SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13980HX paired with the Intel Arc A530M is an unusual combination in the benchmark database: a flagship-class mobile processor joined to a mid-tier mobile discrete GPU, both from Intel, inside a laptop chassis. The data shows a combined percentile of 88 across tracked CPU+GPU pairings, but that headline figure is carried almost entirely by the processor, which sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc A530M lands in the 85th percentile of all GPUs — a strong-sounding number that nonetheless masks a wide absolute gap between a top-bin HX chip and a mainstream discrete part. This page analyzes what that asymmetry means for real workloads, based strictly on the recorded benchmark scores. One important caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly observed.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die soldered onto the Intel BGA 1964 package. Its topology splits into performance and efficiency clusters clocked from a 2.20 base up to a 5.60 boost, and the benchmark results show exactly the shape you would expect from that hybrid layout. In Cinebench R23, the chip posts 30273 in multi-core against 2110 in single-core — a multi-to-single ratio of roughly fourteen to one, confirming that heavily threaded rendering and compilation workloads extract the full benefit of the 32 threads.

The scaling curve in the 3DMark CPU profile is equally telling. Single-thread scores 1145; four threads reaches 4177; eight threads hits 7290; and all threads tops out at 12601. The jump from four to eight threads is nearly proportional, while the step from eight to maximum threads flattens considerably — the classic signature of a hybrid architecture where the efficiency cores add throughput but not per-thread speed. For real workloads this means the i9-13980HX is fastest when software scales across many cores, as in video encoding, code compilation, and 3D rendering, and merely very fast in latency-sensitive tasks like game logic, where the Cinebench R20 single-core result of 2285 shows the performance cores holding their own.

PassMark results reinforce the picture. The multithread score of 46409 sits alongside an integer math result of 166455, a floating point score of 118645, and a data compression figure of 588306, all pointing to strong aggregate throughput. The single-thread PassMark of 4252 is respectable but not extraordinary, which matches the design intent: this is a throughput-first mobile flagship, not a single-thread specialist.

Upgrade Path and Platform

Because the socket is Intel BGA 1964 — a ball-grid array — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. The same applies to the Arc A530M, which is an integrated-on-package discrete GPU with an IGP slot width. Practical upgrade paths are therefore limited to memory and storage, and the platform is generous on both counts. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and relevant for workstation-style use.

PCIe connectivity comes in at Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing substantial headroom for fast NVMe storage and the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 link. Power delivery is defined by the two TDP figures in the pack: 55 W for the CPU and 65 W for the GPU. Since this is a laptop build, the suggested PSU field is null and no external PSU guidance applies; thermal and power management fall to the chassis vendor's implementation. A sensible next upgrade for a machine with this pairing is not a component swap but a platform replacement — moving to a laptop whose GPU percentile matches the CPU's, since the GPU is the clear ceiling on this configuration. The multiplier is unlocked, so enthusiasts can tune behavior within the laptop's thermal envelope, though BGA packaging rules out any socket-level path.

GPU Analysis

The Arc A530M is Intel's Alchemist-generation Xe-HPG part, fabbed by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The DG2-256 die measures 269 mm² and packs 11,500 million transistors at a density of 42.8M per mm². The hardware configuration is mid-range mobile: 1536 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and 12 RT cores, clocked at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. That yields 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 7.987 TFLOPS of FP16, a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s.

Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus running at an effective 14 Gbps, giving 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering workloads, that bandwidth figure is the practical constraint: 8 GB of capacity is adequate for 1080p-class rendering and comfortable viewport work, but the 128-bit bus limits how quickly textures and geometry can stream, which matters in GPU renderers and high-resolution gaming. The 12 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT, and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support with Vulkan 1.4 means the driver-level feature set is current, including ray tracing and modern API paths.

The GeekBench compute results frame the GPU's position: 49735 in OpenCL and 43492 in Vulkan. Those scores place it at the 85th percentile among tracked GPUs — but the nearestRivals list shows the practical tier: the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46601 against the Arc's average of 46614 (delta 0), the RX 6550M sits 0.2 percent ahead, the NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.2 percent behind, and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 1.4 percent behind. In other words, the A530M computes in the same band as entry professional and mid-tier mobile gaming parts.

FAQ

Q: No measured FPS data exists for this pairing — what does that mean for the gaming numbers on this page?

A: The database contains no measuredFps rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so every frame-rate statement here is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores (CPU percentile 90, GPU percentile 85, combined percentile 88), not a direct measurement.

Q: How does the i9-13980HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 50398 lands within one percent of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (0.1 percent ahead of the Intel), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (0.6 percent ahead), and the Intel Core i7-13850HX (0.7 percent ahead), while beating the Intel Core 9 273PE by 1.1 percent. It is effectively tied with that peer group.

Q: Can this CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes. The multiplier is unlocked, though as a BGA-packaged mobile part the practical tuning ceiling depends on the laptop's cooling and power delivery.

Q: Is 8 GB of VRAM enough for content creation?

A: For 1080p-class work, yes. The Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which suits viewport rendering and GPU compute at mainstream resolutions, but the 128-bit bus is the limiting factor for heavier texture streaming.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13980HX supports ECC, which is notable for a mobile consumer chip and useful for workstation deployments where data integrity matters.

Q: What generation of PCIe does the platform offer?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the Arc A530M itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The launch MSRP is $668.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With no measured FPS data, estimates must come from the GPU scores. The Arc A530M's 85th-percentile standing and its parity with the RX 5600M suggest competitive 1080p performance at high settings; the i9-13980HX's single-thread results (Cinebench R23 2110, PassMark 4252) indicate the CPU will rarely be the limiter in shooters and esports titles. Expect high-refresh 1080p and playable 1440p in most titles, though these are estimates rather than measured figures.

Streaming. The 24-core, 32-thread CPU is the star here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30273 and PassMark multithread of 46409 leave ample headroom for encoding alongside gameplay, since the GPU load of streaming capture is modest relative to the CPU's throughput.

Video editing. PassMark data compression at 588306 and integer math at 166455 translate directly to fast timeline scrubs, exports, and proxy generation. The 8 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth handle GPU-accelerated effects at 1080p comfortably; 4K multicam work will press against VRAM capacity.

3D rendering. With Cinebench R20 multi at 16187 and R15 multi at 4717, CPU rendering is strong for a mobile chip. GPU rendering is mid-tier — the GeekBench OpenCL score of 49735 supports viewport work well but places GPU-path renders in entry-professional territory alongside the RTX A2000.

Software development. Compilation is a throughput workload, and the 3DMark max-threads score of 12601 plus the R23 multi of 30273 indicate fast full-project builds. ECC support adds integrity assurance for long-running test infrastructure.

Student and office work. Frankly, this CPU is overkill for documents and browsing — but the single-thread scores (3DMark 1145, R20 2285) mean everyday responsiveness is excellent, and the headroom guarantees longevity.

Who Should Build It

The realistic buyer of this configuration is a workstation-laptop user whose workload is CPU-dominant: developers compiling large codebases, engineers running simulations, and content creators whose pipelines lean on the 32 threads. The Cinebench and PassMark multi-core results justify that choice directly. Content creators who work at 1080p — editors, motion designers, light 3D artists — will find the Arc A530M sufficient, particularly given its DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support. Gamers are a partial fit: those targeting 1080p high-refresh play will get good estimated performance from the GPU tier implied by its rivals, but anyone wanting 1440p or 4K max-settings gaming should note that the GPU, not the CPU, defines that ceiling. Students and small businesses needing a durable, ECC-capable mobile workstation with heavy multitasking headroom are also well served — the platform's DDR5, Gen 5 storage support, and 90th-percentile CPU make this a long-lived machine for mixed productivity and compute work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear asymmetry. The CPU sits at the 90th percentile with an average benchmark score of 50398, while the GPU sits at the 85th percentile with an average score of 46614 — and the more meaningful gap is absolute: the i9-13980HX is a flagship-tier compute part whose rivals include desktop-class chips like the Ryzen 9 5900XT, whereas the Arc A530M's rivals are mid-tier mobile and entry workstation GPUs. In gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck in virtually every scenario; the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread scores are far above what the A530M's 3.994 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth can exploit at higher settings. In rendering, encoding, and compilation, the reverse holds — the CPU's 12601 max-thread 3DMark score and 30273 R23 multi carry those workloads, and the GPU contributes mainly through the OpenCL score of 49735. The combined percentile of 88 reflects the CPU's dominance of the pairing rather than balanced performance. No measured FPS scaling data exists for this combination, so the bottleneck conclusion rests on the percentile and benchmark-score evidence.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing (buildClass: laptop) combining Intel's top-tier Raptor Lake-HX mobile flagship with an Alchemist discrete mobile GPU of mid-tier compute standing. Both parts remain in active production. The overall tier is high — a combined percentile of 88 places it above most tracked configurations — but the composition is lopsided: workstation-grade CPU throughput paired with mainstream GPU capability, connected over PCIe 4.0 x8, with the CPU contributing Gen 5 lanes and 20 of them for storage and peripherals. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 also exists on-package, giving the system a fallback display path. In class terms, this is a mobile workstation with adequate, not leading, graphics capability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's recorded scores are as follows: Cinebench R23 multi 30273 and single 2110; Cinebench R20 multi 16187 and single 2285; Cinebench R15 multi 4717 and single 304.5; PassMark multithread 46409, single-thread 4252, physics 2575, integer math 166455, floating point 118645, data compression 588306, encryption 35332, extended instructions 33868, string sorting 66125, and prime finding 191; 3DMark CPU profile scores of 1145 single-thread, 2207 two-thread, 4177 four-thread, 7290 eight-thread, and 12601 max-threads. The CPU's average benchmark score is 50398, placing it in the 90th percentile of all tracked CPUs.

The GPU's recorded scores are GeekBench OpenCL 49735 and Vulkan 43492, averaging 46614 and placing 85th among tracked GPUs. The rival comparison is tight on both sides: the CPU's nearest rivals cluster within roughly one percent (Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 at 50448, Ryzen 9 5900XT at 50718, Core i7-13850HX at 50761, Core 9 273PE at 49845), and the GPU's rivals are even closer (RX 5600M at 46601, RX 6550M at 46702, RTX A2000 at 46043, RTX 5880 Ada at 45972). The combined picture — 88th percentile — is a high-performing configuration whose character is defined by CPU throughput dominance and solid mid-tier GPU compute.

Gaming Performance

As noted at the outset, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measurements. The Arc A530M's average score of 46614 and its statistical parity with the Radeon RX 5600M (delta 0) and RX 6550M (delta 0.2 percent) indicate a GPU tier built for 1080p gaming at high settings, with 1440p likely requiring setting reductions in demanding titles — an inference from the rival tier rather than recorded frame data. The 8 GB of GDDR6 and 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth support that 1080p-class expectation, while the 128-bit bus is the constraint that likely limits higher resolutions.

On the CPU side, gaming is well covered: the 3DMark single-thread score of 1145, four-thread score of 4177, and eight-thread score of 7290 show that game-relevant threading levels are strong, and the CPU percentile of 90 means frame pacing and draw-call throughput should not limit play at the resolutions this GPU targets. DirectX 12 Ultimate support means the latest rendering features are available, with 12 RT cores providing hardware ray tracing at a tier appropriate to casual rather than maximal RT use. The realistic estimated verdict: a smooth high-refresh 1080p machine for most titles, occasionally CPU-underutilized — figures that should be treated as estimates until measured data for this pairing is added to the database.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds