SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + Intel Arc A580

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KS

64,051 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

Intel Arc A580

57,756 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900KS + Intel Arc A580: A Curious Desktop Pairing

This build pairs Intel's flagship 13th Gen desktop processor, the Core i9-13900KS, with Intel's Arc A580 graphics card, creating a desktop system that occupies an unusual position in the benchmark database. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 87th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined percentile of 90. The central question this pairing raises is whether a top-tier 24-core CPU can be effectively balanced by a mid-range Alchemist GPU, or whether the processor's immense compute headroom is left largely untapped in graphics-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast overclocking. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with a peak memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the processor supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The package is rated at a 150 W TDP, and the launch MSRP was $699.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that excels across both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score of 1226 climbs to 2412 with 2 threads, 4754 with 4 threads, 8812 with 8 threads, 11616 with 16 threads, and peaks at 16243 with all threads active. This scaling pattern indicates strong thread utilization, though the gains diminish as more threads are added beyond 8, a typical characteristic of desktop workloads that do not scale perfectly to 24 cores.

Cinebench results reinforce the CPU's dual nature. The R15 multicore score of 5177 and single-core score of 730 show a 7.1x ratio between multicore and single-core performance. Moving to R20, the multicore score jumps to 21574 with a single-core score of 3045, a 7.1x ratio again. In R23, the multicore score reaches 51368 with a single-core score of 7252, maintaining a similar 7.1x ratio. This consistent ratio suggests that the processor's 24 cores are being effectively utilized, but the multicore advantage over single-core is not as dramatic as the core count might suggest, likely due to power and thermal constraints at the 150 W TDP.

Geekbench scores show 2771 single-core and 23607 multicore, a ratio of 8.5x. PassMark results are particularly revealing: multithread score of 60644, single-thread of 4712, integer math at 211027, floating-point math at 154805, data compression at 814838, data encryption at 47772, extended instructions at 48217, physics at 3441, random string sorting at 90257, and find prime numbers at 257. The massive integer and floating-point scores indicate strong general-purpose compute, while the encryption score of 47772 is relatively modest compared to the integer math, suggesting the architecture prioritizes throughput over specialized cryptographic acceleration.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64051, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are remarkably close: the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64202 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438 (0.6% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64640 (0.9% higher). Only the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores lower at 63765 (0.4% lower). This clustering within a 1% band suggests that the 13900KS, despite being a flagship, is performance-equivalent to several more recent mid-range and server processors in aggregate benchmark terms.

GPU Analysis

The Intel Arc A580 is built on the DG2-512 chip using the Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 21,700 million transistors on a 406 mm² die. The GPU has a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The shading units number 3072, with 192 texture mapping units and 96 render output units. There are 24 ray tracing cores, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 12.29 TFLOPS with FP16 at 24.58 TFLOPS (2:1). The card is dual-slot, requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.0. The TDP is 175 W.

Benchmark scores for the GPU are limited to three tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the A580 scores 2229. Geekbench OpenCL yields 91657, while Geekbench Vulkan produces 79381. The OpenCL score being notably higher than Vulkan suggests the driver stack or workload characteristics favor OpenCL for this architecture, though both scores are respectable for the GPU's class.

The average benchmark score is 57756, placing the A580 in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58085 (0.6% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 57367 (0.7% lower), the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58392 (1.1% higher). This grouping within a 2% band is striking because the RX 6950 XT is typically considered a high-end card, while the RX 9070 GRE is a much newer product. The data suggests that in aggregate benchmark terms, the A580 holds its own against these varied competitors, though individual workloads may diverge significantly.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth position the A580 as a capable 1080p and entry-level 1440p card. The 24 RT cores provide ray tracing hardware, but the modest FP32 throughput of 12.29 TFLOPS suggests that ray-traced workloads will be limited. The 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for rasterized rendering at mainstream resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a system where the CPU vastly outperforms the GPU in relative terms. The i9-13900KS sits at the 93rd CPU percentile with an average score of 64051, while the Arc A580 sits at the 87th GPU percentile with an average score of 57756. The combined percentile is 90, reflecting the high standing of both components individually.

The CPU's nearest rivals are within a 1% band, with the AMD EPYC 7343 just 0.2% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 0.6% higher, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 0.9% higher, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 is 0.4% lower. This indicates that the 13900KS, despite being from an older generation, remains competitive with newer processors in aggregate benchmarks. The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly close, with the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM 0.6% higher, the Intel Arc A570M 0.8% higher, and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is 0.7% lower.

The CPU's multicore advantage is pronounced: Cinebench R23 multicore of 51368 is 7.1x the single-core score of 7252. This suggests that multithreaded workloads will see substantial benefits, but the GPU may become a bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 60644 and single-thread score of 4712 show a 12.9x ratio, which is even more dramatic. This extreme multithreading capability means that the CPU can handle many concurrent tasks, but the GPU's 87th percentile performance may not fully utilize the CPU's capabilities in gaming or rendering scenarios.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13900KS and Intel Arc A580. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, the Arc A580's 87th percentile ranking and its 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest it is positioned for 1080p gaming at high settings and 1440p gaming at medium to high settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for most current titles at 1080p, but may be limiting at 1440p with high-resolution textures. The 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is generous for this class, which should help maintain consistent frame rates in bandwidth-sensitive scenarios.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 7252, 3DMark single-thread of 1226) ensure that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The high boost clock of 6.00 GHz is particularly beneficial for games that rely on single-thread performance. However, the pairing's overall gaming performance will be dictated primarily by the GPU, as the A580 is the weaker component in this pairing.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the A580 should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in many titles given its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s. For AAA games at 1440p, frame rates will be more moderate, with the 8 GB VRAM potentially causing texture quality reductions in the most demanding titles. Ray tracing performance will be limited by the 24 RT cores and 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, so ray-traced effects are best kept at lower settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is the most viable scenario for this pairing. The CPU's single-thread score of 7252 in Cinebench R23 and 1226 in 3DMark ensures minimal bottleneck, while the GPU's 87th percentile ranking and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate can drive high frame rates in competitive titles. However, the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture settings in the latest releases.

Streaming presents a mixed picture. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by the 3DMark max-threads score of 16243 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 51368, provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The GPU's lack of dedicated tensor cores (the tensorCores field is null) means encoding will fall to the CPU or the fixed-function media engine, but the CPU's strong multithreaded performance can handle this workload.

Video editing is a strong suit for the CPU. The PassMark data compression score of 814838 and floating-point math score of 154805 indicate rapid processing of video data. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 512.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and rendering, though the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute may limit GPU-accelerated effects compared to higher-tier cards.

3D rendering benefits from both components. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51368 positions it among the top processors for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 24.58 TFLOPS FP16 compute (2:1) can accelerate certain renderers that utilize FP16 paths. The 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large scenes, but smaller projects will render efficiently.

Software development sees strong CPU performance for compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 211027 and multithread score of 60644 indicate rapid code compilation and test execution. The GPU's OpenCL score of 91657 can accelerate compute tasks in development pipelines, though the 8 GB VRAM limits large dataset processing.

Student and office work is largely over-provisioned by this CPU. The single-thread score of 4712 in PassMark and 2771 in Geekbench handle everyday tasks with ease, while the GPU's capabilities are mostly unused in this scenario. The 150 W CPU TDP and 175 W GPU TDP suggest a system that is not particularly power-efficient for light workloads.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need exceptional CPU compute power but are willing to compromise on GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or less demanding games will find the A580 sufficient, with the CPU ensuring no frame rate drops from processor bottlenecks. The 93rd CPU percentile and 87th GPU percentile indicate a system that is above average in both domains, but the CPU is clearly the dominant component.

Content creators working on CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene preparation will benefit from the 24-core, 32-thread processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51368 and PassMark multithread score of 60644 demonstrate capability for long-running, heavily threaded workloads. The GPU can handle GPU-accelerated effects in moderation, but users requiring heavy GPU rendering should look elsewhere.

Developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 211027 and the 814838 data compression score for build artifacts. Students in engineering or computer science programs will have more than enough compute for their coursework, though the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limits any machine learning or graphics projects. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive simulations or data processing will see strong performance, with the GPU providing adequate display output and occasional acceleration.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 87th percentile ranking shows a 6-percentile gap. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, data compression, and multithreaded rendering, the i9-13900KS will perform at its full potential, but in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at 1440p or GPU-accelerated rendering, the A580 will cap performance.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 11616 versus max-threads score of 16243 shows that even at 16 threads, the processor is not fully utilized, meaning games that use up to 16 threads will leave headroom. The GPU's 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute is modest compared to the CPU's integer math score of 211027, reinforcing that the GPU is the bottleneck in graphics workloads.

FPS scaling, though not measured, can be inferred from the GPU's benchmark scores. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2229 suggests moderate DirectX 12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench Vulkan score of 79381 indicates similar Vulkan performance. The GPU's 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate limits fill-rate-bound scenarios, while the 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate handles texturing adequately. At 1080p, the CPU will rarely bottleneck, but at 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 12.29 TFLOPS will be the constraining factors.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900KS significantly faster than its nearest rivals?

A: No. The CPU's average benchmark score of 64051 is only 0.2% lower than the AMD EPYC 7343's 64202 and 0.4% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390's 63765. All nearest rivals are within a 1% band.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A580 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT?

A: The A580's average benchmark score of 57756 is 1.1% lower than the RX 6950 XT's 58392. This puts the two cards in a similar aggregate performance tier, despite their different market positioning.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and what memory types does it support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with a peak memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, the Arc A580 has 24 ray tracing cores, though the 12.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggests ray-traced workloads will be limited in performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, based on the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile rankings.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and bus width?

A: The GPU has 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 256-bit bus, with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing builders to choose based on budget and availability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the graphics card will operate at its full interface speed. The CPU's TDP is 150 W, and the GPU's TDP is 175 W, with a suggested PSU of 450 W for the graphics card alone. A system with this CPU and GPU would likely require a higher-wattage PSU, but the suggested 450 W for the GPU is the only PSU figure in the data.

The CPU is unlocked, with a multiplier that can be adjusted for overclocking, and the boost clock of 6.00 GHz leaves some headroom for experienced overclockers. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a desktop processor and may appeal to workstation users. The GPU uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, so the PSU must provide these connections.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The 93rd percentile CPU can drive much faster graphics cards without bottlenecking, so moving to a higher-tier GPU would balance the system better. The CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 87th percentile suggest that the CPU is not the limiting factor in most workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900KS, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor, with the Intel Arc A580, a 3072-shader Xe-HPG graphics card. The CPU is a flagship 13th Gen part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, 36 MB of L3 cache, and a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an Alchemist-generation card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 512.0 GB/s bandwidth, 24 RT cores, and an 87th percentile ranking among all GPUs.

The pairing is notable for the significant gap in relative performance: the CPU is near the top of the processor hierarchy, while the GPU sits slightly below it. The combined percentile of 90 reflects a system that is above average overall, but the CPU is clearly the dominant component. This build suits users who prioritize CPU compute power for multithreaded workloads and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance for gaming and graphics tasks. The system is well-suited for 1080p gaming, software development, video editing, and other CPU-intensive workloads, with the GPU providing adequate graphics acceleration for most tasks.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + Intel Arc A580

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KS

Intel Arc A580

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds