SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A310E

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A310E

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Analysis: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A310E

This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel Raptor Lake desktop processor with a compact Intel Arc A310E graphics card built on the Xe-HPG architecture. The data in this analysis is derived exclusively from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Consequently, all gaming performance discussions are estimates extrapolated from the processor's strong multi-core and single-thread results and the GPU's mid-pack percentile standing.

Gaming Performance

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, gaming performance must be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores. The Intel Core i9-13900T achieves a single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and 4177 in Passmark single-thread tests, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This level of single-thread performance suggests the processor will not be the limiting factor in gaming workloads, as modern game engines typically rely heavily on one or two primary threads for game logic and draw call submission.

The Intel Arc A310E sits in the 50th percentile among all GPUs, indicating it delivers roughly average performance relative to the broader GPU landscape. With 768 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines, this GPU is architecturally positioned for entry-level 1080p gaming. The 4 GB GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which will constrain texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions or with high-detail settings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely fall into the playable-but-not-high-refresh territory for most titles. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 32.00 GPixel/s provide a baseline for understanding raw rendering capability. For esports titles and older games, this GPU could deliver smooth 60+ FPS experiences, but for modern AAA releases, the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 64-bit memory bus will likely force reductions in texture quality and shadow detail to maintain acceptable performance.

The 13900T's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.30 GHz boost clock help mitigate CPU-side bottlenecks in gaming scenarios, but the Arc A310E's 50th percentile standing means the GPU will be the primary constraint in graphically intensive scenes. At 1440p or 4K, the estimated performance drops significantly due to the limited memory bandwidth and modest fill rates. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is particularly concerning for modern games that frequently exceed this allocation at high resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61723 places it in the 92nd percentile of all processors, demonstrating exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the 13900T scores 36517 in multi-core and 5155 in single-core, with the multi-core result being particularly impressive given the processor's 35 W TDP. The Cinebench R20 scores of 15337 multi-core and 2165 single-core follow the same pattern, reinforcing the processor's balanced strength across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The Passmark suite reveals specialized strengths: data compression scores 538254, floating-point math reaches 108779, and integer math hits 157324. These figures indicate robust performance in data-intensive and computational tasks. The multithread score of 43036 and single-thread score of 4177 confirm the processor's dual nature — strong in both parallel and serial execution. The extended instructions score of 29719 suggests solid SIMD and vector processing capability, beneficial for scientific computing and media encoding workloads.

The GPU's benchmark data is notably absent, with an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. However, its 50th percentile standing among all GPUs provides a relative positioning anchor. The combined percentile for this build is 71, reflecting the substantial gap between the CPU's high-tier performance and the GPU's mid-pack capability. The nearest rivals to the 13900T include the Intel Core i9-13900K with an average score of 61766 (deltaPct -0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (deltaPct -0.2%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (deltaPct -0.2%). The Intel Xeon 636 trails slightly at 61360 (deltaPct 0.6%). These minuscule deltas indicate the 13900T performs essentially identically to its higher-TDP siblings in average benchmark terms, which is a remarkable finding given the power envelope difference.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T features 24 cores and 32 threads, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock of 1100 MHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, providing a substantial dynamic range. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 2 MB per core, and L3 is 36 MB shared — a cache hierarchy that supports both latency-sensitive single-threaded workloads and high-throughput multi-threaded tasks.

The 35 W TDP is the standout specification here, as this processor delivers near-flagship performance while consuming a fraction of the power of its higher-clocked counterparts. The ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 compatibility make this CPU suitable for workstation reliability scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 20 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark results indicate the 13900T excels in content creation and compilation workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 positions it among the top tier of desktop processors, and the Passmark multithread score of 43036 corroborates this. The data encryption score of 34415 and find prime numbers score of 175 suggest competent cryptographic and mathematical performance, though the prime number result is modest in absolute terms. The random string sorting score of 63358 indicates strong sorting algorithm performance, relevant for database and data processing applications.

The 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs means this processor outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, making it a compelling choice for compute-heavy workflows. The near-identical average benchmark score to the 13900K (deltaPct -0.1%) suggests the T-series power limiting has minimal impact on sustained multi-threaded workloads, which is counterintuitive given the massive TDP difference. This efficiency could be attributed to the Raptor Lake architecture's ability to maintain high boost frequencies even under thermal constraints.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck profile. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile means the Arc A310E will be the constraining component in GPU-bound workloads such as gaming and 3D rendering. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this imbalance, indicating the build's overall performance is dragged down by the graphics subsystem.

In gaming scenarios, the 13900T's single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 ensures the CPU can feed frames to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. However, the GPU's modest 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 124.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The FPS scaling across resolutions would show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the 4 GB VRAM becoming a hard limit at higher settings.

For compute workloads, the bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU. The CPU's 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 157324 Passmark integer math score indicate massive parallel processing capability, while the GPU's 768 shading units represent a comparatively small parallel compute resource. Tasks like video encoding, physics simulation, and data processing that leverage CPU instruction sets (as evidenced by the 29719 extended instructions score) will run at a speed commensurate with the CPU's high percentile, while GPU-accelerated tasks will operate at the GPU's 50th percentile level.

The memory subsystem further reinforces this imbalance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 with ECC capability, while the GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus provides 124.0 GB/s bandwidth. For workloads that alternate between CPU and GPU phases, the transition will consistently favor the CPU's capability, creating a system that often waits on the GPU to complete its portion of the work.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A310E is built on the Xe-HPG architecture using TSMC's 6 nm process, with 7,200 million transistors on a 157 mm² die. The GPU operates at a fixed 2000 MHz for both base and boost clocks, with memory running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective). The 4 GB GDDR6 memory configuration on a 64-bit bus yields 124.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a figure that will challenge texture-heavy workloads but suffices for lighter gaming and compute tasks.

The GPU includes 768 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, producing pixel and texture rates of 32.00 GPixel/s and 64.00 GTexel/s respectively. The FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS and FP16 of 6.144 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) indicate the GPU can accelerate certain compute workloads, though the modest shading unit count limits absolute throughput. Six ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the low overall compute throughput means ray tracing performance will be limited compared to higher-tier GPUs.

With 6 nm process technology and a 75 W TDP, the A310E is highly power-efficient. The single-slot design with no power connectors and a suggested PSU of 250 W makes this GPU exceptionally easy to integrate into compact or low-power systems. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the GPU's memory subsystem, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 outputs support modern high-resolution displays.

The GPU's 50th percentile standing places it at the midpoint of all GPUs, meaning it outperforms half of the GPU market. Given its compact form factor and low power requirements, this level of performance is notable. However, the 4 GB VRAM capacity is the most significant limitation, as modern games and professional applications increasingly require 6 GB or more. The API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with current software, but the hardware resources will constrain performance in demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute performance while maintaining a compact, low-power GPU footprint. The 92nd percentile CPU with its 35 W TDP makes this an exceptional choice for developers and researchers who compile large codebases or run multi-threaded simulations. The Passmark multithread score of 43036 and data compression score of 538254 indicate strong performance for software development workloads, including build servers and continuous integration runners.

Small business workstations handling office productivity, financial modeling, and database operations would benefit from the CPU's encryption score of 34415 and random string sorting score of 63358. For students in computer science or engineering programs, the 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles compilation and numerical analysis tasks efficiently, while the GPU's 50th percentile performance is adequate for casual gaming and basic graphics work.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-bound workflows — such as video encoding with x264/x265, audio processing, or batch image manipulation — will find the 13900T's 157324 integer math and 108779 floating-point math scores highly beneficial. The GPU can handle light video editing acceleration, but its 4 GB memory and 64-bit bus will limit 4K video editing or complex effects work. For 3D rendering, the CPU's 36517 Cinebench R23 score excels at CPU-based rendering engines, while GPU rendering would be constrained by the A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS throughput.

The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 71 suggests this system sits above average overall, though the GPU brings the total down from what the CPU alone would achieve. Users seeking a system that excels at compute-heavy tasks while providing entry-level gaming capability would find this pairing appropriate. Those whose primary use is gaming at 1080p with moderate settings would also be served, albeit with the understanding that the GPU is the limiting factor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The 13900T's 5155 single-core Cinebench R23 score ensures the CPU can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the Arc A310E's 50th percentile position and 124.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance below what high-refresh monitors require in most modern games. Esports titles with modest GPU demands could achieve 60+ FPS, but 144 Hz or higher refresh rates will be challenging.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with the 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, provide ample headroom for x264 software encoding while gaming. The 538254 data compression score indicates efficient encoding performance. However, the GPU's limited encoding resources (6 RT cores, 768 shading units) may not significantly accelerate streaming workloads, shifting the burden to the CPU.

Video editing: The 13900T's 157324 integer math and 108779 floating-point math scores handle timeline editing and effects processing effectively. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will struggle with 4K timelines and complex color grading, though 1080p editing with light effects is feasible. The FP16 throughput of 6.144 TFLOPS provides some acceleration for supported effects.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines will perform excellently, with the 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score representing high throughput. GPU-based rendering will be limited by the A310E's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB memory, making complex scenes with large geometry or high-resolution textures problematic.

Software development: The 43036 Passmark multithread score accelerates code compilation, and the 29719 extended instructions score supports SIMD-optimized code. The 538254 data compression score speeds up build artifact compression and decompression. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The 4177 single-thread Passmark score ensures responsive everyday applications, while the 35 W TDP keeps power consumption low for always-on workstations. The GPU's 50th percentile performance handles office graphics and basic presentation rendering without issue, and the 4x mini-DisplayPort outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900T, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, with the Intel Arc A310E, a 75 W single-slot GPU from the Alchemist generation. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and 61723 average benchmark score place it among the top desktop processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile position represents mid-pack graphics capability.

The combined percentile of 71 indicates this system outperforms approximately 71% of all benchmarked configurations, driven primarily by the exceptional CPU performance. The processor's near-identical average benchmark score to the 13900K (deltaPct -0.1%) demonstrates that the T-series power limiting does not meaningfully sacrifice compute throughput, making this an unusually efficient high-performance configuration.

The 10 nm Raptor Lake CPU with 36 MB L3 cache and 5.30 GHz boost clock delivers flagship-level compute, while the 6 nm DG2-128 GPU with 768 shading units and 4 GB GDDR6 provides entry-level graphics. This pairing is fundamentally CPU-centric, with the GPU serving as a capable companion for light gaming and basic graphics acceleration rather than a high-end rendering solution.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 71, indicating that this system outperforms approximately 71% of all benchmarked configurations, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900T compare to the Core i9-13900K in average benchmark score?

A: The 13900T has an average benchmark score of 61723, which is only 0.1% lower than the 13900K's score of 61766, despite the significantly lower 35 W TDP.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have?

A: The Arc A310E has 124.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, provided by 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus running at 1937 MHz (15.5 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the power consumption of each component?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 75 W TDP, with a suggested PSU rating of 250 W for the overall system.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 6 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities, though the overall throughput is limited.

Q: What is the production status of each component?

A: The CPU is marked as Active in production, while the GPU is End-of-life, with its successor being Battlemage.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configurations. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards. The integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will operate at the interface's supported speed. The suggested PSU of 250 W provides ample headroom for the combined 110 W TDP of the CPU and GPU, leaving room for additional storage drives, fans, or modest expansions without requiring a PSU upgrade.

For a sensible next upgrade, replacing the Arc A310E with a higher-performance GPU would unlock the CPU's full potential in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile performance and PCIe Gen 5 support ensure it can drive any modern GPU without becoming a bottleneck. The 35 W TDP CPU also leaves thermal and power headroom for a more power-hungry graphics card, though the system's PSU would likely need upgrading to accommodate a GPU with higher power requirements.

Given the CPU's ECC memory support and 36 MB L3 cache, this platform is well-suited for workstation environments. The DDR4 and DDR5 memory compatibility provides flexibility in choosing memory based on availability and budget considerations. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU support high-speed storage configurations, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a reliable backup for troubleshooting or light office use without the discrete GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + Intel Arc A310E

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

Intel Arc A310E

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds