SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + Intel Arc A310

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310

7,550 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900F and Intel Arc A310 represent an extreme pairing of a top-tier 24-core desktop processor with an entry-level, low-power graphics card. This combination yields a system whose processing capability is in the top percentile of all CPUs, while its graphical performance sits in the lower half of the GPU distribution. The data indicates a desktop build with a combined performance percentile of 66, but the divergence between the two components' capabilities is stark. The following analysis breaks down the benchmark results for this specific configuration.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, drawing a TDP of 65 watts. The processor is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². Its cache hierarchy is substantial, featuring 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. The CPU connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the processor. It has no integrated graphics, which necessitates a discrete GPU. Its launch MSRP is $524.

Benchmark scores place this CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008. In multi-core performance, the Cinebench R23 score of 39551 is a dominant figure. This is closely mirrored by its nearest rivals, with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scoring 60099 (a delta of -0.2% relative to the i9-14900F), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX scoring 60104 (-0.2%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scoring 59641 (+0.6%). This indicates that the i9-14900F is statistically tied with the fastest mobile and desktop chips available, with differences of less than one percent. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T trails slightly with a score of 60572 (-0.9%).

Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2570. The PassMark single-thread score of 4506 corroborates the strong per-core performance. These results suggest that the CPU excels in tasks that rely on a single core, such as legacy applications and lightly-threaded games. The Cinebench R20 scores of 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core further demonstrate a balanced scaling between multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 reinforces the strength in parallel processing. For productivity, the PassMark integer math score of 177066 and floating-point math score of 119550 indicate high throughput for general computing and scientific calculations. Data compression (564207) and encryption (34644) scores are also strong, highlighting its ability to handle archival and security tasks efficiently.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU is more than capable of feeding frames. The strong single-core performance, evidenced by the 5583 Cinebench R23 single-core score, ensures that game logic and physics calculations are handled with minimal latency. However, the final frame rate will be entirely dependent on the GPU, which is a limiting factor at any resolution above 1080p.

Streaming and content creation benefit from the massive multi-threading capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 allows for fluid encoding of video while simultaneously running a game. The high thread count of 32 ensures that background tasks like streaming software and chat applications do not starve the main processes of CPU resources.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see significant acceleration from the CPU. The high multi-threaded scores indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The 36 MB of L3 cache is beneficial for handling large media files and complex effects, while the high memory bandwidth (supported via DDR5) aids in real-time previews.

3D rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D is a primary strength of this processor. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 directly translates to shorter render times compared to lower-core-count processors. The PassMark physics score of 2899 also suggests competent simulation performance, which is a common bottleneck in complex scenes.

Software development will see marked improvements in compilation times. The multi-core and integer performance (PassMark integer math score of 177066) allow for parallel compilation of large codebases, significantly reducing build times. The high thread count also supports running multiple virtual machines or containers simultaneously.

For student and office work, this CPU is overwhelmingly overqualified. The single-core performance is excellent for everyday productivity applications like word processors and spreadsheets. The benchmark scores show that the processor will never be the bottleneck in these tasks, providing a fluid and responsive experience regardless of background activity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310 is an entry-level graphics card based on the Xe-HPG architecture, built on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. It includes 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. The card operates at a base and boost clock of 1750 MHz, with a memory clock of 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). Its TDP is a minimal 30 W, and it does not require any external power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 200 W. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x8 and offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In terms of raw compute, the Arc A310 delivers 2.688 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 5.376 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. Its pixel rate is 28.00 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 56.00 GTexel/s. The benchmark scores, however, place the GPU in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 7550. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R7 250 (score 7557, delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 (score 7580, delta -0.4%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (score 7472, delta 1%). This places the Arc A310 in the same performance class as older entry-level cards, significantly behind modern mainstream offerings.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 30607 and Vulkan score of 28964 suggest that the card can handle compute and modern graphics APIs, but the PassMark scores tell a more nuanced story. The PassMark G3D score of 5433 is low, indicating weak overall 3D rendering performance. The DirectX 12 score of 29 and DirectX 11 score of 33 are particularly low, suggesting that the card will struggle with modern game engines that rely heavily on these APIs. The 6 ray tracing cores are present, but their performance will be limited by the low overall compute throughput. The 4 GB of VRAM is also a constraint for modern games at higher resolutions, as it is below the 6-8 GB typically recommended for current titles.

Who Should Build It

This build is not a conventional gaming or high-end workstation configuration. It is a specialized pairing that would serve a narrow set of users. For gamers targeting 1080p with esports titles or older games, the CPU's single-core strength will ensure high frame rates in those specific scenarios, but the GPU will cap performance in any demanding modern title. This system is unsuitable for gaming at 1440p or 4K, as the Arc A310's 4 GB VRAM and low compute power will be severe bottlenecks.

Content creators who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, and who require only basic display output, could find this pairing useful. The CPU's massive multi-core performance will accelerate these workloads significantly. The GPU would serve as a basic display adapter for a workstation that does not require GPU acceleration for rendering previews or effects. It is not suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering or AI workloads, as the compute scores are too low.

Developers working on large codebases would benefit from the CPU's compilation speed. The Arc A310 provides a functional display output for development environments, and the 4GB of VRAM is sufficient for desktop compositing and 2D UI rendering. Students and office workers would find this system extremely fast for all productivity tasks, but it is a waste of the CPU's potential. Small business workstations that need to run heavy multi-threaded data processing, such as financial modeling or database management, could leverage the CPU's power while the GPU handles basic office graphics and presentations. The GPU's low TDP of 30 W means it will not add significant heat or power draw to a system.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008. This is a top-tier result, matching the performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX within a 0.2% margin. The GPU, conversely, sits in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7550. This is a mid-to-low-tier result, placing it alongside the AMD Radeon R7 250 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650. The combined percentile of the system is 66, which is dragged down significantly by the GPU.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and single-core score of 5583 demonstrate its dominance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 further validates this. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and DirectX 12 score of 29 are indicative of its limited gaming and 3D capability. The data shows a clear difference: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a bottom-tier performer in the context of modern hardware. The system's overall tier is defined by its CPU strength, but its real-world performance in graphics-heavy tasks will be dictated by the GPU's limitations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i9-14900F and Intel Arc A310. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rate data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all FPS figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Based on the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 5433 and its low DirectX 11 and 12 scores, the estimated gaming performance is very modest. At 1080p with ultra settings, the Arc A310 is expected to deliver playable frame rates only in older or less demanding esports titles. For modern AAA games, the frame rate is likely to be below 30 FPS at 1080p ultra. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor, as many modern games will exceed this at high texture settings.

The CPU's strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583, ensures that it will not be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario. However, it cannot compensate for the GPU's low compute throughput. At 1440p and 4K, the Arc A310 is not a viable option for gaming, as the frame rates would be unplayable. The data suggests that this system would be better suited for non-gaming workloads, as the GPU's performance is insufficient for a satisfying modern gaming experience at any resolution above 1080p with demanding settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

This system exhibits a massive bottleneck, with the GPU being the definitive limiting factor in almost all workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile score and the GPU's 40th percentile score create a massive disparity. In gaming, the CPU is capable of processing game logic far faster than the GPU can render frames. The FPS scaling will be entirely dictated by the GPU's fill rate and compute performance, as evidenced by the low PassMark G3D score of 5433. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to catch up.

In CPU-intensive workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the bottleneck shifts to the CPU, but this is the intended use case for this combination. The GPU's low compute score of 2157 (PassMark GPU compute) means it will not accelerate these tasks, but it will not hinder them either. In this scenario, the system operates as a high-end CPU workstation with basic display output. The performance scaling between the components is non-linear; increasing the GPU's workload does not affect the CPU's performance, and vice versa. This is a clear sign of a system that is unbalanced for gaming but can be highly efficient for specific CPU-bound professional tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system is built around the Intel Socket 1700 platform. The Core i9-14900F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so the motherboard choice will dictate which memory type is used. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, but the Arc A310 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which will run at that speed regardless. The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 30 W, resulting in a low total system power draw. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W, which provides ample headroom for this configuration.

The most sensible next upgrade is to replace the GPU. The CPU is already a top-tier performer, and a more powerful GPU would unlock its full potential in gaming. The motherboard and PSU are likely capable of supporting a significantly more powerful graphics card, given the low power requirements of the current components. If the system was built with a DDR5 motherboard, it is a modern platform. If it was built with DDR4, the memory might also be a candidate for an upgrade in the future, but it is not a bottleneck for the current GPU. The CPU itself is a final-generation part for the Socket 1700 platform, so there is no CPU upgrade path without changing the motherboard. The PCIe 4.0 interface on the GPU is not a bottleneck, as the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5, providing plenty of bandwidth for future graphics cards.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Core i9-14900F?

A: The i9-14900F is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60008. It performs within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX.

Q: What is the performance class of the Intel Arc A310?

A: The Arc A310 is in the 40th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 7550. It performs within 1% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 66, reflecting the strong CPU and weak GPU.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A", so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the power consumption of the Intel Arc A310?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 30 W and does not require external power connectors. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W.

Q: What is the VRAM capacity of the Intel Arc A310?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 124.0 GB/s.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-14900F, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A310, a low-power Alchemist graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier performer, ranking in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level part, ranking in the 40th percentile. The overall system percentile is 66. This configuration is best understood as a high-performance CPU workstation with a basic display adapter. It is not a balanced gaming system, but its CPU power makes it suitable for professional workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation where GPU acceleration is not critical. The data clearly indicates that the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU serves only to provide a functional video output.