SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A570M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A570M

58,239 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. This is a high-core-count part designed for flagship-class laptops, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The chip carries a 55 W TDP, which is modest for a processor of this capability, but the boost behavior and thermal headroom in a laptop chassis will determine sustained performance. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support included, and it exposes 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not in use.

The benchmark results are consistently strong across both synthetic and application-level tests. In 3DMark, the processor scores 8,903 in the 16-thread test and 11,926 in the max-thread test, while the single-thread score of 1,102 and the 2-thread score of 2,107 indicate solid per-core performance. The 4-thread score of 3,957 and 8-thread score of 6,732 show good scaling as thread count increases, which is typical of a hybrid architecture with both performance and efficiency cores. In Cinebench, the multicore scores are particularly telling: Cinebench R15 multicore reaches 4,529, R20 multicore reaches 14,462, and R23 multicore reaches 28,681. The single-core scores in these tests—297 in R15, 2,041 in R20, and 2,096 in R23—are competitive for a mobile part, though the multicore results are where this CPU clearly separates itself from mainstream chips.

PassMark results reinforce the picture. The multithread score of 41,614 is a high figure for a laptop processor, and the integer math score of 147,091 and floating point math score of 105,553 indicate strong number-crunching ability. Data compression scores 510,258, data encryption scores 30,805, and extended instructions score 29,779, all of which point to a processor that handles demanding compute workloads without breaking a sweat. Physics simulation in PassMark scores 2,668, and random string sorting scores 57,274. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,899 is respectable but not class-leading, suggesting that the CPU's strength lies more in multi-threaded throughput than in raw single-core speed. The average benchmark score of 44,342 places this chip in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Core i9-13950HX sits within a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309, a delta of 0.1% (the Intel part is effectively tied). The Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44,240, a delta of 0.2% (the i9 is slightly ahead). The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466, a delta of -0.3% (the i9 trails by a hair). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573, a delta of -0.5% (the i9 trails by half a percent). In practical terms, this CPU is statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate benchmark performance, meaning real-world differences will come down to workload-specific behavior, power delivery, and cooling rather than raw compute headroom.

The architecture matters for how these scores translate to actual use. Raptor Lake-HX is a hybrid design with performance cores and efficiency cores, and the 24-core/32-thread configuration indicates a mix of 8 performance cores and 16 efficiency cores. The 36 MB shared L3 cache, 2 MB L2 per core, and 80 KB L1 per core provide a substantial cache hierarchy that helps feed the high core count. For workloads that scale across many threads—rendering, compilation, video encoding—this CPU will perform near the top of the mobile stack. For lightly threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications, the high boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensures responsiveness, though the single-thread scores suggest it does not lead the field in that regard.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and strong single-thread scores (3,899 in PassMark single-thread, 2,096 in Cinebench R23 single-core) provide enough per-core performance to drive high frame rates in most titles. The 16-thread 3DMark score of 8,903 indicates solid multi-threaded game engine performance, so frame pacing in modern titles that use more than a few cores should be smooth. However, the GPU pairing (Intel Arc A570M) will be the limiter at high refresh rates in demanding games, as discussed later.

Streaming: With 24 cores and 32 threads, the CPU can handle both game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The PassMark multithread score of 41,614 and the extended instructions score of 29,779 suggest that x264 or x265 encoding at reasonable presets will not starve the rest of the system of compute resources. The data encryption score of 30,805 also indicates that encryption overhead from streaming protocols will be trivial.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,681 is a strong indicator for video editing workloads, which are typically multi-threaded and cache-hungry. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and preview rendering. The PassMark floating point score of 105,553 suggests good performance for effects and color grading that rely on floating point math. For 4K video editing with multiple layers, this CPU will handle the decode, encode, and effects pipeline with headroom, though the GPU will assist with hardware-accelerated encoding via Intel's Quick Sync on the integrated UHD Graphics 770 or the Arc A570M.

3D rendering: The max-thread 3DMark score of 11,926 and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,681 are the key numbers here. These scores place the CPU in the top 12% of all processors, meaning rendering tasks in Blender, Maya, or similar software will complete faster than on the vast majority of laptop CPUs. The 24 cores and 32 threads scale well with rendering engines that support multi-threading, and the 55 W TDP means the chip can sustain high clocks under load if cooling allows, which is critical for long render times.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the PassMark integer math score of 147,091 and data compression score of 510,258 suggest that both compiler throughput and build artifact compression will be quick. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds with minimal contention, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces the penalty of context switching. The single-thread score of 3,899 also ensures that interactive tools like IDEs and terminal operations remain snappy.

Student and office work: This CPU is overkill for typical student or office workloads, but the data shows it handles them effortlessly. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,899 and the 2-thread 3DMark score of 2,107 mean that document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing will be instant. The low 55 W TDP also means that battery life in a laptop should be reasonable for light tasks, as the CPU can idle efficiently on its efficiency cores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates that the Intel Core i9-13950HX is a very high-end CPU, sitting in the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Arc A570M GPU also sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL. This alignment means that in most workloads, the CPU and GPU are roughly matched in their relative standing, which is a good sign for balance. However, the specific nature of the workloads determines which component becomes the limiting factor.

For gaming at high refresh rates, the GPU is likely the bottleneck. The Arc A570M has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, which places it near the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, delta 0.3%), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, delta -0.7%). These rivals are a mix of desktop and workstation GPUs, and the Arc A570M is competitive with them in compute terms. However, the GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest for modern high-fidelity gaming. The CPU's single-thread performance will not hold back the GPU in most titles, but the GPU's memory bandwidth could limit frame rates in texture-heavy scenes at high resolutions.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, video encoding, or code compilation, the CPU is the star and the GPU plays a supporting role. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,681 and the PassMark multithread score of 41,614 demonstrate that the CPU can handle sustained multi-threaded loads, while the GPU's compute capability (5.325 TFLOPS FP32) can assist in GPU-accelerated rendering or encoding tasks. In this scenario, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the GPU's 128-bit memory bus might limit GPU-accelerated performance in some tasks, but the CPU will be the primary driver.

The FPS scaling picture is less clear because no measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS discussion must be framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's 88th percentile and the GPU's 88th percentile suggest that the pairing is balanced, but the GPU's memory bandwidth and the CPU's high core count may create a scenario where the CPU can push more frames than the GPU can render in gaming, making the GPU the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. In productivity, the CPU will dominate and the GPU will be secondary.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a laptop that can handle both demanding compute workloads and modern gaming. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking means it outperforms 88% of all CPUs in the database, so serious content creators—video editors, 3D artists, and software developers—will benefit directly from the 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28,681 is a strong indicator for rendering and encoding tasks, so professionals who work in Blender, Premiere Pro, or similar software will see faster export and render times compared to mainstream laptop CPUs.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p resolutions will find this pairing capable, though the GPU's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus may require turning down texture quality or anti-aliasing in the most demanding titles. The GPU's percentile rank of 88 aligns with the CPU's, so at these resolutions the pair should deliver a consistent experience, with the CPU providing enough headroom for background tasks like streaming or Discord while gaming. For high-refresh 1080p esports titles, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,899 and the GPU's compute capability should be sufficient for high frame rates, but the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates.

Software developers will appreciate the 32 threads for parallel builds and the 36 MB L3 cache for large codebases. The PassMark data compression score of 510,258 indicates fast build artifact compression, and the integer math score of 147,091 suggests strong compiler performance. Students and small business users will find this laptop vastly more powerful than needed for typical office tasks, but the 55 W TDP means it can run efficiently when not under load, which is beneficial for battery life. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for simple display tasks, and the discrete Arc A570M can be disabled to save power.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,342, placing it in the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309 (delta 0.1%), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44,240 (delta 0.2%), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466 (delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573 (delta -0.5%). This means the Core i9-13950HX is effectively tied with these parts in aggregate performance, with deltas of less than one percent in all cases. The CPU's strongest results are in multi-threaded tests: Cinebench R23 multicore at 28,681, PassMark multithread at 41,614, and 3DMark max-thread at 11,926. The single-thread scores are lower in relative terms, with PassMark single-thread at 3,899 and Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,096, but they are still competitive.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392, delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085, delta 0.3%), the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58,657, delta -0.7%). The GPU is a mobile part with 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. It has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1).

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 88, indicating that the system sits in the top 12% of all configurations in the database. The CPU and GPU are well matched in their relative performance tiers, which is unusual for a laptop pairing—often one component lags the other. Here, both are at the same percentile, so the system should deliver balanced performance across a wide range of workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means the gaming picture is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest a system that is capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and playable 1440p gaming in most titles, with the CPU providing enough headroom for streaming or recording.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile socket, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. This has significant implications for upgrades: the CPU cannot be swapped out for a newer or faster part. The platform is effectively fixed at the time of purchase, so any future performance improvements would come from the GPU or memory, not the CPU. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support, so a user could upgrade memory capacity or speed within the constraints of the laptop's motherboard, but the CPU's memory controller is fixed.

The GPU is an Intel Arc A570M, which is also a mobile part (the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard). Like the CPU, the GPU is not user-upgradable. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for the 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The GPU has a TDP of 75 W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, so the combined power draw is 130 W for the core components, plus additional power for memory, storage, and display. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, but for a laptop this is a fixed power adapter rather than a user-selected PSU, so the upgrade path is limited by the laptop's power delivery design.

A sensible next upgrade for this system, given that the CPU and GPU are soldered, would be to maximize the memory: upgrading to the fastest DDR5 memory supported by the CPU's memory controller would improve memory bandwidth, which could benefit the GPU in memory-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile platform and may be useful for users who require data integrity in compute tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU (20 lanes) means that storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives are possible, provided the laptop has an M.2 slot that supports the faster standard. However, the GPU is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8, so the GPU's bandwidth is capped regardless of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,342, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44,309), Intel Core i5-13600 (44,240), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU upgradable?

A: No, both the CPU (Intel BGA 1964 socket) and the GPU (IGP slot width) are soldered to the motherboard in a laptop form factor.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 3,899 in PassMark single-thread, 2,096 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 1,102 in 3DMark single-thread.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the Intel Core i9-13950HX with the Intel Arc A570M. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Xe-HPG architecture mobile part with 8 GB GDDR6, 2,048 shading units, and a 75 W TDP. The combined percentile for this pairing is 88, meaning it outperforms 88% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,342 (88th percentile), and the GPU's average benchmark score is 58,239 in Geekbench OpenCL (88th percentile). This is a high-end laptop configuration designed for demanding workloads and gaming, with both components sitting at the same performance tier, indicating a balanced system.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU's 88th percentile and GPU's 88th percentile suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and playable 1440p gaming in most titles. The GPU's 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, combined with the CPU's single-thread performance (3,899 PassMark single-thread), indicate that at 1080p with high settings, the system should deliver smooth frame rates in esports titles and many AAA games, though the 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus may limit performance in the most demanding titles with high-resolution textures. At 1440p, the GPU's memory bandwidth becomes the primary constraint, and users may need to adjust settings to maintain playable frame rates. At 4K, the GPU will struggle, and users should expect to lower settings significantly or reduce resolution. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in gaming scenarios; the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capability will dictate frame rates, and the CPU's high core count provides headroom for background tasks like streaming or recording while gaming. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance will vary based on the specific laptop's cooling, power delivery, and driver optimization.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A570M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Arc A570M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds