SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 paired with the Intel Arc A380 is a stark study in contrast, combining a top-tier 24-core processor with an entry-level discrete graphics card. The data shows a desktop build where the CPU operates in the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 44th percentile, making the platform’s overall combined percentile 68. Because no measured FPS data exists for this specific combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, clearly identified as such rather than as lab-tested results.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i9-14900’s average benchmark score is 58115. It trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by -0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by -0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. This places it in a performance band nearly identical to several high-end server and desktop workstation chips.

Q: What is the Intel Arc A380’s performance class based on its benchmark percentile?

A: The Arc A380 sits in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5170M (-0.4%), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (+1.1%), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (+1.2%), and AMD Radeon 880M (+1.4%), indicating it performs in the range of older mobile workstation parts and modern entry-level integrated graphics.

Q: What are the key specifications of the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The CPU features 24 cores and 32 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. It has a 36 MB shared L3 cache, supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. Its TDP is rated at 65 W.

Q: What memory and expansion capabilities does the Intel Arc A380 offer?

A: The Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a TDP of 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. Its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build has a combined percentile of 68 across all components. This reflects a significant imbalance, as the CPU’s 92nd percentile performance is dragged down by the GPU’s 44th percentile standing, resulting in a system that is far stronger in processor-bound tasks than graphics-bound ones.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-14900 support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory support as true for the i9-14900. This feature, combined with its 24-core configuration and Intel Socket 1700 platform, makes it suitable for workstation-class workloads where data integrity is paramount, even though it is a desktop market segment part.

Q: What is the production status of the Intel Arc A380?

A: The Arc A380 is listed as "End-of-life" in its production status. It has a predecessor of Xe Graphics and a successor of Battlemage, indicating it is a previous-generation product in Intel’s Arc lineup, though it remains available in the market.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a profound performance disparity between the two components. The Intel Core i9-14900 achieves a multi-core score of 31070 in Cinebench R23 and 15910 in Cinebench R20, alongside a single-core score of 2212 in R23. In Geekbench, it scores 18495 multi-core and 2488 single-core. These results place the CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58115, putting it within a hair’s breadth of the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M and the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, with deltas of -0.4% and -0.5% respectively. This is flagship-level processing power, capable of sustaining massive parallel workloads.

Conversely, the Intel Arc A380’s GPU benchmark results are modest. It scores 808 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 38224 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 36736 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark G3D score is 6252, with a compute score of 2762. The GPU’s percentile rank of 44 places it below the median of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 8558 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon HD 8870M and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330, which are separated by deltas of only 1.1% and 1.2%. The combined picture is a system with exceptional compute headroom in the CPU that will be perpetually starved for graphics throughput in any GPU-accelerated task.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate that the Intel Arc A380 is the definitive bottleneck in nearly every graphics-related workload. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 44th percentile creates a massive imbalance where the processor will frequently wait for the graphics card to finish rendering frames. In gaming scenarios, the CPU can calculate game logic and physics far faster than the GPU can rasterize and shade, meaning the Arc A380 will cap frame rates well below what the i9-14900 could theoretically support. The GPU’s FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s are the limiting factors here.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, the i9-14900 excels with a PassMark score of 550271, while the GPU’s role is negligible. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 44578 and integer math score of 175010 demonstrate that the processor is not the limiting factor in any scenario. The 65 W TDP of the CPU and the 75 W TDP of the GPU suggest that power delivery is not a bottleneck, but the FPS scaling is entirely dependent on the GPU’s capabilities. Therefore, the balance is heavily skewed: the CPU offers immense headroom for future GPU upgrades, while the current GPU will limit all visual output.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is severely constrained by the Arc A380. Given the GPU’s 44th percentile rank and 6 GB VRAM capacity, achieving high frame rates at 1080p with high refresh rates is unrealistic. The CPU’s single-core score of 2212 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient for gaming, but the GPU’s performance will cap frame rates, making this build unsuitable for competitive esports at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The i9-14900’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, as its multi-core scores (31070 in R23) show. However, the Arc A380’s limited graphics performance will restrict the game’s visual quality and frame rate, making the stream’s game capture quality the primary weakness. The CPU can handle the encoding load, but the GPU will struggle with modern game titles.

Video Editing: The CPU excels here, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 44578 and a data encryption score of 33540, accelerating export and rendering timelines. The Arc A380’s 6 GB memory and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth may offer some hardware acceleration in compatible software, but its 44th percentile standing means it will not significantly speed up effects-heavy timelines or 4K playback compared to the CPU’s raw processing power.

3D Rendering: This is the strongest use case for the CPU, as its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 demonstrates exceptional ray-tracing and mesh-processing capabilities. The Arc A380’s 8 RT cores and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for GPU-based rendering, meaning the workload will fall entirely on the CPU, which will perform admirably but leave the GPU idle.

Software Development: The i9-14900 is ideal for compilation and parallel build tasks, with its 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache significantly reducing build times. The Arc A380 is irrelevant for most development tasks, but its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with graphics APIs for testing. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking makes this a top-tier development machine.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is massively overqualified for office tasks. The CPU’s single-core performance (2212 in R23) and the GPU’s G2D score of 610 handle spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease. However, the Arc A380’s 75 W TDP and dual-slot design add unnecessary cost and power consumption for a workload that the CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle alone.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in memory selection. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the Arc A380 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, meaning the GPU is not using the fastest available lanes but is not bottlenecked by them either. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, indicating that the current power supply headroom is modest but sufficient for this configuration.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 92nd percentile performance can easily support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU ensure that any next-generation GPU will have full bandwidth. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation use, and the dual-channel memory bus supports high-capacity DDR5 modules. The CPU’s 65 W TDP suggests that a high-end GPU upgrade would require a PSU upgrade beyond the suggested 250 W, but the platform itself is future-proof.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The Arc A380’s 44th percentile rank and 6 GB VRAM indicate that at 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles will likely run at low-to-medium frame rates, perhaps in the 30-50 FPS range. At 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 186.0 GB/s and FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS will struggle, with frame rates dropping below 30 FPS in most demanding titles.

The CPU’s performance will have no impact on these estimates, as the GPU is the limiting factor. In lighter esports titles, the Arc A380’s PassMark G3D score of 6252 suggests it can handle 1080p medium settings at 60 FPS, but the i9-14900’s power will be wasted. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures modern API compatibility, but the hardware’s 8 RT cores are too few for meaningful ray tracing at playable frame rates. The data clearly shows that for gaming, this build is a low-resolution, low-detail machine.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU-centric workloads over gaming. The Intel Core i9-14900’s 92nd percentile performance makes it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, video editors exporting long timelines, and 3D artists rendering scenes where the CPU is the primary engine. The 24 cores and 32 threads handle multi-threaded applications with ease, and the support for ECC memory makes it suitable for small business workstations handling critical data.

Gamers at 1080p with low-to-medium settings may find the Arc A380 acceptable for older or less demanding titles, but it is not recommended for enthusiasts. Students and office workers would benefit from the CPU’s responsiveness but would be better served by the integrated graphics, making the discrete GPU unnecessary. The build is best suited for professionals who need a high-core-count CPU and can tolerate a placeholder GPU, with a clear path to upgrade the graphics card later.

Build Overview

This build is a desktop-class system pairing the Intel Core i9-14900, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A380, an entry-level Xe-HPG graphics card. The combined percentile of 68 reflects a system where the CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking dominates, while the GPU’s 44th percentile drags the overall tier down. This is a CPU-first configuration, where the processor provides exceptional compute performance for productivity, but the GPU limits the system to entry-level gaming and graphics tasks. The data indicates a platform with high potential for future GPU upgrades, but in its current form, it is an unbalanced build optimized for processor-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel. It operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core. Its benchmark scores are exceptional: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31070 and a single-core score of 2212, along with a Geekbench multi-core score of 18495. The PassMark multi-thread score of 44578 and data compression score of 550271 highlight its strength in parallel workloads.

In real-world terms, this CPU is a powerhouse for multi-threaded applications. Its 92nd percentile rank places it among the fastest processors available, just behind server-class Xeons and high-end Ryzen parts. The 65 W TDP is surprisingly low for such high performance, suggesting excellent efficiency. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose between cost and speed, and its PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with the fastest storage and GPUs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but the discrete Arc A380 handles the graphics load. For workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data analysis, the i9-14900’s benchmark scores indicate it will deliver top-tier performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds