SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900T and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM form a desktop pairing that targets a specific performance niche: high-end multi-threaded productivity combined with solid 1440p-class rasterization. Because no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores, not from direct game testing. The CPU’s 35 W base TDP and the GPU’s 220 W TDP create an interesting dynamic where the processor is heavily power-constrained relative to its full 24-core potential, while the graphics card operates closer to its intended performance envelope.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance of this system is defined by a stark contrast in energy allocation. The Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost of 5.30 GHz, yet its TDP is only 35 W. This is a deliberate power-limiting design, often found in space-constrained or thermally-limited prebuilt systems. The benchmark data confirms that this restraint does not cripple the CPU: it scores 36517 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K, scores 61766 in average benchmark score, a delta of only -0.1% from the 13900T’s 61723 average. This indicates that in sustained multi-threaded workloads, the T-series chip is remarkably close to the flagship K-series part, likely due to the boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz on lighter loads.

The bottleneck situation shifts depending on the workload type. For gaming, the RTX 3070 TiM with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit bus is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions, but the CPU’s single-core performance is not a weak point. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 is strong, and the PassMark single-thread score of 4177 confirms that the 13900T handles lightly-threaded tasks without issue. Data from PassMark integer math (157324) and floating-point math (108779) shows the CPU can feed the GPU with ample data. However, the GPU’s percentile rank is 50, meaning half of all GPUs are faster, so in graphically intensive games at 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint. In CPU-heavy simulations or physics calculations, the PassMark physics score of 2497 is relatively modest compared to the multi-thread score of 43036, suggesting that the power limit may throttle sustained all-core workloads more than bursty tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the specific memory bandwidth figures are not available in the data. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop chip and benefits workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity is provided through Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, allowing for a fast connection to modern storage and expansion cards. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible and fully sufficient for the RTX 3070 TiM.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, which is a modest requirement given the GPU’s 220 W TDP. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is exceptionally low, so the overall system power draw is manageable. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities in Cinebench R23 (36517) suggest it can handle heavy multitasking, and more RAM would prevent memory pressure in creative applications. The GPU’s production status is end-of-life, so upgrading the graphics card later to a newer generation would be the logical step, but the CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for years. The socket 1700 platform is mature, so a future upgrade would likely require a new motherboard.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a Raptor Lake-S architecture processor built on a 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 24 cores and 32 threads, arranged in a hybrid layout of performance and efficiency cores, though the data does not specify the exact core distribution. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for a low-power chip. The base clock of 1100 MHz is very low, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, which explains the strong single-core performance. The launch MSRP is $549, and the multiplier is locked, preventing manual overclocking.

Benchmark results show a processor that punches above its power class. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3680 and single-core score of 519 are solid, but the R20 scores (15337 multi, 2165 single) and R23 scores (36517 multi, 5155 single) demonstrate scaling in newer workloads. PassMark results are mixed: the multi-thread score of 43036 is excellent, but the find prime numbers score of 175 is low, suggesting that certain integer-heavy algorithms are constrained by the power limit. Data compression (538254) and encryption (34415) scores are high, making this CPU effective for file archiving and secure communication tasks. The extended instructions score of 29719 indicates good AVX-512 or similar vector performance, useful for scientific computing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, but all gaming is handled by the discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need heavy multi-threaded CPU performance but have power or thermal limits. The CPU’s 92nd percentile rank makes it suitable for content creators who render video or 3D scenes, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 indicates strong rendering capability. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the high multi-thread score and 32 threads. Students in engineering or computer science fields can run simulations and virtual machines without system slowdowns, and the low CPU TDP of 35 W helps keep dorm-room setups quiet. Small business workstations handling data encryption (PassMark score 34415) or compression (538254) will see efficient throughput.

For gamers, the RTX 3070 TiM’s 50th percentile rank means it is an average GPU, so the build is not aimed at competitive high-refresh gaming at maximum settings. Instead, it suits gamers who play at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings and also use the system for productivity. The CPU’s single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 ensures that games requiring strong per-core performance will run smoothly. This is not a build for those seeking maximum frame rates, but rather a balanced workstation that can also game.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this specific CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the processor and the known class of the graphics card. The RTX 3070 TiM has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with a boost clock of 1410 MHz. The GPU’s pixel rate is 135.4 GPixel/s and texture rate is 259.4 GTexel/s, which provides a baseline for rasterization throughput. The 8 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be limiting for 4K textures.

At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-core performance (PassMark single-thread 4177) will allow the GPU to reach its full potential, and the estimated frame rates in esports titles like competitive shooters would be high, likely exceeding 100 FPS on medium settings. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the stronger factor, and the 50th percentile rank suggests average performance, so frame rates would be lower, typically in the 60-90 FPS range for demanding AAA titles. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM could cause texture-related stuttering, and the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest for 4K, leading to estimated frame rates below 60 FPS in many games. The CPU’s low base clock of 1100 MHz means that in games with poor multi-threaded scaling, the constant boost to 5.30 GHz is critical, and the data suggests it maintains that boost effectively based on the high single-core scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is an Ampere architecture GPU built on an 8 nm process node by Samsung, with a die size of 392 mm² and 17,400 million transistors. The chip is GA104, and it includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features like DLSS. The base clock is 915 MHz and the boost clock is 1410 MHz, which is lower than some full-power variants of the same chip, likely due to thermal or power constraints in a mobile or compact form factor. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective, across a 256-bit bus for 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory is a point of consideration; it is sufficient for current games at 1080p and 1440p, but the 50th percentile rank indicates that many GPUs outperform it. The FP32 performance of 16.60 TFLOPS is the same as FP16 (1:1), which is unusual and suggests the compute units are not optimized for half-precision. For rendering tasks, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The TDP of 220 W and suggested PSU of 550 W are moderate, and the triple-slot cooler with 1x 8-pin power connector suggests a substantial cooling solution. The GPU is end-of-life, so new stock may be scarce, but the benchmark scores (which are listed as zero in the data) do not provide a specific performance figure, leaving the percentile rank and specifications as the primary indicators.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 5155 ensures high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU’s 50th percentile rank limits maximum FPS. At 1080p, the RTX 3070 TiM can push high frame rates in less demanding titles, but ultra settings in modern games may drop below 144 FPS.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 43036, can handle software encoding at high quality while gaming, reducing the need for the GPU’s NVENC encoder. The low power draw of 35 W means less heat and noise during long streams.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 indicates fast export times in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, and the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth helps with real-time timeline scrubbing of 4K footage, though 8 GB VRAM may limit complex effects.

3D rendering: In Blender or Maya, the CPU’s multi-thread performance is strong, but the GPU’s 16.60 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is moderate, so GPU rendering would be slower than a higher-tier card. The CPU’s 36 MB of L3 cache helps with scene data.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 32 threads, and the PassMark data compression score of 538254 speeds up build artifact packaging. The ECC memory support reduces crashes in long-running test suites.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4177 makes everyday applications feel responsive, and the low TDP keeps power bills down. The integrated graphics provide a backup if the GPU fails.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, which is very low for a 24-core processor. Despite this, it boosts to 5.30 GHz and scores 36517 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, matching the performance of the 13900K within 0.1% in average benchmark score.

Q: Does this system support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The specific bandwidth figures are not provided, but both types are compatible.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 3070 TiM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may be limiting at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning manual overclocking is not supported. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is the maximum attainable.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage?

A: The GPU suggests a 550 W power supply, which is modest given the CPU’s 35 W TDP. The GPU itself has a 220 W TDP.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This is backward compatible and provides sufficient bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU’s production status?

A: The GPU is end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production. The CPU is still active.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61723, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-13900K with an average score of 61766, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 13900T is essentially identical in overall performance. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (delta -0.2%), and the 13900KF scores 61841 (delta -0.2%). The Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360, which is 0.6% lower. In specific tests, the 13900T achieves 36517 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 5155 in single-core, with PassMark multi-thread at 43036.

The GPU’s percentile rank is 50, with an average benchmark score listed as zero, meaning no direct benchmark scores are available for comparison. The GPU has no nearest rivals listed. The combined percentile of the CPU and GPU is 71, indicating that the system as a whole outperforms 71% of all possible pairings. The absence of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is inferred from the CPU’s high percentile and the GPU’s mid-range percentile, suggesting a system that is strong for productivity but average for gaming.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (class: desktop) that pairs a top-tier low-power CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 35 W TDP and a 92nd percentile ranking, making it one of the best multi-threaded performers available for its power envelope. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM is a 30-series Ampere GPU with 8 GB VRAM and a 50th percentile rank, representing average graphics performance. The combined percentile of 71 reflects a system that is well above average overall, driven primarily by the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded capability.

The build is best understood as a workstation-first, gaming-second configuration. The CPU’s performance in Cinebench and PassMark benchmarks indicates that it can handle demanding rendering, compilation, and data processing tasks with ease, matching the flagship 13900K within 0.1%. The GPU, while not a top-tier performer, is capable of smooth 1080p and 1440p gaming and supports ray tracing and DLSS through its dedicated RT and tensor cores. The low CPU TDP means the system can be built with a modest cooler, and the 550 W suggested PSU keeps power consumption reasonable. This pairing is ideal for users who need serious compute power but do not prioritize maximum gaming frame rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds