SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A370M: A Study in Extreme CPU-GPU Asymmetry

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier 24-core mobile processor with Intel's entry-level Arc 3 discrete GPU in a laptop configuration. The data shows a system with exceptional compute horsepower in the CPU but graphics performance that sits far below the processor's capabilities. There are no measured FPS rows in the FACT PACK for this exact combination — no game-specific frame rate data exists — so all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct observation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13950HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not user-replaceable in any practical sense. The platform is built around Intel's Raptor Lake-HX architecture, a 10 nm process design with 24 cores and 32 threads. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, giving system builders flexibility depending on the laptop's motherboard design. ECC memory is supported, which is notable for a mobile platform and suggests the chip can handle workstation-class reliability demands.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself. This is a forward-looking interface that supports the fastest NVMe storage and, in theory, the most modern discrete GPUs — though the specific GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The platform's power envelope shows a 55 W TDP for the CPU, which is modest for a 24-core part but reflects the thermal constraints of a laptop chassis. The GPU runs at a 35 W TDP, and the FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU, indicating this is an integrated laptop solution where the power delivery is fixed by the OEM.

For PSU headroom, the absence of a suggested PSU figure means the system's power supply is whatever the laptop manufacturer installed. The combined 90 W TDP of CPU and GPU (55 W + 35 W) is relatively low for a high-core-count i9, which implies the chassis can be reasonably compact. A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be replacing the GPU if the laptop supports MXM modules — though the Arc A370M is soldered in most implementations, so realistically the upgrade path is limited to storage (PCIe Gen 5 NVMe), memory capacity (DDR5 up to the motherboard's limit), or a full laptop replacement. The CPU itself is already at the top of the mobile stack, so processor upgrades are not a consideration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a picture of a processor that dominates multi-threaded workloads. In 3DMark tests, the i9-13950HX scores 8903 in 16 threads, 6732 in 8 threads, 3957 in 4 threads, and 2107 in 2 threads, with a single-thread score of 1102 and a max-thread score of 11926. The scaling from 2 to 16 threads is nearly linear (2107 → 8903, roughly 4.2x for 8x the threads), and the jump to max threads (11926) shows the full 32-thread capability adds another 34% over the 16-thread result. This is a processor that rewards heavily threaded workloads.

Cinebench results reinforce this. The R23 multicore score of 28681 is exceptional for a mobile part, while the R23 single-core score of 2096 shows strong per-core performance for a 5.50 GHz boost clock. The R20 scores (14462 multicore, 2041 single-core) and R15 scores (4529 multicore, 297 single-core) follow the same pattern. PassMark results are equally telling: multithread score of 41614, integer math of 147091, floating point math of 105553, and data compression of 510258. The single-thread PassMark score of 3899 places it comfortably in high-end desktop territory.

The CPU's 88th percentile vs all CPUs places it in the top 12% of all processors ever benchmarked. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (0.5% ahead). The i9-13950HX's average benchmark score of 44342 sits in a dead heat with these rivals — the differences are within noise, meaning the i9 is trading blows with mid-range desktop chips and top-tier mobile parts.

The GPU side is dramatically different. The Intel Arc A370M scores 29676 in Geekbench OpenCL and 28673 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 29175 and a 74th percentile vs all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (29197, 0.1% ahead), the AMD FirePro W8000 (29211, 0.1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996, 0.6% behind), and the AMD Radeon RX 6800M (28874, 1% ahead — an odd result given the 6800M's much higher tier, suggesting benchmark variability). The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms 88% of all processors but a GPU that only outperforms 74% of all GPUs — a massive capability gap.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A370M is built on the DG2-128 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. It features 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth at a 1750 MHz memory clock (14 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1550 MHz with a 2050 MHz boost clock.

The memory configuration is the GPU's most significant limitation. A 64-bit bus with 4 GB is entry-level territory, and the 112.0 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck the shading units in texture-heavy scenes. The pixel rate is 65.60 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 131.2 GTexel/s, both reasonable for the class but insufficient for high-resolution gaming. The FP32 throughput of 4.198 TFLOPS and FP16 of 8.397 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate the GPU can handle compute tasks but at a modest scale.

The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the API support is complete: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This means the GPU is feature-complete for modern games, but the raw throughput limits its ability to use those features at high quality settings. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 29676 and Vulkan score of 28673 place it near the AMD Radeon RX 470 (28996), a desktop GPU from 2016. For rendering workloads, the 4 GB VRAM is the hard ceiling — modern 3D scenes with high-resolution textures will exceed this quickly, forcing lower texture quality or reduced scene complexity. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking means it beats roughly a quarter of all GPUs but sits far below the CPU's 88th percentile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in modern titles. Estimated FPS from the benchmark scores suggests competitive esports titles (CS2, Valorant, Rocket League) could run at 100+ FPS at low settings, but AAA games will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at medium settings. The CPU's 11926 max-thread 3DMark score ensures no CPU bottleneck in gaming, but the GPU's 74th percentile means frame rates will be GPU-limited in virtually every scenario.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptional for streaming. The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining game performance. The PassMark multithread score of 41614 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 28681 mean the CPU can handle encoding, scene composition, and background tasks simultaneously without dropping frames. The GPU's 8 RT cores and Xe-HPG architecture do offer AV1 encoding support via Intel's media engine, but the CPU-based approach will be more reliable given the GPU's modest compute resources.

Video editing: The CPU's 88th percentile performance makes it ideal for video editing. The 510258 data compression score and 105553 floating point math score in PassMark indicate strong performance in codec-heavy workloads. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM is a limitation for 4K timelines with effects — proxy workflows will be necessary — but the CPU can handle rendering and export tasks efficiently. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 suggests export times will be short for a laptop.

3D rendering: This is a split verdict. CPU-based rendering (Blender Cycles, V-Ray CPU) will be excellent — the 24 cores deliver near-desktop-class performance. GPU-based rendering (Octane, Redshift GPU) will be severely limited by the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. The 8 RT cores help with ray-traced previews, but production rendering will be CPU-bound by necessity.

Software development: The CPU is superb for compilation, with the 147091 integer math score and 57274 random string sorting score indicating fast code compilation and data processing. The 30805 data encryption score and 29779 extended instructions score show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The GPU is irrelevant for most development work, making this pairing ideal for developers who need a powerful compile machine without gaming ambitions.

Student and office work: This is overkill in the CPU and adequate in the GPU. The 3899 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy productivity, while the 2668 physics score is irrelevant for office tasks. The 4 GB GPU is fine for dual displays and office acceleration, but the system's 90 W combined TDP means battery life will be shorter than lighter configs. Students doing programming or engineering coursework will appreciate the CPU; those doing CAD will hit the GPU's VRAM limits.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a Raptor Lake part, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It has 24 cores and 32 threads — a configuration that uses 8 performance cores and 16 efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not break down the core types. The base clock is 2.20 GHz with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking on capable laptops. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware decode capabilities, though the discrete Arc A370M will handle graphics duties. The CPU's ECC memory support is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and points to workstation aspirations. The 88th percentile vs all CPUs ranking, with an average benchmark score of 44342, places it alongside desktop mid-range chips — the Intel Core i5-13600 (44240) is within 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) is only 0.5% ahead.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8903 is 4.2x the 2-thread score of 2107, and the max-thread score of 11926 is 5.7x the 2-thread result. Cinebench R23 multicore of 28681 is 13.7x the single-core score of 2096 — a strong scaling ratio that indicates the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully. The PassMark data compression score of 510258 is particularly high, suggesting the chip excels at data-heavy workloads like database operations and file compression.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need extreme CPU performance but have modest GPU requirements. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 147091 integer math score and 57274 random string sorting score — build times will be short, and the 32 threads handle parallel test suites effortlessly. Data scientists and analysts working with large datasets will appreciate the 510258 data compression score and 105553 floating point math score, though GPU-accelerated machine learning will hit the 4 GB VRAM ceiling quickly.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU handles MATLAB, simulation tools, and compilation with ease, while the GPU is sufficient for basic visualization and CAD at low-to-medium settings. Small business workstations handling accounting software, database queries, and office productivity will be overpowered by the CPU but will run flawlessly. Content creators who primarily do CPU-based rendering or video encoding will see excellent performance — the 28681 Cinebench R23 multicore score rivals desktop workstations — but those relying on GPU acceleration should look elsewhere.

The combined percentile of 81 places this build above 81% of all systems, but that figure is misleading — the CPU alone is at 88th percentile, and the GPU is at 74th. The system's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU, making it a poor choice for gamers at any resolution above 1080p low settings, but a strong choice for compute-focused users who need a portable workstation-class CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing is the definition of an unbalanced build. The CPU's 88th percentile versus the GPU's 74th percentile creates a scenario where the GPU is the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, estimated FPS will be determined almost entirely by the A370M — the CPU's 11926 max-thread 3DMark score ensures it can feed the GPU far more frames than the GPU can render. The GPU's 112.0 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cause frame drops in texture-heavy scenes, and the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits raw rasterization speed.

For productivity, the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. CPU-bound tasks like compilation (integer math 147091), data compression (510258), and video encoding (Cinebench R23 multicore 28681) will be CPU-limited only by the thermal envelope of the laptop chassis. GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering in GPU-accelerated engines will be limited by the A370M's 4 GB VRAM and 74th percentile compute performance. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 5.50 GHz boost clock mean single-threaded tasks are never constrained, but multi-threaded tasks may be throttled by the 55 W TDP in sustained loads.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, confirms the imbalance: the CPU could support 150+ FPS in most titles at 1080p, but the GPU's 74th percentile suggests it will deliver roughly half that in modern AAA games. The pairRankByFps is null in the data, meaning there is no direct FPS comparison for this combination, but the percentile gap (88 vs 74) is the clearest indicator of where the bottleneck lives.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13950HX, a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX flagship, with the Intel Arc A370M, an entry-level Alchemist mobile GPU. The CPU is a top-tier mobile part with an 88th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 44342, while the GPU sits at 74th percentile with an average score of 29175. The combined percentile is 81, placing the system in the top 19% of all builds — but this figure masks the extreme asymmetry between components.

In practical terms, this is a workstation-class CPU in a chassis with an entry-level discrete GPU. The i9-13950HX delivers desktop-level multi-threaded performance in a mobile form factor, while the Arc A370M provides basic gaming and acceleration capabilities. The system's overall tier is "high-end CPU, mid-low GPU" — it will excel at compute tasks, struggle with modern gaming at high settings, and sit comfortably in the upper echelon of productivity laptops. The 55 W CPU TDP and 35 W GPU TDP make it a relatively efficient system for the processing power on offer, though the 4 GB GPU memory will be the limiting factor for any graphics-heavy application.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming at 1080p?

A: Estimated FPS from benchmark scores suggests it can handle esports titles (CS2, Valorant) at high frame rates with low settings, but AAA games will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at medium settings. The GPU's 74th percentile and 4 GB VRAM are the limiting factors, while the CPU's 88th percentile ensures no processor bottleneck.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded in this laptop?

A: No. The Intel Core i9-13950HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile mount. The CPU is not user-replaceable, and the GPU is similarly integrated in most implementations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D?

A: The i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44342 versus the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 44573, a 0.5% difference. The i9 has 24 cores and 32 threads with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, while the Ryzen 5 is a desktop part — the performance is effectively identical in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The Arc A370M has 112.0 GB/s bandwidth from 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. This is low by modern standards and will bottleneck the 1024 shading units in texture-heavy scenes, causing frame drops when VRAM usage exceeds 4 GB.

Q: Is ECC memory support useful in a laptop?

A: The CPU supports ECC memory (true for the i9-13950HX), which is valuable for workstation tasks like financial modeling or scientific computing where data integrity is critical. However, the laptop's motherboard must support ECC DIMMs, which is rare in consumer mobile platforms.

Q: Can the GPU handle ray tracing?

A: The Arc A370M has 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so hardware ray tracing is available. However, the 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput means ray-traced scenes will run at low frame rates, making the feature impractical for gaming beyond low settings.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX has a launch MSRP of $590. The GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the data.