SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-14900 and Intel Arc A310E represent an extreme mismatch in computing priorities. The CPU is a high-end 24-core desktop processor designed for heavy multitasking and content creation, while the GPU is an entry-level, low-profile card intended for basic display output and light acceleration. The benchmark data confirms this is a workstation-oriented pairing where the graphics card serves as a complement to the processor rather than a gaming engine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The chip features a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, a significant range that allows it to scale from power-efficient idle states to high-performance bursts. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support for reliability in professional environments.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in multi-threaded workloads. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to turbo boost behavior rather than manual adjustment. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 as a fallback display solution.

Benchmark results place this processor in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, a strong showing that reflects its multi-threaded prowess. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31,070 points in multi-core and 2,212 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates excellent rendering performance for video encoding, 3D modeling, and compilation tasks. Geekbench results show 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of strong parallel throughput with competitive single-thread speed.

PassMark tests reveal specialized strengths: data compression scores 550,271, floating-point math hits 120,262, and integer math reaches 175,010. The multithread score of 44,578 is particularly telling — it shows the chip can maintain high throughput across many simultaneous threads. However, the single-thread score of 4,323 and the physics score of 2,486 are more modest, suggesting that while the chip excels at parallel workloads, its per-core performance is adequate but not class-leading. The data encryption score of 33,540 and extended instructions score of 30,624 further demonstrate capability in security and vectorized tasks.

Compared to nearest rivals, the i9-14900 sits within a tight band. It trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D by 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w5-2545 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1%. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the i9-14900 performs nearly identically to these server and workstation chips in aggregate benchmark scores. The average benchmark score of 58,115 places it firmly in high-end desktop territory.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is a stark contrast to the CPU. This is a low-power graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the Alchemist generation (Arc 3). The chip, designated DG2-128, is manufactured on a 6 nm process from TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It runs at a fixed 2000 MHz base and boost clock, with memory clocked at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem is minimal: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, providing 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for basic display tasks and light compute but will bottleneck any modern game at higher resolutions. The GPU has 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores, though their performance is limited by the overall low shader count. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 reaches 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), which is modest by current standards.

The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it feature-complete for modern APIs. It has a 75 W TDP and requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W, reflecting its low power draw. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and includes four mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs. Physically, it is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width.

The GPU benchmarks list is empty, and its percentile ranking is 50, indicating median performance among all GPUs. With no nearest rivals provided, the data cannot directly compare it to other graphics cards. The average benchmark score is 0, which suggests no standardized benchmark data exists for this card in the database. This GPU is end-of-life, with Battlemage listed as its successor and Xe Graphics as its predecessor, indicating it is a transitional product in Intel's discrete GPU roadmap.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of imbalance. The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a 42-point gap that indicates the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card. In any workload that relies on GPU compute — gaming, 3D rendering, video encoding with hardware acceleration — the Arc A310E will be the limiting factor. The CPU will remain underutilized while waiting for the GPU to finish tasks.

For CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, spreadsheet processing, or database operations, the i9-14900 will perform near its peak, and the GPU will have little influence. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even handle basic display output, making the discrete GPU unnecessary for pure productivity. However, the presence of the Arc A310E adds dedicated video encoding and decoding capabilities, which can offload work from the CPU in media tasks.

The combined percentile is 71, which reflects the drag of the weak GPU on the overall system rating. The CPU's 92nd percentile is pulled down by the GPU's median performance. In gaming, the FPS will be determined almost entirely by the GPU, with the CPU providing far more headroom than needed. In productivity, the GPU is rarely a bottleneck, so the system performs close to CPU expectations.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU uses a dual-channel memory bus, and the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but the choice between DDR4 and DDR5 will affect system performance. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. Since the card draws only 75 W and requires no external power, the 250 W suggested PSU is extremely modest, leaving huge headroom for upgrades. A sensible next step would be replacing the Arc A310E with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU can easily support any modern graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's boost clock of 5.80 GHz and 24 cores will remain relevant for years.

The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 24-core part, indicating efficient power management at base clock. This low TDP combined with the GPU's 75 W means the total system draw is under 140 W before other components, so most power supplies will have ample room. The launch MSRP of the CPU is $549, which positions it as a premium desktop processor. The GPU has no launch MSRP listed. The platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer chips and useful for workstation reliability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are consistently strong across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R15, it scores 4,793 multi-core and 315 single-core. The R20 results show 15,910 multi-core and 2,245 single-core. R23 results are 31,070 multi-core and 2,212 single-core. Geekbench shows 18,495 multi-core and 2,488 single-core. These scores place the CPU in the 92nd percentile, just behind server-class Xeon and EPYC parts by negligible margins.

PassMark results provide deeper insight into specific workloads. The multithread score of 44,578 is the headline figure, showing strong parallel processing. The data compression score of 550,271 is exceptional, suggesting the CPU handles archival and compression tasks with ease. Floating-point math at 120,262 and integer math at 175,010 indicate balanced arithmetic performance. The random string sorting score of 61,060 shows good memory access patterns, while the find prime numbers score of 188 is relatively low, indicating weaker integer-heavy single-thread tasks.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, so its 50th percentile ranking comes from unspecified data. The combined system percentile is 71, which is a compromise between the CPU's high rank and the GPU's median rank. The average CPU benchmark score is 58,115, and it trails the nearest rival Xeon Platinum 8260M by 0.4% — a difference that would be imperceptible in real use. Overall, the system's benchmark picture is defined by the CPU's excellence and the GPU's adequacy.

FAQ

Q: What is the core count and thread count of the Intel Core i9-14900?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, which allows it to handle heavily parallel workloads efficiently.

Q: Does the Intel Arc A310E support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 6 ray tracing cores, though its overall performance is limited by the small number of shading units.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth via 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported beyond the factory turbo boost behavior.

Q: What is the process node for each component?

A: The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 6 nm process.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 75 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W for the system.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is beneficial for workstation stability and data integrity.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus indicate it is suited for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in older or less demanding titles. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance places it in the entry-level category, meaning modern AAA games at high settings will likely struggle. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 2,212 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU, but the GPU itself will limit frame rates.

The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests it performs around the median of all GPUs, which includes integrated graphics and older discrete cards. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the card may deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings. For graphically intensive games, players should expect low settings and potentially lower resolutions. The ray tracing cores are present but unlikely to provide usable performance in ray-traced titles given the low shader count. The 124.0 GB/s bandwidth is a significant constraint, as modern games often require more than 200 GB/s for smooth high-texture gameplay. The 4 GB VRAM will also cause texture pop-in or reduced texture quality in games that exceed this capacity.

Build Overview

This build pairs a top-tier desktop CPU with an entry-level discrete GPU. The build class is desktop, confirmed by the Intel Socket 1700 platform and the single-slot GPU design. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking places it among the best processors available, suitable for professional workloads. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking places it at the median, adequate for basic display and light acceleration. The combined percentile of 71 reflects a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU performance.

The i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, making it a powerhouse for rendering, compiling, and multitasking. The Arc A310E is a 75 W, single-slot card with 4 GB VRAM, designed for low-power environments such as small form factor workstations or as a display adapter. The pairing makes sense for users who need maximum CPU throughput but only minimal GPU acceleration. The system's overall tier is upper-midrange, driven by the CPU's excellence rather than the GPU's contribution.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, as these workloads scale well with parallel processing. The PassMark data compression score of 550,271 suggests excellent performance for data archival and backup tasks. Developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the multi-core design.

Students and researchers running simulations or data analysis will find the CPU's floating-point math score of 120,262 useful for numerical computations. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization can leverage the 32 threads and ECC memory support for reliability. Gamers at 1080p with low settings may find the system acceptable for casual play, but the GPU is not suited for high-refresh or high-detail gaming. The system is better described as a professional workstation with basic graphics capability, ideal for environments where the GPU is secondary to raw CPU power.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds