SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900F

60,008 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT: Desktop Benchmark Analysis

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship CPU with AMD's RDNA 2-based 16 GB GPU, landing in the 90th combined percentile across all benchmarked configurations. The CPU holds a 92nd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 88th percentile among all graphics cards, making this a high-tier build with distinct strengths in multi-threaded productivity and high-resolution rasterization.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the Navi 21 chip using TSMC's 7 nm process, with a die size of 520 mm² and 26,800 million transistors. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is substantial for high-resolution textures and large scene data, positioning this card well for 4K asset-heavy workloads.

Compute resources include 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. The GPU delivers 23.65 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 47.31 TFLOPS of FP16 via 2:1 ratio, with pixel rate at 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate at 739.2 GTexel/s. Ray tracing hardware comprises 80 dedicated RT cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing support, though the RDNA 2 implementation is generally less robust than newer architectures. There are no tensor cores present, meaning no dedicated AI acceleration hardware; the GPU relies on standard compute shaders for any AI-related tasks.

Benchmark scores reflect a strong rasterization performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 places the GPU firmly in the upper tier of graphics hardware. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 165212 and OpenCL score of 205998 indicate solid compute capability, while the Metal score of 222653 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong performance in Apple-ecosystem cross-platform workloads. PassMark G3D score of 28070 and GPU compute score of 14199 reinforce the card's standing as a high-end rasterization part. The GPU's 88th percentile rank among all GPUs means it outperforms roughly 88% of tested graphics cards, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA P102-100 (deltaPct -0.2%), Intel Arc A570M (deltaPct 0.3%), and AMD Radeon PRO V710 (deltaPct -0.5%). These deltas are all within 0.5%, indicating a tightly clustered competitive field.

For rendering workloads, the key takeaway is that this GPU excels at traditional rasterized rendering, with its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM handling large texture sets and complex geometry. The 80 RT cores enable ray-traced effects but with less efficiency than dedicated RT-focused architectures; users should expect playable but not exceptional ray tracing performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-14900F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility is notable: users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on motherboard selection, though the memory bus remains dual-channel regardless of memory type. ECC memory support is present, which is a feature typically associated with workstation-class builds.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU with Gen 5, providing 16 lanes from the processor. This is the latest PCIe generation, offering substantial bandwidth headroom for high-end storage devices and future expansion cards, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU's bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x16 is backward-compatible and remains fully functional in a PCIe 5.0 slot, though it will not utilize the extra bandwidth of the newer standard.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for a 24-core part, suggesting efficient power management under typical loads. The GPU, however, has a TDP of 335 W and recommends a 700 W power supply. This creates a significant PSU headroom consideration: a system with this CPU and GPU combination should have a power supply rated at or above the 700 W suggested PSU specification to handle peak loads comfortably. The GPU requires two 8-pin power connectors and occupies a triple-slot width, so case clearance and PSU cable configuration are practical considerations.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers several paths. The Socket 1700 platform can accommodate newer 14th Gen processors, though the i9-14900F is already near the top of that stack. Memory can be upgraded to DDR5 with higher speeds, which would benefit CPU-bound scenarios given the dual-channel memory bus. The GPU, being end-of-life and on the PCIe 4.0 interface, could be replaced with a newer generation card when the user requires more ray tracing performance or newer feature sets, though the current 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth remain competitive for most current workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the i9-14900F and RX 6950 XT is characterized by a powerful CPU paired with a high-end but not flagship GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile rank versus the GPU's 88th percentile rank indicates the processor has slightly more headroom relative to its competitive field than the graphics card does. In practice, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where the 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are heavily utilized.

The CPU's multi-threaded dominance is clear from its benchmark scores: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark multithread score of 46532 are exceptional figures. The GPU's compute score of 14199 in PassMark is strong but not proportionally as dominant. In GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or heavy ray tracing, the RX 6950 XT will saturate before the CPU does, making the GPU the primary performance limiter. For CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p high-refresh-rate gaming or physics-heavy simulations, the i9-14900F's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583) and high core count ensure it will not hold back the GPU.

The data shows a slight imbalance favoring the CPU in terms of percentile ranking, but the delta is small enough that the pairing is well-matched for most workloads. The GPU's nearest rival comparisons show deltas within 0.5%, indicating the RX 6950 XT is solidly positioned in its performance tier, while the CPU's nearest rivals—AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, Ryzen 7 8745HX, Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T—all have average scores within 0.9% of the i9-14900F, showing a very competitive CPU landscape.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who need a high-performance desktop for both gaming and productivity. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz make it suitable for heavily multi-threaded workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and PassMark multithread score of 46532 indicate excellent performance for content creation tasks that scale across many threads.

Gamers at high resolutions—specifically 1440p and 4K—will benefit from the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, which handle large textures and high-resolution rendering without memory capacity constraints. The 88th percentile GPU rank ensures smooth gameplay in most titles, though the card is end-of-life, so future game optimizations may favor newer architectures.

Content creators working with video editing, motion graphics, or 3D modeling will find the CPU's strong multi-core scores and the GPU's compute capability (OpenCL score of 205998, Vulkan score of 165212) useful for rendering and effects work. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 564207 and encryption score of 34644 indicate strong performance for data-intensive tasks like file archiving and secure data handling.

Software developers building large codebases will benefit from the high multithreaded performance, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compilation jobs. Students in engineering or computer science programs who run simulations or compile code will find the CPU's physics score of 2899 and integer math score of 177066 valuable. Small business workstations running database workloads or virtualization will leverage the 32 threads and the CPU's balanced performance across diverse benchmark tests.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 295.7 GPixel/s pixel rate support high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, though the CPU's single-core score of 5583 in Cinebench R23 ensures the processor can feed frames quickly. The 16 GB VRAM prevents capacity-related stutters in modern titles, and the 88th percentile GPU rank indicates the card outperforms most alternatives.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads with a 65 W TDP provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and streaming tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 46532 and floating point math score of 119550 indicate the processor can handle real-time encoding while maintaining game performance, though the GPU lacks dedicated encoders that newer cards offer.

Video editing: Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 16611 and R15 multi-core score of 3986 demonstrate strong rendering performance in timeline previews and final exports. The GPU's OpenCL score of 205998 accelerates effects processing, while the 16 GB VRAM handles large 4K or multi-layer projects without memory pressure.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 is exceptional for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 47.31 TFLOPS FP16 performance supports GPGPU rendering workloads. The combination allows hybrid rendering pipelines where the CPU handles geometry and the GPU handles shading, with the 80 RT cores providing ray tracing acceleration.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 177066 and extended instructions score of 31084 show strong performance for compilation and code analysis tasks. The high thread count (32 threads) allows parallel builds, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4506 in PassMark single-thread tests ensures responsive everyday application performance, while the 65 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks but enables students to run visualization or simulation software when needed.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, placing this build in the top 10% of all benchmarked configurations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900F compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: The i9-14900F has an average benchmark score of 60008, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average score of 60099, resulting in a deltaPct of -0.2%, meaning the i9-14900F is 0.2% slower on average.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, achieved via 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900F have integrated graphics?

A: No, the integrated graphics field is listed as "N/A," meaning the CPU requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 700 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 335 W with two 8-pin power connectors.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The GPU is manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process, with a die size of 520 mm² and 26,800 million transistors.

Q: How does the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, has an average score of 58528, while the RX 6950 XT has an average score of 58392, a deltaPct of -0.2%, indicating near-identical average performance.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900F is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename from the Core 14th Gen series. Built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², the CPU has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for error-correcting workloads. PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provides 16 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed storage and expansion. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to adjustments via the base clock or motherboard settings, and it relies on the Raptor Lake's boost behavior to reach its 5.80 GHz maximum.

Benchmark scores demonstrate the CPU's exceptional multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39551 and R20 multi-core score of 16611 place it among the top processors for heavily threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 20008 and PassMark multithread score of 46532 reinforce its position near the top of the CPU hierarchy, with a 92nd percentile rank. Single-thread performance is also strong: Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583 and Geekbench single-core score of 2570 indicate excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded applications.

Specialized workloads show specific strengths. The PassMark data compression score of 564207 is exceptionally high, indicating rapid file archiving and compression tasks. Data encryption score of 34644 and extended instructions score of 31084 show solid performance for cryptographic and SIMD-heavy workloads. Floating point math score of 119550 and integer math score of 177066 reflect strong computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The prime number finding score of 209 is relatively modest, suggesting the architecture's performance in certain integer-heavy algorithms is less dominant.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (avgScore 60099, deltaPct -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (avgScore 60104, deltaPct -0.2%), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (avgScore 59641, deltaPct 0.6%), and Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (avgScore 60572, deltaPct -0.9%). These tight deltas indicate the i9-14900F is highly competitive with the best available processors, with the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D being the only rival the i9-14900F outperforms on average, by 0.6%.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's Core i9-14900F with AMD's Radeon RX 6950 XT. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 14th Gen series, while the GPU is a 16 GB RDNA 2-based graphics card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The combined percentile rank is 90, meaning this pairing outperforms 90% of all benchmarked CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The build's tier is high-end, driven primarily by the CPU's strong performance. The i9-14900F's 92nd percentile rank among all CPUs is the standout feature, while the GPU's 88th percentile rank is solidly upper-mid-range. The CPU is the more competitive component in this pairing, with the GPU being slightly behind in relative performance terms. The GPU is end-of-life, having been released in May 2022, while the CPU is active and was released in January 2024. This means the platform benefits from a newer CPU with potential for longer-term driver and software support, while the GPU is at the tail end of its lifecycle.

The launch MSRP for the CPU is $524, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 1,099 USD. The build targets users who require high multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity work and strong rasterized gaming performance at high resolutions, with the understanding that the GPU's feature set is from the RDNA 2 generation.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60008, with a percentile rank of 92 among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 58392, with a percentile rank of 88 among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 90, indicating that this configuration sits above the vast majority of tested builds.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 39551 multi-core and 5583 single-core. The R20 scores are 16611 multi-core and 2344 single-core, while R15 scores are 3986 multi-core and 562 single-core. Geekbench scores are 20008 multi-core and 2570 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 46532, single-thread score of 4506, floating point math of 119550, integer math of 177066, data compression of 564207, data encryption of 34644, extended instructions of 31084, physics of 2899, and random string sorting of 63728.

For the GPU, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4235. Geekbench scores are 222653 for Metal, 205998 for OpenCL, and 165212 for Vulkan. PassMark scores include 28070 for G3D, 14199 for GPU compute, 1063 for G2D, 303 for DirectX 9, 300 for DirectX 11, 164 for DirectX 10, and 114 for DirectX 12.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded workloads, with scores that place it among the top 8% of all processors. The GPU, while not at the absolute top, delivers strong rasterized performance with a percentile rank that puts it ahead of 88% of graphics cards. The CPU's single-thread performance is also excellent, ensuring balanced behavior across diverse application types. The delta between the CPU and GPU percentile ranks (92 vs 88) suggests that the CPU has slightly more headroom, meaning in well-optimized scenarios, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate figures discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU's 88th percentile rank and its 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 performance, this build should deliver high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most games with ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample capacity and throughput for high-resolution textures, reducing the likelihood of stutter in memory-intensive scenarios. At 4K resolution, the GPU's pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s support playable frame rates, though not at the highest refresh rates in demanding titles.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5583) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, particularly in CPU-bound scenarios like open-world games or simulation titles. The 24-core configuration with a 5.80 GHz boost clock provides headroom for background tasks during gaming, such as streaming or recording. The 65 W TDP of the CPU means thermal management is straightforward, allowing sustained boost clocks without excessive power draw.

For esports titles at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's high boost clock and the GPU's 128 ROPs should support very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in less demanding games. For AAA titles at 1440p ultra, frame rates are estimated to be in the range where high-refresh monitors (120-165 Hz) are usable, though the most demanding ray-traced titles may require settings adjustments, given the GPU has 80 RT cores but with RDNA 2's less mature ray tracing implementation. At 4K, the build is estimated to deliver playable frame rates (60+ FPS) in most well-optimized titles, but may need medium-to-high settings in the most demanding games to maintain smooth performance. These figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores presented here, not direct measurements from game benchmarks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900F + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900F

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds