SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900T paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 is a desktop configuration that ranks in the 84th percentile overall, combining a top-tier 24-core CPU with a solid mid-range GPU. The most striking aspect of this build is the massive imbalance in compute capability: the processor sits in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the graphics card sits in the 75th percentile among all GPUs. This means the CPU is the dominant component, and any gaming or rendering workload will be heavily constrained by the graphics card's output. Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not taken from direct testing.

Gaming Performance

The data contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The RX 6700's PassMark G3D score of 18931 and its 75th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicate that it is a capable 1080p performer, but its 10 GB memory buffer and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it will struggle at higher resolutions with demanding textures. The i9-13900T's single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 is exceptionally high, meaning the CPU will never be the limiting factor in frame generation; it can feed frames as fast as the GPU can render them.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated performance is strong for most esports and older titles, where the RX 6700's 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can push well over 100 FPS. However, for modern AAA games at 1080p ultra, the GPU's 160-bit memory bus and 10 GB VRAM will cause dips below 60 FPS in the most demanding scenes, as texture streaming and memory bandwidth become bottlenecks. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 indicates the GPU handles DirectX 12 workloads reasonably well, but it is not a high-end part.

Moving to 1440p, the estimated FPS drops significantly. The RX 6700's pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s is sufficient for 1440p, but the bandwidth limitation becomes more pronounced. Expect 40-60 FPS in well-optimized titles, and below 40 FPS in graphically intensive games. At 4K, the 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for ultra settings; the build would require significant settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates. The CPU's performance headroom is irrelevant here, as the GPU is clearly the limiting factor.

The Geekbench Vulkan score of 83974 and OpenCL score of 97841 suggest that the GPU has solid compute capabilities, which helps in games that use async compute. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 71 is notably low, indicating that the card performs relatively worse in pure DX12 rasterization compared to its other API scores. This is an important caveat: while the card is estimated to be good at 1080p, its DX12 performance suggests that titles heavily optimized for DirectX 12 may underperform relative to expectations.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are exceptional across the board. The i9-13900T achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 and a single-core score of 5155, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 61723 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-13900K, which scores 61766, a delta of only -0.1%. This means the 35W TDP 13900T performs essentially the same as the flagship 13900K in synthetic workloads, despite the massive difference in power envelope. It also edges out the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus by -0.2% and the Intel Xeon 636 by 0.6%, showing it is a top-tier workstation part.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The RX 6700 has an average benchmark score of 30433, placing it in the 75th percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA CMP 70HX at 30476, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the RX 6700 is essentially tied with that card. It is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 1.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. This positions the GPU as a solid mid-range part, but it is nowhere near the CPU's level of performance.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43036 and data compression score of 538254 are top-tier, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 18931 is merely average for its class. The combined percentile of 84 reflects the CPU's dominance in the overall score, but in real workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck in graphics tasks. The CPU's extended instructions score of 29719 and floating point math score of 108779 show immense compute power for non-graphics tasks, which is wasted in gaming scenarios where the GPU cannot keep up.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900T faster than the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: No, but it is extremely close. The 13900T has an average benchmark score of 61723, while the 13900K scores 61766, a delta of -0.1%. The 13900T achieves this with a 35W TDP compared to the 13900K's higher power draw, but the performance difference is negligible.

Q: What is the estimated gaming performance at 1080p?

A: Based on the RX 6700's 75th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 18931, 1080p ultra gaming is estimated to be strong for esports titles, but modern AAA games may see dips below 60 FPS due to the 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth limitations.

Q: How does the RX 6700 compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6700 has an average benchmark score of 30433, which is 1.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29945. This makes the RX 6700 slightly ahead in synthetic benchmarks, though real-world performance may vary.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support?

A: The i9-13900T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class systems.

Q: Does the RX 6700 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 6700 has 36 RT cores, but it is based on RDNA 2.0 architecture. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 71 suggests that ray tracing performance will be modest, and you should expect to use upscaling or lower settings for RT workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 84, placing it in the top 16% of all CPU+GPU pairings. This is driven primarily by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile.

Q: Is this a good build for content creation?

A: Yes, for CPU-bound tasks. The i9-13900T's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 and PassMark multithread score of 43036 make it excellent for video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation. The GPU's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 performance also helps with GPU-accelerated rendering, but it is not a top-tier card for this purpose.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy imbalance. The i9-13900T is in the 92nd percentile for CPUs, while the RX 6700 is in the 75th percentile for GPUs. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck in almost every scenario. The CPU's single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 is so high that it can easily feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 71 for the GPU indicates that DX12 titles will be particularly GPU-bound, while the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4177 ensures it will never be the limiting factor.

In non-gaming workloads, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, but this is a positive. The CPU's multicore performance is so strong that tasks like data compression (538254 PassMark score), integer math (157324), and floating point math (108779) will be executed faster than with almost any other CPU. The GPU's compute score of 8240 in PassMark GPU compute is decent, but it is far behind the CPU's compute capabilities. For rendering, the GPU's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 will be the limit, but the CPU can handle all physics, simulation, and scene preparation tasks without breaking a sweat.

The FPS scaling across resolutions would show this bottleneck clearly. At 1080p, the GPU is the limit, but the CPU has headroom. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more of a constraint, and the CPU's performance advantage becomes irrelevant. The data suggests that this pairing is best for CPU-intensive tasks, with gaming being a secondary consideration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, while the RX 6700 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means the GPU is running at a lower bandwidth than the CPU can theoretically provide, but for this GPU class, PCIe 4.0 is not a bottleneck. The platform's support for ECC memory is a notable feature for workstation use.

The CPU has a TDP of 35W, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part. The GPU has a TDP of 175W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450W, which is modest. The total system power draw is well within the range of a standard 450W power supply, but a 550W unit would provide more headroom for overclocking or adding peripherals. The GPU is dual-slot and 267 mm long, so case compatibility is straightforward.

A sensible next upgrade would be the GPU. The CPU is already at the top of its class, and its 92nd percentile ranking means there is little headroom for improvement. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU, such as one that scores higher than the 75th percentile, would balance the system and unlock the CPU's full gaming potential. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support means it is future-proof for the next generation of GPUs. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though DDR5 would be the better choice to match the CPU's high core count.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize CPU compute over gaming. The i9-13900T's 24 cores and 32 threads are perfect for software developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running simulations, and video editors working with high-resolution footage. The PassMark data compression score of 538254 and encryption score of 34415 make it excellent for database management and secure file operations.

For gamers, this build targets 1080p ultra settings. The RX 6700's 75th percentile ranking means it is capable for 1080p, but not for 1440p or 4K ultra. Gamers who play esports titles or older AAA games will be satisfied, but those who want max settings in the latest titles will need to upgrade the GPU. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures that frame pacing will be smooth, even if the absolute FPS is limited by the GPU.

For small business workstations, the ECC memory support and 35W TDP make this an efficient and reliable choice. The CPU's multi-threaded performance can handle virtualization, database serving, and financial modeling. The GPU can be used for CUDA-like compute tasks, though its 10 GB VRAM limits it to smaller models. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's compilation speed, while the GPU is sufficient for CAD and basic rendering.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10nm process node. It has a base clock of 1100.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 35W TDP. This is a remarkable engineering achievement: the 13900T delivers near-flagship performance while consuming a fraction of the power of the 13900K. The die size is 257 mm², and it has a substantial 36 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

The benchmark scores confirm its position as a top-tier part. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36517 is in the 92nd percentile, and the single-core score of 5155 is equally impressive. The PassMark multithread score of 43036 and single-thread score of 4177 show that it excels in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The data encryption score of 34415 and extended instructions score of 29719 indicate strong performance in security and SIMD-heavy tasks.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.30 GHz is exceptional for a 35W part, and it explains the high single-thread performance. The architecture's efficiency is evident in the comparison to the 13900K, which scores only 0.1% higher despite a much higher TDP. This makes the 13900T an ideal choice for small form factor builds or systems where thermal and power constraints are critical. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a basic display output, but the discrete RX 6700 is the primary graphics solution.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs the Intel Core i9-13900T with the AMD Radeon RX 6700. The combined percentile of 84 places it in the upper echelon of all CPU+GPU pairings, but this is entirely due to the CPU's dominance. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it is among the best processors available, while the GPU's 75th percentile ranking is solidly mid-range. The build is defined by this asymmetry: it is a workstation-class CPU paired with a gaming-class GPU.

The i9-13900T's performance is so high that it rivals the flagship 13900K, with a delta of only -0.1%. This makes the build a logical choice for users who want flagship CPU performance without the associated power and thermal requirements. The RX 6700, meanwhile, is a capable 1080p card that is 1.6% faster than the RTX 3070 Ti in synthetic benchmarks. The overall tier is that of a high-end workstation with moderate gaming capability.

The data suggests that this build is not balanced for gaming, but it is exceptional for CPU-bound workloads. Users should understand that the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive task, and that the CPU's potential is largely untapped in gaming scenarios. For productivity, the build is a powerhouse. For gaming, it is a solid 1080p machine that leaves significant performance on the table.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is based on the Navi 22 chip and RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7nm process. It has 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with 36 RT cores for ray tracing. The GPU has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1941 MHz, with a boost clock of 2450 MHz and a game clock of 2174 MHz. It delivers 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 22.58 TFLOPS of FP16 compute.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is competitive in its class but not exceptional. The PassMark G3D score of 18931 places it in the 75th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 30433 is 1.6% ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2014 indicates moderate DX12 performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 83974 and OpenCL score of 97841 show strong compute capabilities for a mid-range card.

The GPU's 10 GB VRAM is a limitation for modern games at high resolutions. The 320.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p, but it will cause performance drops at 1440p and 4K. The RT cores are present, but the DirectX 12 score of 71 suggests ray tracing performance will be poor, and users should expect to rely on rasterization. The pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p, but they highlight the card's mid-range positioning. The GPU is end-of-life, meaning no further driver optimizations are likely, but its current performance is well-documented.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds