SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A350M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A350M

24,647 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

This mobile platform pairs a flagship 24-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with Intel's entry-level Arc A350M GPU, and the performance data reveals a stark imbalance between the two components. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 44,342, while the GPU lands at the 70th percentile with an average score of 24,647. That 20-percentage-point gap in percentile ranking tells the story: this is a system where the processor dramatically outclasses the graphics solution.

In CPU-bound workloads, the i9-13950HX will rarely be the limiting factor. Its 3DMark multi-threaded score of 11,926 and Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 28,681 place it firmly in high-end territory, meaning tasks like code compilation, 3D scene preparation, and video encoding will run at speeds limited only by the software's ability to use 32 threads. The GPU, however, becomes the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive scenario. With only 768 shading units, a 64-bit memory bus, and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory delivering 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the Arc A350M will saturate well before the CPU breaks a sweat.

The FPS scaling picture reinforces this imbalance. Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact configuration, estimates from the benchmark scores indicate that in games, the GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 52.80 GPixel/s pixel rate will cap frame rates at 1080p medium-to-high settings, while the CPU's single-thread score of 1,102 in 3DMark and 2,096 in Cinebench R23 could push far higher frame rates if paired with a stronger GPU. This is a system where the processor waits on the graphics card, not the other way around.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,342 places it at the 88th percentile, sitting within 1% of several close rivals. It edges out the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44,309, +0.1%) and the Intel Core i5-13600 (44,240, +0.2%), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44,466, -0.3%) and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573, -0.5%) by similarly narrow margins. The 3DMark results show a healthy scaling curve from 1,102 single-thread to 8,903 at 16 threads and 11,926 at max threads, indicating strong multi-core efficiency. Cinebench R23 scores of 2,096 single-core and 28,681 multi-core confirm the processor's ability to handle both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads with authority.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 24,647 places it at the 70th percentile, with Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results of 24,546 and 24,747 respectively. Its nearest rivals bracket it tightly: the AMD Radeon RX 590 scores 24,744 (-0.4%), the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile scores 24,763 (-0.5%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT scores 24,442 (+0.8%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 scores 24,277 (+1.5%). The combined system percentile of 79 reflects the GPU dragging down what would otherwise be a top-tier mobile workstation.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a desktop-class powerhouse in a laptop chassis, while the GPU is an entry-level mobile part. When evaluating the platform as a whole, the data suggests that CPU-intensive professional workloads will perform at near-desktop levels, while gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited to roughly the performance of a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. It runs at a 2.20 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.50 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that allows for substantial turbo headroom in a well-cooled laptop chassis. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for frequently accessed data.

Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for storage and external devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not needed, though the Arc A350M will handle most graphics tasks.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,614 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 indicate the processor can handle heavily parallel workloads with ease. Integer math scores of 147,091 and floating-point math of 105,553 in PassMark demonstrate strong computational throughput, while data compression (510,258) and encryption (30,805) scores show real-world productivity strength. The single-thread score of 3,899 in PassMark and 1,102 in 3DMark confirm that lightly-threaded applications also run well, thanks to the 5.50 GHz boost clock.

For real workloads, this CPU excels at code compilation, video encoding, 3D scene rendering, and scientific computing. The 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, including many desktop parts. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% in average score, however, indicating that the performance tier is crowded at the top — the i9-13950HX is not a standout among its peers, but it is firmly in elite territory.

# Who Should Build It

This platform targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop but do not require high-end graphics. The primary audience is developers and engineers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, or perform data analysis — tasks that benefit from 32 threads and high single-thread speed. The PassMark data compression score of 510,258 and encryption score of 30,805 indicate strong performance in database work and secure communications.

Content creators working with 2D graphics, audio production, or light video editing will find the CPU more than capable, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Arc A350M. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 suggests rendering times for CPU-based workflows will be competitive with desktop systems, making this a viable choice for animators and architects who rely on CPU rendering engines.

Students in computer science, engineering, or data science programs will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded prowess for compilation and simulation workloads, while the integrated and discrete graphics handle standard productivity and light gaming. Small business workstations running database servers, financial modeling, or ERP software will see excellent responsiveness from the 24-core processor, with the GPU handling basic display output and occasional graphics acceleration.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they primarily play esports titles at lower resolutions, where the CPU's strong single-thread performance can compensate for the GPU's limitations. The system is not suitable for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p or 4K, nor for users who need GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, DaVinci Resolve, or similar applications.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Arc A350M's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will limit frame rates to roughly 60-80 FPS at 1080p in esports titles with reduced settings, based on the GPU's 70th percentile ranking. The CPU can push far higher frame rates, but the GPU becomes the constraint.

Streaming: The i9-13950HX's 32 threads handle encoding workloads easily — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 suggests x264 encoding at high presets without impacting gameplay performance. The GPU's limited shading units (768) mean game capture at high settings will strain the graphics card.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing and preview playback benefit from the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and high single-thread performance (3,899 in PassMark). However, effects that rely on GPU acceleration will be slow, as the A350M's 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 compute is modest for modern editing software.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles will perform well, with the 28,681 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicating render times competitive with desktop workstations. GPU-based rendering will be limited to simple scenes given the GPU's 24,647 average benchmark score.

Software development: Compilation times will be short thanks to 32 threads and high integer math scores (147,091 in PassMark). The 5.50 GHz boost clock keeps single-threaded builds and IDE responsiveness snappy.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (1,102 in 3DMark) ensures smooth office applications, while the GPU handles basic graphics acceleration. The 55 W TDP means the laptop runs efficiently for battery life, though the full CPU performance requires adequate cooling.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact configuration of Intel Core i9-13950HX with Intel Arc A350M. All frame rate figures here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 24,647 — nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 590 and NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile — provide a reference point for expected performance.

At 1080p with ultra settings, most modern AAA titles will run at 30-50 FPS, with lighter esports titles reaching 60-90 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM capacity will become a limiting factor in newer games at higher texture quality, causing stutter or reduced detail levels. The GPU's 64-bit memory bus and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are below what modern gaming GPUs typically offer, so texture-heavy scenes will show performance dips.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (2,096 in Cinebench R23) means that in CPU-bound scenarios or at lower resolutions, frame rates will be limited solely by the GPU. Dropping to medium or low settings will yield playable frame rates in most games, but users should not expect high-refresh experiences beyond 1080p. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring compatibility with modern game engines, though performance will remain modest.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — upgrades to the processor are not possible in a conventional sense. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC enabled, giving users flexibility in system memory choice, though the maximum capacity depends on the laptop's design.

The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes from the CPU provides substantial bandwidth for NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the latter would be limited by the laptop's implementation. The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its performance class. The Arc A350M is a 25 W part, leaving significant thermal and power headroom in the system — the CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 25 W TDP suggests the platform could theoretically support a more powerful GPU in a future laptop revision.

A sensible next upgrade for users of this platform would be to maximize memory capacity and storage speed, as those are the only user-serviceable components. For users who need more graphics performance, an external GPU enclosure over Thunderbolt (if supported by the laptop) would bypass the A350M's limitations, though the data does not confirm Thunderbolt support. The CPU's long-term viability is strong given its 88th percentile ranking, so a future laptop with the same CPU but a higher-tier GPU would be a compelling upgrade path.

# FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13950HX faster than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: Yes, but by a hair. The i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44,342 versus 44,309 for the Ryzen AI Max 385, a delta of +0.1%.

Q: How much VRAM does the Intel Arc A350M have?

A: The Arc A350M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can this laptop handle 4K gaming?

A: No. The GPU's 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 4 GB VRAM are insufficient for 4K gaming at reasonable settings. The CPU could handle it, but the GPU is the bottleneck.

Q: What is the release date of the Intel Core i9-13950HX?

A: The processor was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $590.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13950HX supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer mobile processor and valuable for workstation use.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile?

A: The Arc A350M scores 24,647 on average, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX A5000 Mobile's 24,763. They are effectively performance peers in compute benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance like?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,102, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,096, indicating strong performance for lightly-threaded tasks.

# GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A350M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using the DG2-128 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs, with 6 dedicated ray tracing cores. Clock speeds range from a 1150 MHz base to a 2200 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 112.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute performance is modest: 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 and 6.758 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 and is rated at 25 W TDP, making it an efficient part suitable for thin-and-light laptops.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 24,546 in Geekbench OpenCL and 24,747 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 24,647. This places it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 590 (24,744, -0.4%), NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile (24,763, -0.5%), AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (24,442, +0.8%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 (24,277, +1.5%). The GPU is production status end-of-life, released March 29, 2022.

For rendering workloads, the A350M's ray tracing cores (6) provide hardware-accelerated RT in supported titles, but the low shading unit count and memory bandwidth will limit overall ray-traced performance to low settings or reduced resolutions. The GPU's 70th percentile ranking means it outperforms 70% of all GPUs in the database, but that percentile is driven by a wide field of integrated and entry-level parts. In real-world terms, this GPU performs around the level of a mid-range desktop card from 2019, adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but not for demanding creative workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + Intel Arc A350M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

Intel Arc A350M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds