SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + Intel Arc B570

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KS

64,051 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc B570

20,556 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel’s Core i9-13900KS sits atop the Raptor Lake desktop stack, and its pairing with the Intel Arc B570 creates a fascinating study in asymmetry. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread powerhouse built on a 10 nm Intel process, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. This is a flagship part, and the benchmark data confirms its position: its average benchmark score of 64,051 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals in the data are remarkably close, with the AMD EPYC 7343 scoring 64,202 (a delta of -0.2%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scoring 64,438 (-0.6%), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scoring 64,640 (-0.9%). The only rival with a positive delta is the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 at 63,765 (+0.4%). This tells a clear story: the 13900KS is not just competitive; it is statistically tied with some of the strongest server and high-end desktop silicon available, with all deltas contained within a single percentage point.

The architectural details support this performance. Raptor Lake-S, as the codename suggests, is an evolution of Intel’s hybrid design, here with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy is deep: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 cache. That L3 pool is critical for gaming and productivity workloads that share data across cores. Memory support is dual-channel for both DDR4 and DDR5, with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The platform also includes PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, ensuring the CPU is not a bottleneck for modern storage or graphics. The data shows the CPU’s raw throughput in Cinebench R23: a multicore score of 51,368 and a single-core score of 7,252. For real workloads, that multicore number suggests heavy rendering or compilation tasks will be exceptionally fast, while the single-core score ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications.

Delving into the CPU’s thread scaling reveals its character. In 3DMark, the 2-thread score is 2,412, the 4-thread score is 4,754, and the 8-thread score is 8,812. The progression to 16 threads yields 11,616, and the max-thread score reaches 16,243. This is not perfectly linear scaling, but the jump from 8 to 16 threads is substantial, and the max-thread score is over 6.7 times the 2-thread score. The Geekbench multicore score of 23,607 further reinforces the multi-threaded might. In PassMark, the CPU shows specialization: integer math scores 211,027, floating-point math scores 154,805, and extended instructions (like SIMD) hit 48,217. Data compression scores 814,838, while encryption is 47,772. The single-thread PassMark score is 4,712. This data paints a picture of a processor that is a general-purpose beast, with no obvious weak point in compute-heavy tasks. The CPU’s TDP is listed at 150 W, but the boost behavior of the KS variant is known to push beyond that, so cooling is a primary consideration for sustained workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic display output, but it is overshadowed by the discrete GPU in this build.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc B570 is a completely different beast. Built on the Xe2-HPG architecture and TSMC’s 5 nm process, this is a modern, efficient GPU with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die. It is a desktop part from the Battlemage generation, specifically the Arc 5 tier. The GPU has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. Critically, it includes 18 dedicated ray tracing cores, which are essential for modern lighting effects. The FP32 compute throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS, with FP16 rated at 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s. These numbers place it firmly in the mainstream-to-midrange category, a stark contrast to the flagship CPU it is paired with.

Memory is a key differentiator for this GPU. It has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2375 MHz, with an effective data rate of 19 Gbps. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 160-bit bus width is a limiting factor compared to wider-bus competitors. The GPU clocks are fixed at 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which is a simple and predictable power profile. The board power is rated at 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. It uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card, measuring 272 mm in length. Connectivity is modern, with one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the lanes of the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capability, but for a midrange GPU, this is rarely a bottleneck.

The benchmark scores for the Arc B570 show its position in the market. Its average benchmark score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are telling: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20,534 (delta of +0.1%), the Intel Arc A750 scores 20,582 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M scores 20,480 (+0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X scores 20,662 (-0.5%). This is a fascinating comparison. The Arc B570 is effectively dead-even with a previous-generation mobile RTX 3070 and its own predecessor, the A750. The deltas are all under a single percentage point, meaning the B570 is a solid, predictable performer, but not a generational leap over its direct ancestor. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2,649. In Geekbench, it scores 83,514 in OpenCL and 96,844 in Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 14,195, with a G2D score of 661. The DirectX 9 score of 164 is notably higher than the DirectX 12 score of 72, which suggests the architecture is heavily optimized for older APIs or that the DX12 path is underutilized in that specific test. The GPU compute score in PassMark is 7,281.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a profound imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile. This is a classic case of a flagship processor throttling a midrange graphics card. In gaming, the CPU is so fast that it will easily feed the GPU at lower resolutions, but the GPU will become the limiting factor as resolution and graphical fidelity increase. The benchmark scores support this: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368 is exceptional, while the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649 is solid but not spectacular. For any workload that requires both components, the GPU will finish its tasks first and wait for the CPU, or vice versa, depending on the task. In a purely gaming scenario, the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU has more headroom than any current game can use, so the frame rate will be dictated by the Arc B570’s rendering speed.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. If a task is purely GPU-accelerated, like 3D rendering in a GPU-based engine, the B570 will perform at its 65th percentile level. However, if the task is CPU-bound, such as video encoding or physics simulation, the 13900KS will dominate. The data shows the CPU’s PassMark physics score is 3,441, and its multithread score is 60,644. The GPU’s compute score is 7,281. This suggests that for hybrid workloads, the CPU is not the limiting factor. The FPS scaling in games will be determined by the GPU. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance (Geekbench 2,771) is more than sufficient for game logic, but the GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 380 GB/s bandwidth will be the deciding factor at higher settings. The conclusion is clear: this is a CPU-limited system in the sense that the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU; the GPU is the constraint in most interactive workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 socket for 13th Gen processors. This is a mature platform, and the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, which is future-proof for storage and high-bandwidth peripherals. The memory support is dual-channel for both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility, but the maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is tied to the memory type and speed. The CPU’s TDP is 150 W, but the boost clocks require robust cooling. The GPU’s TDP is also 150 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. This is a modest power supply recommendation, which leaves headroom for upgrades. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is possible, but the data does not include overclocked scores.

A sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU has enormous headroom, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile standing. Swapping the Arc B570 for a higher-tier GPU would immediately unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface of the B570 is adequate, but a future GPU with PCIe 5.0 would leverage the CPU’s lanes. The power supply headroom from the 450 W suggestion is comfortable, but a higher-wattage PSU would be prudent for a more power-hungry GPU. Memory is another consideration: the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but to maximize bandwidth, a fast DDR5 kit would be preferable. The platform itself is at the end of its socket life, so a CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the 13900KS is so capable that it should remain relevant for years. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a fallback option if the discrete GPU fails or during troubleshooting.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the CPU is overkill, and the GPU will dictate performance. The Arc B570’s 65th percentile score suggests it can handle high frame rates in esports titles, but its 10 GB VRAM may limit ultra textures in demanding AAA games. The CPU’s single-thread score of 7,252 in Cinebench R23 ensures no game logic bottleneck.

For streaming, the CPU is a powerhouse. The 24 cores and 32 threads are more than sufficient for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark data compression score of 814,838 and multithread score of 60,644 indicate that software encoding will not cause stutters. The GPU’s 18 RT cores are a bonus, but streaming is a CPU-friendly task here.

For video editing, the combination is strong but lopsided. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368 will crush timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 compute will accelerate effects and previews, but the 10 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large 4K projects with complex effects.

For 3D rendering, the CPU excels in CPU-based renderers. The Geekbench multicore score of 23,607 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 16,243 show exceptional multi-threaded performance. For GPU-based renderers, the Arc B570’s 65th percentile standing is mid-pack, so render times will be moderate, not exceptional.

For software development, the CPU is ideal. Compilation is highly parallel, and the PassMark integer math score of 211,027 suggests rapid code builds. The GPU is less relevant, but its Vulkan score of 96,844 is decent for graphics debugging or running local ML inference, though the FP32 compute is modest.

For student and office work, this is extreme overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance is superb for spreadsheet and browser tasks, but the power draw and cost are unnecessary. The GPU is more than capable for document work and light media editing, but the pairing is akin to using a race car for commuting.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900KS, and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 13900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop CPU from Intel’s Core 13th Gen series. Its average benchmark score is 64,051, which is 0.2% below the AMD EPYC 7343, 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, 0.6% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F, and 0.9% above the Intel Core Ultra 7 265.

Q: What is the GPU architecture and memory configuration of the Intel Arc B570?

A: The Arc B570 uses the Xe2-HPG architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 19,600 million transistors. It has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this build?

A: For gaming, the GPU is the bottleneck. The CPU is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 65th percentile, meaning the GPU will limit frame rates in most graphical workloads.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, based on the GPU’s TDP of 150 W and the CPU’s TDP of 150 W.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the CPU has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking is supported. Its boost clock is 6.00 GHz.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the CPU’s single-thread and multi-thread scores?

A: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score is 7,252, while the multicore score is 51,368. This indicates a strong scaling from 1 to 24 cores, with the multicore score being roughly 7 times higher.

Q: What are the display outputs on the Intel Arc B570?

A: The GPU features 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is exceptional. Its average score is 64,051, placing it in the 93rd percentile. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368 is a flagship-level result, and the single-core score of 7,252 is equally impressive. In Geekbench, it scores 23,607 multicore and 2,771 single-core. The PassMark multithread score is 60,644, with a single-thread score of 4,712. The GPU’s performance is solidly midrange. Its average score is 20,556, placing it in the 65th percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,649, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 96,844. The PassMark G3D score is 14,195.

The combined picture is one of stark contrast. The CPU is a top-tier performer, statistically tied with server-grade chips like the AMD EPYC 7343, which has an average score of 64,202. The GPU is a competent mainstream part, trading blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534) and the Intel Arc A750 (20,582). The combined percentile for this build is 79, reflecting that the strong CPU drags the overall score up, but the GPU holds it back from the top tier. The data shows that this is a build where the processor is the star, and the graphics card is a capable but secondary component.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the flagship Intel Core i9-13900KS with the midrange Intel Arc B570. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a Battlemage-generation Arc 5 card with 10 GB of VRAM. The combined percentile of this pairing is 79. This places the build in the upper-middle tier of overall performance, but the individual components are far apart in their respective standings. The CPU’s 93rd percentile is elite, while the GPU’s 65th percentile is respectable but not high-end. This is a pairing that prioritizes CPU compute power over graphical fidelity, making it a workstation-oriented configuration with gaming capabilities. The build class is desktop, and the platform is Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature ecosystem with DDR4 and DDR5 support.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional or power user who needs maximum CPU throughput but has modest graphics requirements. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering engines will benefit from the 13900KS’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the PassMark integer math score of 211,027. Students in engineering or data science fields who run simulations will find the 24 cores and 32 threads invaluable. The GPU is suitable for users who play games at 1080p or 1440p with medium-to-high settings, but not for those seeking 4K ultra performance. Small business workstations that run heavy spreadsheet analysis, database queries, or virtualization can leverage the CPU’s multithread score of 60,644. This is not a build for the casual user; it is for those who know their workloads are CPU-bound and want the best consumer processor available, while accepting a midrange GPU.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient for any game, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,771. The GPU’s 65th percentile standing suggests it is capable of high frame rates in competitive titles at 1080p, but the 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth may be limiting for AAA games at ultra settings. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 72 in PassMark is a concern, potentially indicating driver overhead or suboptimal DX12 path, but this is a single test and should be weighed against the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,649, which is a modern DX12 benchmark. For 1440p, the GPU will likely deliver playable but not high-refresh rates in demanding games. The CPU will never be the bottleneck, so frame rates will scale with GPU load. Given the CPU’s 93rd percentile and the GPU’s 65th percentile, this is a system where frame rates are entirely GPU-limited, and users should expect performance consistent with a midrange graphics card, not the flagship CPU.