SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-14900

58,115 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The Intel Core i9-14900 and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT form a pairing where the CPU's multi-threaded dominance is the defining characteristic, but the GPU's raw rasterization power is equally substantial. The data shows a combined percentile of 90, placing this build firmly in the upper echelon of desktop configurations. The CPU's percentile vs all CPUs is 92, while the GPU sits at 88, indicating a near-balanced pairing with a slight CPU advantage in relative standing. This balance means neither component is likely to become a severe bottleneck in most workloads, though the nature of the workload—whether it favors the 24-core, 32-thread CPU or the 5120-shader GPU—will determine which component is the limiting factor.

In gaming workloads, the GPU's 88th percentile rank and its 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest that at higher resolutions, the RX 6950 XT will be the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2212 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2488, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p. However, the data indicates that at 4K, the GPU's workload scales more heavily, and the CPU's advantage in multi-core tasks becomes less relevant to frame pacing. Conversely, in productivity and content creation workloads, the CPU's 92nd percentile rank and multi-core scores—Cinebench R23 multicore at 31070 and Geekbench multicore at 18495—demonstrate that the CPU is the dominant force, with the GPU's compute capabilities (Passmark GPU Compute score of 14199) playing a secondary role.

The FPS scaling evidence, while no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB GDDR6 memory are substantial, but the CPU's 36 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support (DDR4 and DDR5) are equally important for feeding data to the GPU. The bottleneck analysis suggests that in CPU-intensive titles—those that rely heavily on single-thread performance—the i9-14900's boost clock of 5.80 GHz will prevent any CPU-side limitation. In GPU-intensive scenarios, such as ray tracing or high-resolution rendering, the RX 6950 XT's 80 RT cores and 23.65 TFLOPS will be the limiting factor, but this is expected given the GPU's role.

The Passmark data further illustrates the balance: the CPU's multi-thread score of 44578 and single-thread score of 4323 show strong performance in both parallel and serial workloads. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 28070 indicates strong rasterization, while its DirectX 12 score of 114 (Passmark) suggests that API-specific optimizations matter. The data does not show a clear bottleneck in either direction, but it does indicate that the CPU is slightly more capable relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its own peers. This suggests that in mixed workloads—such as gaming while streaming or rendering while gaming—the CPU has enough headroom to handle background tasks without impacting game performance, a key advantage of the 24-core configuration.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-14900 delivers a commanding benchmark presence. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 31070 places it in the top tier of desktop processors, while the single-core score of 2212 is equally impressive for tasks that rely on low latency and high clock speeds. The Geekbench scores—multicore 18495 and single-core 2488—corroborate this dual-strength profile. The Passmark suite reinforces the CPU's capabilities: multi-thread score of 44578, single-thread score of 4323, integer math at 175010, and floating-point math at 120262. The data compression score of 550271 and encryption score of 33540 highlight strengths in data-intensive workloads, while the extended instructions score of 30624 and find prime numbers score of 188 show a balanced ALU/FPU design.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 58115, with a percentile rank of 92. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-14900 trails the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by a mere 0.4% (58323 vs 58115), sits 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (58386), and is 0.7% behind the Intel Xeon w5-2545 (58504). However, it leads the AMD EPYC 9015 by 1.0% (57555). These deltas are minimal, indicating that the i9-14900 sits in a tightly contested performance band where architectural differences matter more than raw score deltas.

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT's benchmark results are equally robust. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 demonstrates strong DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench scores are notably high: Metal at 222653, OpenCL at 205998, and Vulkan at 165212, showing cross-API versatility. The Passmark G3D score of 28070 places the GPU in the upper percentile, while the GPU Compute score of 14199 indicates solid compute throughput outside of gaming. The GPU's average benchmark score is 58392, with a percentile rank of 88. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the NVIDIA P102-100 is 0.2% ahead (58528), the Intel Arc A570M is 0.3% behind (58239), the AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 0.5% ahead (58657), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM is 0.5% behind (58085).

The combined picture is of a system that excels in both CPU- and GPU-bound scenarios. The CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile, when combined, yield a 90th percentile overall build. This indicates that the pairing is harmonious—neither component drags the other down significantly. The CPU's nearest rivals are mostly server-class or high-end workstation chips, while the GPU's rivals are a mix of professional and consumer parts, suggesting that this build straddles the line between high-end gaming and entry-level workstation use.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-14900 is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth figures are not listed in the data. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-oriented builds, which adds a layer of reliability for data-critical applications. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The CPU's TDP is 65 watts, which is notably low for a 24-core processor. This suggests that the i9-14900 is designed for power efficiency under typical loads, though boost clocks of 5.80 GHz will draw more power. The GPU, by contrast, has a TDP of 335 watts and a suggested PSU of 700 watts, indicating that the power supply must be sized to handle the GPU's demands. The combination of a 65W CPU and a 335W GPU means that a 700W PSU is the minimum recommended, with headroom for additional components such as storage drives and cooling systems.

The GPU's power requirements are substantial: two 8-pin connectors and a triple-slot cooler design. The card's dimensions—267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width—require a full-size ATX case or a larger mid-tower. The production status of the GPU is listed as end-of-life, meaning that this is a last-generation part, while the CPU is still active. This suggests that the upgrade path for the GPU is more urgent than for the CPU, as newer RDNA 3 or competitor parts would offer better performance per watt. For the CPU, the Socket 1700 platform is likely at the end of its lifecycle, so a future upgrade would require a new motherboard and possibly new memory (if moving to a platform that only supports DDR5).

A sensible next upgrade for this build would be to replace the GPU with a newer generation model, as the CPU still has significant headroom to drive faster graphics cards. The CPU's 92nd percentile rank and multi-core scores suggest it can handle a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster NVMe storage would improve overall system responsiveness, though the data does not specify memory capacity or storage benchmarks.

# FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of this CPU+GPU build?

A: The combined percentile is 90, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 88th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-14900 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D?

A: The i9-14900's average benchmark score is 58115, which is 0.5% lower than the Ryzen 7 9850X3D's 58386.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-14900 supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core i9-14900 is $549.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU is still active.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need both high-end gaming performance and substantial multi-core CPU throughput. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's 88th percentile rank and 16 GB of VRAM, which is ample for modern titles at high settings. The CPU's 92nd percentile rank ensures that even at lower resolutions where CPU-bound scenarios are more common, frame rates will remain high. Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will find the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads invaluable, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and Geekbench multicore score of 18495 demonstrate strong parallel performance. The GPU's compute capabilities—23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 14199—also accelerate rendering tasks in GPU-accelerated applications.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's high single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2488) for compilation tasks that are often serialized, as well as the multi-thread headroom for parallel build systems. Students and small business workstations that run simulations, data analysis, or virtual machines will benefit from the ECC memory support and the CPU's data compression score of 550271, which indicates strong throughput for database and archive workloads. The build's desktop class and 90th combined percentile make it suitable for power users who refuse to compromise on either CPU or GPU performance. However, the GPU's end-of-life status and high power draw (335W TDP) mean that this build is best suited for users who prioritize raw performance over power efficiency or future upgradeability.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The Navi 21 chip contains 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die, with a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². The GPU features 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. Clock speeds are impressive: a base clock of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. The memory subsystem comprises 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, with memory clocks at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for 4K gaming and large texture datasets.

The GPU's RT capabilities are supported by 80 RT cores, which is a significant number for the RDNA 2 generation, though the data does not provide specific ray tracing benchmark scores. The pixel rate is 295.7 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 739.2 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for rasterization. The FP32 performance is 23.65 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), making the GPU capable of handling AI inference and compute workloads that leverage half-precision arithmetic. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are strong across the board. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance for gaming. Geekbench Metal at 222653 and OpenCL at 205998 show that the GPU excels in compute-heavy tasks on both Apple and OpenCL platforms, while Vulkan at 165212 is respectable. The Passmark G3D score of 28070 places the GPU in the upper 88th percentile of all GPUs, and the GPU Compute score of 14199 confirms its capabilities for non-gaming workloads. The GPU's average benchmark score of 58392 and its nearest rival comparisons (NVIDIA P102-100 at -0.2%, Intel Arc A570M at +0.3%, AMD Radeon PRO V710 at -0.5%, and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at +0.5%) show that the RX 6950 XT sits in a competitive band, though its end-of-life status means newer parts may offer better efficiency. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are critical for large scenes and high-resolution textures, while the 80 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the data does not quantify RT performance directly.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-14900 is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU's base clock is 2.00 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, providing a wide frequency range for both efficiency and performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that require rapid access to shared data across cores. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU bandwidth.

The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional. Cinebench R23 multicore at 31070 is a strong indicator of multi-threaded rendering performance, while the single-core score of 2212 shows that the architecture's high boost clock translates into excellent single-thread performance. Geekbench scores of 18495 (multicore) and 2488 (single-core) corroborate this balanced profile. Passmark scores provide a granular view: multi-thread at 44578, single-thread at 4323, integer math at 175010, floating-point math at 120262, and extended instructions at 30624. The data compression score of 550271 is particularly notable, indicating strong performance in file archiving and database operations. The encryption score of 33540 shows that the CPU's AES-NI and other cryptographic instructions are efficient, while the find prime numbers score of 188 and random string sorting score of 61060 round out a comprehensive performance picture.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 58115, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (-0.4%), AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D (-0.5%), Intel Xeon w5-2545 (-0.7%), and AMD EPYC 9015 (+1.0%). These deltas are small, but the i9-14900's advantage is its combination of high single-thread and multi-thread performance, which is rare in the server-class rivals that often sacrifice single-thread for core count. For real workloads, the CPU excels in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any task that can utilize its 32 threads. The 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures that lightly-threaded tasks like gaming or office applications receive top-tier responsiveness. The 65W TDP is surprisingly low for a 24-core part, suggesting that the CPU can maintain high clock speeds without excessive power draw, though sustained all-core loads will likely push power consumption higher.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-14900 with the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT in a desktop configuration. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz and a 65W TDP, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is an RDNA 2.0 part with 16 GB GDDR6 memory, 5120 shading units, and a 335W TDP, sitting at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Together, they achieve a combined percentile of 90, indicating that this is a high-end desktop build that excels in both CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks. The CPU's average benchmark score of 58115 and the GPU's average benchmark score of 58392 are nearly identical, which is rare and contributes to the balanced nature of the build.

The build's class is desktop, and its tier is upper-mid to high-end, based on the 90th combined percentile. The CPU is still in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, which is a factor to consider for future upgrades. The CPU's launch MSRP is $549, while the GPU's launch MSRP is 1,099 USD, though these figures are historical and do not reflect current market prices. The GPU's triple-slot design and 267 mm length require a spacious case, and its 2x 8-pin power connectors demand a power supply with sufficient cables and wattage (suggested 700W). This build is not for the budget-conscious, but rather for users who demand top-tier performance in both productivity and gaming.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 2212 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensure that frame rates are not CPU-limited, while the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 576 GB/s bandwidth provide the rasterization power to push high refresh rates. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-texture settings at these resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads allow for simultaneous gaming and encoding without significant performance degradation. The multi-thread score of 44578 on Passmark indicates that background tasks like streaming software (OBS, etc.) will have ample CPU resources, while the GPU's compute score of 14199 can assist with encoding if needed.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31070 and Geekbench multicore score of 18495 demonstrate that timeline scrubbing, rendering, and exporting will be fast. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading in GPU-accelerated editors.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads are ideal for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray, while the GPU's 5120 shading units and 80 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers. The FP32 throughput of 23.65 TFLOPS is substantial for viewport performance and final frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread score of 2488 on Geekbench is excellent for compilation tasks that are often serial, while the multi-thread score of 18495 speeds up parallel builds. The data compression score of 550271 is useful for version control and package management.

Student and office work: While this build is overkill for basic tasks, the CPU's high single-thread performance ensures snappy response in office applications, and the GPU's compute capabilities can handle data analysis or light scientific computing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running data processing tasks.

# Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results. The GPU's 88th percentile rank and the CPU's 92nd percentile rank suggest that this build is capable of high frame rates in most modern games at 1440p and 4K, though exact numbers cannot be provided.

For ultra settings, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited to high-resolution textures and demanding shaders. The CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures that even in CPU-intensive titles, frame rates will not be hampered by the processor. In titles that leverage DirectX 12, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235 indicates strong performance, while Vulkan titles should also run well given the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 165212. The GPU's Passmark DirectX 11 score of 300 and DirectX 12 score of 114 suggest that the card handles both APIs competently, though the DirectX 12 score is lower relative to the DirectX 11 score.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance will likely be the deciding factor, and the data indicates it is more than sufficient. For AAA titles at 4K, the GPU's 23.65 TFLOPS and 16 GB VRAM should allow for high settings, though ray tracing may require lower resolutions or settings due to the RDNA 2 architecture's less mature RT implementation compared to newer competitors. The estimates suggest that this build is a strong gaming platform, but users seeking verified FPS numbers should consult dedicated gaming benchmarks for specific titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-14900 + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-14900

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds