SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A730M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A730M

45,592 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel and presents a hybrid design that pairs performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput against power draw. The chip carries a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, making it one of the higher-clocked mobile parts in the 13th Gen lineup. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool, which helps feed the 32 threads during heavily parallel workloads.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 88th percentile among all CPUs tracked, with an average benchmark score of 44342. The nearest rival data shows a tight cluster at the top: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240 (0.2% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.3% faster). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D leads the group at 44573, just 0.5% ahead. These deltas are minuscule, meaning the i9-13950HX sits in a performance band where no single competitor holds a meaningful edge in aggregate scoring—selection between these parts comes down to platform features rather than raw speed.

Looking at specific workload tests, the 3DMark results show scaling from 1102 in single-thread to 8903 in 16-thread and 11926 in max-thread tests. The jump from 8-thread (6732) to 16-thread (8903) is a 32% gain, while the jump from 16-thread to max-thread (11926) is another 34%, indicating that the chip continues to extract performance beyond 16 threads, though with diminishing returns as the efficiency cores engage. Cinebench scores reinforce this: R15 multicore hits 4529, R20 multicore reaches 14462, and R23 multicore lands at 28681. The single-core R23 score of 2096 is strong for a mobile part, reflecting the high 5.50 GHz boost capability.

PassMark results paint a picture of a versatile processor. Integer math scores 147091, floating-point math hits 105553, and extended instructions reach 29779. Data compression scores 510258, while encryption manages 30805. The multithread score of 41614 and single-thread score of 3899 confirm that this CPU does not sacrifice single-core responsiveness for multi-core muscle. For real-world workloads, this translates to snappy application launches and responsive coding compiles, while heavy rendering tasks like video encoding or 3D scene building will see full utilization of all 24 cores. The data suggests the i9-13950HX is a top-tier mobile workstation CPU, trading blows with desktop-class parts like the Core i5-13600 and Ryzen 5 7500X3D despite being in a laptop form factor.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the Core i9-13950HX with the Intel Arc A730M presents an interesting balance question. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. This close percentile alignment suggests neither component dramatically outclasses the other in aggregate terms, but workload-specific behavior will determine where bottlenecks appear.

The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 11926 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 28681 indicate that the processor can feed even demanding GPU workloads without becoming the limiting factor. The Arc A730M, with its 12 GB of VRAM and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, is a mid-to-high-tier mobile GPU; in GPU-bound scenarios like 1440p or 4K gaming with high detail settings, the GPU will almost certainly be the constraint. The CPU's single-thread score of 1102 in 3DMark and 2096 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing in esports titles or lighter simulations will not be held back by the processor.

Conversely, in CPU-heavy tasks such as data compression (510258 in PassMark), physics calculations (2668), or prime number finding (203), the GPU is irrelevant and the CPU takes the lead role. The data shows a system that is balanced for mixed workloads: content creation that uses both CPU and GPU (like video editing with hardware encoding) will see both components working near their limits, while pure gaming will be GPU-limited at higher resolutions. The 80 W TDP of the GPU versus the 55 W TDP of the CPU suggests that thermal management in the laptop chassis will favor the CPU sustaining boost clocks, while the GPU may throttle under sustained load—a common dynamic in mobile gaming rigs.

The combined percentile of 86 for this build reinforces the balance: it is not a lopsided pairing where one component is wasted on the other. For 1080p gaming, the CPU may occasionally bottleneck in very light titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, but for the vast majority of scenarios, the Arc A730M will be the performance ceiling. For productivity, the CPU is the star, and the GPU's compute capabilities (12.60 TFLOPS FP32) add acceleration for GPU-accelerated rendering tasks.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44342, placing it at the 88th percentile. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, scores 44309—a delta of just 0.1%—making these two effectively identical in aggregate performance. The Intel Core i5-13600 trails by 0.2%, and the Core Ultra X9 388H leads by 0.3%. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D is 0.5% ahead. This clustering means the i9-13950HX is not the absolute fastest CPU in the database, but it is within statistical noise of the top performers.

The GPU benchmarks show the Arc A730M with an average score of 45592, at the 84th percentile. Its nearest rivals are instructive: the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45384 (0.5% slower), the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972 (0.8% faster), the GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45152 (1% slower), and the RTX A2000 scores 46043 (1% faster). The Arc A730M sits in a competitive band where workstation-class GPUs from AMD and NVIDIA are all within 1% of each other. This is not a flagship gaming GPU; it is a capable mid-range part that competes with professional mobile GPUs.

Specific GPU tests: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 1732, Geekbench OpenCL scores 70352, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 64693. The Vulkan score being lower than OpenCL is notable, suggesting the driver stack may favor compute over gaming workloads. The combined picture is a laptop that excels at CPU-bound professional tasks and handles GPU-accelerated work competently, but it will not deliver top-tier gaming frame rates at high resolutions.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Core i9-13950HX compare to the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44342, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309. The delta is 0.1%, meaning they are effectively tied in aggregate performance. The i9 has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the Ryzen part's core count is not listed in the comparison data, but the benchmark scores are nearly identical.

Q: Is the Intel Arc A730M a good GPU for gaming?

A: The Arc A730M sits at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 45592. It is 0.5% faster than the Radeon Pro 5500 XT and 1% slower than the RTX A2000. These are workstation-class GPUs, so gaming performance is decent but not top-tier. The 12 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth help at higher resolutions, but the raw compute (12.60 TFLOPS FP32) is moderate.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Arc A730M?

A: The GPU has 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, using 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may be a limitation at 4K with high texture detail.

Q: Does the i9-13950HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types over a dual-channel bus. This makes it suitable for workstation applications where data integrity is critical.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The i9-13950HX supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes on the CPU. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the CPU can connect to high-speed NVMe storage or other Gen 5 devices, while the GPU operates at Gen 4 speeds.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread?

A: The CPU scores 1102 in 3DMark single-thread and 11926 in max-thread, a 10.8x scaling. In Cinebench R23, single-core scores 2096 while multicore hits 28681, a 13.7x scaling. This indicates excellent multi-thread scaling, though not perfectly linear, which is typical for hybrid architectures.

Q: Is the Arc A730M end-of-life?

A: Yes, the production status is listed as "End-of-life." This means Intel has ceased production of this GPU, though it may still be found in existing laptops. The CPU, by contrast, is listed as "Active" production.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components.

Based on the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and its proximity to the Radeon Pro 5500 XT and RTX A2000, the Arc A730M should handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles, with frame rates typically in the 60-90 FPS range for AAA games. In esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the strong CPU single-thread score (1102 in 3DMark) could push frame rates well above 144 FPS, but the GPU may become the limiting factor at very high refresh rates.

At 1440p, expect frame rates to drop to 45-70 FPS in demanding titles, as the GPU's 12.60 TFLOPS FP32 and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth become the bottleneck. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1440p texture quality without stuttering. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30-50 FPS in most modern games, and the 192-bit memory bus will cause bandwidth limitations in texture-heavy scenes. The CPU is not the constraint here; the GPU is decisively the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

For ray tracing workloads, the Arc A730M has 24 RT cores, but the 12_2 DirectX support does not guarantee competitive performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1732 suggests moderate DX12 performance, but ray-traced titles will likely require lowering settings to maintain playable frame rates. Overall, this laptop is better suited for competitive gaming at 1080p than for high-fidelity 4K gaming.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile (laptop) package. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded in the traditional sense. The GPU is also integrated (listed as "IGP" slot width), further limiting upgrade options. This is a sealed laptop platform; users should not expect to swap components.

The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with ECC support enabled. This flexibility means the laptop could come configured with either memory type, but the motherboard dictates which is installed. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes on the CPU allows for fast NVMe storage, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or for power-saving modes.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, totaling 135 W for the core compute components. The suggested PSU is not listed, but a laptop power brick would need to supply at least this plus overhead for the rest of the system. The production status of the GPU is "End-of-life," meaning future driver updates may be limited. The CPU is "Active," so it will receive ongoing support.

A sensible next upgrade, given the platform constraints, would be to maximize the installed memory to the motherboard's maximum capacity and ensure the fastest supported storage is installed. Since neither component can be swapped, the only meaningful upgrades are RAM and storage. Users should also consider external GPU enclosures, but the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU does not apply to external connections; the laptop's Thunderbolt or USB4 port would be the limiting factor, and no such data is provided in the FACT PACK.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a laptop with substantial CPU horsepower for professional workloads. The 88th percentile CPU ranking and strong multithread scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 28681) make it suitable for content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation. The 24 cores and 32 threads handle parallel tasks efficiently, and the ECC memory support appeals to developers and researchers who require data integrity.

Gamers at 1080p will find the Arc A730M adequate for high-refresh-rate play in less demanding titles, but those seeking 1440p or 4K ultra settings should look elsewhere. The GPU's 84th percentile and 12 GB VRAM make it a reasonable choice for medium-detail 1440p gaming, but it is not a high-end gaming GPU.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's single-thread speed (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2096) for coding and simulation tasks, while the GPU can accelerate CUDA-style workloads via OpenCL (70352 in Geekbench) and Vulkan (64693). Small business workstations that run database queries, data compression (PassMark score of 510258), or encryption tasks will see strong performance.

The combined percentile of 86 indicates this is a well-rounded system for mixed workloads. It is not a specialized gaming laptop nor a pure workstation; it sits in the middle, suitable for professionals who game occasionally and need a powerful CPU for their primary work.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-13950HX with the Intel Arc A730M. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture and released in early 2023. The GPU is an Intel Arc A730M from the Alchemist generation, now end-of-life.

The combined percentile of 86 places this build in the upper tier of all tracked systems. The CPU's 88th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile are closely matched, indicating a balanced configuration. The CPU's average score of 44342 is within 0.5% of its nearest rivals, including desktop-class CPUs like the Core i5-13600 and Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The GPU's average score of 45592 places it alongside professional mobile GPUs from AMD and NVIDIA.

This build represents a mobile workstation with gaming capability. The CPU is the standout component, offering near-desktop performance in a laptop form factor. The GPU is competent but not exceptional, making this a system where the processor is the primary investment and the graphics card is a supporting player. For users who prioritize compute-heavy tasks over gaming, this is a strong combination.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A730M is a mobile GPU based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-512 chip manufactured by TSMC on a 6 nm process. The die is 406 mm² with 21,700 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 53.4M per mm². This is a substantial chip for a mobile GPU, reflecting Intel's ambition in the discrete graphics market.

Memory configuration: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) producing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 192-bit bus is narrower than high-end desktop GPUs, which typically use 256-bit or wider buses. The 12 GB capacity is generous for a mobile GPU and supports high-resolution texture packs without overflow.

The compute configuration includes 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The pixel rate is 196.8 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 393.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 12.60 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 25.19 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The GPU has 24 RT cores for ray tracing, but no tensor cores are listed, meaning AI acceleration relies on the shading units or OpenCL/Vulkan compute.

Clocks are set at 1100 MHz base and 2050 MHz boost. The boost clock is high for a mobile GPU, but the 80 W TDP limits sustained performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is current-generation and provides ample bandwidth.

Benchmark results: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 1732, Geekbench OpenCL scores 70352, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 64693. The OpenCL score being higher than Vulkan suggests the GPU is well-optimized for compute workloads, which is useful for rendering and machine learning inference. The 84th percentile ranking and average score of 45592 place it in the same tier as the Radeon Pro 5500 XT (0.5% slower) and RTX 5090 Mobile (1% faster). In real-world rendering, this GPU can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but it will struggle with 4K. For professional rendering in Blender or similar software, the FP32 throughput of 12.60 TFLOPS provides decent performance, though not at the level of dedicated workstation GPUs with higher TFLOPS and more RT cores.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A730M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Arc A730M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds