SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A530M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A530M

46,614 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX paired with the Intel Arc A530M is a laptop-class combination that targets high-end mobile productivity with respectable graphics capability. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part, while the GPU is an Alchemist-generation Arc 5 Mobile chip with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS values — so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than derived from direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 2.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a mobile processor, socketed into Intel BGA 1964, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a mobile part and relevant for workstation-style reliability.

Benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores climb from 1102 in single-thread to 2107 with 2 threads, 3957 with 4 threads, 6732 with 8 threads, 8903 with 16 threads, and peak at 11926 with max threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, with the jump from 8 to 16 threads adding roughly 32% more performance, and the final leap to max threads adding another 34%. For real workloads, this translates to excellent behavior in heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation, where the CPU can leverage all 32 threads effectively.

Cinebench results reinforce the multi-core strength. The R23 multicore score is 28681, while the single-core score is 2096. The ratio between these is roughly 13.7x, meaning that fully loaded multi-threaded workloads can deliver more than thirteen times the throughput of a single-threaded task. The R20 scores (14462 multicore, 2041 single-core) and R15 scores (4529 multicore, 297 single-core) follow the same pattern. PassMark tests show similarly strong results: integer math at 147091, floating-point math at 105553, and multithread score at 41614. Data compression hits 510258, while encryption reaches 30805 and extended instructions score 29779.

The CPU’s percentile versus all CPUs is 88, placing it in the upper tier of processors. Its average benchmark score is 44342, which puts it staggeringly close to its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (just 0.1% behind), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.3% ahead). The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (0.5% ahead). These deltas are all within half a percent, meaning that in aggregate benchmark performance, the i9-13950HX is functionally tied with its closest competitors. However, the i9-13950HX’s advantage lies in its core count and thread scaling, which specific multithreaded tests will highlight even if the average scores are similar.

The boost clock of 5.50 GHz is notable for a mobile part, and the single-thread PassMark score of 3899 confirms strong single-core capability that benefits everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The multiplier is unlocked, which suggests overclocking headroom, though in a laptop chassis that headroom is typically constrained by thermals.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance discussed here is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured results. The data explicitly indicates that no measured FPS rows exist, so treat the following as projections based on component-level benchmarks.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3899, 3DMark single-thread score of 1102) suggests it will not bottleneck most games. The GPU’s Geekbench scores — 49735 in OpenCL and 43492 in Vulkan — provide a rough indication of its graphics compute capability. The Arc A530M’s GPU percentile versus all GPUs is 85, which places it above the majority of mobile graphics solutions.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, this pairing should handle esports titles and older AAA games comfortably, given the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. For more demanding modern titles, the GPU is likely to be the limiting factor at ultra settings, as its FP32 performance of 3.994 TFLOPS is modest compared to high-end desktop parts. The GPU’s 1536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs suggest it can render at 1080p with reasonable quality, but 1440p ultra would strain the system, and 4K ultra is likely beyond its capabilities for most games.

The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 8903 indicates strong gaming-related physics and logic performance, while the PassMark physics score of 2668 is lower but still adequate. The combination should provide a smooth experience at 1080p with medium-to-high settings in most titles, with frame rates dropping as resolution and quality settings increase. Since no measured FPS data exists, these are estimates only, and actual performance will vary by game optimization and driver maturity.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A530M is based on the Xe-HPG architecture, using the DG2-256 chip manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. The die contains 11,500 million transistors across 269 mm², giving a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective throughput.

Clock speeds are conservative: a base of 900 MHz and a boost of 1300 MHz. This yields a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. For ray tracing, it includes 12 dedicated RT cores. The FP32 compute is 3.994 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The TDP is rated at 65 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard or soldered onto the board.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern gaming APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for this class of GPU. Display outputs are described as “Portable Device Dependent,” meaning the actual ports vary by laptop design.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 49735 and a Vulkan score of 43492. The average benchmark score is 46614, with a percentile of 85 versus all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46601 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6550M scores 46702 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 scores 46043 (1.2% behind), and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972 (1.4% behind). This places the Arc A530M in a competitive mid-range mobile GPU tier, though the RTX 5880 Ada Generation being only 1.4% behind is surprising given its name suggests a much higher-end part — the data shows the scores are what they are.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 12 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the modest FP32 throughput means ray tracing at high resolutions will be demanding. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p textures and moderate RT workloads, but large scenes or high-resolution textures could exceed it. The 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is on the lower side for a modern GPU, which will limit performance in bandwidth-sensitive tasks like high-resolution texture streaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s percentile of 88 versus all CPUs is only slightly higher than the GPU’s percentile of 85 versus all GPUs, suggesting a reasonably balanced pairing. However, the nature of the workloads determines which component becomes the limiting factor.

In CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computing, the i9-13950HX’s 24 cores and 32 threads will dominate, and the GPU will be underutilized. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 and PassMark multithread of 41614 indicate the CPU can sustain massive parallel workloads, while the GPU’s 3.994 TFLOPS is comparatively modest for compute-heavy rendering.

In gaming, the balance shifts. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (PassMark 3899 single-thread) means it will rarely bottleneck the GPU at 1080p. The GPU’s performance, estimated from its Geekbench scores and 85th percentile, will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p ultra, the GPU is the bottleneck for demanding titles. At 720p or with lower settings, the CPU could become the constraint in some scenarios, but its single-thread scores suggest it would hold up well.

The CPU’s 3DMark 4-thread score of 3957 and 8-thread score of 6732 indicate strong gaming-related performance, since most games use fewer than 8 threads. The PassMark physics score of 2668 is lower, which might affect physics-heavy games, but this is a minor concern. Overall, the data suggests a system where the CPU has headroom over the GPU in most gaming scenarios, meaning the GPU is the primary constraint for frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44342, with a percentile of 88. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, scores 44309 (0.1% behind), while the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is 0.3% ahead at 44466. The CPU’s best result comes in Cinebench R23 multicore at 28681, where it demonstrates its multi-threading advantage. Single-thread performance is also strong, with R23 single-core at 2096 and PassMark single-thread at 3899.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 46614, with a percentile of 85. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 49735 is the higher of its two results, while Vulkan scores 43492. The nearest GPU rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M, scores 46601 (0% delta), showing the Arc A530M is essentially matched with that part. The NVIDIA RTX A2000 is 1.2% behind, and the RTX 5880 Ada Generation is 1.4% behind.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 87, which places the system in the upper tier of laptop configurations. The CPU drives the overall score higher than the GPU alone would suggest, since the CPU’s 88th percentile is above the GPU’s 85th. The combined picture is a system where the processor is the stronger component, and the GPU is competent but not class-leading. For productivity and content creation, this is an excellent combination. For gaming, it is solidly mid-range.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious CPU power in a laptop form factor. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit from the 24-core, 32-thread CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 indicates the system can handle long render times efficiently, and the PassMark data compression score of 510258 suggests fast archiving and file manipulation.

Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the multithreaded workload, with PassMark integer math at 147091 and extended instructions at 29779. Students in engineering or data science fields who run simulations or heavy computational workloads will also appreciate the CPU’s capabilities.

For gamers, this system is best suited to 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings, based on the GPU’s estimated performance. The CPU will not be a bottleneck for most titles, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 3.994 TFLOPS limit high-resolution or high-fidelity gaming. Small business workstations handling spreadsheet-heavy tasks, database queries, or virtualization will find the 32 threads useful, though the GPU adds little value for those workloads.

The ECC memory support makes this suitable for users who require data integrity, such as financial analysts or researchers. The laptop class means this is a mobile workstation, so portability is a given, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 65 W GPU TDP suggest the system will need adequate cooling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core count and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The Intel Arc A530M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.50 GHz, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is notable for a mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture?

A: The GPU uses the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in average score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44342, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309) and 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13600 (44240).

Q: What APIs does the GPU support for gaming?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, placing it in the upper tier of systems.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13950HX (Raptor Lake-HX) with the Intel Arc A530M (Alchemist, Arc 5 Mobile). The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, while the GPU offers 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 12 RT cores. The pairing sits at the 87th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 85th percentile. This places the system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, though the GPU is the weaker component relative to the CPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44342 is nearly identical to its closest rivals, while the GPU’s average score of 46614 matches the AMD Radeon RX 5600M almost exactly.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed into Intel BGA 1964, which is a soldered mobile socket, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded independently in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, so upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 would require a motherboard change, which is typically not feasible in a laptop. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 55 W. No suggested PSU is listed, which is typical for a laptop where the power supply is fixed by the chassis design. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5, with no specific bandwidth figures provided in the data.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU’s 88th percentile suggests it will remain competitive for several years. The GPU, at the 85th percentile, is more likely to become the limiting factor as games and applications demand more graphics performance. A future upgrade would involve replacing the entire laptop or, if the chassis allows, swapping the GPU module — though mobile GPUs are often soldered. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that might influence a buyer toward this platform for reliability-focused workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is forward-looking, though the GPU currently uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is headroom for faster storage or external GPU enclosures if the laptop supports them.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A530M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Arc A530M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds