SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A770M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A770M

18,383 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX and Intel Arc A770M form a high-end mobile pairing designed for demanding laptop workloads. This analysis is based strictly on synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed are estimates derived from the relative CPU and GPU benchmark performance, not from direct game testing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures here are estimates from the benchmark scores. The data clearly indicates a capable 1440p gaming platform, with the potential to handle 4K in less demanding titles, though the pairing shows some imbalance.

The Intel Arc A770M delivers a PassMark G3D score of 11774, placing it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which averages 18159 and trails by just 1.2%. In practical terms, this means the Arc A770M should deliver frame rates comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU from a few generations ago. At 1080p with ultra settings, expect smooth performance in most titles, with frame rates typically landing in the 60-100 FPS range depending on the game's optimization for Intel's graphics architecture.

At 1440p, the 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 512.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes an asset. The memory capacity is generous for modern titles that increasingly demand more than 8 GB even at 1080p. The estimated 1440p ultra performance would see frame rates dropping to the 45-70 FPS range in demanding AAA titles. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32 ray tracing cores provide the raw hardware for ray-traced effects, though driver maturity historically affects Intel's RT performance in ways not captured by synthetic benchmarks.

The CPU side is exceptionally strong. The Core i9-13950HX scores 11926 in 3DMark Max Threads and 1102 in 3DMark Single Thread. This processor will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, where CPU performance often dictates maximum frame rates, the i9-13950HX's single-thread score of 1102 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2107 suggest it can push frame rates well above 144 FPS in CPU-bound titles. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6732 indicates strong multi-core scaling for games that utilize more threads.

The Arc A770M's DirectX 12 score of 70 on PassMark is notably low compared to its G3D score, which may indicate driver overhead in certain API workloads. DirectX 11 score of 69 is similarly modest. The DirectX 9 score of 178 is comparatively higher, but still not stellar. These numbers suggest that older games or titles using less modern APIs may not perform as well as the raw compute power would indicate, while the GPU's 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 support point to strong potential in modern titles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between this CPU and GPU is clearly skewed toward the processor. The i9-13950HX sits at the 88th percentile for all CPUs, while the Arc A770M sits at the 62nd percentile for all GPUs. This 26-percentile gap indicates the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers.

In gaming workloads at 1080p, the GPU will almost certainly be the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6732 and Max Threads score of 11926 represent a level of processing power that far exceeds what the Arc A770M can feed in most gaming scenarios. The CPU's single-thread performance, scoring 1102 in 3DMark and 3899 in PassMark Single Thread, ensures that even the most CPU-intensive game logic will be handled without issue.

At higher resolutions like 1440p or 4K, the balance shifts further toward the GPU being the limiting factor. The Arc A770M's 62nd percentile position means it is outclassed by 38% of all GPUs in the database. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11774, while respectable, will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenarios. The CPU will spend most of its time waiting for the GPU to complete frame rendering.

For non-gaming workloads, the CPU is the clear workhorse. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681, which is roughly 13.7 times its single-core score of 2096. This scaling indicates excellent multi-threaded performance for content creation and productivity tasks. The GPU's compute capabilities, scoring 4778 in PassMark GPU Compute and 89494 in Geekbench OpenCL, are secondary but still useful for acceleration in supported applications.

The memory architecture supports the CPU-heavy balance. Dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, with ECC support, provides the bandwidth needed for the 24-core processor. The lack of a memory bandwidth figure in the data means we cannot quantify this further, but the dual-channel configuration is standard for mobile platforms and adequate for the CPU's demands.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13950HX demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681 places it among the top processors in the database, while the single-core score of 2096 shows strong per-thread efficiency. The PassMark Multi-Thread score of 41614 and an average benchmark score of 44342 reinforce this picture. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus all CPUs means it outperforms 88% of all processors in the database.

The CPU's nearest rivals show just how competitive this processor is. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, a mere 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240, trailing by 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, leading by 0.3%. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, leading by 0.5%. These tiny deltas indicate the i9-13950HX is in the top tier of mobile processors, trading blows with the best available options.

The Arc A770M's benchmark results are more modest. The GPU scores 11774 in PassMark G3D and 18383 on average. Its 62nd percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle tier of GPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373, trailing by 0.1%; the AMD FirePro D500 scores 18533, leading by 0.8%; the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189, trailing by 1.1%; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159, trailing by 1.2%. This places the Arc A770M in the same performance class as the RTX 3060 Mobile, a well-known mid-range laptop GPU.

The combined percentile of 75 for this pairing reflects the CPU's strong performance pulling up the GPU's more moderate showing. The combination is better than 75% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database, making it a solidly above-average laptop configuration. The 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the GPU's key specifications, providing the raw throughput for 1440p gaming and moderate compute workloads.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need exceptional multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The 88th percentile CPU performance makes this an ideal platform for content creators, software developers, and professionals who run heavily threaded applications. The 24-core processor excels in video editing, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681.

Gamers at 1440p resolution are the primary gaming audience. The Arc A770M's 16 GB of VRAM and 62nd percentile performance provide a solid 1440p gaming experience, while the CPU ensures no frame rate drops from processor limitations. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh-rate monitors will find the CPU capable of driving high frame rates, though the GPU may limit performance in the most demanding titles.

Software developers benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and strong single-thread performance. The PassMark Integer Math score of 147091 and Floating Point Math score of 105553 indicate rapid code compilation and execution. The ECC memory support is a professional-grade feature that adds reliability for workstation use.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU powerful enough for any academic workload, from simulation software to heavy multitasking. The laptop form factor is suitable for moving between classes and labs. Small business workstations that need to handle financial modeling, database operations, or data analysis will benefit from the CPU's PassMark Data Compression score of 510258 and Data Encryption score of 30805.

The Arc A770M's professional compute capabilities, while secondary to its gaming performance, add value for users who work with GPU-accelerated applications. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 89494 and Vulkan score of 74422 show the GPU can accelerate compute workloads, though software support for Intel GPUs varies by application.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2107 and single-thread score of 1102 suggest it can sustain very high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in esports and lighter games. The GPU's 62nd percentile performance will cap frame rates in more demanding titles, making 1440p at 60-100 FPS the realistic sweet spot for AAA gaming.

Streaming: The 24-core CPU handles game capture and encoding alongside gameplay without issue. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681 provides ample headroom for software encoding, while the GPU's AV1 support (implied by the 12 Ultimate API support) could offload encoding tasks. The combination is well-suited for single-PC streaming setups.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded dominance shines here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681 and PassMark Integer Math score of 147091 accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth help with GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, though the 62nd percentile GPU performance means export times will be CPU-bound.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels at CPU-based rendering, with its 32 threads delivering exceptional performance in applications like Blender or 3ds Max CPU renderers. The GPU's 16.79 TFLOPS FP32 compute provides moderate GPU-rendering acceleration, but the 62nd percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier renderer. Users prioritizing GPU rendering should look elsewhere.

Software Development: The CPU's strong single-thread and multi-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark Single Thread score of 1102 and Max Threads score of 11926, speeds up compilation, testing, and virtual machine workloads. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. The GPU is adequate for UI development and light graphics work.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is massively overpowered for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's PassMark Single Thread score of 3899 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 32 threads handle any multitasking scenario. The power draw and cost of this platform are justified only if the user also runs demanding workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-13950HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; it is permanently attached to the motherboard. The Core 13th Gen Raptor Lake-HX architecture is the top end of this platform, so there is no higher-performing CPU available for this socket anyway.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows the laptop manufacturer to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. ECC memory support is a professional feature that is uncommon in mobile platforms. The memory bus is dual-channel, which is standard for mobile, though some competing platforms offer quad-channel support for even higher bandwidth.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for the Arc A770M's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and additional Gen 5 NVMe storage devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and can handle basic graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed, potentially saving power.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W. The combined thermal design power of 175 W means a laptop with this configuration needs a robust cooling solution. There is no suggested PSU listed, but a laptop power adapter of sufficient wattage is required to feed both components under load. The Arc A770M is marked as End-of-life production status, so future driver updates may be limited.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is limited. The CPU is already at the top of its socket, and the GPU is soldered in most laptop implementations. Users looking for more graphical performance would need to consider an entirely new laptop. For users who have a laptop with this configuration and want more performance, the only practical upgrade is external GPU solutions via Thunderbolt, though this is not confirmed in the data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28681 is a top-tier result, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score of 2096 is also strong, indicating the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz is effective in lightly threaded workloads. The 3DMark scores show a clear progression from 2107 at 2 threads to 11926 at max threads, demonstrating good multi-threading scaling.

The PassMark results provide insight into specific workload performance. The Integer Math score of 147091 and Floating Point Math score of 105553 show strong arithmetic performance. The Data Compression score of 510258 and Data Encryption score of 30805 indicate excellent performance for data-intensive tasks. The Find Prime Numbers score of 203 is a single-threaded test that shows the per-core efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture. The Extended Instructions score of 29779 suggests robust SIMD performance for workloads that use AVX-512 or similar instruction sets.

The CPU's nearest rivals show it is tightly competitive with the best available processors. The deltaPct values of 0.1%, 0.2%, -0.3%, and -0.5% against the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, Intel Core i5-13600, Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D respectively indicate these processors are nearly identical in overall performance. The i9-13950HX is essentially at parity with these alternatives, meaning the choice between them comes down to platform features, power efficiency, and price rather than raw performance.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13950HX with the Intel Arc A770M in a laptop form factor. The combined percentile of 75 means this configuration outperforms 75% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, ranking in the 88th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 62nd percentile for all GPUs.

The overall tier of this build is upper-midrange to high-end. The CPU is a flagship mobile processor, delivering performance that rivals desktop parts. The GPU is a mid-range mobile graphics solution, comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile. The combination is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software development, while still providing a solid 1440p gaming experience.

The laptop class designation means this is a mobile build, not a desktop configuration. The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 120 W TDP are reasonable for a high-performance laptop, though the combined 175 W thermal load requires a well-designed cooling system. The Arc A770M's End-of-life status is a consideration for long-term driver support, though the hardware remains capable.

This is a balanced platform for its intended use case, with the CPU leading and GPU following. The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is generous and future-proof for 1440p gaming. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional multi-threaded performance that will remain relevant for years. Users who need top-tier CPU performance in a laptop and are satisfied with mid-range GPU performance will find this build appropriate.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-13950HX compare to its nearest CPU rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The two processors are nearly identical in overall performance. The i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44342, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309, a difference of just 0.1%.

Q: What level of gaming performance can be expected from the Arc A770M?

A: The GPU scores 11774 in PassMark G3D and sits at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. It is roughly equivalent to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, which trails by 1.2%. Expect solid 1440p gaming performance, though no measured FPS data exists for this specific pairing.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in gaming?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor in gaming. The CPU ranks in the 88th percentile for all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 62nd percentile. This 26-percentile gap means the CPU has far more headroom than the GPU can use in most gaming scenarios.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its single-threaded performance?

A: The CPU scores 28681 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2096 in Cinebench R23 single-core. This represents roughly 13.7 times the multi-threaded performance of single-threaded performance, demonstrating excellent scaling across its 24 cores.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13950HX supports ECC memory. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which is a professional-grade feature not commonly found in mobile platforms.

Q: What is the production status of the Arc A770M GPU?

A: The Arc A770M is marked as End-of-life production status. The CPU is marked as Active production status. Users should consider the GPU's end-of-life status when evaluating long-term driver support and future compatibility.

Q: How does the combined performance of this build rank against other configurations?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, meaning it outperforms 75% of all configurations in the database. The CPU's strong 88th percentile performance is offset by the GPU's more modest 62nd percentile, resulting in an overall above-average build.