SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13905H + Intel Arc A370M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13905H

40,313 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A370M

29,175 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13905H pairs with the Intel Arc A370M in a laptop configuration that represents a study in contrasts. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a strong 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU, though capable, sits at the 74th percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a system where the processor is rarely the limiting factor, and the graphics solution dictates the ultimate performance ceiling for visually intensive tasks. The data for this specific combination contains no measured FPS values; all gaming performance discussions are estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores of the individual components.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H mobile variant. It operates on a 10 nm process node, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This configuration, with a 45 W TDP, is designed to deliver high performance in a mobile form factor. The core layout, typical of Raptor Lake, combines performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput and power consumption, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact core type distribution.

The CPU's benchmark results are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, it scores 20,034 points in multi-core and 2,020 points in single-core tests. The multi-core score indicates that the processor can handle heavily threaded workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding with significant headroom. The single-core score of 2,020 is equally important, as it reflects strong performance in tasks that rely on fewer threads, such as many games and everyday applications. In PassMark testing, the CPU achieves a multi-thread score of 29,779 and a single-thread score of 3,703, reinforcing its capability in both parallel and sequential processing.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 40,313, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Xeon 6369P (average score 40,327, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (average score 40,431, deltaPct -0.3), and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (average score 40,246, deltaPct 0.2). The negligible deltaPct values (0.2% or -0.3%) show that the i9-13905H is statistically tied with these other high-end processors, making its performance level a benchmark for top-tier mobile computing. In real workloads, this translates to a CPU that can handle simultaneous compilation, streaming, and gaming without becoming a bottleneck, though the integrated graphics and GPU pairing will limit the visual output.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-core performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,020 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,703. This provides the necessary processing power to feed frames to a high-refresh-rate display in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the Intel Arc A370M GPU, with its 4 GB of memory and 74th percentile ranking, will be the primary constraint on frame rates in modern titles, making it suitable for high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions and settings, but not for pushing maximum frames at high detail.

Streaming: The 14-core, 20-thread configuration, combined with a multi-thread score of 29,779 in PassMark, provides ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The CPU can handle the x264 encoding workload alongside game logic, though offloading to the GPU's fixed-function encoders, which are part of the Arc A370M's feature set, could free up CPU resources for even smoother performance.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,034 suggests that the i9-13905H can handle 4K video editing timelines and export tasks with relative ease. The PassMark floating-point math score of 73,434 further indicates strong capabilities in processing video effects and color grading. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 112.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be a limitation for complex effects and high-resolution previews, but the CPU is more than capable for the core editing workload.

3D Rendering: This is a workload where the CPU excels. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10,605 and the R15 multi-core score of 2,857 demonstrate strong scaling across the 14 cores. For CPU-based renderers, this processor will perform competitively against other high-end mobile chips, as indicated by its near-identical average score to the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H. The GPU, however, is not a primary renderer for this task, so its lower specification is less relevant here.

Software Development: The PassMark data compression score of 354,330 and integer math score of 101,716 are directly relevant to compilation and code execution. These scores are high, indicating that the CPU can reduce build times for large projects. The 20 threads allow for parallel compilation with multiple cores, making this a strong platform for developers, though the 24 MB of shared L3 cache is a factor in how efficiently those threads can share data.

Student and Office Work: For typical productivity tasks, this CPU is overkill. The single-core performance of 2,020 in Cinebench R23 ensures that spreadsheets, word processors, and web browsers operate with zero perceptible lag. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 96EU provides a fallback for display output, and the overall system is responsive enough for any office workload, though the discrete GPU remains idle in these scenarios.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, and the data should be treated as a projection rather than a measured result.

Based on the Intel Arc A370M's average benchmark score of 29,175 and its 74th percentile ranking, this GPU is positioned as an entry-level discrete solution. In gaming terms, the estimated performance is suitable for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in less demanding titles, such as esports games. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 112.0 GB/s bandwidth suggests that texture-heavy games at high resolutions may exceed its memory capacity, leading to stuttering or reduced texture quality. The GPU's architectural features, including 8 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, mean it can render ray-traced effects, but the raw compute power of 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 will likely limit these effects to low or medium quality.

The CPU's gaming potential is significantly higher than the GPU's. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,703 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,020 ensure that the processor will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. In CPU-intensive games, such as strategy or simulation titles, the i9-13905H's performance will be the deciding factor, and it is more than capable of maintaining high frame rates. The overall gaming experience will be defined by the GPU's limits; users should expect frame rates that are playable but not high-end, with a need to adjust settings to achieve smooth performance in modern AAA titles.

Who Should Build It

The Intel Core i9-13905H and Intel Arc A370M pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance in a mobile workstation or high-end productivity laptop. The target user is a content creator who works with video editing or 3D rendering, where the CPU's multi-threaded power, evidenced by its 20,034 Cinebench R23 score, provides tangible benefits. For developers, the CPU's compilation speed, supported by the 101,716 PassMark integer math score, makes it an excellent choice for a portable development machine.

This build is not intended for gamers seeking high-end graphics performance. The Arc A370M's 74th percentile ranking places it below many mainstream GPUs, so gamers should target this system for esports titles and older games where the CPU's strong single-thread performance can shine. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's power for simulations and coding, while small business workstations handling data analysis or financial modeling will find the multi-thread performance sufficient. The build class is a laptop, so this is a complete, portable system, and the target user is someone who needs a powerful processor on the go, with graphics capabilities that are adequate for standard tasks and light gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 81, indicating that it outperforms the majority of systems in the database. The CPU is the dominant component, with an average benchmark score of 40,313, placing it at the 87th percentile. The GPU, Intel Arc A370M, has an average benchmark score of 29,175, placing it at the 74th percentile. The difference in these percentiles highlights the imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier component, while the GPU is a mid-to-low-tier component.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU's multi-core score of 20,034 is a strong indicator of its rendering capability. The GPU's Geekbench scores are 29,676 (OpenCL) and 28,673 (Vulkan). These scores show the GPU's compute performance is decent for its class, but they are not directly comparable to the CPU's scores. The nearest rivals for the CPU include the Intel Xeon 6369P and AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, with deltaPct values of 0 and -0.3, respectively, meaning the i9-13905H is essentially tied with these parts. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH (deltaPct -0.1) and the AMD Radeon RX 470 (deltaPct 0.6), indicating it performs similarly to those older or lower-tier parts. The combined picture is a system that computes very fast but renders graphics at a modest level, making it a productivity-first machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i9-13905H?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 40,313, which places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A370M compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 29,175. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, has a score of 29,197, with a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the Arc A370M is essentially tied in performance.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A370M has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 112.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13905H has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU's performance in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test?

A: The CPU scores 20,034 points in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test.

Q: How many cores and threads does the processor have?

A: The Intel Core i9-13905H has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly indicates that the Intel Arc A370M is the primary bottleneck in this system for graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 87th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 74th percentile ranking shows a significant gap. In gaming, this means that even if the CPU can process game logic and physics at a high rate, the GPU will limit the final frame output. The GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 112.0 GB/s bandwidth are the likely constraints, as modern games require more memory and bandwidth at higher resolutions and detail settings.

For CPU-bound workloads, such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or software compilation, the balance is reversed. The CPU's multi-thread performance, exemplified by its 20,034 Cinebench R23 score, is the deciding factor. The GPU plays a minimal role in these tasks, so its lower performance does not impact the system's capability. The data shows that the i9-13905H's performance is tied with other high-end CPUs like the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, confirming that it is not a bottleneck for any application that relies on the processor.

The FPS scaling in games would be directly tied to the GPU's capabilities. As game settings increase, the demand on the GPU's 4 GB of VRAM and 4.198 TFLOPS of compute power will become the limiting factor. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,703 in PassMark ensures that it can keep up with the GPU, but the opposite is not true. Therefore, users should expect that upgrading the GPU in a future system would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would only benefit specific non-gaming workloads.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs the Intel Core i9-13905H with the Intel Arc A370M. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor from the Raptor Lake family, designed for high performance in portable devices. The GPU is an entry-level discrete graphics solution from Intel's Arc Alchemist series, based on the Xe-HPG architecture and manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC.

The overall tier of this system is defined by its combined percentile of 81, which places it above the majority of systems in the database. However, this ranking is heavily weighted by the CPU's 87th percentile performance. The GPU's 74th percentile performance is respectable but not high-end. This creates a system that is a top-tier productivity and development machine, but a mid-tier gaming or graphics workstation. The build is best described as a high-performance CPU-centric laptop where the GPU provides adequate, but not exceptional, graphics capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13905H is a mobile processor designed for the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform. This means that the CPU itself cannot be upgraded in a traditional sense; the entire laptop motherboard would need to be replaced. The memory support for the CPU is DDR4 and DDR5, operating on a dual-channel bus. The CPU also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, which is reserved for the CPU's direct connections.

The GPU, Intel Arc A370M, is also a soldered component, as its slot width is listed as "IGP" (Integrated Graphics Processor), and its display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent." This indicates that the GPU is not upgradeable and is permanently attached to the laptop's motherboard. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface.

The TDP for the CPU is 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 35 W, totaling 80 W for the core compute components. The FACT PACK does not provide a suggested PSU rating, so power supply headroom is a qualitative concern. Since this is a laptop, the power delivery is handled by the system's charger and battery, and the 80 W combined TDP is a moderate load for a mobile platform.

Given the soldered nature of both the CPU and GPU, a sensible "next upgrade" would not be a component swap. Instead, the upgrade path would be to a new laptop system that offers a higher-tier GPU, such as one with a higher percentile ranking, to better match the CPU's performance. The current system's CPU performance is so high that any future upgrade should focus on improving the graphics subsystem to create a more balanced system, as the data shows the GPU is the current performance limiter.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13905H + Intel Arc A370M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13905H

Intel Arc A370M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds