SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13980HX and Intel Arc A370M represent a peculiar pairing in the mobile landscape: a flagship 24-core processor paired with an entry-level discrete GPU. This combination produces a benchmark profile that is exceptionally strong for compute-intensive CPU workloads but constrained in graphics-bound scenarios. The data shows a system that is a workstation-class CPU engine wrapped in a laptop chassis with a modest graphics solution, making it a highly specialized tool rather than a balanced gaming machine.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring a substantial 257 mm² die size. It is a 24-core, 32-thread part with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, paired with a 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with ECC capability, and it provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1,145 in single-thread to 2,207 in 2-thread, 4,177 in 4-thread, 7,290 in 8-thread, 9,440 in 16-thread, and peak at 12,601 in max-thread tests. This scaling curve indicates strong multi-core efficiency, with performance nearly doubling from 8 to 16 threads and continuing to gain another 33% when moving to the full 32-thread count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,273 reinforces this, showing a processor that can sustain heavy all-core workloads, while the single-core score of 2,110 demonstrates that it does not sacrifice single-threaded responsiveness for its multi-core might.

The PassMark suite provides further granularity. The multi-thread score of 46,409 is complemented by an integer math score of 166,455, floating-point math of 118,645, and data compression of 588,306. These figures suggest the processor excels at both integer-heavy compilation tasks and floating-point-driven scientific or rendering workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,252, while lower than the multi-thread absolute numbers, still places it in a competitive position for everyday responsiveness. The processor holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,398.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the i9-13980HX sits within a tight cluster. It trails the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 by a negligible 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT by 0.6%, and the Intel Core i7-13850HX by 0.7%. It leads the Intel Core 9 273PE by 1.1%. These deltas are all within a 1.8 percentage point spread, indicating that the i9-13980HX is effectively performance-equivalent to its closest competitors in aggregate benchmark scores, with the differences being within typical run-to-run variance rather than representing meaningful performance gaps.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the Intel Core i9-13980HX?

A: The processor has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, which is notably high for a mobile part and contributes to its strong single-thread performance in benchmarks like Cinebench R23 where it scores 2,110.

Q: How does the i9-13980HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT in average benchmark scores?

A: The i9-13980HX has an average benchmark score of 50,398, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT's score of 50,718. This places them in a statistical tie for overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The Intel Arc A370M features a 64-bit memory bus with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a limiting factor for its performance in high-resolution gaming scenarios.

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13980HX support error-correcting code memory?

A: Yes, the processor supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical, such as scientific computing or financial modeling.

Q: What graphics API support does the Intel Arc A370M offer?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, enabling modern rendering features and broad software compatibility.

Q: How much L3 cache does the i9-13980HX have?

A: The processor has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial and helps feed its 24 cores and 32 threads in cache-sensitive workloads like database operations and complex simulations.

Q: What is the process node for the Intel Arc A370M?

A: The GPU is manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process node, featuring 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die, which is a relatively small and power-efficient design for a discrete mobile GPU.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture with the DG2-128 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process. It packs 7,200 million transistors into a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1550 MHz with a boost clock of 2050 MHz, and its memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem is modest: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a clear bottleneck for the GPU's compute capabilities.

The GPU contains 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output pipelines. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores, although no tensor cores are present. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 4.198 TFLOPS, with FP16 rated at 8.397 TFLOPS under a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 35 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of March 2022.

In Geekbench compute benchmarks, the Arc A370M scores 29,676 in OpenCL and 28,673 in Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This is a mid-pack position that reflects its entry-level classification. The nearest rivals show a tight grouping: it trails the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH by 0.1% and the AMD FirePro W8000 by 0.1%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 470 by 0.6% and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M by 1%. The near-identical scores to the RX 6800M, which is typically a much higher-tier mobile GPU, are notable but the similarity is in aggregate workload performance, not in specific gaming scenarios where memory bandwidth and driver optimization play larger roles.

The RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but with only 8 cores and a 112 GB/s memory bandwidth, ray-traced workloads will be severely constrained. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is also limiting for modern game textures and large compute buffers. For rendering tasks, the FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS is workable for light 3D modeling and previews, but the 64-bit memory bus will throttle complex scene loads. The OpenCL score of 29,676 suggests reasonable general-purpose compute performance for its class, but it is not a compute powerhouse.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i9-13980HX and the Arc A370M is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the system is 82, reflecting that the CPU drags the overall score upward while the GPU holds it back from the top tier.

In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, video encoding, or scientific simulation, the system will perform at a level comparable to the nearest rival CPUs, which are within a 1.1% delta. The 3DMark max-thread score of 12,601 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,273 indicate that the CPU is rarely the limiting factor. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint. The GPU's bandwidth is a fraction of what modern high-end mobile GPUs offer, meaning that texture streaming and frame buffer operations will encounter significant bottlenecks.

The FPS scaling in games, if measured, would show a pattern where lower resolutions (1080p) would be more CPU-limited but still constrained by the GPU, while higher resolutions (1440p and above) would be strictly GPU-limited. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means these are estimates based on the benchmark scores, but the disparity in percentiles (90 vs. 74) is a clear indicator that the GPU is the system's weakest link for any graphics-dependent workload. For tasks that rely on both CPU and GPU, such as game physics (CPU) combined with rendering (GPU), the experience will be uneven, with the CPU waiting on the GPU to complete frame renders.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is not a typical consumer gaming laptop configuration. It targets users who need extreme multi-threaded CPU performance but have relatively modest graphics requirements. The primary audience is software developers who compile large codebases, data analysts processing large datasets, and researchers running CPU-bound simulations. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,409 and data encryption score of 35,332 support this, indicating strong performance in tasks that stress integer and encryption workloads.

For content creators, the system is viable for video editing but with caveats. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,273 ensures fast rendering of video timelines, but the GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit effects processing and preview quality. 3D artists working with moderate polygon counts will find the FP32 performance of 4.198 TFLOPS acceptable for viewport work, but complex scenes will strain the memory bandwidth.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU performance for compilation and simulation tasks, but they should be aware that gaming performance will be modest. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet models will see excellent CPU performance, with the ECC memory support adding reliability for long-running processes. The system is not suited for gamers seeking high frame rates in modern titles, nor for GPU-accelerated machine learning workloads, given the lack of tensor cores and limited VRAM.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. All gaming performance figures are therefore estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 74th percentile ranking and its 4 GB VRAM, the Arc A370M is capable of running esports titles at playable frame rates. Games like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends, which are not VRAM or bandwidth intensive, should perform adequately at 1080p with medium settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,145 in 3DMark and 2,110 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will be consistent without CPU-side stutters.

For AAA titles at 1080p with high settings, the GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 and 112 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors. Frame rates will likely be in the 30-50 FPS range for recent releases, with dips below 30 FPS in demanding scenes. At 1440p, the 4 GB VRAM will be insufficient for high texture quality, and performance will degrade significantly. Ray tracing, despite the presence of 8 RT cores, will be limited to minimal usage due to the bandwidth constraints. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 28,673 suggests that it handles modern APIs efficiently, but the hardware resources are simply not there for high-end gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 50,398, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier result that is within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-13850HX. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29,175, placing it in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, with a 0.1% delta to the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH and a 0.6% lead over the AMD Radeon RX 470.

The combined percentile for the system is 82, which is pulled down by the GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,273 is a standout figure, nearly double the single-core score of 2,110, indicating excellent scaling. The PassMark multi-thread score of 46,409 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 12,601 corroborate this. The GPU's OpenCL score of 29,676 is respectable for its class, but it lags the CPU's performance relative to their respective peer groups. The overall picture is a system that excels at compute tasks but is balanced toward the CPU in a way that leaves graphics performance as a secondary consideration.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-13980HX and Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor with a 90th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture part with a 74th percentile ranking. The system's combined percentile of 82 places it in the upper tier of laptop configurations, but this is driven almost entirely by the CPU.

The build class is explicitly "laptop," and the GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics package), suggesting it is a compact solution soldered to the motherboard. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 35 W TDP are both low for their respective performance classes, indicating a thermally efficient design that prioritizes sustained CPU performance over GPU headroom. This is a workstation-oriented laptop where the CPU is the star and the GPU is an afterthought for basic display output and light acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded without replacing the motherboard. The memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, allowing for a range of memory configurations depending on the laptop's design. The PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for high-speed SSDs and external devices.

The GPU is an end-of-life product, so there is no direct upgrade path within the same architecture. The system's PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface for the GPU suggests that it is also soldered, making GPU upgrades impossible in most laptop chassis. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the combined TDP of 55 W for the CPU and 35 W for the GPU indicates a modest power budget, so any PSU capable of handling 90 W for these components plus the rest of the system should suffice.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize the CPU's potential by installing high-speed DDR5 memory and a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe SSD to leverage the 20 CPU lanes. For users needing better graphics, the only option is a new laptop with a more powerful discrete GPU, as the Arc A370M cannot be replaced. The ECC memory support is a feature that could be beneficial for workstation use, provided the laptop's BIOS enables it.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 4.198 TFLOPS and 112 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in most titles. Esports games may reach 60-100 FPS with lowered settings, but the 4 GB VRAM will cause stutters in competitive shooters with high texture packs. This is not a high-refresh gaming machine.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads are ideal for software encoding via x264 or x265. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 30,273 and PassMark integer math of 166,455 ensure that encoding will not bottleneck a stream, even with a game running on the GPU. The GPU's limited performance will cap game quality, but the stream itself will be smooth.

Video editing: The CPU excels in export and rendering tasks, with PassMark floating-point math of 118,645 accelerating effects and transitions. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM will limit timeline preview to lower resolutions and fewer color grading nodes. The OpenCL score of 29,676 provides modest GPU acceleration for effects, but heavy work will fall to the CPU.

3D rendering: The 30,273 Cinebench R23 multi-core score makes CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray very fast. The GPU's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 is suitable for viewport previews but not for final frame renders. The 8 RT cores are insufficient for production ray tracing, which will need to be done on the CPU.

Software development: The multi-threaded PassMark score of 46,409 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,440 indicate that parallel compilation will be exceptionally fast. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and ECC memory support adds stability for long builds.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,252 in PassMark ensures snappy response in office applications and web browsing. The GPU is more than adequate for 2D acceleration and video playback. The 55 W CPU TDP is efficient for a laptop, providing long battery life for a processor of this capability, making it a strong choice for engineering students who need CPU power on the go.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds