SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A380

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A380

8,558 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A380: A Study in Asymmetry

This desktop pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel Core i9-13900T with a 6 GB Intel Arc A380, creating one of the most lopsided CPU-to-GPU performance ratios in the benchmark database. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 44th percentile of all graphics cards — a 48-percentile gap that defines every workload discussion. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, so the following gaming analysis is estimated purely from benchmark scores. The Arc A380's PassMark G3D score of 6252 and its 44th percentile ranking among all GPUs place it firmly in entry-level territory. The GPU's nearest rivals — the AMD FirePro W5170M (avg score 8595, 0.4% ahead), AMD Radeon HD 8870M (1.1% behind), NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (1.2% behind), and AMD Radeon 880M (1.4% behind) — are all mobile or legacy parts, suggesting the A380 competes with integrated-class graphics rather than modern discrete cards.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 186.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest playable frame rates only in older or less demanding titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 35 in PassMark and DirectX 11 score of 38 indicate that modern API titles will stress the hardware significantly. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but with only 1024 shading units and 32 ROPs, ray-traced scenes would likely see frame rates drop below playable thresholds even at 1080p.

The i9-13900T's CPU performance — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 and single-core score of 5155 — ensures that the CPU will never be the limiting factor in gaming. Even at 720p, where CPU overhead is highest, this processor can feed frames far faster than the A380 can render them. The practical outcome is that gamers would need to reduce resolution to 720p or drop settings to low/medium to achieve smooth frame rates in modern titles, with the A380's 6 GB VRAM potentially becoming a bottleneck at higher texture quality settings.

At 1440p and 4K, the A380's 96-bit memory bus and 186.0 GB/s bandwidth become critical constraints. The pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s are indicative of a card designed for 1080p gaming at moderate settings. Frame rates at higher resolutions would likely fall below 30 FPS in demanding titles, making this pairing unsuitable for high-resolution gaming despite the CPU's immense headroom.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61723 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i9-13900K (avg score 61766, 0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0.2% ahead), Intel Core i9-13900KF (61841, 0.2% ahead), and Intel Xeon 636 (61360, 0.6% behind). This clustering shows the 13900T delivers flagship-tier multi-threaded performance despite its 35 W TDP, coming within 0.2% of the unlocked 13900K in average benchmark scores.

Specific CPU scores reveal the processor's strengths: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36517, R20 multi-core at 15337, and R15 multi-core at 3680. Single-core performance is equally impressive with R23 single-core at 5155 and R20 single-core at 2165. PassMark integer math scores 157324, floating-point math scores 108779, and extended instructions score 29719, indicating strong compute throughput across varied workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 8558 places it in the 44th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6252 illustrate entry-level rasterization performance. OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 38224 and 36736 respectively show moderate compute capability, while the PassMark GPU compute score of 2762 lags behind, suggesting the A380 is better suited to graphics than general-purpose compute.

The combined percentile of 68 for this pairing reflects the dominant influence of the CPU's high percentile position, but the GPU's sub-50th percentile ranking drags the overall system below what the processor alone would suggest. The data shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but struggles in GPU-intensive workloads, creating a combined profile that is neither fully high-end nor fully balanced.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The bottleneck analysis here is unambiguous: the GPU limits every graphics-intensive workload. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 44th percentile creates a 48-point gap that manifests in all gaming and rendering scenarios. Even at low resolutions where CPU overhead is highest, the A380's modest 6252 PassMark G3D score and 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput would cap frame rates well below what the i9-13900T could theoretically support.

Evidence from FPS scaling patterns, while estimated, supports this conclusion. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as 720p gaming with low settings — the i9-13900T's 5155 single-core Cinebench R23 score and 4177 PassMark single-thread score would allow high frame rates, but the A380's rendering pipeline would still limit output to roughly what the GPU can produce. The GPU's 65.60 GPixel/s pixel rate and 131.2 GTexel/s texture rate define hard ceilings that no CPU can overcome.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or data compression, the GPU becomes irrelevant. The i9-13900T's PassMark data compression score of 538254 and data encryption score of 34415 show the CPU operating at full potential, with the A380 contributing nothing. The GPU's 2762 PassMark GPU compute score would actually hinder compute-heavy tasks if offloaded, making CPU-only execution preferable.

The practical bottleneck profile is therefore workload-dependent: the GPU limits gaming and real-time rendering, while the CPU dominates productivity and compute tasks. This asymmetry is not inherently problematic, but it means the system's overall capability is defined by whichever component the specific application uses most heavily.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: This pairing cannot achieve high-refresh gaming. The A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking and 6252 PassMark G3D score limit frame rates to approximately 30-60 FPS at 1080p in most titles, far below the 144 Hz or higher targets associated with high-refresh displays. The i9-13900T's 5155 single-core R23 score ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU simply cannot produce enough frames.

Streaming: The i9-13900T's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a 36517 multi-core R23 score, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The A380's 8 RT cores and 1024 shading units would handle the gaming load, though at reduced quality settings. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43036 suggests streaming at 1080p60 is feasible without dedicated encoding hardware, though the GPU's modest performance may require lower game settings.

Video editing: The CPU's 157324 PassMark integer math score and 108779 floating-point math score accelerate timeline scrubbing, effect processing, and export encoding. The A380's 186.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM can handle 1080p previews, but the GPU's 44th percentile ranking means hardware-accelerated effects would be limited. Export times would be CPU-bound, favoring this processor's multi-core strength.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D would excel, with the i9-13900T's 36517 multi-core R23 score providing near-flagship performance. GPU rendering, however, would be severely constrained by the A380's 4.198 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 2762 PassMark GPU compute score, making GPU-accelerated rendering impractical for professional workloads.

Software development: The i9-13900T's 538254 PassMark data compression score and 34415 data encryption score speed up code compilation, package management, and build pipelines. The 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. The A380 is irrelevant here, making this an excellent development workstation CPU.

Student and office work: Both components are overkill for basic productivity. The i9-13900T's 4177 PassMark single-thread score handles document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with massive headroom, while the A380's 610 PassMark G2D score supports 2D acceleration. However, the 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP make this an energy-efficient pairing for academic use, despite the high initial cost.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The i9-13900T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, providing ample bandwidth for high-end storage and future GPU upgrades. The CPU's 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core processor, and the suggested PSU of 250 W for the GPU indicates the current system draws minimal power.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Arc A380 with a significantly more powerful GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile performance ensures it would not bottleneck even top-tier graphics cards, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide future-proofing. The 250 W suggested PSU leaves headroom for a GPU with higher power requirements, though the exact wattage of any replacement would depend on the specific model.

Memory is another upgrade avenue. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, and while the FACT PACK does not specify speed support, the dual-channel configuration and 36 MB L3 cache suggest that faster memory could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is notable for workstation use, though consumer motherboards may not enable this feature.

The platform's socket compatibility means users could also upgrade to other 13th-generation or 14th-generation processors on the same motherboard, though the 13900T already sits near the top of the stack. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes support multiple NVMe drives or a single high-bandwidth GPU, making the platform suitable for content creation workstations.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Arc A380 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Arc A380 has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 15.5 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The i9-13900T ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61723, placing it within 0.2% of the Core i9-13900K.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc A380 has 8 RT cores, and its architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Arc A380 ranks in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 8558, comparable to the AMD Radeon 880M (1.4% higher).

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The i9-13900T has a 35 W TDP and uses Intel Socket 1700, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and have minimal GPU requirements. The i9-13900T's 92nd percentile CPU ranking and 36517 multi-core R23 score make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running data analysis, and professionals using CPU-based rendering engines. The 538254 PassMark data compression score and 34415 data encryption score suit database administrators and security professionals handling large datasets.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications — such as audio production, video encoding with software codecs, or batch photo processing — would benefit from the processor's 32 threads and 36 MB L3 cache. The A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking and 6 GB VRAM limit GPU-accelerated tasks, so users requiring GPU rendering should look elsewhere.

Students in computer science or engineering programs would appreciate the CPU's multi-core strength for compilation and simulation workloads, though the GPU's modest performance means gaming or graphics coursework would be constrained. Small business workstations running virtualization, database servers, or financial modeling would leverage the CPU's 157324 integer math score effectively.

The energy efficiency of this pairing — 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP — makes it attractive for always-on workstations or office environments where power consumption matters. However, the launch MSRP of $549 for the CPU alone positions this as a premium investment, despite the GPU's budget-tier status.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build combining a flagship-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The i9-13900T's 92nd percentile CPU ranking and 61723 average benchmark score place it among the fastest processors available, while the Arc A380's 44th percentile GPU ranking and 8558 average score position it at the bottom of discrete graphics. The combined percentile of 68 reflects this asymmetry, placing the overall system in the upper-midrange tier despite the GPU's modest capabilities.

The build class is desktop, confirmed by the buildClass field, with the CPU's Intel Socket 1700 and the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface designed for desktop motherboards. The 35 W CPU TDP and 75 W GPU TDP are exceptionally low for a desktop system, suggesting a compact or energy-efficient build is possible. The GPU's dual-slot design and 222 mm length require a standard mid-tower case, but the low power draw means cooling requirements are minimal.

This pairing represents an unusual configuration: a processor typically found in high-end workstations paired with a graphics card closer to integrated graphics in performance. The system excels at CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing while struggling with GPU-accelerated workloads. Users seeking balanced performance should consider a more powerful GPU, while those with CPU-centric workloads will find the i9-13900T's performance unmatched at this power level.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock of 1100 MHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, allowing the CPU to scale from power-efficient operation to high-performance bursts. The 35 W TDP is exceptional for a 24-core processor, indicating aggressive power management that limits sustained all-core loads but preserves single-thread performance.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache, providing substantial data locality for multi-threaded workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support for reliability-critical applications. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU enable high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion.

Benchmark scores reveal the practical implications: the 36517 multi-core R23 score demonstrates near-flagship multi-threaded performance, while the 5155 single-core R23 score ensures responsive single-threaded applications. The PassMark multithread score of 43036 and floating-point math score of 108779 indicate strong scientific computing capability. The 538254 data compression score and 34415 encryption score show excellent throughput for data-heavy workloads.

The 13900T's nearest rival, the Core i9-13900K, scores only 0.1% higher on average despite having a higher TDP and unlocked multiplier. This suggests the 13900T offers nearly identical performance to the flagship 13900K in most workloads, making it an attractive option for users who prioritize energy efficiency without sacrificing compute power. The 4177 PassMark single-thread score confirms that even at 1100 MHz base clock, the processor can boost to competitive single-thread performance.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Intel Arc A380 is built on the Xe-HPG architecture (Alchemist generation) using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 186.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 15.5 Gbps effective. The base clock of 2000 MHz boosts to 2050 MHz, delivering 4.198 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8.397 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio).

The GPU's 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs define its rasterization capabilities, with a pixel rate of 65.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 131.2 GTexel/s. The 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, though the modest compute resources limit ray tracing performance. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility.

Rendering performance, as indicated by benchmark scores, is entry-level. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 808 and PassMark G3D score of 6252 place the A380 in the 44th percentile of all GPUs, comparable to mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (1.2% faster) and AMD Radeon 880M (1.4% faster). The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 38 and DirectX 12 score of 35 suggest that modern game engines will strain the GPU.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 2762 PassMark GPU compute score and 38224 OpenCL score indicate limited compute throughput. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may be insufficient for 1440p or 4K rendering scenes. The 186.0 GB/s bandwidth is a bottleneck for memory-intensive rendering, and the 96-bit bus restricts data throughput. The GPU's 75 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU indicate low power requirements, but the end-of-life production status and 149 USD launch MSRP suggest this is a legacy product with limited future support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A380

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

Intel Arc A380

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds