SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and 10nm process node. Its base clock sits at 1100 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, a substantial dynamic range that lets the chip idle efficiently yet deliver high single-thread performance when demanded. The 35W TDP is remarkably low for a Core i9 part, making this a power-conscious flagship rather than an unlocked overclocker's dream — the multiplier is locked.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool. This large L3 helps with workloads that exhibit cache locality, and the dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in platform memory selection. ECC memory support is present, which is notable for workstation-oriented builds. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor, and integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback display output.

Benchmark results place this chip in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 36517 is a strong result for a 35W part, while the single-core score of 5155 indicates excellent per-thread performance. The Cinebench R20 results show 15337 multi-core and 2165 single-core, and R15 scores are 3680 multi-core and 519 single-core. PassMark numbers paint a similar picture: multi-thread score of 43036, single-thread score of 4177, integer math at 157324, floating point math at 108779, and extended instructions at 29719. Data compression scores 538254, while encryption hits 34415.

The nearest rival comparisons are telling. The Intel Core i9-13900K has an average score of 61766, a delta of -0.1% relative to this chip's 61723 average. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (-0.2%), and the Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (-0.2%). The Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61360, a +0.6% delta. In practical terms, the 13900T trades essentially nothing in average benchmark score against the flagship 13900K, despite its dramatically lower TDP. The data shows this is a remarkably efficient part that sacrifices almost no compute capability.

For real workloads, the 24-core/32-thread configuration means heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will see substantial throughput. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures that lightly threaded applications — office suites, web browsing, single-threaded legacy software — still feel snappy. The combination of high core count and high boost clock is unusual at this TDP, positioning the chip as a workstation-grade processor that can be cooled by modest hardware.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the same socket family as other 13th Gen Core processors. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5, with a dual-channel bus. This means a builder can choose between the cost-effective DDR4 ecosystem or the higher-bandwidth DDR5 modules, depending on motherboard selection and budget constraints. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and current-generation graphics cards, although the paired GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, has a suggested PSU of 300 W and a TDP of 115 W. The CPU's TDP is 35 W, so the combined power draw of this pairing is modest. A 300 W power supply recommendation for the GPU alone suggests that a typical 400-500 W unit would provide ample headroom for the entire system, including drives and peripherals. The RTX 4060 uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. These dimensions make it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve replacing the RTX 4060 with a higher-tier GPU when the user's performance needs outgrow this card's capabilities. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the RTX 4060 means the slot bandwidth is sufficient for current games, but a future GPU with a wider interface would still work on the same motherboard. The CPU itself has substantial headroom — its 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it will not bottleneck a faster GPU in most workloads. The platform supports DDR5 memory, so upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, but the CPU and memory controller are already capable of handling either type. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available across price points. Given the CPU's locked multiplier, overclocking is not an option, so the platform's value lies in its efficiency and core count rather than tuning headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 require a high-wattage power supply?

A: No. The suggested PSU is 300 W, and the GPU's TDP is 115 W. The CPU's TDP is 35 W, so the combined power requirement is modest.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900T support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the i9-13900K in benchmarks?

A: The average benchmark score for the 13900T is 61723, while the 13900K scores 61766. The delta is -0.1%, meaning the 13900T performs essentially identically on average.

Q: What is the PCIe generation and lane count from the CPU?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The RTX 4060 GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

Q: Is the i9-13900T overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz out of the box.

Q: What is the production status of the RTX 4060?

A: The GPU is marked as End-of-life, with the GeForce 50 series listed as its successor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. With that caveat stated, the data indicates a capable 1080p gaming machine.

The RTX 4060's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302 places it in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 17639. Notably, the nearest rival to the RTX 4060 is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, with an average score of 17666 and a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (+0.3%), while the Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (+0.5%) and the Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (+0.7%). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the RTX 4060's benchmark position is tightly clustered with these older or integrated parts — an unusual comparison that suggests the 4060's raw compute is not its primary selling point.

The GPU's actual specifications — 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, 3072 shading units, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores — suggest it is designed for 1080p gaming with ray tracing enabled, where the RT and tensor cores provide acceleration that raw raster performance does not capture. The FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS is respectable but not class-leading. The 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores are the differentiating hardware for DLSS and ray-traced effects.

For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the estimated FPS in esports titles would be well above 100 FPS given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's ability to push moderate frame rates at lower resolutions. AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings would likely see 60-80 FPS, with DLSS enabled providing a meaningful boost. At 1440p, the 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus become limiting factors, and frame rates would drop below the 60 FPS threshold in demanding titles. The 4K resolution is not recommended with this GPU, as the memory bandwidth and capacity are insufficient for high-detail textures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a well-balanced pairing for 1080p gaming, but the bottleneck analysis depends on the workload. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile indicates the processor is the stronger component relative to their respective markets. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as simulation games, real-time strategy, or high-refresh esports — the CPU's single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 means the 13900T can feed frames at very high rates, and the GPU would be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound scenarios — such as AAA titles at high resolutions with ray tracing — the RTX 4060's 61st percentile position becomes the constraint, and the CPU's headroom would go underutilized.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark scores supports this: the CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 36517) is far above what gaming workloads require, while the GPU's 3DMark score of 2302 is moderate. For productivity tasks, the CPU does the heavy lifting, and the GPU's compute capability (PassMark GPU compute score of 9213) is secondary. The PassMark data shows the CPU's floating point math at 108779 and integer math at 157324, indicating strong processing throughput for non-graphics workloads.

The memory subsystem also plays a role. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p but become a constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU's dual-channel memory controller, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, means the system memory bandwidth scales with the chosen memory type, potentially affecting CPU-bound workloads. The combined percentile of this pairing is 77, suggesting that, on average, the two components perform at a consistent tier relative to all possible pairings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2302 indicate that 1080p gaming at high refresh rates is achievable, particularly in esports and competitive titles where frame rates are CPU-limited. The RTX 4060's tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates further.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide enough parallel throughput to handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant frame drops. The PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 and data compression score of 538254 support real-time encoding workloads. The GPU's NVENC encoder, implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture, would offload this task from the CPU.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 and PassMark integer math score of 157324 make this CPU well-suited for video editing timelines, where multi-threaded rendering and export benefit from the 32 threads. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing with effects, though 4K timelines with heavy color grading could strain the memory.

3D rendering: The CPU's average benchmark score of 61723, placing it in the 92nd percentile, means CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications will be fast. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM limits texture-heavy scenes.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the 24-core configuration, and the PassMark extended instructions score of 29719 suggests strong SIMD performance for scientific computing. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds or server-like usage.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4177 in PassMark single-thread and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provide a responsive desktop experience for document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 35W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, appropriate for shared spaces. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but it does not hurt.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need serious CPU compute but do not require top-tier GPU raster performance. The i9-13900T's 92nd percentile CPU ranking makes it a fit for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run multi-threaded workloads. The RTX 4060's 61st percentile GPU ranking serves gamers at 1080p resolution who want ray tracing and DLSS support without the power draw of a larger card.

Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find this build adequate, provided they are willing to adjust settings or use DLSS in demanding titles. Content creators editing 1080p video or rendering 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads. Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance, and the ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity. Students and office workers who also game occasionally will appreciate the quiet operation and low power draw. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive batch jobs but only need basic graphics output could use the integrated GPU and skip the discrete card entirely, though the RTX 4060 adds flexibility for light CAD or media work.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory and a 115W TDP. The combined percentile ranking for this pairing is 77, placing it above the majority of all possible CPU+GPU combinations.

The tier structure is asymmetric: the CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This means the build's overall tier is driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional performance, with the GPU serving as a mid-range complement. The CPU's nearest rival is the Core i9-13900K, which it trails by just 0.1% on average score, despite the 13900T's dramatically lower power envelope. The GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, a much older part, which it beats by 0.2%. This unusual rival list for the GPU suggests that raw benchmark scores do not capture the RTX 4060's modern features like ray tracing and DLSS.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900T achieves an average benchmark score of 61723, ranking in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Core i9-13900K, scores 61766, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 13900T is statistically tied with the flagship unlocked part. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (-0.2%), and the Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (-0.2%). The Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61360 (+0.6% delta from the 13900T's perspective). In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 36517 and single-core is 5155. PassMark multi-thread scores 43036, and single-thread scores 4177.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 achieves an average benchmark score of 17639, ranking in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (+0.3%), the Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (+0.5%), and the Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (+0.7%). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2302. PassMark G3D scores 19545, and GPU compute scores 9213. Geekbench OpenCL scores 95057, and Vulkan scores 48643.

The combined picture is a system with extraordinary CPU headroom and adequate-but-not-class-leading GPU performance. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking against the GPU's 61st percentile means that, in mixed workloads, the processor will rarely be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 77 reflects this asymmetry. The data shows a build that excels at productivity and compute, handles 1080p gaming well, and leaves a clear upgrade path for the GPU without needing to replace the CPU or platform.