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe drives. The platform is mature, and the i9-14900F is a top-end part for this socket, so a CPU upgrade within the same platform is unlikely to yield significant gains. The motherboard choice will determine memory type, but the CPU’s memory controller supports both. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds.

The PSU requirement is straightforward: the CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 200 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 550 W for the whole system. This leaves headroom for a modest GPU upgrade in the future. The GPU’s power connector is a single 12-pin, and its dual-slot design fits most cases. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The 92nd-percentile CPU can easily drive a GPU in the 80th or 90th percentile without bottlenecking, making a GPU swap the most logical path to improve gaming performance. The 8 GB VRAM on the current GPU is a limiting factor for future titles, so a GPU with more memory would be a worthwhile upgrade. The platform itself, with DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5, will remain relevant for several more years, so the CPU does not need replacement soon.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-14900F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. The combined percentile is 76, placing it in the upper tier of all systems. The CPU is the star, sitting in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 60008. The GPU is mid-pack, in the 59th percentile with an average score of 16129. This is a productivity-first system with decent gaming capability. The CPU’s 24 cores, 32 threads, and 5.80 GHz boost clock make it a top-tier compute platform, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 16.20 TFLOPS FP32 provide adequate graphics for mainstream gaming. The overall tier is high due to the CPU’s dominance, but the GPU holds the system back from being a top-tier gaming rig. For users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads, this is an excellent pairing; for gamers, it is unbalanced in favor of the processor.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 3060 Ti has an average benchmark score of 16129, placing it in the 59th percentile. It is within 1.7% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014), Radeon Pro 5600M (16351), Radeon RX 5700 XT (16361), and Radeon R9 370X (15862).

Q: What is the total system performance percentile?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 76, indicating a high-tier system overall.

Q: Does this CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-14900F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds