SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc B770

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B770

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc B770 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, a 5 nm design from TSMC with a 368 mm² die. It ships with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a substantial memory pool for a desktop GPU at this performance tier, and the bandwidth figure suggests it can feed high-resolution textures and large scene data without stalling. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, or 16 Gbps effective, which is a standard but capable configuration for the class.

The GPU's compute resources are laid out as 4096 shading units, 256 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. The base clock is 2100 MHz, with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. Pixel fill rate is rated at 307.2 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate at 614.4 GTexel/s. These numbers indicate a GPU that can handle heavy rasterization workloads, particularly at high resolutions where pixel throughput becomes a limiting factor. The FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS places it in a mid-range tier, while FP16 performance of 39.32 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) gives it headroom for workloads that can leverage reduced precision, such as certain AI inference tasks or mixed-precision rendering pipelines.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 32 dedicated RT cores. There is no tensor core count listed in the data, so any AI-accelerated features must be discussed qualitatively rather than with specific TOPS or TFLOPS figures. The API support is forward-looking: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and professional rendering applications that rely on these APIs. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is sufficient for most workloads, though it does not take advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The Arc B770's benchmark scores are not listed in the fact pack — the benchmarks array is empty for the GPU. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits at the median of the GPU performance distribution. This is a useful anchor: it is neither a top-tier enthusiast card nor a budget offering. For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth is the key differentiator — it can hold large texture sets and complex geometry in memory, and the bandwidth is adequate to stream that data to the compute units. The 50th percentile ranking suggests it will handle 1080p and 1440p rendering comfortably, with 4K being possible but not at the highest settings in the most demanding titles.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination means all gaming performance discussions must be framed as estimates derived from the component scores. The GPU's raw compute and memory figures, however, give a reasonable basis for those estimates. The RT cores will help with ray-traced effects, but the 50th percentile standing implies that heavy RT workloads may require reduced settings or resolution scaling.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile for this build is 71, which indicates that the pairing of the Intel Core i9-14900F and the Intel Arc B770 produces a system that outperforms 71% of all tested configurations. This is a strong overall position, but it does not tell the full story about where the bottleneck lies. The CPU's percentile versus all CPUs is 92, meaning it outperforms 92% of processors in the database. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of the balance: the CPU is far more capable than the GPU in relative terms.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation, data compression, or single-threaded productivity tasks — the i9-14900F will be the dominant factor, and the GPU will not be the limiting component. The data shows this clearly: the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score is 46532, and its single-thread score is 4506. These are strong numbers that place it in the top 8% of all CPUs. For tasks that rely heavily on these metrics, the GPU's 50th percentile standing will not hold the system back.

In GPU-bound workloads — such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing — the Arc B770 becomes the constraint. The CPU has plenty of headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU's median performance tier means it will cap frame rates or render times. The FPS scaling evidence is not available in the fact pack since no measured FPS rows exist for this combination. However, the percentile gap strongly suggests that at 1080p, the CPU may still have spare capacity while the GPU is at full utilization. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, as pixel and shading workloads increase faster than the CPU's role in frame generation.

The practical implication is that this is a well-balanced system for productivity and content creation, where the CPU does the heavy lifting and the GPU accelerates specific tasks. For gaming, the balance is less ideal — the CPU is overqualified relative to the GPU, meaning users are leaving some CPU performance on the table in GPU-limited scenarios. This is not a problem per se, but it does mean that the system would benefit more from a GPU upgrade than a CPU upgrade in the future.

Power delivery also factors into the balance. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part, while the GPU is rated at 225 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W. The CPU's modest power draw means the system's total power envelope is dominated by the GPU, which further reinforces the GPU as the performance ceiling in sustained workloads.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration is not explicitly broken down into performance and efficiency cores in the fact pack, but the total counts are substantial: 24 cores and 32 threads indicate a hybrid design with 8 performance cores and 16 efficiency cores, given the thread count does not double for the efficiency cores. This is a standard Raptor Lake layout, and it provides strong multi-threaded performance for heavily parallel workloads.

The base clock is 2.00 GHz, which is conservative, but the boost clock of 5.80 GHz is among the highest available on any desktop processor. This wide clock range means the CPU can idle efficiently but also burst to very high frequencies for single-threaded tasks. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a generous cache allocation that helps with data locality in workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets.

The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the fact pack does not specify maximum speeds for either. ECC memory is supported, which is notable for workstation and server-like use cases where data integrity is critical. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which provides high bandwidth for storage and expansion cards, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a top-tier CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 39551, and the single-core score is 5583. These are excellent figures that place the CPU in the top 8% of all processors. The Geekbench multi-core score is 20008, with a single-core score of 2570. PassMark results are equally strong: multi-thread score of 46532, single-thread of 4506, and notable sub-scores including data compression at 564207, data encryption at 34644, floating point math at 119550, and integer math at 177066.

These scores translate to real-world performance as follows. The multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23, Geekbench multi-core, PassMark multi-thread) indicate that the i9-14900F is excellent for video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any workload that can utilize 24 cores or 32 threads. The single-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 single, Geekbench single, PassMark single-thread) show that it is also very strong for gaming, office applications, and tasks that depend on a single fast core, such as legacy software or certain database queries.

The average benchmark score of 60008, with a 92nd percentile ranking, places it in the same league as several high-end AMD parts. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (average score 60099, 0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, 0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59641, 0.6% lower), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (60572, 0.9% higher). The deltas are all within 1%, meaning the i9-14900F is statistically tied with these competitors, and the choice among them would come down to platform features, power efficiency, or price rather than raw performance.

The TDP of 65 W is notably low for a processor with this core count and clock speed. This suggests that the F-series (no integrated graphics) allows Intel to bin chips with better power efficiency, and the 65 W rating likely reflects a power limit that can be exceeded under boost conditions, but it still implies that a modest cooler is sufficient for most workloads. The launch MSRP was $524, which positions it as a high-end desktop part.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The data points to a specific set of users who would benefit most from this CPU+GPU combination. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores make it ideal for content creators and professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads. Video editors working with high-resolution footage, 3D artists rendering scenes in software like Blender, and software developers compiling large codebases will all see significant benefits from the i9-14900F's 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 46532 are the relevant metrics here — they indicate that the CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads without becoming a bottleneck.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the system capable, though the GPU's 50th percentile standing means it is not optimized for 4K gaming at maximum settings. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 5583) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU will limit frame rates in most modern titles. For competitive gamers who prioritize frame rate over resolution, this system is viable, but they may want a stronger GPU.

Students and small business users who run office applications, web browsing, and light productivity tools will find this system massively overqualified. The CPU's single-threaded scores (Geekbench single of 2570, PassMark single of 4506) are far beyond what such tasks require. However, the system could serve as a long-term investment that handles future workloads without upgrade pressure, and the ECC memory support makes it suitable for users who need data integrity for financial or research data.

Developers working on parallel or multi-threaded applications will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 and encryption score of 34644 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks, which is relevant for database management, data analysis, and scientific computing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM also helps with GPU-accelerated compute tasks, though its FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is modest for compute-heavy workloads.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-14900F achieves an average benchmark score of 60008, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score, confirming it as a top-tier processor. The specific benchmark results are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 3986 and single-core 562; Cinebench R20 multi-core 16611 and single-core 2344; Cinebench R23 multi-core 39551 and single-core 5583; Geekbench multi-core 20008 and single-core 2570. PassMark results include multi-thread 46532, single-thread 4506, data compression 564207, data encryption 34644, extended instructions 31084, find prime numbers 209, floating point math 119550, integer math 177066, physics 2899, and random string sorting 63728.

The Intel Arc B770 has no benchmark scores listed in the fact pack, but its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0 (which is a placeholder indicating missing data). The combined percentile for the build is 71, meaning the system outperforms 71% of all tested configurations.

The combined picture is one of a CPU-heavy system. The CPU is in the top 8% of all processors, while the GPU is exactly at the median. This means that in mixed workloads — such as gaming with background encoding, or rendering that uses both CPU and GPU — the system's overall performance is anchored by the GPU. The 71st combined percentile reflects this: it is higher than the GPU's 50th percentile but lower than the CPU's 92nd percentile, which is consistent with a system where the GPU is the weaker component.

For users who primarily run CPU-bound tasks, the system will perform at a level near the CPU's 92nd percentile. For GPU-bound tasks, it will perform near the GPU's 50th percentile. The lack of measured FPS data means there is no direct evidence of in-game performance, but the percentile data allows for reasonable inference: at 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them at a level typical of a median GPU; at 1440p and 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to feed a high-refresh monitor, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means frame rates will be typical of a mid-range card. The 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle modern games at high settings, but not at the extreme frame rates achievable with top-tier GPUs. Users seeking 144Hz or higher in demanding titles may need to lower settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 46532, make it excellent for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 225 W TDP and 16 GB VRAM can handle the rendering side, and the system's combined 71st percentile suggests it can manage simultaneous gaming and encoding without severe frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark floating point math score of 119550 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM will help with GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering, though its FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is modest for heavy GPU effects.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads will accelerate CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 16 GB memory will hold large scenes. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated rendering (such as in Blender's Cycles) will be slower than with higher-end cards. The RT cores are present but not top-tier.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 564207 and integer math score of 177066 are excellent for compilation, code analysis, and data processing. The 32 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU is adequate for basic UI acceleration but not necessary for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This system is massively overkill. The CPU's single-thread score of 4506 in PassMark is far beyond what office applications require. The system will handle any document, spreadsheet, or web workload with ease, and the 16 GB GPU memory is irrelevant for such tasks, but it leaves room for future needs.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, the Arc B770 is expected to deliver performance typical of a median desktop GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it will not be a bottleneck in most games. At 1080p with ultra settings, the system is estimated to achieve playable frame rates (roughly 60-100 FPS) in most modern titles, with the GPU being the limiting factor. At 1440p ultra, frame rates are estimated to drop to the 40-70 FPS range, depending on the game's optimization. At 4K ultra, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM will fit most textures, but the FP32 performance of 19.66 TFLOPS is likely insufficient for smooth frame rates in demanding titles, with estimates in the 20-40 FPS range.

The GPU's 512.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB memory are assets for high-resolution textures and large open-world games. The 32 RT cores will enable ray-traced effects, but the 50th percentile standing suggests that enabling full ray tracing at high resolutions will significantly impact frame rates. For competitive games at 1080p with lower settings, the system could achieve high frame rates, as the CPU can drive 200+ FPS in esports titles, though the GPU may cap it at lower values.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F is at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc B770 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all tested configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-14900F supports ECC memory, which is useful for data integrity in workstation scenarios.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Arc B770 is based on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What are the CPU's boost and base clocks?

A: The i9-14900F has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The Arc B770 has a suggested PSU of 550 W, with a TDP of 225 W.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU uses DDR4 or DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, and it supports ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means that storage devices and expansion cards that use PCIe Gen 5 will have full bandwidth from the CPU, but the GPU is limited to Gen 4.

The CPU's TDP is 65 W, which is low for a 24-core part, meaning the existing cooling solution is likely adequate and there is headroom for power delivery. The GPU's TDP is 225 W, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. If a user upgrades to a more powerful GPU in the future, they will need to consider the PSU headroom. The current GPU uses a 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connector configuration, which is standard for mid-range cards.

The most sensible next upgrade for this system is the GPU. The CPU is already at the 92nd percentile, so upgrading it would yield minimal gains. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile, and upgrading to a higher-tier card would directly improve gaming performance and GPU-accelerated workloads. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, but the GPU interface is Gen 4, so a new GPU would still work at Gen 4 speeds unless it is a Gen 5 card. The 16 GB VRAM on the current GPU is generous, so users should focus on raw compute performance (FP32 and RT cores) rather than memory capacity when selecting an upgrade.

The motherboard's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, but users should match their existing memory type. The CPU's 36 MB of L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core are unlikely to be a bottleneck for any future GPU. The system's 71st combined percentile means there is meaningful headroom for improvement, and a GPU upgrade could push the system into the 80th or 90th percentile range, given the CPU's strength.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc B770

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

Intel Arc B770

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds