SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

2,690 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-14900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER form a desktop pairing that sits at the 55th percentile overall when combined. The CPU is the clear performance anchor, delivering an average benchmark score of 58,115 and ranking in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs. The GPU, however, is a significant outlier, with an average score of 2,690 that places it in only the 18th percentile against all GPUs. This is a configuration where the processor’s high-end capabilities are paired with a graphics card that benchmarks far below the CPU’s tier, creating a substantial performance gap that defines the system’s character.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistently strong across every test. In Cinebench R23, the i9-14900 scores 31,070 in multi-core and 2,212 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 15,910 multi-core and 2,245 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 4,793 multi-core and 315 single-core. Geekbench scores are 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. PassMark results are equally comprehensive: multi-threaded performance is 44,578, single-thread is 4,323, integer math scores 175,010, floating-point math scores 120,262, and extended instructions score 30,624. Data compression scores 550,271, data encryption scores 33,540, and random string sorting hits 61,060. Physics performance is 2,486, and prime number finding is 188.

The GPU’s single benchmark result is a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690. This score places the RTX 5070 SUPER at the 18th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664, +1% delta) and the GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, +1.1% delta). The combined percentile of 55 reflects the dominance of the CPU in the overall average, but the GPU’s low percentile drags the system down from what the processor alone would achieve. The data shows a clear picture: this is a CPU-forward system with a GPU that performs at a fraction of the level the processor’s benchmarks suggest it could support.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a Raptor Lake-R codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and it operates within a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results indicate the CPU’s multi-core performance is exceptional. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 puts it in the top tier of processors. The nearest rivals in the data show the i9-14900 is closely matched with the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323 average, -0.4% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (58,386 average, -0.5% delta), while it edges out the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555 average, +1% delta). These are workstation and server-class competitors, which contextualizes the desktop i9-14900 as a processor that competes with enterprise silicon in multi-threaded throughput. For real workloads, the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache make it well-suited for heavily parallel tasks like video rendering, 3D scene construction, and large-scale code compilation. Single-core performance, with a Geekbench score of 2,488 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,212, remains strong for everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a pronounced bottleneck scenario. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking contrasts sharply with the GPU’s 18th percentile, meaning the graphics card is the limiting factor in virtually every graphics-bound workload. In gaming, the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames, but the GPU’s low 3DMark score of 2,690 indicates it will cap frame rates well below what the processor can generate. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 44,578 suggests it can handle substantial game logic, physics, and background tasks without breaking a sweat, but the GPU’s rendering throughput will constrain the final output. For CPU-bound tasks like content creation, the GPU is rarely involved, and the system performs at the 92nd percentile level. The bottleneck is therefore workload-dependent: the CPU dominates in non-graphics tasks, while the GPU dominates as a limiting factor in any 3D application.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over graphics performance. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070 demonstrates. Software developers managing large codebases will find the multi-threaded PassMark score of 44,578 useful for parallel builds. Students and small business workstations handling office productivity, data analysis, or scientific computing will see strong results in CPU-bound tasks. Gamers at low resolutions or with low graphical settings might extract playable performance, but the GPU’s 18th percentile ranking makes this a poor choice for modern gaming at high detail. The system is best suited for professionals who need a powerful processor and only require basic graphics output, such as server-style workloads or remote desktop applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. The GPU has 6,400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. It includes 50 RT cores and 200 tensor cores. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and memory operates at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. Memory capacity is 18 GB of GDDR7 across a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s. The GPU is rated for a 275 W TDP and uses a single 16-pin power connector. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690 is the only benchmark data available, and it places the GPU in the 18th percentile. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2,664, +1% delta), GeForce GT 1030 (2,662, +1.1% delta), Intel Arc Pro B50 (2,660, +1.1% delta), and GeForce GT 440 (2,645, +1.7% delta). This score indicates the RTX 5070 SUPER performs at a level comparable to entry-level graphics cards from several generations ago. The 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantial, but the processing power, as measured by the 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 rate, is not translating into competitive benchmark results. The RT and tensor cores are present, but their effectiveness in real applications is not reflected in the available data. For rendering tasks, the GPU’s low score suggests it will struggle with modern workloads, despite the large memory buffer.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking against all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900 ranks in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,115.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-14900 is 0.4% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon w5-2545, and 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9015.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2,690 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and how does it compare to rivals?

A: The GPU ranks in the 18th percentile, with the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M at 1% higher, the GeForce GT 1030 at 1.1% higher, the Intel Arc Pro B50 at 1.1% higher, and the GeForce GT 440 at 1.7% higher.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the data, so all gaming figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,690, which places it at the 18th percentile, indicates that gaming performance will be poor for modern titles. The nearest rival comparisons show the RTX 5070 SUPER performing within 1.7% of the GeForce GT 440, a card from a much older generation. Based on this, estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would be in the low tens for demanding games, and at 1440p or 4K, the GPU would likely fail to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4,323 in PassMark single-thread means it will not be the limiting factor in gaming, but the GPU’s low throughput will cap the experience. For esports titles with low graphical demands, the system might achieve modest frame rates, but for any AAA game at ultra settings, the estimates are unfavorable. The 18 GB of VRAM is ample, but the raw rendering power is insufficient for high-refresh gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-14900 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. The CPU is a high-end desktop processor in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is a low-tier card in the 18th percentile. The combined percentile of 55 places the overall system in the mid-range tier, but this average is heavily skewed by the CPU’s strong performance. The build represents a mismatched pairing where a flagship-class processor is bottlenecked by a graphics card that benchmarks at entry-level levels. The CPU’s 24 cores, 32 threads, and 36 MB L3 cache are workstation-class features, while the GPU’s 18 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth are underutilized by its low processing power. This is not a balanced gaming system, but it could serve as a capable workstation for CPU-intensive tasks with basic graphics needs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 275 W TDP, so the total system power draw is modest for a high-core-count desktop. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the 340 W combined TDP of the CPU and GPU indicates a mid-range power supply would be adequate. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU, as it is the primary bottleneck. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking suggests it has years of relevant performance left, so upgrading the graphics card to a higher-tier model would unlock the CPU’s full potential in gaming and 3D rendering. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so memory upgrades are possible without changing the motherboard, though the choice of memory type is fixed by the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with modern high-bandwidth devices.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is not recommended. The GPU’s 18th percentile ranking and 3DMark score of 2,690 indicate frame rates will be low, even at 1080p, and the CPU’s strong single-core score of 4,323 cannot compensate for the graphics bottleneck.

Streaming is feasible from a CPU perspective, as the 24 cores and 32 threads can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, but the GPU’s low rendering performance will limit the game quality and frame rate that can be streamed. The CPU’s multi-threaded PassMark score of 44,578 supports concurrent workloads, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in the visual output.

Video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31,070, which accelerates rendering and exporting. The GPU’s low score has minimal impact on CPU-based editing, but GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. The 18 GB of VRAM is ample for large projects, but the processing power is insufficient for real-time previews of complex effects.

3D rendering in CPU-based renderers will perform excellently, with the 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache driving high throughput. GPU-based renderers will struggle, as the RTX 5070 SUPER’s low benchmark score indicates poor compute performance, despite the presence of RT and tensor cores.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, including a PassMark integer math score of 175,010, speed up compilation and testing. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a suitable configuration for a developer workstation.

Student and office work will be more than adequately served. The CPU’s single-core Geekbench score of 2,488 provides fast responsiveness for everyday applications, and the multi-core power handles any background tasks. The GPU’s low performance is irrelevant for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, making this a productive if unusual pairing for general productivity.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds