SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

178,050 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D form a desktop-class pairing that sits at the 95th percentile of all combined builds, according to the benchmark database. The CPU holds a 92nd percentile position against all processors, while the GPU reaches the 98th percentile against all graphics cards. This is a top-tier configuration where both components operate in the upper echelon of their respective categories, though the data shows the graphics card is the stronger of the two relative to its competition.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD102 chip, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. Memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X across a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for 4K texture-heavy workloads and large scene rendering, where capacity and throughput determine whether a project fits entirely in VRAM.

The shading complex includes 14,592 shading units, 456 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs. Ray tracing is handled by 114 dedicated RT cores, while 456 tensor cores accelerate AI-driven tasks such as DLSS and denoising. Pixel rate is 443.5 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,149.1 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 73.54 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 73.54 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio. These raw compute figures place the card in a class where 3D rendering, physics simulation, and compute-heavy filters run at speeds that lower-tier GPUs cannot approach.

Benchmark results confirm this positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8,587, which reflects strong DirectX 12 rasterization performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 278,621 and Vulkan score of 246,941 indicate substantial compute capability across different APIs. The average benchmark score is 178,050, placing the GPU at the 98th percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 4090 D trails the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell by 2.2%, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB by 3.1%, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation by 3.6%, and the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB by 4.9%. These are narrow margins, meaning the 4090 D trades blows with professional-grade compute cards while offering the full feature set of a consumer GeForce product.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 14th Gen series. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. This means the platform can handle the fastest current SSDs and expansion cards, though the RTX 4090 D itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Power delivery is a critical consideration. The GPU has a TDP of 425 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 800 W, while the CPU has a TDP of just 65 W. This creates a substantial headroom situation: the CPU draws relatively little power, leaving almost the entire PSU budget for the GPU and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be adding more NVMe storage over the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, since the platform has the bandwidth to support multiple high-speed drives. Memory capacity can also be expanded, with DDR5 being the natural choice for new builds, though DDR4 remains supported for users migrating from older platforms.

The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. This means buyers looking for the absolute latest hardware should consider the newer generation, but the 4090 D remains a current and active product for the CPU, which was released on 2024-01-07. The CPU's production status is active, and its multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option for the processor itself. The GPU is triple-slot in width, measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 61 mm in width, so case compatibility should be verified before purchase.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It runs on the 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². Base clock is 2.00 GHz, and boost clock reaches 5.80 GHz. Cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The unlocked multiplier is false, so the chip operates at stock clocks only.

Benchmark data shows strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 31,070, while single-core is 2,212. Cinebench R20 shows 15,910 multi-core and 2,245 single-core. Cinebench R15 scores are 4,793 multi-core and 315 single-core. Geekbench results are 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. PassMark scores include 44,578 for multithread, 4,323 for single thread, 175,010 for integer math, 120,262 for floating point math, 33,540 for data encryption, 550,271 for data compression, 30,624 for extended instructions, and 188 for find prime numbers. The average benchmark score is 58,115, placing the CPU at the 92nd percentile.

The nearest rivals show a tight cluster. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58,323 on average, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58,386, 0.5% higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58,504, 0.7% higher. The AMD EPYC 9015 scores 57,555, which is 1% lower. These deltas are minimal, meaning the i9-14900 performs essentially on par with these server and workstation parts in aggregate benchmarks. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, smooth video editing timelines, and responsive multi-tasking. The 32 threads handle heavily parallel tasks such as 3D rendering and scientific computing, while the high boost clock ensures snappy single-threaded performance for legacy applications and day-to-day use.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

The 95th combined percentile and the individual 92nd CPU and 98th GPU percentiles define the target audience. Gamers seeking maximum frame rates at high resolutions are a primary fit, given the GPU's 98th percentile standing. Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes benefit from the 24 GB VRAM and the CPU's 32 threads. Software developers compiling large codebases will see fast iteration times from the multi-core scores. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or machine learning experiments can leverage the tensor cores and high FP32 throughput. Small business workstations handling CAD, architectural visualization, or data analysis will find the combination of CPU multi-threading and GPU compute power sufficient for demanding professional applications.

The GPU's 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth and 24 GB capacity are particularly suited for large dataset processing. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 550,271 and encryption score of 33,540 indicate strong performance in file archiving and secure data handling. The extended instructions score of 30,624 suggests good AVX-512 or similar vectorized workload performance. For users who need a single machine that does everything well, this pairing covers the full spectrum from gaming to professional rendering without a weak point in either direction.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 58,115, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 178,050, placing it at the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 95. The GPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, sitting six percentile points higher than the CPU. This means the graphics card is closer to the top of its class than the processor is.

In multi-core CPU tests, the i9-14900 scores 31,070 in Cinebench R23 and 15,910 in Cinebench R20. Single-core scores are 2,212 and 2,245 respectively. Geekbench multi-core is 18,495 and single-core is 2,488. The GPU scores 8,587 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 278,621 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 246,941 in Geekbench Vulkan. The combined picture shows a system where the GPU leads the performance envelope, but the CPU is more than capable of feeding it. The 0.4% to 0.7% deltas from the CPU's nearest rivals indicate that the processor is not a bottleneck in any meaningful sense, as the differences are within noise for most workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D is 95, meaning it outperforms 95% of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4090 D have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 31,070 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, with a single-core score of 2,212.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the processor runs at its stock 2.00 GHz base and 5.80 GHz boost clocks.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 4090 D is 800 W, while the GPU's TDP is 425 W and the CPU's TDP is 65 W.

Q: Does the platform support both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Core i9-14900 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What are the GPU's nearest rivals and how much faster are they?

A: The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (2.2% faster), A100 SXM4 80 GB (3.1% faster), RTX 5000 Ada Generation (3.6% faster), and A100 SXM4 40 GB (4.9% faster).

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured for this specific pairing. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,587 suggest that it will deliver extremely high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles when paired with the CPU's 92nd percentile processing power. The 24 GB VRAM ensures that texture-heavy games at maximum settings will not run out of memory. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth provides ample data throughput for high-resolution assets.

At 4K ultra settings, the GPU's raw rasterization power from 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 should push frame rates beyond 60 FPS in demanding titles, and often beyond 100 FPS in optimized games. At 1440p, the CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 32 threads will keep frame pacing consistent, avoiding CPU-bound dips. The 114 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at playable frame rates, especially with DLSS frame generation, which the tensor cores support. These are estimates based on benchmark scores, not measured results. Users should expect top-tier performance but should treat specific FPS numbers as approximations.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D. The build class is explicitly desktop, not laptop or mobile. The combined percentile is 95, placing this configuration in the top 5% of all tracked systems. The CPU is at the 92nd percentile, and the GPU is at the 98th percentile. This asymmetry is notable: the graphics card is the standout component, while the processor is merely very good rather than exceptional.

The GPU is end-of-life in production status, with the GeForce 50 series as its successor. The CPU is active and was released on 2024-01-07. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $549, and the launch MSRP for the GPU is 1,599 USD. The GPU is triple-slot, requiring significant case space. The CPU has integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output without the discrete GPU. This pairing represents a high-end desktop workstation or enthusiast gaming rig, with the GPU doing the heavy lifting for graphics and compute, while the CPU handles general processing and multitasking.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between CPU and GPU is skewed toward the GPU. At the 98th percentile, the RTX 4090 D is near the top of its class, while the CPU at the 92nd percentile is good but not the absolute best. In gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is typically the limiting factor, but with a card this powerful, the CPU becomes more relevant at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high. The CPU's single-core score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 8,587 in 3DMark Steel Nomad suggest that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be fully utilized before the CPU becomes a constraint. However, in CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games with many units, the CPU's 32 threads will be the bottleneck.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts depending on the task. Video editing and 3D rendering use both components heavily. The CPU's multi-core score of 31,070 in Cinebench R23 handles rendering, while the GPU's 278,621 OpenCL score accelerates effects and encoding. Data compression at 550,271 and encryption at 33,540 are CPU-bound, meaning the GPU's power does not help there. The nearest rival deltas for the CPU are small, with the fastest rival being 0.7% ahead, so the CPU is not a significant bottleneck for most tasks. The GPU's nearest rivals are 2.2% to 4.9% faster, meaning the 4090 D has slightly more headroom relative to its competition.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p or 1080p with high refresh monitors, the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and 73.54 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will push frame rates well beyond 144 FPS in most titles, with the CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock ensuring minimal frame time spikes. The 24 GB VRAM prevents texture pop-in at ultra settings.

Streaming: The 456 tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based upscaling, while the CPU's 32 threads handle game capture and broadcast software simultaneously without dropping frames. The PassMark multithread score of 44,578 indicates ample headroom for encoding alongside gaming.

Video editing: The GPU's 278,621 OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading, while the CPU's 31,070 Cinebench R23 multi-core score speeds up timeline rendering and export. The 1.01 TB/s bandwidth moves 4K footage quickly between VRAM and the editing timeline.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads process geometry and physics, scoring 15,910 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, while the GPU's 8,587 3DMark Steel Nomad score reflects its ability to render complex scenes at high resolution. The 24 GB VRAM holds large scenes without swapping.

Software development: The CPU's 120,262 floating point math and 175,010 integer math PassMark scores indicate fast compilation and test execution, while the 32 threads handle parallel builds. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive application loading, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking means even demanding engineering software runs smoothly, though the system is overkill for basic office tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds